$P(X^2+Y^2<1)$ of two independent n(0,1) random variables
$begingroup$
Suppose that X and Y are independent n(0,1) random variables.
a) Find $P(X^2+Y^2<1)$
Attempt:
a) Let $U = X^2 + Y^2$, $V = Y$.
Then $X = sqrt{V^2 -U}$, $Y = V$.
$J = left| begin{array}{ccc}
frac{-1}{sqrt{V^2-U}} & frac{V}{V^2-U} \
0 & 1\
end{array} right| $
Then the joint distribution of $f_{u,v}(u,v)$ is:
$$f_{u,v}(u,v)= frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}$$
Then $P(X^2 +Y^2 <1)$ is:
$$int_0^infty int_0^{v^2-u} frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}dudv$$
However, at this point I simply do not know how any tricks to complete this integration.
probability probability-theory probability-distributions normal-distribution
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Suppose that X and Y are independent n(0,1) random variables.
a) Find $P(X^2+Y^2<1)$
Attempt:
a) Let $U = X^2 + Y^2$, $V = Y$.
Then $X = sqrt{V^2 -U}$, $Y = V$.
$J = left| begin{array}{ccc}
frac{-1}{sqrt{V^2-U}} & frac{V}{V^2-U} \
0 & 1\
end{array} right| $
Then the joint distribution of $f_{u,v}(u,v)$ is:
$$f_{u,v}(u,v)= frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}$$
Then $P(X^2 +Y^2 <1)$ is:
$$int_0^infty int_0^{v^2-u} frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}dudv$$
However, at this point I simply do not know how any tricks to complete this integration.
probability probability-theory probability-distributions normal-distribution
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think it might be easier to view this geometrically. X and Y ranges correspond to a unit square and the equation $X^2+Y^2<1$ makes a quarter circle in that area.
$endgroup$
– ryagami
Sep 19 '14 at 15:48
$begingroup$
ryagami, $X$ and $Y$ are normally distributed, not uniformly.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Perhaps an easier approach is by noting that $X^2+Y^2$ follows a $chi^2$ distribution with $2$ degrees of freedom.
$endgroup$
– Kim Jong Un
Sep 19 '14 at 15:55
$begingroup$
statsguyz, consider the random variable $r = sqrt{X^2+Y^2}$ - the density function of $r$ is $frac{r}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-r^2/2}$. Use this and solve for $Pr(r<1)$.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:57
$begingroup$
You might want to stop tinkering with the LaTeX encoding of your math formulas. The standardest, the better. (And negative densities should startle you...)
$endgroup$
– Did
Sep 20 '14 at 8:01
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Suppose that X and Y are independent n(0,1) random variables.
a) Find $P(X^2+Y^2<1)$
Attempt:
a) Let $U = X^2 + Y^2$, $V = Y$.
Then $X = sqrt{V^2 -U}$, $Y = V$.
$J = left| begin{array}{ccc}
frac{-1}{sqrt{V^2-U}} & frac{V}{V^2-U} \
0 & 1\
end{array} right| $
Then the joint distribution of $f_{u,v}(u,v)$ is:
$$f_{u,v}(u,v)= frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}$$
Then $P(X^2 +Y^2 <1)$ is:
$$int_0^infty int_0^{v^2-u} frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}dudv$$
However, at this point I simply do not know how any tricks to complete this integration.
probability probability-theory probability-distributions normal-distribution
$endgroup$
Suppose that X and Y are independent n(0,1) random variables.
a) Find $P(X^2+Y^2<1)$
Attempt:
a) Let $U = X^2 + Y^2$, $V = Y$.
Then $X = sqrt{V^2 -U}$, $Y = V$.
$J = left| begin{array}{ccc}
frac{-1}{sqrt{V^2-U}} & frac{V}{V^2-U} \
0 & 1\
end{array} right| $
Then the joint distribution of $f_{u,v}(u,v)$ is:
$$f_{u,v}(u,v)= frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}$$
Then $P(X^2 +Y^2 <1)$ is:
$$int_0^infty int_0^{v^2-u} frac{1}{2pi}e^{frac{-sqrt{v^2-u}}{2}}e^{frac{-u^2}{2}}frac{1}{sqrt{v^2-u}}dudv$$
However, at this point I simply do not know how any tricks to complete this integration.
probability probability-theory probability-distributions normal-distribution
probability probability-theory probability-distributions normal-distribution
edited Sep 20 '14 at 13:43
statsguyz
asked Sep 19 '14 at 15:44
statsguyzstatsguyz
160314
160314
$begingroup$
I think it might be easier to view this geometrically. X and Y ranges correspond to a unit square and the equation $X^2+Y^2<1$ makes a quarter circle in that area.
$endgroup$
– ryagami
Sep 19 '14 at 15:48
$begingroup$
ryagami, $X$ and $Y$ are normally distributed, not uniformly.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Perhaps an easier approach is by noting that $X^2+Y^2$ follows a $chi^2$ distribution with $2$ degrees of freedom.
$endgroup$
– Kim Jong Un
Sep 19 '14 at 15:55
$begingroup$
statsguyz, consider the random variable $r = sqrt{X^2+Y^2}$ - the density function of $r$ is $frac{r}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-r^2/2}$. Use this and solve for $Pr(r<1)$.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:57
$begingroup$
You might want to stop tinkering with the LaTeX encoding of your math formulas. The standardest, the better. (And negative densities should startle you...)
$endgroup$
– Did
Sep 20 '14 at 8:01
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I think it might be easier to view this geometrically. X and Y ranges correspond to a unit square and the equation $X^2+Y^2<1$ makes a quarter circle in that area.
$endgroup$
– ryagami
Sep 19 '14 at 15:48
$begingroup$
ryagami, $X$ and $Y$ are normally distributed, not uniformly.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Perhaps an easier approach is by noting that $X^2+Y^2$ follows a $chi^2$ distribution with $2$ degrees of freedom.
$endgroup$
– Kim Jong Un
Sep 19 '14 at 15:55
$begingroup$
statsguyz, consider the random variable $r = sqrt{X^2+Y^2}$ - the density function of $r$ is $frac{r}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-r^2/2}$. Use this and solve for $Pr(r<1)$.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:57
$begingroup$
You might want to stop tinkering with the LaTeX encoding of your math formulas. The standardest, the better. (And negative densities should startle you...)
$endgroup$
– Did
Sep 20 '14 at 8:01
$begingroup$
I think it might be easier to view this geometrically. X and Y ranges correspond to a unit square and the equation $X^2+Y^2<1$ makes a quarter circle in that area.
$endgroup$
– ryagami
Sep 19 '14 at 15:48
$begingroup$
I think it might be easier to view this geometrically. X and Y ranges correspond to a unit square and the equation $X^2+Y^2<1$ makes a quarter circle in that area.
$endgroup$
– ryagami
Sep 19 '14 at 15:48
$begingroup$
ryagami, $X$ and $Y$ are normally distributed, not uniformly.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:52
$begingroup$
ryagami, $X$ and $Y$ are normally distributed, not uniformly.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Perhaps an easier approach is by noting that $X^2+Y^2$ follows a $chi^2$ distribution with $2$ degrees of freedom.
$endgroup$
– Kim Jong Un
Sep 19 '14 at 15:55
$begingroup$
Perhaps an easier approach is by noting that $X^2+Y^2$ follows a $chi^2$ distribution with $2$ degrees of freedom.
$endgroup$
– Kim Jong Un
Sep 19 '14 at 15:55
$begingroup$
statsguyz, consider the random variable $r = sqrt{X^2+Y^2}$ - the density function of $r$ is $frac{r}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-r^2/2}$. Use this and solve for $Pr(r<1)$.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:57
$begingroup$
statsguyz, consider the random variable $r = sqrt{X^2+Y^2}$ - the density function of $r$ is $frac{r}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-r^2/2}$. Use this and solve for $Pr(r<1)$.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:57
$begingroup$
You might want to stop tinkering with the LaTeX encoding of your math formulas. The standardest, the better. (And negative densities should startle you...)
$endgroup$
– Did
Sep 20 '14 at 8:01
$begingroup$
You might want to stop tinkering with the LaTeX encoding of your math formulas. The standardest, the better. (And negative densities should startle you...)
$endgroup$
– Did
Sep 20 '14 at 8:01
|
show 1 more comment
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, the joint density of $X$ and $Y$ is the product of the individual densities, so it is
$$frac{1}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2}$$
on the entire $x$-$y$ plane. We want to find
$$int_D frac{x^2+y^2}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2},dy,dx,$$
where $D$ is the unit disk. Switch to polar coordinates. We want to find
$$int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi} frac{r^3}{2pi}e^{-r^2/2},dtheta,dr.$$
The integration with respect to $theta$ gets rid of the $2pi$ in the denominator.
So we want
$$int_0^1 r^3 e^{-r^2/2},dr.$$
This can be done by integration by parts. To make things more familiar, you may wish to first make the substitution $t=r^2/2$. Our integral becomes
$$int_0^{1/2} 2te^{-t},dt.$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Just need clarification on two things: 1.Why the $x^2+y^2$ ended up on the numerator of the integral? 2. It's been a long time since I used polar coordinates, but I see that the $x^2+y^2$ in the numerator of the fraction becomes $r^3$, but in the exponential it becomes $r^2$. Why is that?
$endgroup$
– statsguyz
Sep 19 '14 at 23:01
$begingroup$
This answer is wrong. The OP had the good sense of questioning the factor $x^2+y^2$, which is unsound.
$endgroup$
– Did
Nov 4 '16 at 6:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although the following method is more convoluted than necessary, I think it provides a fun way to see the convolution method for computing the density of a sum of independent random variables in action. It also requires a few fun integration tricks.
First we will find the distribution for $X^2$ (and, by symmetry, the distribution of $Y^2$). We consider the cdf $F_{X^2}(t)$, and we see that $$F_{X^2}(t) = P(X^2 leq t) = P(|X| leq sqrt{t}) = P(X in [-sqrt{t},sqrt{t}] = P(X leq sqrt{t}) - P(X < sqrt{t}) $$ Continuing this logic, and noting that $X$ has density $f_X = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2}$, we see that $$ F_{X^2}(t) = F_X(sqrt{t}) - F_X(-sqrt{t}) = displaystyleint_{-infty}^{sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx - displaystyleint_{-infty} ^{-sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx$$ We can then find the density $f_{X^2}$ by differentiating our equation for $F_{X^2}(t)$ with respect to $t$, which gives us $$f_{X^2}(t) = frac{d}{dt}left(F_{X^2}(t) right) = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left( frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) - frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (-sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left(- frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) $$ and this simplifies to tell us that $$f_{X^2}(t) = f_{Y^2}(t) = frac{1}{sqrt{t} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- t/2} $$
Because we know that $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it follows that $X^2$ and $Y^2$ are independent as well. Therefore we can apply the convolution method to find the probability density for $Z = X^2 + Y^2$. We can write the probability distribution as the convolution $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_{0}^z f_{X^2}(z-y) f_{Y^2}(y) dy $$ where the lower-limit of the integral is 0 because $Y^2$ is a non-negative random variable, and the upper limit is $z$ because it cannot be the case that both $Y^2 = y > z$ and $X^2 < z - y$, as $X^2 $ is a non-negative random variable. Plugging our value for the densities $f_{X^2}(z-y) = frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} $ and $f_{Y^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2}$, we have that $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_0^z left( frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} right) left( frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2} right) dy = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}}$$
Now, what we have left to do is to compute the integral on the right. Completing the square under the square root sign we have $$displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (frac{z^2}{4} - zy + y^2) }} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (y - frac{z}{2})^2 }} $$ Making the u-substitution $u = y - frac{z}{2}$ (with $du = dy$ and with transformed limits of integration $y = 0 mapsto u = -z/2$ and $y = z mapsto z/2$), we obtain the integral $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - u^2}} = frac{2}{z} displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{1 - (frac{2u}{z})^2}} = frac{2}{z} left( left(frac{1}{frac{2}{z}} right) sin^{-1}(frac{2u}{z}) bigg|_{-z/2}^{z/2} right) $$ This simplifies to $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = sin^{-1}(1) - sin^{-1}(-1) = frac{pi}{2} - (- frac{pi}{2}) = pi $$ and therefore we have that $$f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} left( pi right) Longrightarrow boxed{f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2}} $$
And we can compute that $$P(X^2 + Y^2 <1 ) = P(Z < 1) = displaystyleint_0^1 f_{Z}(z)dz = displaystyleint_0^1 frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2} dz = - e^{-z/2} bigg|_0^1 $$ and we obtain our final answer $$ boxed{P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1 - e^{-1/2}} $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, and because $mu=0$ and $sigma=1$, then we know that $$f_{X,Y}(x,y)=f_X(x)f_Y(y)=frac{1}{2pi}exp(frac{-(x^2+y^2}{2}).$$
Of course, since our domain over which we are integrating is a circle with a radius of 1, we convert $x^2+y^2=r^2$, and $text{d}x text{d}y=rtext{d}rtext{d}theta$, using
$x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsin theta$ using the standard polar coordinate transformation. Notice, we are converting the joint pdf $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ to make our lives easier, and the circle defined by the question, ie $X^2+Y^2<1$, merely comes into play when looking at what we integrate over.
begin{align*}
P(X^2+Y^2<1)&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r text{d}theta\
&=2pi frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r\
&=int_{u=1}^{e^{-1/2}}-text{d}underbrace{(e^{-r^2/2})}_u=-ubigg|_1^{e^{-1/2}}\
&=-e^{1/2}--1=1-e^{-1/2}
end{align*}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As per my knowledge you don't need to integrate , this type of questions are normally asked in competetive exam if you started integrating there then it will take much time. I have a shortcut.
$$Xsim N(0,1)$$
$$Y sim N(0,1)$$
then
$$X^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$Y^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$chi_1^2+chi_1^2 simchi_2^2$$
Chi-square distribution with $2$ degree of freedom will follow Gamma distribution with parameters $(1,frac12)$ which is an exponential distribution with parameter $lambda=frac12$ so now we have an exponetial distribution lets call it $T$ so
$$ T sim expo(1/2) $$
we have to find
$$P(T<1)$$
as we know $P(T<1)$ is cumulative ditribution function of exponetial ditribution which is generally given by
$$F(x) = 1- e^{-lambda x}$$
as we know $lambda$=1/2
$$F(1)= 1-e^{{-{1over 2}}times 1}$$
$$Rightarrow P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1-e^{-1/2}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Box-Muller transform suggests that if $X, Y$ are two independent standard normal random variables, then if we let $X = R cosTheta, Y = R sinTheta, R in (0, infty), Theta in [0, 2pi)$ (polar coordinate), then this bivariate transform is 1-to-1 and onto. Further, $R, Theta$ are also independent. And $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1), Theta sim Uniform(0, 2pi)$, i.e., $frac{1}{2}R^2$ follows an Exponential distribution with $lambda = 1$ and $Theta$ follows a Uniform distribution on $(0, 2pi)$.
Hence, $P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = P(R^2cos^2Theta + R^2sin^2Theta < 1) = P(R^2 < 1) = P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2})$. And since $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1)$, we can denote $Z = frac{1}{2}R^2$. Using the pdf of an $Exponential(1)$ distribution, $P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2}) = P(Z < frac{1}{2}) = int_{-infty}^{frac{1}{2}} e^{-z} , dz = 1 - e^{-frac{1}{2}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f937972%2fpx2y21-of-two-independent-n0-1-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, the joint density of $X$ and $Y$ is the product of the individual densities, so it is
$$frac{1}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2}$$
on the entire $x$-$y$ plane. We want to find
$$int_D frac{x^2+y^2}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2},dy,dx,$$
where $D$ is the unit disk. Switch to polar coordinates. We want to find
$$int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi} frac{r^3}{2pi}e^{-r^2/2},dtheta,dr.$$
The integration with respect to $theta$ gets rid of the $2pi$ in the denominator.
So we want
$$int_0^1 r^3 e^{-r^2/2},dr.$$
This can be done by integration by parts. To make things more familiar, you may wish to first make the substitution $t=r^2/2$. Our integral becomes
$$int_0^{1/2} 2te^{-t},dt.$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Just need clarification on two things: 1.Why the $x^2+y^2$ ended up on the numerator of the integral? 2. It's been a long time since I used polar coordinates, but I see that the $x^2+y^2$ in the numerator of the fraction becomes $r^3$, but in the exponential it becomes $r^2$. Why is that?
$endgroup$
– statsguyz
Sep 19 '14 at 23:01
$begingroup$
This answer is wrong. The OP had the good sense of questioning the factor $x^2+y^2$, which is unsound.
$endgroup$
– Did
Nov 4 '16 at 6:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, the joint density of $X$ and $Y$ is the product of the individual densities, so it is
$$frac{1}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2}$$
on the entire $x$-$y$ plane. We want to find
$$int_D frac{x^2+y^2}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2},dy,dx,$$
where $D$ is the unit disk. Switch to polar coordinates. We want to find
$$int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi} frac{r^3}{2pi}e^{-r^2/2},dtheta,dr.$$
The integration with respect to $theta$ gets rid of the $2pi$ in the denominator.
So we want
$$int_0^1 r^3 e^{-r^2/2},dr.$$
This can be done by integration by parts. To make things more familiar, you may wish to first make the substitution $t=r^2/2$. Our integral becomes
$$int_0^{1/2} 2te^{-t},dt.$$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Just need clarification on two things: 1.Why the $x^2+y^2$ ended up on the numerator of the integral? 2. It's been a long time since I used polar coordinates, but I see that the $x^2+y^2$ in the numerator of the fraction becomes $r^3$, but in the exponential it becomes $r^2$. Why is that?
$endgroup$
– statsguyz
Sep 19 '14 at 23:01
$begingroup$
This answer is wrong. The OP had the good sense of questioning the factor $x^2+y^2$, which is unsound.
$endgroup$
– Did
Nov 4 '16 at 6:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, the joint density of $X$ and $Y$ is the product of the individual densities, so it is
$$frac{1}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2}$$
on the entire $x$-$y$ plane. We want to find
$$int_D frac{x^2+y^2}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2},dy,dx,$$
where $D$ is the unit disk. Switch to polar coordinates. We want to find
$$int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi} frac{r^3}{2pi}e^{-r^2/2},dtheta,dr.$$
The integration with respect to $theta$ gets rid of the $2pi$ in the denominator.
So we want
$$int_0^1 r^3 e^{-r^2/2},dr.$$
This can be done by integration by parts. To make things more familiar, you may wish to first make the substitution $t=r^2/2$. Our integral becomes
$$int_0^{1/2} 2te^{-t},dt.$$
$endgroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, the joint density of $X$ and $Y$ is the product of the individual densities, so it is
$$frac{1}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2}$$
on the entire $x$-$y$ plane. We want to find
$$int_D frac{x^2+y^2}{2pi}e^{-(x^2+y^2)/2},dy,dx,$$
where $D$ is the unit disk. Switch to polar coordinates. We want to find
$$int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi} frac{r^3}{2pi}e^{-r^2/2},dtheta,dr.$$
The integration with respect to $theta$ gets rid of the $2pi$ in the denominator.
So we want
$$int_0^1 r^3 e^{-r^2/2},dr.$$
This can be done by integration by parts. To make things more familiar, you may wish to first make the substitution $t=r^2/2$. Our integral becomes
$$int_0^{1/2} 2te^{-t},dt.$$
edited Sep 19 '14 at 16:28
answered Sep 19 '14 at 15:55
André NicolasAndré Nicolas
454k36432819
454k36432819
2
$begingroup$
Just need clarification on two things: 1.Why the $x^2+y^2$ ended up on the numerator of the integral? 2. It's been a long time since I used polar coordinates, but I see that the $x^2+y^2$ in the numerator of the fraction becomes $r^3$, but in the exponential it becomes $r^2$. Why is that?
$endgroup$
– statsguyz
Sep 19 '14 at 23:01
$begingroup$
This answer is wrong. The OP had the good sense of questioning the factor $x^2+y^2$, which is unsound.
$endgroup$
– Did
Nov 4 '16 at 6:30
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Just need clarification on two things: 1.Why the $x^2+y^2$ ended up on the numerator of the integral? 2. It's been a long time since I used polar coordinates, but I see that the $x^2+y^2$ in the numerator of the fraction becomes $r^3$, but in the exponential it becomes $r^2$. Why is that?
$endgroup$
– statsguyz
Sep 19 '14 at 23:01
$begingroup$
This answer is wrong. The OP had the good sense of questioning the factor $x^2+y^2$, which is unsound.
$endgroup$
– Did
Nov 4 '16 at 6:30
2
2
$begingroup$
Just need clarification on two things: 1.Why the $x^2+y^2$ ended up on the numerator of the integral? 2. It's been a long time since I used polar coordinates, but I see that the $x^2+y^2$ in the numerator of the fraction becomes $r^3$, but in the exponential it becomes $r^2$. Why is that?
$endgroup$
– statsguyz
Sep 19 '14 at 23:01
$begingroup$
Just need clarification on two things: 1.Why the $x^2+y^2$ ended up on the numerator of the integral? 2. It's been a long time since I used polar coordinates, but I see that the $x^2+y^2$ in the numerator of the fraction becomes $r^3$, but in the exponential it becomes $r^2$. Why is that?
$endgroup$
– statsguyz
Sep 19 '14 at 23:01
$begingroup$
This answer is wrong. The OP had the good sense of questioning the factor $x^2+y^2$, which is unsound.
$endgroup$
– Did
Nov 4 '16 at 6:30
$begingroup$
This answer is wrong. The OP had the good sense of questioning the factor $x^2+y^2$, which is unsound.
$endgroup$
– Did
Nov 4 '16 at 6:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although the following method is more convoluted than necessary, I think it provides a fun way to see the convolution method for computing the density of a sum of independent random variables in action. It also requires a few fun integration tricks.
First we will find the distribution for $X^2$ (and, by symmetry, the distribution of $Y^2$). We consider the cdf $F_{X^2}(t)$, and we see that $$F_{X^2}(t) = P(X^2 leq t) = P(|X| leq sqrt{t}) = P(X in [-sqrt{t},sqrt{t}] = P(X leq sqrt{t}) - P(X < sqrt{t}) $$ Continuing this logic, and noting that $X$ has density $f_X = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2}$, we see that $$ F_{X^2}(t) = F_X(sqrt{t}) - F_X(-sqrt{t}) = displaystyleint_{-infty}^{sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx - displaystyleint_{-infty} ^{-sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx$$ We can then find the density $f_{X^2}$ by differentiating our equation for $F_{X^2}(t)$ with respect to $t$, which gives us $$f_{X^2}(t) = frac{d}{dt}left(F_{X^2}(t) right) = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left( frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) - frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (-sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left(- frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) $$ and this simplifies to tell us that $$f_{X^2}(t) = f_{Y^2}(t) = frac{1}{sqrt{t} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- t/2} $$
Because we know that $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it follows that $X^2$ and $Y^2$ are independent as well. Therefore we can apply the convolution method to find the probability density for $Z = X^2 + Y^2$. We can write the probability distribution as the convolution $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_{0}^z f_{X^2}(z-y) f_{Y^2}(y) dy $$ where the lower-limit of the integral is 0 because $Y^2$ is a non-negative random variable, and the upper limit is $z$ because it cannot be the case that both $Y^2 = y > z$ and $X^2 < z - y$, as $X^2 $ is a non-negative random variable. Plugging our value for the densities $f_{X^2}(z-y) = frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} $ and $f_{Y^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2}$, we have that $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_0^z left( frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} right) left( frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2} right) dy = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}}$$
Now, what we have left to do is to compute the integral on the right. Completing the square under the square root sign we have $$displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (frac{z^2}{4} - zy + y^2) }} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (y - frac{z}{2})^2 }} $$ Making the u-substitution $u = y - frac{z}{2}$ (with $du = dy$ and with transformed limits of integration $y = 0 mapsto u = -z/2$ and $y = z mapsto z/2$), we obtain the integral $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - u^2}} = frac{2}{z} displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{1 - (frac{2u}{z})^2}} = frac{2}{z} left( left(frac{1}{frac{2}{z}} right) sin^{-1}(frac{2u}{z}) bigg|_{-z/2}^{z/2} right) $$ This simplifies to $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = sin^{-1}(1) - sin^{-1}(-1) = frac{pi}{2} - (- frac{pi}{2}) = pi $$ and therefore we have that $$f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} left( pi right) Longrightarrow boxed{f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2}} $$
And we can compute that $$P(X^2 + Y^2 <1 ) = P(Z < 1) = displaystyleint_0^1 f_{Z}(z)dz = displaystyleint_0^1 frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2} dz = - e^{-z/2} bigg|_0^1 $$ and we obtain our final answer $$ boxed{P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1 - e^{-1/2}} $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although the following method is more convoluted than necessary, I think it provides a fun way to see the convolution method for computing the density of a sum of independent random variables in action. It also requires a few fun integration tricks.
First we will find the distribution for $X^2$ (and, by symmetry, the distribution of $Y^2$). We consider the cdf $F_{X^2}(t)$, and we see that $$F_{X^2}(t) = P(X^2 leq t) = P(|X| leq sqrt{t}) = P(X in [-sqrt{t},sqrt{t}] = P(X leq sqrt{t}) - P(X < sqrt{t}) $$ Continuing this logic, and noting that $X$ has density $f_X = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2}$, we see that $$ F_{X^2}(t) = F_X(sqrt{t}) - F_X(-sqrt{t}) = displaystyleint_{-infty}^{sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx - displaystyleint_{-infty} ^{-sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx$$ We can then find the density $f_{X^2}$ by differentiating our equation for $F_{X^2}(t)$ with respect to $t$, which gives us $$f_{X^2}(t) = frac{d}{dt}left(F_{X^2}(t) right) = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left( frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) - frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (-sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left(- frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) $$ and this simplifies to tell us that $$f_{X^2}(t) = f_{Y^2}(t) = frac{1}{sqrt{t} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- t/2} $$
Because we know that $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it follows that $X^2$ and $Y^2$ are independent as well. Therefore we can apply the convolution method to find the probability density for $Z = X^2 + Y^2$. We can write the probability distribution as the convolution $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_{0}^z f_{X^2}(z-y) f_{Y^2}(y) dy $$ where the lower-limit of the integral is 0 because $Y^2$ is a non-negative random variable, and the upper limit is $z$ because it cannot be the case that both $Y^2 = y > z$ and $X^2 < z - y$, as $X^2 $ is a non-negative random variable. Plugging our value for the densities $f_{X^2}(z-y) = frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} $ and $f_{Y^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2}$, we have that $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_0^z left( frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} right) left( frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2} right) dy = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}}$$
Now, what we have left to do is to compute the integral on the right. Completing the square under the square root sign we have $$displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (frac{z^2}{4} - zy + y^2) }} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (y - frac{z}{2})^2 }} $$ Making the u-substitution $u = y - frac{z}{2}$ (with $du = dy$ and with transformed limits of integration $y = 0 mapsto u = -z/2$ and $y = z mapsto z/2$), we obtain the integral $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - u^2}} = frac{2}{z} displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{1 - (frac{2u}{z})^2}} = frac{2}{z} left( left(frac{1}{frac{2}{z}} right) sin^{-1}(frac{2u}{z}) bigg|_{-z/2}^{z/2} right) $$ This simplifies to $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = sin^{-1}(1) - sin^{-1}(-1) = frac{pi}{2} - (- frac{pi}{2}) = pi $$ and therefore we have that $$f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} left( pi right) Longrightarrow boxed{f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2}} $$
And we can compute that $$P(X^2 + Y^2 <1 ) = P(Z < 1) = displaystyleint_0^1 f_{Z}(z)dz = displaystyleint_0^1 frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2} dz = - e^{-z/2} bigg|_0^1 $$ and we obtain our final answer $$ boxed{P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1 - e^{-1/2}} $$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Although the following method is more convoluted than necessary, I think it provides a fun way to see the convolution method for computing the density of a sum of independent random variables in action. It also requires a few fun integration tricks.
First we will find the distribution for $X^2$ (and, by symmetry, the distribution of $Y^2$). We consider the cdf $F_{X^2}(t)$, and we see that $$F_{X^2}(t) = P(X^2 leq t) = P(|X| leq sqrt{t}) = P(X in [-sqrt{t},sqrt{t}] = P(X leq sqrt{t}) - P(X < sqrt{t}) $$ Continuing this logic, and noting that $X$ has density $f_X = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2}$, we see that $$ F_{X^2}(t) = F_X(sqrt{t}) - F_X(-sqrt{t}) = displaystyleint_{-infty}^{sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx - displaystyleint_{-infty} ^{-sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx$$ We can then find the density $f_{X^2}$ by differentiating our equation for $F_{X^2}(t)$ with respect to $t$, which gives us $$f_{X^2}(t) = frac{d}{dt}left(F_{X^2}(t) right) = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left( frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) - frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (-sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left(- frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) $$ and this simplifies to tell us that $$f_{X^2}(t) = f_{Y^2}(t) = frac{1}{sqrt{t} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- t/2} $$
Because we know that $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it follows that $X^2$ and $Y^2$ are independent as well. Therefore we can apply the convolution method to find the probability density for $Z = X^2 + Y^2$. We can write the probability distribution as the convolution $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_{0}^z f_{X^2}(z-y) f_{Y^2}(y) dy $$ where the lower-limit of the integral is 0 because $Y^2$ is a non-negative random variable, and the upper limit is $z$ because it cannot be the case that both $Y^2 = y > z$ and $X^2 < z - y$, as $X^2 $ is a non-negative random variable. Plugging our value for the densities $f_{X^2}(z-y) = frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} $ and $f_{Y^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2}$, we have that $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_0^z left( frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} right) left( frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2} right) dy = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}}$$
Now, what we have left to do is to compute the integral on the right. Completing the square under the square root sign we have $$displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (frac{z^2}{4} - zy + y^2) }} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (y - frac{z}{2})^2 }} $$ Making the u-substitution $u = y - frac{z}{2}$ (with $du = dy$ and with transformed limits of integration $y = 0 mapsto u = -z/2$ and $y = z mapsto z/2$), we obtain the integral $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - u^2}} = frac{2}{z} displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{1 - (frac{2u}{z})^2}} = frac{2}{z} left( left(frac{1}{frac{2}{z}} right) sin^{-1}(frac{2u}{z}) bigg|_{-z/2}^{z/2} right) $$ This simplifies to $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = sin^{-1}(1) - sin^{-1}(-1) = frac{pi}{2} - (- frac{pi}{2}) = pi $$ and therefore we have that $$f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} left( pi right) Longrightarrow boxed{f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2}} $$
And we can compute that $$P(X^2 + Y^2 <1 ) = P(Z < 1) = displaystyleint_0^1 f_{Z}(z)dz = displaystyleint_0^1 frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2} dz = - e^{-z/2} bigg|_0^1 $$ and we obtain our final answer $$ boxed{P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1 - e^{-1/2}} $$
$endgroup$
Although the following method is more convoluted than necessary, I think it provides a fun way to see the convolution method for computing the density of a sum of independent random variables in action. It also requires a few fun integration tricks.
First we will find the distribution for $X^2$ (and, by symmetry, the distribution of $Y^2$). We consider the cdf $F_{X^2}(t)$, and we see that $$F_{X^2}(t) = P(X^2 leq t) = P(|X| leq sqrt{t}) = P(X in [-sqrt{t},sqrt{t}] = P(X leq sqrt{t}) - P(X < sqrt{t}) $$ Continuing this logic, and noting that $X$ has density $f_X = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2}$, we see that $$ F_{X^2}(t) = F_X(sqrt{t}) - F_X(-sqrt{t}) = displaystyleint_{-infty}^{sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx - displaystyleint_{-infty} ^{-sqrt{t}} frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-x^2/2} dx$$ We can then find the density $f_{X^2}$ by differentiating our equation for $F_{X^2}(t)$ with respect to $t$, which gives us $$f_{X^2}(t) = frac{d}{dt}left(F_{X^2}(t) right) = frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left( frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) - frac{1}{sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- (-sqrt{t})^2 / 2} left(- frac{1}{2 sqrt{t}} right) $$ and this simplifies to tell us that $$f_{X^2}(t) = f_{Y^2}(t) = frac{1}{sqrt{t} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{- t/2} $$
Because we know that $X$ and $Y$ are independent, it follows that $X^2$ and $Y^2$ are independent as well. Therefore we can apply the convolution method to find the probability density for $Z = X^2 + Y^2$. We can write the probability distribution as the convolution $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_{0}^z f_{X^2}(z-y) f_{Y^2}(y) dy $$ where the lower-limit of the integral is 0 because $Y^2$ is a non-negative random variable, and the upper limit is $z$ because it cannot be the case that both $Y^2 = y > z$ and $X^2 < z - y$, as $X^2 $ is a non-negative random variable. Plugging our value for the densities $f_{X^2}(z-y) = frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} $ and $f_{Y^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2}$, we have that $$f_Z(z) = displaystyleint_0^z left( frac{1}{sqrt{z-y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-(z-y)/2} right) left( frac{1}{sqrt{y} sqrt{2 pi}} e^{-y/2} right) dy = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}}$$
Now, what we have left to do is to compute the integral on the right. Completing the square under the square root sign we have $$displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (frac{z^2}{4} - zy + y^2) }} = displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - (y - frac{z}{2})^2 }} $$ Making the u-substitution $u = y - frac{z}{2}$ (with $du = dy$ and with transformed limits of integration $y = 0 mapsto u = -z/2$ and $y = z mapsto z/2$), we obtain the integral $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{frac{z^2}{4} - u^2}} = frac{2}{z} displaystyleint_{-z/2}^{z/2} displaystylefrac{du}{sqrt{1 - (frac{2u}{z})^2}} = frac{2}{z} left( left(frac{1}{frac{2}{z}} right) sin^{-1}(frac{2u}{z}) bigg|_{-z/2}^{z/2} right) $$ This simplifies to $$ displaystyleint_0^z displaystylefrac{dy}{sqrt{zy - y^2}} = sin^{-1}(1) - sin^{-1}(-1) = frac{pi}{2} - (- frac{pi}{2}) = pi $$ and therefore we have that $$f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2 pi} e^{-z/2} left( pi right) Longrightarrow boxed{f_{Z}(z) = frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2}} $$
And we can compute that $$P(X^2 + Y^2 <1 ) = P(Z < 1) = displaystyleint_0^1 f_{Z}(z)dz = displaystyleint_0^1 frac{1}{2} e^{-z/2} dz = - e^{-z/2} bigg|_0^1 $$ and we obtain our final answer $$ boxed{P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1 - e^{-1/2}} $$
edited Mar 6 '17 at 23:41
answered Dec 17 '15 at 1:59
Wright-MoranWright-Moran
610311
610311
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, and because $mu=0$ and $sigma=1$, then we know that $$f_{X,Y}(x,y)=f_X(x)f_Y(y)=frac{1}{2pi}exp(frac{-(x^2+y^2}{2}).$$
Of course, since our domain over which we are integrating is a circle with a radius of 1, we convert $x^2+y^2=r^2$, and $text{d}x text{d}y=rtext{d}rtext{d}theta$, using
$x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsin theta$ using the standard polar coordinate transformation. Notice, we are converting the joint pdf $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ to make our lives easier, and the circle defined by the question, ie $X^2+Y^2<1$, merely comes into play when looking at what we integrate over.
begin{align*}
P(X^2+Y^2<1)&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r text{d}theta\
&=2pi frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r\
&=int_{u=1}^{e^{-1/2}}-text{d}underbrace{(e^{-r^2/2})}_u=-ubigg|_1^{e^{-1/2}}\
&=-e^{1/2}--1=1-e^{-1/2}
end{align*}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, and because $mu=0$ and $sigma=1$, then we know that $$f_{X,Y}(x,y)=f_X(x)f_Y(y)=frac{1}{2pi}exp(frac{-(x^2+y^2}{2}).$$
Of course, since our domain over which we are integrating is a circle with a radius of 1, we convert $x^2+y^2=r^2$, and $text{d}x text{d}y=rtext{d}rtext{d}theta$, using
$x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsin theta$ using the standard polar coordinate transformation. Notice, we are converting the joint pdf $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ to make our lives easier, and the circle defined by the question, ie $X^2+Y^2<1$, merely comes into play when looking at what we integrate over.
begin{align*}
P(X^2+Y^2<1)&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r text{d}theta\
&=2pi frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r\
&=int_{u=1}^{e^{-1/2}}-text{d}underbrace{(e^{-r^2/2})}_u=-ubigg|_1^{e^{-1/2}}\
&=-e^{1/2}--1=1-e^{-1/2}
end{align*}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, and because $mu=0$ and $sigma=1$, then we know that $$f_{X,Y}(x,y)=f_X(x)f_Y(y)=frac{1}{2pi}exp(frac{-(x^2+y^2}{2}).$$
Of course, since our domain over which we are integrating is a circle with a radius of 1, we convert $x^2+y^2=r^2$, and $text{d}x text{d}y=rtext{d}rtext{d}theta$, using
$x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsin theta$ using the standard polar coordinate transformation. Notice, we are converting the joint pdf $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ to make our lives easier, and the circle defined by the question, ie $X^2+Y^2<1$, merely comes into play when looking at what we integrate over.
begin{align*}
P(X^2+Y^2<1)&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r text{d}theta\
&=2pi frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r\
&=int_{u=1}^{e^{-1/2}}-text{d}underbrace{(e^{-r^2/2})}_u=-ubigg|_1^{e^{-1/2}}\
&=-e^{1/2}--1=1-e^{-1/2}
end{align*}
$endgroup$
Since $X$ and $Y$ are independent, and because $mu=0$ and $sigma=1$, then we know that $$f_{X,Y}(x,y)=f_X(x)f_Y(y)=frac{1}{2pi}exp(frac{-(x^2+y^2}{2}).$$
Of course, since our domain over which we are integrating is a circle with a radius of 1, we convert $x^2+y^2=r^2$, and $text{d}x text{d}y=rtext{d}rtext{d}theta$, using
$x=rcostheta$ and $y=rsin theta$ using the standard polar coordinate transformation. Notice, we are converting the joint pdf $f_{X,Y}(x,y)$ to make our lives easier, and the circle defined by the question, ie $X^2+Y^2<1$, merely comes into play when looking at what we integrate over.
begin{align*}
P(X^2+Y^2<1)&=frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}int_{theta=0}^{2pi}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r text{d}theta\
&=2pi frac{1}{2pi}int_{r=0}^{1}e^{(frac{-r^2}{2})}r text{d}r\
&=int_{u=1}^{e^{-1/2}}-text{d}underbrace{(e^{-r^2/2})}_u=-ubigg|_1^{e^{-1/2}}\
&=-e^{1/2}--1=1-e^{-1/2}
end{align*}
edited Dec 17 '18 at 15:35
answered Oct 23 '18 at 6:12
Demetrios PapakostasDemetrios Papakostas
609
609
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As per my knowledge you don't need to integrate , this type of questions are normally asked in competetive exam if you started integrating there then it will take much time. I have a shortcut.
$$Xsim N(0,1)$$
$$Y sim N(0,1)$$
then
$$X^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$Y^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$chi_1^2+chi_1^2 simchi_2^2$$
Chi-square distribution with $2$ degree of freedom will follow Gamma distribution with parameters $(1,frac12)$ which is an exponential distribution with parameter $lambda=frac12$ so now we have an exponetial distribution lets call it $T$ so
$$ T sim expo(1/2) $$
we have to find
$$P(T<1)$$
as we know $P(T<1)$ is cumulative ditribution function of exponetial ditribution which is generally given by
$$F(x) = 1- e^{-lambda x}$$
as we know $lambda$=1/2
$$F(1)= 1-e^{{-{1over 2}}times 1}$$
$$Rightarrow P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1-e^{-1/2}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As per my knowledge you don't need to integrate , this type of questions are normally asked in competetive exam if you started integrating there then it will take much time. I have a shortcut.
$$Xsim N(0,1)$$
$$Y sim N(0,1)$$
then
$$X^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$Y^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$chi_1^2+chi_1^2 simchi_2^2$$
Chi-square distribution with $2$ degree of freedom will follow Gamma distribution with parameters $(1,frac12)$ which is an exponential distribution with parameter $lambda=frac12$ so now we have an exponetial distribution lets call it $T$ so
$$ T sim expo(1/2) $$
we have to find
$$P(T<1)$$
as we know $P(T<1)$ is cumulative ditribution function of exponetial ditribution which is generally given by
$$F(x) = 1- e^{-lambda x}$$
as we know $lambda$=1/2
$$F(1)= 1-e^{{-{1over 2}}times 1}$$
$$Rightarrow P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1-e^{-1/2}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As per my knowledge you don't need to integrate , this type of questions are normally asked in competetive exam if you started integrating there then it will take much time. I have a shortcut.
$$Xsim N(0,1)$$
$$Y sim N(0,1)$$
then
$$X^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$Y^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$chi_1^2+chi_1^2 simchi_2^2$$
Chi-square distribution with $2$ degree of freedom will follow Gamma distribution with parameters $(1,frac12)$ which is an exponential distribution with parameter $lambda=frac12$ so now we have an exponetial distribution lets call it $T$ so
$$ T sim expo(1/2) $$
we have to find
$$P(T<1)$$
as we know $P(T<1)$ is cumulative ditribution function of exponetial ditribution which is generally given by
$$F(x) = 1- e^{-lambda x}$$
as we know $lambda$=1/2
$$F(1)= 1-e^{{-{1over 2}}times 1}$$
$$Rightarrow P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1-e^{-1/2}$$
$endgroup$
As per my knowledge you don't need to integrate , this type of questions are normally asked in competetive exam if you started integrating there then it will take much time. I have a shortcut.
$$Xsim N(0,1)$$
$$Y sim N(0,1)$$
then
$$X^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$Y^2 simchi_1^2$$
$$chi_1^2+chi_1^2 simchi_2^2$$
Chi-square distribution with $2$ degree of freedom will follow Gamma distribution with parameters $(1,frac12)$ which is an exponential distribution with parameter $lambda=frac12$ so now we have an exponetial distribution lets call it $T$ so
$$ T sim expo(1/2) $$
we have to find
$$P(T<1)$$
as we know $P(T<1)$ is cumulative ditribution function of exponetial ditribution which is generally given by
$$F(x) = 1- e^{-lambda x}$$
as we know $lambda$=1/2
$$F(1)= 1-e^{{-{1over 2}}times 1}$$
$$Rightarrow P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = 1-e^{-1/2}$$
edited Jan 17 '18 at 20:22
Siong Thye Goh
103k1468119
103k1468119
answered Jan 17 '18 at 20:01
Rahul GiriRahul Giri
675
675
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Box-Muller transform suggests that if $X, Y$ are two independent standard normal random variables, then if we let $X = R cosTheta, Y = R sinTheta, R in (0, infty), Theta in [0, 2pi)$ (polar coordinate), then this bivariate transform is 1-to-1 and onto. Further, $R, Theta$ are also independent. And $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1), Theta sim Uniform(0, 2pi)$, i.e., $frac{1}{2}R^2$ follows an Exponential distribution with $lambda = 1$ and $Theta$ follows a Uniform distribution on $(0, 2pi)$.
Hence, $P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = P(R^2cos^2Theta + R^2sin^2Theta < 1) = P(R^2 < 1) = P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2})$. And since $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1)$, we can denote $Z = frac{1}{2}R^2$. Using the pdf of an $Exponential(1)$ distribution, $P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2}) = P(Z < frac{1}{2}) = int_{-infty}^{frac{1}{2}} e^{-z} , dz = 1 - e^{-frac{1}{2}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Box-Muller transform suggests that if $X, Y$ are two independent standard normal random variables, then if we let $X = R cosTheta, Y = R sinTheta, R in (0, infty), Theta in [0, 2pi)$ (polar coordinate), then this bivariate transform is 1-to-1 and onto. Further, $R, Theta$ are also independent. And $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1), Theta sim Uniform(0, 2pi)$, i.e., $frac{1}{2}R^2$ follows an Exponential distribution with $lambda = 1$ and $Theta$ follows a Uniform distribution on $(0, 2pi)$.
Hence, $P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = P(R^2cos^2Theta + R^2sin^2Theta < 1) = P(R^2 < 1) = P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2})$. And since $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1)$, we can denote $Z = frac{1}{2}R^2$. Using the pdf of an $Exponential(1)$ distribution, $P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2}) = P(Z < frac{1}{2}) = int_{-infty}^{frac{1}{2}} e^{-z} , dz = 1 - e^{-frac{1}{2}}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Box-Muller transform suggests that if $X, Y$ are two independent standard normal random variables, then if we let $X = R cosTheta, Y = R sinTheta, R in (0, infty), Theta in [0, 2pi)$ (polar coordinate), then this bivariate transform is 1-to-1 and onto. Further, $R, Theta$ are also independent. And $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1), Theta sim Uniform(0, 2pi)$, i.e., $frac{1}{2}R^2$ follows an Exponential distribution with $lambda = 1$ and $Theta$ follows a Uniform distribution on $(0, 2pi)$.
Hence, $P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = P(R^2cos^2Theta + R^2sin^2Theta < 1) = P(R^2 < 1) = P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2})$. And since $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1)$, we can denote $Z = frac{1}{2}R^2$. Using the pdf of an $Exponential(1)$ distribution, $P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2}) = P(Z < frac{1}{2}) = int_{-infty}^{frac{1}{2}} e^{-z} , dz = 1 - e^{-frac{1}{2}}$.
$endgroup$
Box-Muller transform suggests that if $X, Y$ are two independent standard normal random variables, then if we let $X = R cosTheta, Y = R sinTheta, R in (0, infty), Theta in [0, 2pi)$ (polar coordinate), then this bivariate transform is 1-to-1 and onto. Further, $R, Theta$ are also independent. And $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1), Theta sim Uniform(0, 2pi)$, i.e., $frac{1}{2}R^2$ follows an Exponential distribution with $lambda = 1$ and $Theta$ follows a Uniform distribution on $(0, 2pi)$.
Hence, $P(X^2 + Y^2 < 1) = P(R^2cos^2Theta + R^2sin^2Theta < 1) = P(R^2 < 1) = P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2})$. And since $frac{1}{2}R^2 sim Exponential(1)$, we can denote $Z = frac{1}{2}R^2$. Using the pdf of an $Exponential(1)$ distribution, $P(frac{1}{2}R^2 < frac{1}{2}) = P(Z < frac{1}{2}) = int_{-infty}^{frac{1}{2}} e^{-z} , dz = 1 - e^{-frac{1}{2}}$.
answered Nov 24 '17 at 21:12
mkmlpmkmlp
136212
136212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f937972%2fpx2y21-of-two-independent-n0-1-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think it might be easier to view this geometrically. X and Y ranges correspond to a unit square and the equation $X^2+Y^2<1$ makes a quarter circle in that area.
$endgroup$
– ryagami
Sep 19 '14 at 15:48
$begingroup$
ryagami, $X$ and $Y$ are normally distributed, not uniformly.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Perhaps an easier approach is by noting that $X^2+Y^2$ follows a $chi^2$ distribution with $2$ degrees of freedom.
$endgroup$
– Kim Jong Un
Sep 19 '14 at 15:55
$begingroup$
statsguyz, consider the random variable $r = sqrt{X^2+Y^2}$ - the density function of $r$ is $frac{r}{sqrt{2pi}}e^{-r^2/2}$. Use this and solve for $Pr(r<1)$.
$endgroup$
– Shash
Sep 19 '14 at 15:57
$begingroup$
You might want to stop tinkering with the LaTeX encoding of your math formulas. The standardest, the better. (And negative densities should startle you...)
$endgroup$
– Did
Sep 20 '14 at 8:01