Why is the volume of a parallelepiped linear in each row in the matrix representation?












0














In this question, the determinant of a matrix is explained to be a measure of the volume of a parallelepiped formed by using the columns in a matrix as vectors.



It is also noted that the determinant is linear in each row. We can represent this geometrically as the volume of a parallelpiped being the sum of the volumes of two other ones. Is there a geometric proof that the volume corresponding to these matrices is linear in this manner?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The determinant, by cinstruction, ismultilinear in its rows (or its columns as well), independently of any geometric consideration.
    – Bernard
    Nov 21 at 20:57










  • @Bernard: Sure, but it seems like there should be a geometric representation. Maybe I need to reword the question.
    – Casebash
    Nov 21 at 21:16






  • 1




    I think there is a geometric representation. Note that the determinant does not change upon adding multiples of one row/column to another. This corresponds to a shear mapping of the paralelepiped, so the volume does not change under this operation. Then, you use the Gram-Schmidt process to express the original vectors which form the base,width and height (etc if there are more than 3 dimensions) in terms of a determinant which results from applying the operation of adding multiples of one row/column to another.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 21 at 21:55


















0














In this question, the determinant of a matrix is explained to be a measure of the volume of a parallelepiped formed by using the columns in a matrix as vectors.



It is also noted that the determinant is linear in each row. We can represent this geometrically as the volume of a parallelpiped being the sum of the volumes of two other ones. Is there a geometric proof that the volume corresponding to these matrices is linear in this manner?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The determinant, by cinstruction, ismultilinear in its rows (or its columns as well), independently of any geometric consideration.
    – Bernard
    Nov 21 at 20:57










  • @Bernard: Sure, but it seems like there should be a geometric representation. Maybe I need to reword the question.
    – Casebash
    Nov 21 at 21:16






  • 1




    I think there is a geometric representation. Note that the determinant does not change upon adding multiples of one row/column to another. This corresponds to a shear mapping of the paralelepiped, so the volume does not change under this operation. Then, you use the Gram-Schmidt process to express the original vectors which form the base,width and height (etc if there are more than 3 dimensions) in terms of a determinant which results from applying the operation of adding multiples of one row/column to another.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 21 at 21:55
















0












0








0







In this question, the determinant of a matrix is explained to be a measure of the volume of a parallelepiped formed by using the columns in a matrix as vectors.



It is also noted that the determinant is linear in each row. We can represent this geometrically as the volume of a parallelpiped being the sum of the volumes of two other ones. Is there a geometric proof that the volume corresponding to these matrices is linear in this manner?










share|cite|improve this question















In this question, the determinant of a matrix is explained to be a measure of the volume of a parallelepiped formed by using the columns in a matrix as vectors.



It is also noted that the determinant is linear in each row. We can represent this geometrically as the volume of a parallelpiped being the sum of the volumes of two other ones. Is there a geometric proof that the volume corresponding to these matrices is linear in this manner?







matrices determinant volume






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 21:18

























asked Nov 21 at 20:52









Casebash

5,63834070




5,63834070












  • The determinant, by cinstruction, ismultilinear in its rows (or its columns as well), independently of any geometric consideration.
    – Bernard
    Nov 21 at 20:57










  • @Bernard: Sure, but it seems like there should be a geometric representation. Maybe I need to reword the question.
    – Casebash
    Nov 21 at 21:16






  • 1




    I think there is a geometric representation. Note that the determinant does not change upon adding multiples of one row/column to another. This corresponds to a shear mapping of the paralelepiped, so the volume does not change under this operation. Then, you use the Gram-Schmidt process to express the original vectors which form the base,width and height (etc if there are more than 3 dimensions) in terms of a determinant which results from applying the operation of adding multiples of one row/column to another.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 21 at 21:55




















  • The determinant, by cinstruction, ismultilinear in its rows (or its columns as well), independently of any geometric consideration.
    – Bernard
    Nov 21 at 20:57










  • @Bernard: Sure, but it seems like there should be a geometric representation. Maybe I need to reword the question.
    – Casebash
    Nov 21 at 21:16






  • 1




    I think there is a geometric representation. Note that the determinant does not change upon adding multiples of one row/column to another. This corresponds to a shear mapping of the paralelepiped, so the volume does not change under this operation. Then, you use the Gram-Schmidt process to express the original vectors which form the base,width and height (etc if there are more than 3 dimensions) in terms of a determinant which results from applying the operation of adding multiples of one row/column to another.
    – Matematleta
    Nov 21 at 21:55


















The determinant, by cinstruction, ismultilinear in its rows (or its columns as well), independently of any geometric consideration.
– Bernard
Nov 21 at 20:57




The determinant, by cinstruction, ismultilinear in its rows (or its columns as well), independently of any geometric consideration.
– Bernard
Nov 21 at 20:57












@Bernard: Sure, but it seems like there should be a geometric representation. Maybe I need to reword the question.
– Casebash
Nov 21 at 21:16




@Bernard: Sure, but it seems like there should be a geometric representation. Maybe I need to reword the question.
– Casebash
Nov 21 at 21:16




1




1




I think there is a geometric representation. Note that the determinant does not change upon adding multiples of one row/column to another. This corresponds to a shear mapping of the paralelepiped, so the volume does not change under this operation. Then, you use the Gram-Schmidt process to express the original vectors which form the base,width and height (etc if there are more than 3 dimensions) in terms of a determinant which results from applying the operation of adding multiples of one row/column to another.
– Matematleta
Nov 21 at 21:55






I think there is a geometric representation. Note that the determinant does not change upon adding multiples of one row/column to another. This corresponds to a shear mapping of the paralelepiped, so the volume does not change under this operation. Then, you use the Gram-Schmidt process to express the original vectors which form the base,width and height (etc if there are more than 3 dimensions) in terms of a determinant which results from applying the operation of adding multiples of one row/column to another.
– Matematleta
Nov 21 at 21:55

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008340%2fwhy-is-the-volume-of-a-parallelepiped-linear-in-each-row-in-the-matrix-represent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008340%2fwhy-is-the-volume-of-a-parallelepiped-linear-in-each-row-in-the-matrix-represent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...