An application of a variation of the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem












1












$begingroup$


I'm working on Part D of the following question:



enter image description here



I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:




Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$




I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?



A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf



I am having trouble following it though.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
    $endgroup$
    – yoshi
    Nov 7 '18 at 19:19
















1












$begingroup$


I'm working on Part D of the following question:



enter image description here



I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:




Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$




I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?



A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf



I am having trouble following it though.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
    $endgroup$
    – yoshi
    Nov 7 '18 at 19:19














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I'm working on Part D of the following question:



enter image description here



I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:




Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$




I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?



A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf



I am having trouble following it though.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm working on Part D of the following question:



enter image description here



I am trying to use the following variation on Stone-Weierstrass:




Let $U$ be a non-compact locally compact hausdorff space. If $mathcal{A}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ (the continuous functions from $U$ to $mathbb{R}$ which vanish at infinity) which separates points. Then $mathcal{A}=C_0(U,mathbb{R})$ or $mathcal{A}={f in C_0(U,mathbb{R}):f(x_0)=0}$ for some $x_oin U$




I'm having trouble seeing how to use the theorem and why $U$ should not be compact. Thoughts?



A solution is given here: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b602/17d061e2f6ca4c592edf5efb7bcb19320b04.pdf



I am having trouble following it though.







real-analysis functional-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 7 '18 at 18:35









Luca Carai

31119




31119










asked Nov 7 '18 at 18:09









yoshiyoshi

1,181817




1,181817












  • $begingroup$
    I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
    $endgroup$
    – yoshi
    Nov 7 '18 at 19:19


















  • $begingroup$
    I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
    $endgroup$
    – yoshi
    Nov 7 '18 at 19:19
















$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19




$begingroup$
I am also having trouble with part E. The solution says parts C and D show $k$ is a bijection. I can't see this though
$endgroup$
– yoshi
Nov 7 '18 at 19:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)



c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.



Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.



Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.



For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.



Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
$$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.



The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2988876%2fan-application-of-a-variation-of-the-stone-weierstrass-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)



    c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.



    Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.



    Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.



    For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.



    Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
    $$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
    Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.



    The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)



      c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.



      Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.



      Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.



      For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.



      Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
      $$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
      Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.



      The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)



        c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.



        Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.



        Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.



        For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.



        Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
        $$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
        Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.



        The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The first part a) is easy: We have $h(J) = bigcap_{f in J} f^{-1}({0})$. Since every $f in J$ is continuous, this set is closed as the intersection of the closed sets $f^{-1}({0})$. In b) obviously $k(E)$ is also an ideal. Here we denote $pi_x colon C(X) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the projection on the point $x$, i.e. $pi_x(f) = f(x)$. Then $pi_x$ is continuous and $k(E) = bigcap_{x in E} pi_x^{-1}({0})$, i.e. $k(E)$ is closed. (One can also argue by using sequences in order to prove that $k(E)$ is sequentially closed and thus closed, since $C(X)$ is a metric space.)



        c) can be shown as follows: First, let $x in E$, then for any $f in k(E)$ we have $f(x)=0$. Thus $x in h(k(E))$ by definition. SInce $h(k(E))$ is closed, we have $overline{E} subset h(k(E))$. On the other hand, for any $x notin overline{E}$, there exists by Urysohn's lemma a function $f colon X rightarrow [0,1]$ with $f(x) =1$ and $f(y) =0$ for all $y in overline{E}$. Thus $f in k(E)$ by definition and, because $f(x) =1$, we get $x notin h(k(E))$.



        Let us prove now d): Let $f in J$, then for any $x in h(J)$ we have $f(x) =0$. Thus $f in k(h(J))$. Since this set is closed, we also get $overline{J} subset k(h(J))$. Now, we use the hint: Let $U = X subset h(J)$. This is a open set and is not necessary compact.



        Counterexample: If $X=[0,1]$ we can take $x_0 =0$ and the maximal ideal $J = {f in C([a,b]): f(x_0) =0}$, then $h(J) = {0}$. Thus $X setminus h(J) = (0,1]$ is not compact.



        For any $varepsilon >0$ we can cover $h(J)$ with finite many open sets $V_1,ldots,V_n$ such that $|f(x)| < varepsilon$ for fixed $f in k(h(J))$, because $h(J)$ is compact. Set $V = V_1 cup ldots cup V_n$. Then $K^c = V^c = V_1^c cap ldots cap V_n^c$ is compact in $X$ and hence also in $U$. We verified that $k(h(J)) subset C_0(U)$. Note that this set is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$.



        Thus $mathcal{A}:= overline{J}$ is a closed subalgebra of $C_0(U)$. By definition for any $x in U$ there exists at least one $f_x in J$ with $f_x(x) ne 0$. Let $x,y in U$ are different points, we can use Urysohn's lemma to find functions $h_x$ and $h_y$ with $h_x(x)=1$ and $h_x(z) = 0 $ for $z in h(J) cup {y}$, resp. $h_y(y)=1$ and $h_y(y) = 0$ for $z in h(J) cup {x}$. Now define
        $$h(z) := h_x(z) frac{f_x(z)}{f_x(x)} - h_y(z) frac{f_y(z)}{f_y(y)}.$$
        Then $h in J$ with $h(x) =1 neq -1 =h(y)$. Hence $mathcal{A}$ separates points and also vanishes nowhere. Stone-Weierstraß already shows that $mathcal{A} = C_0(U)$ and thus $mathcal{A} = k(h(J))$.



        The last part is now a consequence of the previous ones: If $E$ is a closed set in $X$, then $k(E)$ is a closed ideal in $C(X)$ with $h(k(E)) =E$. On the other hand, any closed ideal $J$ in $C(X)$ gives a closed set $h(J)$ with $k(h(J)) = J$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 1 '18 at 9:02









        p4schp4sch

        4,995217




        4,995217






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2988876%2fan-application-of-a-variation-of-the-stone-weierstrass-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...