Find the locus of perpendicular drawn from focus upon variable tangent to the parabola...
$begingroup$
Find the locus of perpendicular drawn from focus upon variable tangent to the parabola $(2x-y+1)^2=frac{8}{sqrt{5}}(x+2y+3)$.
My approach
I am trying to convert above equation in parabolic form
$frac{(ax+by+c)^2}{a^2+b^2}=(x-alpha)^2+(y-beta)^2$
where $ ax+by+c=0$ is the equation of directrix and ($alpha,beta$) is the focus of the parabola but getting complicated.
conic-sections
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the locus of perpendicular drawn from focus upon variable tangent to the parabola $(2x-y+1)^2=frac{8}{sqrt{5}}(x+2y+3)$.
My approach
I am trying to convert above equation in parabolic form
$frac{(ax+by+c)^2}{a^2+b^2}=(x-alpha)^2+(y-beta)^2$
where $ ax+by+c=0$ is the equation of directrix and ($alpha,beta$) is the focus of the parabola but getting complicated.
conic-sections
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$$5,left(-left({{2,y}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{x}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{3, sqrt{5}+2}over{5}}right)^2+left(y-{{4,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}} right)^2+left(x-{{2,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}}right)^2right)$$
$endgroup$
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Dec 12 '18 at 6:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the locus of perpendicular drawn from focus upon variable tangent to the parabola $(2x-y+1)^2=frac{8}{sqrt{5}}(x+2y+3)$.
My approach
I am trying to convert above equation in parabolic form
$frac{(ax+by+c)^2}{a^2+b^2}=(x-alpha)^2+(y-beta)^2$
where $ ax+by+c=0$ is the equation of directrix and ($alpha,beta$) is the focus of the parabola but getting complicated.
conic-sections
$endgroup$
Find the locus of perpendicular drawn from focus upon variable tangent to the parabola $(2x-y+1)^2=frac{8}{sqrt{5}}(x+2y+3)$.
My approach
I am trying to convert above equation in parabolic form
$frac{(ax+by+c)^2}{a^2+b^2}=(x-alpha)^2+(y-beta)^2$
where $ ax+by+c=0$ is the equation of directrix and ($alpha,beta$) is the focus of the parabola but getting complicated.
conic-sections
conic-sections
asked Dec 12 '18 at 4:51
Samar Imam ZaidiSamar Imam Zaidi
1,5501520
1,5501520
$begingroup$
$$5,left(-left({{2,y}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{x}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{3, sqrt{5}+2}over{5}}right)^2+left(y-{{4,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}} right)^2+left(x-{{2,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}}right)^2right)$$
$endgroup$
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Dec 12 '18 at 6:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$$5,left(-left({{2,y}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{x}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{3, sqrt{5}+2}over{5}}right)^2+left(y-{{4,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}} right)^2+left(x-{{2,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}}right)^2right)$$
$endgroup$
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Dec 12 '18 at 6:11
$begingroup$
$$5,left(-left({{2,y}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{x}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{3, sqrt{5}+2}over{5}}right)^2+left(y-{{4,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}} right)^2+left(x-{{2,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}}right)^2right)$$
$endgroup$
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Dec 12 '18 at 6:11
$begingroup$
$$5,left(-left({{2,y}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{x}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{3, sqrt{5}+2}over{5}}right)^2+left(y-{{4,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}} right)^2+left(x-{{2,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}}right)^2right)$$
$endgroup$
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Dec 12 '18 at 6:11
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint :
Let $Y=2x-y+1 (1)$ and $4aX=dfrac{8(x+2y+3)}{sqrt5}$ with $x+2y+3=X
(2), a=?$
whose focus is $(a,0)$
Any point on $Y^2=4aX,$ can be set to $P(at^2,2at)$
Find the equation of the tangent at $P$
Find the equation of the normal for the tangent passing through $(a,0)$
Find the intersection of the normal with the tangent.
Eliminate $t$
Replace the values of $X,Y$ with $x,y$ using $(1),(2)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a general identity that the locus of the foot of perpendiculars to all tangents of the parabola is the tangent at the vertex. Here is a link to the proof. So it is easier to find the line parallel to the directrix (from the equation) and at equal distance from the focus and directrix. That is the tangent at vertex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This begs the question, doesn’t it? It seems to me that this is an exercise in discovering or verifying the property for this particular parabola. Otherwise, the problem can be solved by inspection since the equations of both the axis and tangent at the vertex are explicit in the parabola’s equation.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 12 '18 at 7:54
$begingroup$
I think that the question doesn't want us to do tedious calculations rather wants to check if the answerer can identify a parabola and know (or think of) this property. I personally don't think they want us to verify the property. If it does, I think the other answer does that.
$endgroup$
– Sri Krishna Sahoo
Dec 12 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The equation of the parabola’s axis is $2x-y+1=0$ and that of its tangent at the vertex is $x+2y+3=0$. The directrix therefore has the form $x+2y+d=0$ and you can find the focus in various ways, such as using the fact that the vertex is halfway between the focus and directrix.
That said, if you’re planning to compute tangents to the parabola and the perpendiculars through the focus, the approach in lab bhattacharjee’s answer is probably a simpler way to go than starting from the form of equation that you propose.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036241%2ffind-the-locus-of-perpendicular-drawn-from-focus-upon-variable-tangent-to-the-pa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint :
Let $Y=2x-y+1 (1)$ and $4aX=dfrac{8(x+2y+3)}{sqrt5}$ with $x+2y+3=X
(2), a=?$
whose focus is $(a,0)$
Any point on $Y^2=4aX,$ can be set to $P(at^2,2at)$
Find the equation of the tangent at $P$
Find the equation of the normal for the tangent passing through $(a,0)$
Find the intersection of the normal with the tangent.
Eliminate $t$
Replace the values of $X,Y$ with $x,y$ using $(1),(2)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint :
Let $Y=2x-y+1 (1)$ and $4aX=dfrac{8(x+2y+3)}{sqrt5}$ with $x+2y+3=X
(2), a=?$
whose focus is $(a,0)$
Any point on $Y^2=4aX,$ can be set to $P(at^2,2at)$
Find the equation of the tangent at $P$
Find the equation of the normal for the tangent passing through $(a,0)$
Find the intersection of the normal with the tangent.
Eliminate $t$
Replace the values of $X,Y$ with $x,y$ using $(1),(2)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint :
Let $Y=2x-y+1 (1)$ and $4aX=dfrac{8(x+2y+3)}{sqrt5}$ with $x+2y+3=X
(2), a=?$
whose focus is $(a,0)$
Any point on $Y^2=4aX,$ can be set to $P(at^2,2at)$
Find the equation of the tangent at $P$
Find the equation of the normal for the tangent passing through $(a,0)$
Find the intersection of the normal with the tangent.
Eliminate $t$
Replace the values of $X,Y$ with $x,y$ using $(1),(2)$
$endgroup$
Hint :
Let $Y=2x-y+1 (1)$ and $4aX=dfrac{8(x+2y+3)}{sqrt5}$ with $x+2y+3=X
(2), a=?$
whose focus is $(a,0)$
Any point on $Y^2=4aX,$ can be set to $P(at^2,2at)$
Find the equation of the tangent at $P$
Find the equation of the normal for the tangent passing through $(a,0)$
Find the intersection of the normal with the tangent.
Eliminate $t$
Replace the values of $X,Y$ with $x,y$ using $(1),(2)$
answered Dec 12 '18 at 5:21
lab bhattacharjeelab bhattacharjee
226k15157275
226k15157275
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a general identity that the locus of the foot of perpendiculars to all tangents of the parabola is the tangent at the vertex. Here is a link to the proof. So it is easier to find the line parallel to the directrix (from the equation) and at equal distance from the focus and directrix. That is the tangent at vertex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This begs the question, doesn’t it? It seems to me that this is an exercise in discovering or verifying the property for this particular parabola. Otherwise, the problem can be solved by inspection since the equations of both the axis and tangent at the vertex are explicit in the parabola’s equation.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 12 '18 at 7:54
$begingroup$
I think that the question doesn't want us to do tedious calculations rather wants to check if the answerer can identify a parabola and know (or think of) this property. I personally don't think they want us to verify the property. If it does, I think the other answer does that.
$endgroup$
– Sri Krishna Sahoo
Dec 12 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a general identity that the locus of the foot of perpendiculars to all tangents of the parabola is the tangent at the vertex. Here is a link to the proof. So it is easier to find the line parallel to the directrix (from the equation) and at equal distance from the focus and directrix. That is the tangent at vertex.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This begs the question, doesn’t it? It seems to me that this is an exercise in discovering or verifying the property for this particular parabola. Otherwise, the problem can be solved by inspection since the equations of both the axis and tangent at the vertex are explicit in the parabola’s equation.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 12 '18 at 7:54
$begingroup$
I think that the question doesn't want us to do tedious calculations rather wants to check if the answerer can identify a parabola and know (or think of) this property. I personally don't think they want us to verify the property. If it does, I think the other answer does that.
$endgroup$
– Sri Krishna Sahoo
Dec 12 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a general identity that the locus of the foot of perpendiculars to all tangents of the parabola is the tangent at the vertex. Here is a link to the proof. So it is easier to find the line parallel to the directrix (from the equation) and at equal distance from the focus and directrix. That is the tangent at vertex.
$endgroup$
There is a general identity that the locus of the foot of perpendiculars to all tangents of the parabola is the tangent at the vertex. Here is a link to the proof. So it is easier to find the line parallel to the directrix (from the equation) and at equal distance from the focus and directrix. That is the tangent at vertex.
answered Dec 12 '18 at 7:31
Sri Krishna SahooSri Krishna Sahoo
606217
606217
$begingroup$
This begs the question, doesn’t it? It seems to me that this is an exercise in discovering or verifying the property for this particular parabola. Otherwise, the problem can be solved by inspection since the equations of both the axis and tangent at the vertex are explicit in the parabola’s equation.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 12 '18 at 7:54
$begingroup$
I think that the question doesn't want us to do tedious calculations rather wants to check if the answerer can identify a parabola and know (or think of) this property. I personally don't think they want us to verify the property. If it does, I think the other answer does that.
$endgroup$
– Sri Krishna Sahoo
Dec 12 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This begs the question, doesn’t it? It seems to me that this is an exercise in discovering or verifying the property for this particular parabola. Otherwise, the problem can be solved by inspection since the equations of both the axis and tangent at the vertex are explicit in the parabola’s equation.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 12 '18 at 7:54
$begingroup$
I think that the question doesn't want us to do tedious calculations rather wants to check if the answerer can identify a parabola and know (or think of) this property. I personally don't think they want us to verify the property. If it does, I think the other answer does that.
$endgroup$
– Sri Krishna Sahoo
Dec 12 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
This begs the question, doesn’t it? It seems to me that this is an exercise in discovering or verifying the property for this particular parabola. Otherwise, the problem can be solved by inspection since the equations of both the axis and tangent at the vertex are explicit in the parabola’s equation.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 12 '18 at 7:54
$begingroup$
This begs the question, doesn’t it? It seems to me that this is an exercise in discovering or verifying the property for this particular parabola. Otherwise, the problem can be solved by inspection since the equations of both the axis and tangent at the vertex are explicit in the parabola’s equation.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 12 '18 at 7:54
$begingroup$
I think that the question doesn't want us to do tedious calculations rather wants to check if the answerer can identify a parabola and know (or think of) this property. I personally don't think they want us to verify the property. If it does, I think the other answer does that.
$endgroup$
– Sri Krishna Sahoo
Dec 12 '18 at 7:58
$begingroup$
I think that the question doesn't want us to do tedious calculations rather wants to check if the answerer can identify a parabola and know (or think of) this property. I personally don't think they want us to verify the property. If it does, I think the other answer does that.
$endgroup$
– Sri Krishna Sahoo
Dec 12 '18 at 7:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The equation of the parabola’s axis is $2x-y+1=0$ and that of its tangent at the vertex is $x+2y+3=0$. The directrix therefore has the form $x+2y+d=0$ and you can find the focus in various ways, such as using the fact that the vertex is halfway between the focus and directrix.
That said, if you’re planning to compute tangents to the parabola and the perpendiculars through the focus, the approach in lab bhattacharjee’s answer is probably a simpler way to go than starting from the form of equation that you propose.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The equation of the parabola’s axis is $2x-y+1=0$ and that of its tangent at the vertex is $x+2y+3=0$. The directrix therefore has the form $x+2y+d=0$ and you can find the focus in various ways, such as using the fact that the vertex is halfway between the focus and directrix.
That said, if you’re planning to compute tangents to the parabola and the perpendiculars through the focus, the approach in lab bhattacharjee’s answer is probably a simpler way to go than starting from the form of equation that you propose.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The equation of the parabola’s axis is $2x-y+1=0$ and that of its tangent at the vertex is $x+2y+3=0$. The directrix therefore has the form $x+2y+d=0$ and you can find the focus in various ways, such as using the fact that the vertex is halfway between the focus and directrix.
That said, if you’re planning to compute tangents to the parabola and the perpendiculars through the focus, the approach in lab bhattacharjee’s answer is probably a simpler way to go than starting from the form of equation that you propose.
$endgroup$
The equation of the parabola’s axis is $2x-y+1=0$ and that of its tangent at the vertex is $x+2y+3=0$. The directrix therefore has the form $x+2y+d=0$ and you can find the focus in various ways, such as using the fact that the vertex is halfway between the focus and directrix.
That said, if you’re planning to compute tangents to the parabola and the perpendiculars through the focus, the approach in lab bhattacharjee’s answer is probably a simpler way to go than starting from the form of equation that you propose.
edited Dec 12 '18 at 8:20
answered Dec 12 '18 at 8:00
amdamd
30.6k21050
30.6k21050
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3036241%2ffind-the-locus-of-perpendicular-drawn-from-focus-upon-variable-tangent-to-the-pa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
$$5,left(-left({{2,y}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{x}over{sqrt{5}}}+{{3, sqrt{5}+2}over{5}}right)^2+left(y-{{4,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}} right)^2+left(x-{{2,sqrt{5}-25}over{25}}right)^2right)$$
$endgroup$
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Dec 12 '18 at 6:11