Integral inequality with a strange condition
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.
It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$
Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$
I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.
Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$
real-analysis integration derivatives inequality definite-integrals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.
It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$
Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$
I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.
Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$
real-analysis integration derivatives inequality definite-integrals
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50
$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.
It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$
Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$
I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.
Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$
real-analysis integration derivatives inequality definite-integrals
$endgroup$
Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.
It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$
Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$
I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.
Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$
real-analysis integration derivatives inequality definite-integrals
real-analysis integration derivatives inequality definite-integrals
edited Nov 5 '18 at 16:45
Lee David Chung Lin
4,38031241
4,38031241
asked Nov 5 '18 at 16:37
Legend KillerLegend Killer
1,6671523
1,6671523
$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50
$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50
$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25
$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50
$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50
$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25
$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.
This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional
$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$
One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.
Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by
$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$
The question can be rephrased as
What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.
Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.
For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.
Consider following function over $[0,1]$
$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$
We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$
It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.
For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows
$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find
$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$
Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,
$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get
$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$
As a result,
$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40
1
$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2985972%2fintegral-inequality-with-a-strange-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.
This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional
$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$
One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.
Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by
$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$
The question can be rephrased as
What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.
Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.
For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.
Consider following function over $[0,1]$
$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$
We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$
It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.
For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows
$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find
$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$
Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,
$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get
$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$
As a result,
$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40
1
$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.
This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional
$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$
One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.
Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by
$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$
The question can be rephrased as
What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.
Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.
For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.
Consider following function over $[0,1]$
$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$
We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$
It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.
For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows
$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find
$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$
Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,
$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get
$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$
As a result,
$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40
1
$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.
This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional
$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$
One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.
Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by
$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$
The question can be rephrased as
What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.
Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.
For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.
Consider following function over $[0,1]$
$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$
We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$
It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.
For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows
$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find
$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$
Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,
$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get
$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$
As a result,
$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$
$endgroup$
The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.
This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional
$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$
One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.
Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by
$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$
The question can be rephrased as
What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.
Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.
For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.
Consider following function over $[0,1]$
$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$
We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$
It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.
For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows
$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find
$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$
Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,
$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get
$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$
As a result,
$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$
edited Nov 5 '18 at 23:00
answered Nov 5 '18 at 20:55
achille huiachille hui
96.1k5132260
96.1k5132260
$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40
1
$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40
1
$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40
$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40
1
1
$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2985972%2fintegral-inequality-with-a-strange-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50
$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25