Integral inequality with a strange condition












7












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.



It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$




Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$




I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.



Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Nov 5 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, it means the square of $f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 5 '18 at 17:25
















7












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.



It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$




Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$




I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.



Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Nov 5 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, it means the square of $f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 5 '18 at 17:25














7












7








7


1



$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.



It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$




Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$




I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.



Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f$ be a continuously differentiable real valued function on $[0,1]$.



It is given that $displaystyle int_{frac{1}{3}}^{frac{2}{3}}f(x) dx=0$




Find the minimum value of $dfrac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx right)^2}$




I tried to use Cauchy-Schwarz to show that
$$frac{int_{0}^{1} (f'(x))^2 dx}{left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{left( int_0^1 bigl| f(x)f'(x) bigr| dx right)^2}{ left( int_0^1 f(x) dx right)^2} ge frac{ f(1)^2 - f(0)^2}{2 left( int_0^1 f^2 (x) dx right)^2}$$
But I can't proceed from here.



Also, I don't know how to use the condition $int_{1/3}^{2/3}f(x) dx=0$







real-analysis integration derivatives inequality definite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 5 '18 at 16:45









Lee David Chung Lin

4,38031241




4,38031241










asked Nov 5 '18 at 16:37









Legend KillerLegend Killer

1,6671523




1,6671523












  • $begingroup$
    Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Nov 5 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, it means the square of $f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 5 '18 at 17:25


















  • $begingroup$
    Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee David Chung Lin
    Nov 5 '18 at 16:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, it means the square of $f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 5 '18 at 17:25
















$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50




$begingroup$
Hope you don't mind my edit, and please feel free to overwrite. Is there a typo in the last denominator? What is $f^2(x)$ supposed to mean? The second derivative? If so then it should be $f^{(2)}(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lee David Chung Lin
Nov 5 '18 at 16:50












$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25




$begingroup$
No, it means the square of $f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 5 '18 at 17:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.



This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional



$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$

One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.





Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by



$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$



The question can be rephrased as




What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.




Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.



For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.



Consider following function over $[0,1]$



$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$

We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$

It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.



For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows



$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find



$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$

Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,



$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get



$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$



As a result,



$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 6 '18 at 2:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
    $endgroup$
    – achille hui
    Nov 6 '18 at 3:43











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2985972%2fintegral-inequality-with-a-strange-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.



This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional



$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$

One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.





Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by



$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$



The question can be rephrased as




What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.




Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.



For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.



Consider following function over $[0,1]$



$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$

We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$

It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.



For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows



$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find



$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$

Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,



$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get



$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$



As a result,



$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 6 '18 at 2:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
    $endgroup$
    – achille hui
    Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
















10












$begingroup$

The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.



This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional



$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$

One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.





Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by



$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$



The question can be rephrased as




What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.




Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.



For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.



Consider following function over $[0,1]$



$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$

We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$

It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.



For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows



$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find



$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$

Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,



$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get



$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$



As a result,



$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 6 '18 at 2:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
    $endgroup$
    – achille hui
    Nov 6 '18 at 3:43














10












10








10





$begingroup$

The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.



This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional



$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$

One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.





Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by



$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$



The question can be rephrased as




What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.




Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.



For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.



Consider following function over $[0,1]$



$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$

We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$

It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.



For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows



$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find



$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$

Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,



$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get



$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$



As a result,



$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The minimum ratio is $27$, achieved by a piecewise quadratic polynomial in $x$.



This is sort of expected. When one throw the functional



$$int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx$$
to Euler-Lagrange equation and subject it to the constraints
$$int_0^1 f(x) dx = text{constant}quadtext{ and }quad
int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx = 0$$

One find $f''(x)$ has to be a piecewise constant.
It takes one value over $[0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]$ and another value over $(frac13,frac23)$. What I has done is use a CAS to pin down the correct piecewise quadratic polynomial and then verify it give us the minimum.





Let $X = mathcal{C}^1[0,1]$ and $P,Q,C : X to mathbb{R}$ be the functionals over $X$ defined by



$$P(f) = int_0^1 f'(x)^2 dx,quad
Q(f) = int_0^1 f(x) dx,quadtext{ and }quad C(f) = int_{1/3}^{2/3} f(x) dx$$



The question can be rephrased as




What is the minimum of the ratio $frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2}$ for $f in X$ subject to the constraint $C(f) = 0$.




Since the ratio and constraint are both invariant under scaling of $f$ by constant, we
can restrict our attention to those $f$ which satisfies $C(f) = 0$ and $Q(f)$ equal to a specific constant.



For any $K in mathbb{R}$, let $Y_K = big{; f in X : C(f) = 0, Q(f) = K; big}$.



Consider following function over $[0,1]$



$$g(x) = begin{cases}
4 - 27x^2, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(x^2-x) + 13, & x in [frac13,frac23]\
4 - 27(1-x)^2, & x in [frac23,1]
end{cases}$$

We have
$$
g'(x) = begin{cases}
-54x, & x in [0,frac13]\
54(2x-1),& x in [frac13,frac23]\
54(1-x),& x in [frac23,1]
end{cases},quad
g''(x) = begin{cases}
-54, & x in [0,frac13) cup (frac23,1]\
108, & x in (frac13,frac23)
end{cases}
$$

It is not hard to see $g in X$. With a little bit of effort, one can verify
$P(g) = 108$, $Q(g) = 2$ and $C(g) = 0$. This means $g in Y_2$.



For other $f in Y_2$, it is easy to see $eta = f - g in Y_0$. We can decompose $P(f)$ as follows



$$P(f) = int_0^1 (g'(x)+eta'(x))^2 dx = int_0^1 (g'(x)^2 + eta'(x)^2 + 2g'(x)eta'(x)) dx$$
Let us look at the cross term. Integrate by part and using the fact $g'(0) = g'(1) = 0$, we find



$$begin{align}int_0^1 g'(x)eta'(x) dx
&= [ g'(x) eta(x) ]_0^1 - int_0^1 g''(x)eta(x) dx\
&= 54 int_0^1 eta(x) dx - 162int_{1/3}^{2/3}eta(x)dx\
&= 54 Q(eta) - 162 C(eta)
end{align}
$$

Since $eta in Y_0$, $Q(eta) = C(eta) = 0$ and the cross term goes away. As a result,



$$P(f) = P(g) + P(eta) ge P(g)$$
because $P(eta)$ is non-negative. Together with $Q(f) = Q(g) = 2$, we get



$$frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} ge frac{P(g)}{Q(g)^2} = frac{108}{2^2} = 27$$



As a result,



$$minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in X, C(f) = 0 right} =
minleft{ frac{P(f)}{Q(f)^2} : f in Y_2 right} = 27$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 5 '18 at 23:00

























answered Nov 5 '18 at 20:55









achille huiachille hui

96.1k5132260




96.1k5132260












  • $begingroup$
    Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 6 '18 at 2:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
    $endgroup$
    – achille hui
    Nov 6 '18 at 3:43


















  • $begingroup$
    Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
    $endgroup$
    – Legend Killer
    Nov 6 '18 at 2:40








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
    $endgroup$
    – achille hui
    Nov 6 '18 at 3:43
















$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40






$begingroup$
Did the Lagrange Euler equation force you to the fact that $f''(x)$ is a constant?Moreover $f$ may not be double differentiable
$endgroup$
– Legend Killer
Nov 6 '18 at 2:40






1




1




$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43




$begingroup$
@LegendKiller within the framework, it does force local extremum of the ratio to has piecewise constant $f''$. However, there are loopholes, e.g. the actual $f$ may not be doubly differentiable or what one get is only a local extremum. That's why after EL tell you what the minimum "should" be, one need to verify it is indeed the correct answer.
$endgroup$
– achille hui
Nov 6 '18 at 3:43


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2985972%2fintegral-inequality-with-a-strange-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa