Is this function continuous everywhere or at 1 point only?












2












$begingroup$


Problem:



let $f:[0,1]rightarrow R$ be defined by
$f(x) = left{
begin{array}{lr}
2x-1 & : x notin mathbb{Q}\
x^2 & : x in mathbb{Q}
end{array}
right.$



Determine the points where $f$ is continuous



Solution:



I think this is continuous either everywhere or only at $x=1$.



Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $x$ contains both irrational and rational numbers.



thus there are only 3 cases:





  1. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, ynotin Q$


  2. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, yin Q$


  3. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xnotin Q, ynotin Q$


In each of these cases we have :



$|2x-1-x^2|=|(-x+1)(x-1)|\
|x^2-x^2|=|0|\
|2x-1-(2x-1)|=|0|$



Since any ball around any $x$ contains both rationals and irrationals, we have to look at case $1$. In this case, $forall x,y in B_delta(x)$, if $x=1$ then this is continuous, because $forall epsilon >0$, $|f(x)-f(y)|rightarrow |0|=0 < epsilon$



But is it continuous everywhere? Because this function, $|-x^2+2x-1|$ will grow monotonically as a function of $x$. Therefore, for whatever $epsilon$, cant one find a $delta$ where $|-x^2+2x-1|<epsilon$ if $|x-y|<delta$



Choose $x^2<epsilon$, so am I right that it is continuous everywhere?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Problem:



    let $f:[0,1]rightarrow R$ be defined by
    $f(x) = left{
    begin{array}{lr}
    2x-1 & : x notin mathbb{Q}\
    x^2 & : x in mathbb{Q}
    end{array}
    right.$



    Determine the points where $f$ is continuous



    Solution:



    I think this is continuous either everywhere or only at $x=1$.



    Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $x$ contains both irrational and rational numbers.



    thus there are only 3 cases:





    1. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, ynotin Q$


    2. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, yin Q$


    3. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xnotin Q, ynotin Q$


    In each of these cases we have :



    $|2x-1-x^2|=|(-x+1)(x-1)|\
    |x^2-x^2|=|0|\
    |2x-1-(2x-1)|=|0|$



    Since any ball around any $x$ contains both rationals and irrationals, we have to look at case $1$. In this case, $forall x,y in B_delta(x)$, if $x=1$ then this is continuous, because $forall epsilon >0$, $|f(x)-f(y)|rightarrow |0|=0 < epsilon$



    But is it continuous everywhere? Because this function, $|-x^2+2x-1|$ will grow monotonically as a function of $x$. Therefore, for whatever $epsilon$, cant one find a $delta$ where $|-x^2+2x-1|<epsilon$ if $|x-y|<delta$



    Choose $x^2<epsilon$, so am I right that it is continuous everywhere?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Problem:



      let $f:[0,1]rightarrow R$ be defined by
      $f(x) = left{
      begin{array}{lr}
      2x-1 & : x notin mathbb{Q}\
      x^2 & : x in mathbb{Q}
      end{array}
      right.$



      Determine the points where $f$ is continuous



      Solution:



      I think this is continuous either everywhere or only at $x=1$.



      Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $x$ contains both irrational and rational numbers.



      thus there are only 3 cases:





      1. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, ynotin Q$


      2. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, yin Q$


      3. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xnotin Q, ynotin Q$


      In each of these cases we have :



      $|2x-1-x^2|=|(-x+1)(x-1)|\
      |x^2-x^2|=|0|\
      |2x-1-(2x-1)|=|0|$



      Since any ball around any $x$ contains both rationals and irrationals, we have to look at case $1$. In this case, $forall x,y in B_delta(x)$, if $x=1$ then this is continuous, because $forall epsilon >0$, $|f(x)-f(y)|rightarrow |0|=0 < epsilon$



      But is it continuous everywhere? Because this function, $|-x^2+2x-1|$ will grow monotonically as a function of $x$. Therefore, for whatever $epsilon$, cant one find a $delta$ where $|-x^2+2x-1|<epsilon$ if $|x-y|<delta$



      Choose $x^2<epsilon$, so am I right that it is continuous everywhere?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Problem:



      let $f:[0,1]rightarrow R$ be defined by
      $f(x) = left{
      begin{array}{lr}
      2x-1 & : x notin mathbb{Q}\
      x^2 & : x in mathbb{Q}
      end{array}
      right.$



      Determine the points where $f$ is continuous



      Solution:



      I think this is continuous either everywhere or only at $x=1$.



      Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $x$ contains both irrational and rational numbers.



      thus there are only 3 cases:





      1. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, ynotin Q$


      2. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xin Q, yin Q$


      3. $|f(x)-f(y)|$ S.T. $xnotin Q, ynotin Q$


      In each of these cases we have :



      $|2x-1-x^2|=|(-x+1)(x-1)|\
      |x^2-x^2|=|0|\
      |2x-1-(2x-1)|=|0|$



      Since any ball around any $x$ contains both rationals and irrationals, we have to look at case $1$. In this case, $forall x,y in B_delta(x)$, if $x=1$ then this is continuous, because $forall epsilon >0$, $|f(x)-f(y)|rightarrow |0|=0 < epsilon$



      But is it continuous everywhere? Because this function, $|-x^2+2x-1|$ will grow monotonically as a function of $x$. Therefore, for whatever $epsilon$, cant one find a $delta$ where $|-x^2+2x-1|<epsilon$ if $|x-y|<delta$



      Choose $x^2<epsilon$, so am I right that it is continuous everywhere?







      real-analysis continuity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 12 '18 at 6:41









      José Carlos Santos

      163k22131234




      163k22131234










      asked Dec 11 '18 at 22:15









      FrankFrank

      16210




      16210






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          No. That function is continuous at $1$ and only there. If $aneq 1$, $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ because:




          • if $ainmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of irrational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=2a-1neq a^2=f(a)$;

          • if $anotinmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of rational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=a^2neq 2a-1=f(a)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            In addition to the correct answer by José Carlos Santos, let me tell you where you went wrong, so you don't make the same mistake(s) next time.



            Considering the cases is OK, but you are missing case 4: $x not in Q, y in Q$.



            First mistake is that suddenly when you discuss those cases, all traces of $y$ are gone. In case 3, the inequality should have been $|x^2-y^2|<epsilon$, for the other cases that applies similiarly.



            Then, because of your incorrect handling above, cases 2) and 3) become (incorrectly) trivially 'continuous'. But case 1 only is 'small' for $x=1$.



            Then you make the next, bigger mistake: You think you can choose $x$ as you want. That's not true, you started the whole argument with "Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $xldots$". If you now 'choose $x$', whatever you wrote will only be true for that $x$ you chose, and not for any $x$.



            The third mistake is that your choice of $x^2 < epsilon$ is not even correct, as that implies $|x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x-1|$ is very near to $1$, which makes it 'not small'.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035909%2fis-this-function-continuous-everywhere-or-at-1-point-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              No. That function is continuous at $1$ and only there. If $aneq 1$, $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ because:




              • if $ainmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of irrational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=2a-1neq a^2=f(a)$;

              • if $anotinmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of rational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=a^2neq 2a-1=f(a)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                No. That function is continuous at $1$ and only there. If $aneq 1$, $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ because:




                • if $ainmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of irrational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=2a-1neq a^2=f(a)$;

                • if $anotinmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of rational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=a^2neq 2a-1=f(a)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  No. That function is continuous at $1$ and only there. If $aneq 1$, $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ because:




                  • if $ainmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of irrational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=2a-1neq a^2=f(a)$;

                  • if $anotinmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of rational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=a^2neq 2a-1=f(a)$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  No. That function is continuous at $1$ and only there. If $aneq 1$, $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ because:




                  • if $ainmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of irrational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=2a-1neq a^2=f(a)$;

                  • if $anotinmathbb Q$ you take a sequence $(a_n)_{ninmathbb N}$ of rational numbers converging to $a$, and then $lim_{ntoinfty}f(a_n)=a^2neq 2a-1=f(a)$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 11 '18 at 22:19









                  José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                  163k22131234




                  163k22131234























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      In addition to the correct answer by José Carlos Santos, let me tell you where you went wrong, so you don't make the same mistake(s) next time.



                      Considering the cases is OK, but you are missing case 4: $x not in Q, y in Q$.



                      First mistake is that suddenly when you discuss those cases, all traces of $y$ are gone. In case 3, the inequality should have been $|x^2-y^2|<epsilon$, for the other cases that applies similiarly.



                      Then, because of your incorrect handling above, cases 2) and 3) become (incorrectly) trivially 'continuous'. But case 1 only is 'small' for $x=1$.



                      Then you make the next, bigger mistake: You think you can choose $x$ as you want. That's not true, you started the whole argument with "Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $xldots$". If you now 'choose $x$', whatever you wrote will only be true for that $x$ you chose, and not for any $x$.



                      The third mistake is that your choice of $x^2 < epsilon$ is not even correct, as that implies $|x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x-1|$ is very near to $1$, which makes it 'not small'.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        In addition to the correct answer by José Carlos Santos, let me tell you where you went wrong, so you don't make the same mistake(s) next time.



                        Considering the cases is OK, but you are missing case 4: $x not in Q, y in Q$.



                        First mistake is that suddenly when you discuss those cases, all traces of $y$ are gone. In case 3, the inequality should have been $|x^2-y^2|<epsilon$, for the other cases that applies similiarly.



                        Then, because of your incorrect handling above, cases 2) and 3) become (incorrectly) trivially 'continuous'. But case 1 only is 'small' for $x=1$.



                        Then you make the next, bigger mistake: You think you can choose $x$ as you want. That's not true, you started the whole argument with "Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $xldots$". If you now 'choose $x$', whatever you wrote will only be true for that $x$ you chose, and not for any $x$.



                        The third mistake is that your choice of $x^2 < epsilon$ is not even correct, as that implies $|x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x-1|$ is very near to $1$, which makes it 'not small'.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          In addition to the correct answer by José Carlos Santos, let me tell you where you went wrong, so you don't make the same mistake(s) next time.



                          Considering the cases is OK, but you are missing case 4: $x not in Q, y in Q$.



                          First mistake is that suddenly when you discuss those cases, all traces of $y$ are gone. In case 3, the inequality should have been $|x^2-y^2|<epsilon$, for the other cases that applies similiarly.



                          Then, because of your incorrect handling above, cases 2) and 3) become (incorrectly) trivially 'continuous'. But case 1 only is 'small' for $x=1$.



                          Then you make the next, bigger mistake: You think you can choose $x$ as you want. That's not true, you started the whole argument with "Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $xldots$". If you now 'choose $x$', whatever you wrote will only be true for that $x$ you chose, and not for any $x$.



                          The third mistake is that your choice of $x^2 < epsilon$ is not even correct, as that implies $|x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x-1|$ is very near to $1$, which makes it 'not small'.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          In addition to the correct answer by José Carlos Santos, let me tell you where you went wrong, so you don't make the same mistake(s) next time.



                          Considering the cases is OK, but you are missing case 4: $x not in Q, y in Q$.



                          First mistake is that suddenly when you discuss those cases, all traces of $y$ are gone. In case 3, the inequality should have been $|x^2-y^2|<epsilon$, for the other cases that applies similiarly.



                          Then, because of your incorrect handling above, cases 2) and 3) become (incorrectly) trivially 'continuous'. But case 1 only is 'small' for $x=1$.



                          Then you make the next, bigger mistake: You think you can choose $x$ as you want. That's not true, you started the whole argument with "Any ball of radius $delta$ around any point $xldots$". If you now 'choose $x$', whatever you wrote will only be true for that $x$ you chose, and not for any $x$.



                          The third mistake is that your choice of $x^2 < epsilon$ is not even correct, as that implies $|x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x|$ is small, which implies that $|-x^2+2x-1|$ is very near to $1$, which makes it 'not small'.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 12 '18 at 0:03









                          IngixIngix

                          4,457159




                          4,457159






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035909%2fis-this-function-continuous-everywhere-or-at-1-point-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Plaza Victoria

                              In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                              How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...