Connected Lie group for which every connected Lie subgroup is simply connected
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a simply connected Lie group. If $G$ is nilpotent, we know every connected Lie subgroup of $G$ is simply connected by Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. What about the converse? If every connected Lie subgroup $G$ is simply connected, then is $G$ nilpotent? If not, can we classify them?
algebraic-topology lie-groups nilpotent-groups
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a simply connected Lie group. If $G$ is nilpotent, we know every connected Lie subgroup of $G$ is simply connected by Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. What about the converse? If every connected Lie subgroup $G$ is simply connected, then is $G$ nilpotent? If not, can we classify them?
algebraic-topology lie-groups nilpotent-groups
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@user10354138 For simply connected nilpotent Lie group, there is no torus inside it.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a simply connected Lie group. If $G$ is nilpotent, we know every connected Lie subgroup of $G$ is simply connected by Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. What about the converse? If every connected Lie subgroup $G$ is simply connected, then is $G$ nilpotent? If not, can we classify them?
algebraic-topology lie-groups nilpotent-groups
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a simply connected Lie group. If $G$ is nilpotent, we know every connected Lie subgroup of $G$ is simply connected by Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. What about the converse? If every connected Lie subgroup $G$ is simply connected, then is $G$ nilpotent? If not, can we classify them?
algebraic-topology lie-groups nilpotent-groups
algebraic-topology lie-groups nilpotent-groups
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
asked Dec 18 '18 at 6:13
zzyzzy
2,6431420
2,6431420
$begingroup$
@user10354138 For simply connected nilpotent Lie group, there is no torus inside it.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@user10354138 For simply connected nilpotent Lie group, there is no torus inside it.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:19
$begingroup$
@user10354138 For simply connected nilpotent Lie group, there is no torus inside it.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:19
$begingroup$
@user10354138 For simply connected nilpotent Lie group, there is no torus inside it.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the group of matrices $pmatrix{a &bcr 0&c}, a,c>0$ every connected subgroup of this group is simply connected but this group is solvable and not nilpotent.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is there any classification? Must it be solvable? And you use that $mathbb R_{>0}$ is simply connected which does not appear over $mathbb C$.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 16:15
$begingroup$
I believe that all connected subgroups of the universal cover of $Sl(2,mathbb{R})$ are simply connected.
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
How do you see that?
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 19 '18 at 23:35
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044837%2fconnected-lie-group-for-which-every-connected-lie-subgroup-is-simply-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Consider the group of matrices $pmatrix{a &bcr 0&c}, a,c>0$ every connected subgroup of this group is simply connected but this group is solvable and not nilpotent.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is there any classification? Must it be solvable? And you use that $mathbb R_{>0}$ is simply connected which does not appear over $mathbb C$.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 16:15
$begingroup$
I believe that all connected subgroups of the universal cover of $Sl(2,mathbb{R})$ are simply connected.
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
How do you see that?
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 19 '18 at 23:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the group of matrices $pmatrix{a &bcr 0&c}, a,c>0$ every connected subgroup of this group is simply connected but this group is solvable and not nilpotent.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is there any classification? Must it be solvable? And you use that $mathbb R_{>0}$ is simply connected which does not appear over $mathbb C$.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 16:15
$begingroup$
I believe that all connected subgroups of the universal cover of $Sl(2,mathbb{R})$ are simply connected.
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
How do you see that?
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 19 '18 at 23:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the group of matrices $pmatrix{a &bcr 0&c}, a,c>0$ every connected subgroup of this group is simply connected but this group is solvable and not nilpotent.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
$endgroup$
Consider the group of matrices $pmatrix{a &bcr 0&c}, a,c>0$ every connected subgroup of this group is simply connected but this group is solvable and not nilpotent.
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
edited Dec 18 '18 at 9:34
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
answered Dec 18 '18 at 9:26
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
59.8k11446
59.8k11446
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is there any classification? Must it be solvable? And you use that $mathbb R_{>0}$ is simply connected which does not appear over $mathbb C$.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 16:15
$begingroup$
I believe that all connected subgroups of the universal cover of $Sl(2,mathbb{R})$ are simply connected.
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
How do you see that?
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 19 '18 at 23:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is there any classification? Must it be solvable? And you use that $mathbb R_{>0}$ is simply connected which does not appear over $mathbb C$.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 16:15
$begingroup$
I believe that all connected subgroups of the universal cover of $Sl(2,mathbb{R})$ are simply connected.
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
How do you see that?
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 19 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is there any classification? Must it be solvable? And you use that $mathbb R_{>0}$ is simply connected which does not appear over $mathbb C$.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 16:15
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is there any classification? Must it be solvable? And you use that $mathbb R_{>0}$ is simply connected which does not appear over $mathbb C$.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 16:15
$begingroup$
I believe that all connected subgroups of the universal cover of $Sl(2,mathbb{R})$ are simply connected.
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
I believe that all connected subgroups of the universal cover of $Sl(2,mathbb{R})$ are simply connected.
$endgroup$
– Tsemo Aristide
Dec 18 '18 at 18:31
$begingroup$
How do you see that?
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 19 '18 at 23:35
$begingroup$
How do you see that?
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 19 '18 at 23:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044837%2fconnected-lie-group-for-which-every-connected-lie-subgroup-is-simply-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@user10354138 For simply connected nilpotent Lie group, there is no torus inside it.
$endgroup$
– zzy
Dec 18 '18 at 6:19