Derivation of the Riemannian metric tensor












3












$begingroup$


Firstly, I would like to say that I didn't do a course in Riemannian geometry, so my doubt is probably something that is not clear for me from the basis of the Riemannian geometry, which I'm self-studying.



I'm reading Interior estimates for hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature and I'm trying understand the statement:



"Now note that $nabla u = omega - langle nu , omega rangle$ and $nabla (|textbf{x}|^2 - u^2) = 2(textbf{x} - langle textbf{x} , nu rangle nu - u nabla u)$",



where $M$ is an hypersurface of dimension $n$ which evolves under Mean Curvature Flow by the immersion $F: M times [0,T) longrightarrow mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $textbf{x} = F(p,t)$, $u := langle textbf{x} , omega rangle$, $nu$ is the normal unit vector and $omega$ is a fixed vector on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ such that $langle omega, nu rangle > 0$.



First, I think the authors wanted to write $nabla u = omega - langle nu, omega rangle nu$, i.e., $nabla u$ it's the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$.



I tried compute $nabla u$ and I found $nabla u = langle nabla textbf{x}, omega rangle$, which is the length of the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$. I did this computation by the fact that $u$ is a function defined on $M$, by the compatibility of the tensor metric, but I found some problems because my computation of $nabla u$ doesn't match with the computation of $nabla u$ did by the authors and the other problem is that the compatibility of the tensor metric it's relationed with the derivation of a function along to a vector field by relation



$$nabla_X langle Y,Z rangle = X langle Y,Z rangle = langle nabla_X Y,Z rangle + langle Y, nabla_X Z rangle,$$



but I don't have explicitly along what vector field $u$ is being differentiated. I think this vector field defined on $M$ is arbitrary and this explain why the direction was omitted in the differentiation of $u$. I had these same problems when I tried compute $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$ by an analagous argument.



I would like to know how compute $nabla u$ and $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$. Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Firstly, I would like to say that I didn't do a course in Riemannian geometry, so my doubt is probably something that is not clear for me from the basis of the Riemannian geometry, which I'm self-studying.



    I'm reading Interior estimates for hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature and I'm trying understand the statement:



    "Now note that $nabla u = omega - langle nu , omega rangle$ and $nabla (|textbf{x}|^2 - u^2) = 2(textbf{x} - langle textbf{x} , nu rangle nu - u nabla u)$",



    where $M$ is an hypersurface of dimension $n$ which evolves under Mean Curvature Flow by the immersion $F: M times [0,T) longrightarrow mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $textbf{x} = F(p,t)$, $u := langle textbf{x} , omega rangle$, $nu$ is the normal unit vector and $omega$ is a fixed vector on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ such that $langle omega, nu rangle > 0$.



    First, I think the authors wanted to write $nabla u = omega - langle nu, omega rangle nu$, i.e., $nabla u$ it's the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$.



    I tried compute $nabla u$ and I found $nabla u = langle nabla textbf{x}, omega rangle$, which is the length of the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$. I did this computation by the fact that $u$ is a function defined on $M$, by the compatibility of the tensor metric, but I found some problems because my computation of $nabla u$ doesn't match with the computation of $nabla u$ did by the authors and the other problem is that the compatibility of the tensor metric it's relationed with the derivation of a function along to a vector field by relation



    $$nabla_X langle Y,Z rangle = X langle Y,Z rangle = langle nabla_X Y,Z rangle + langle Y, nabla_X Z rangle,$$



    but I don't have explicitly along what vector field $u$ is being differentiated. I think this vector field defined on $M$ is arbitrary and this explain why the direction was omitted in the differentiation of $u$. I had these same problems when I tried compute $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$ by an analagous argument.



    I would like to know how compute $nabla u$ and $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$. Thanks in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Firstly, I would like to say that I didn't do a course in Riemannian geometry, so my doubt is probably something that is not clear for me from the basis of the Riemannian geometry, which I'm self-studying.



      I'm reading Interior estimates for hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature and I'm trying understand the statement:



      "Now note that $nabla u = omega - langle nu , omega rangle$ and $nabla (|textbf{x}|^2 - u^2) = 2(textbf{x} - langle textbf{x} , nu rangle nu - u nabla u)$",



      where $M$ is an hypersurface of dimension $n$ which evolves under Mean Curvature Flow by the immersion $F: M times [0,T) longrightarrow mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $textbf{x} = F(p,t)$, $u := langle textbf{x} , omega rangle$, $nu$ is the normal unit vector and $omega$ is a fixed vector on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ such that $langle omega, nu rangle > 0$.



      First, I think the authors wanted to write $nabla u = omega - langle nu, omega rangle nu$, i.e., $nabla u$ it's the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$.



      I tried compute $nabla u$ and I found $nabla u = langle nabla textbf{x}, omega rangle$, which is the length of the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$. I did this computation by the fact that $u$ is a function defined on $M$, by the compatibility of the tensor metric, but I found some problems because my computation of $nabla u$ doesn't match with the computation of $nabla u$ did by the authors and the other problem is that the compatibility of the tensor metric it's relationed with the derivation of a function along to a vector field by relation



      $$nabla_X langle Y,Z rangle = X langle Y,Z rangle = langle nabla_X Y,Z rangle + langle Y, nabla_X Z rangle,$$



      but I don't have explicitly along what vector field $u$ is being differentiated. I think this vector field defined on $M$ is arbitrary and this explain why the direction was omitted in the differentiation of $u$. I had these same problems when I tried compute $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$ by an analagous argument.



      I would like to know how compute $nabla u$ and $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$. Thanks in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Firstly, I would like to say that I didn't do a course in Riemannian geometry, so my doubt is probably something that is not clear for me from the basis of the Riemannian geometry, which I'm self-studying.



      I'm reading Interior estimates for hypersurfaces moving by mean curvature and I'm trying understand the statement:



      "Now note that $nabla u = omega - langle nu , omega rangle$ and $nabla (|textbf{x}|^2 - u^2) = 2(textbf{x} - langle textbf{x} , nu rangle nu - u nabla u)$",



      where $M$ is an hypersurface of dimension $n$ which evolves under Mean Curvature Flow by the immersion $F: M times [0,T) longrightarrow mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, $textbf{x} = F(p,t)$, $u := langle textbf{x} , omega rangle$, $nu$ is the normal unit vector and $omega$ is a fixed vector on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ such that $langle omega, nu rangle > 0$.



      First, I think the authors wanted to write $nabla u = omega - langle nu, omega rangle nu$, i.e., $nabla u$ it's the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$.



      I tried compute $nabla u$ and I found $nabla u = langle nabla textbf{x}, omega rangle$, which is the length of the projection of $omega$ on tangent space of $M$. I did this computation by the fact that $u$ is a function defined on $M$, by the compatibility of the tensor metric, but I found some problems because my computation of $nabla u$ doesn't match with the computation of $nabla u$ did by the authors and the other problem is that the compatibility of the tensor metric it's relationed with the derivation of a function along to a vector field by relation



      $$nabla_X langle Y,Z rangle = X langle Y,Z rangle = langle nabla_X Y,Z rangle + langle Y, nabla_X Z rangle,$$



      but I don't have explicitly along what vector field $u$ is being differentiated. I think this vector field defined on $M$ is arbitrary and this explain why the direction was omitted in the differentiation of $u$. I had these same problems when I tried compute $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$ by an analagous argument.



      I would like to know how compute $nabla u$ and $nabla |textbf{x}|^2$. Thanks in advance!







      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 18 '18 at 19:46









      GeorgeGeorge

      850615




      850615






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045611%2fderivation-of-the-riemannian-metric-tensor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045611%2fderivation-of-the-riemannian-metric-tensor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...