Number of points in the fibers of étale morphisms.












1












$begingroup$


Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:



Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale

covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.



The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.



My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?



$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.



thanks










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:36












  • $begingroup$
    @jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
    $endgroup$
    – Manoel
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:59
















1












$begingroup$


Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:



Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale

covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.



The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.



My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?



$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.



thanks










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:36












  • $begingroup$
    @jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
    $endgroup$
    – Manoel
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:59














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:



Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale

covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.



The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.



My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?



$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.



thanks










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Consider the following theorem$^{*}$:



Theorem of conservation of number: Suppose $f:X longrightarrow Y$ is an étale

covering, and $Y$ is connected. Then the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$.



The way of proof is that locally on $Y$, the variety $X$
can be defined in $mathbb{A}^1 times Y$ by one equation, say $T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$,
where the $a_i in K[Y]$. Now, since $f$ is étale, all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them.



My question is why all the roots of the equation
$T^m + a_1T^{m-1} + ... + a_m = 0$ are simple, and there are precisely $m$ of
them $Longrightarrow$ the number of points in a fibre $f^{-1}(y)$ is
independent of $y in Y$? How to connect the simple $m$ roots of the equation with the number of points in a fiber?



$^*$Algebraic Geometry I - Algebraic Curves - Algebraic Manifolds and Schemes (I. R. Shafarevich). Section 5.5.



thanks







algebraic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 18 '18 at 19:08









ManoelManoel

930518




930518








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:36












  • $begingroup$
    @jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
    $endgroup$
    – Manoel
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:59














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
    $endgroup$
    – jgon
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:36












  • $begingroup$
    @jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
    $endgroup$
    – Manoel
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:59








1




1




$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36






$begingroup$
A repeated root should result in ramification of the cover, so the map wouldn't be etale. Also the solutions of the equation are the points in the preimage, which is why the number of roots is the number of points in the fibre.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 19 '18 at 15:36














$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59




$begingroup$
@jgon, Do you know where I can find proof of this fact, a reference?
$endgroup$
– Manoel
Dec 20 '18 at 1:59










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045564%2fnumber-of-points-in-the-fibers-of-%25c3%25a9tale-morphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3045564%2fnumber-of-points-in-the-fibers-of-%25c3%25a9tale-morphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...