How does the secondary effect of the Heat Metal spell interact with a creature resistant/immune to fire...





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







7












$begingroup$


This is the description for the spell heat metal:




Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range. You cause the object to glow red-hot. Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell. Until the spell ends, you can use a bonus action on each of your subsequent turns to cause this damage again.



If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it, the creature must succeed on a Constitution saving throw or drop the object if it can. If it doesn’t drop the object, it has disadvantage on attack rolls and ability checks until the start of your next turn.




Emphasis mine



I know that a resistant or immune creature would receive only half or none of the damage from the spell, but I was wondering if the other effect of the spell does work with them.



Mechanically speaking, I didn't find anything that suggests my idea, but logically speaking, I find it feasible that creatures resistant or immune to fire damage should be affected differently by the secondary effect of the spell. I want to know about that.



So, in order to get it clear (RAW/RAI):
Are creatures that are resistant/immune to fire damage affected differently by the heat metal spell? How does the secondary effect of the spell interact with such a creature?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$



















    7












    $begingroup$


    This is the description for the spell heat metal:




    Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range. You cause the object to glow red-hot. Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell. Until the spell ends, you can use a bonus action on each of your subsequent turns to cause this damage again.



    If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it, the creature must succeed on a Constitution saving throw or drop the object if it can. If it doesn’t drop the object, it has disadvantage on attack rolls and ability checks until the start of your next turn.




    Emphasis mine



    I know that a resistant or immune creature would receive only half or none of the damage from the spell, but I was wondering if the other effect of the spell does work with them.



    Mechanically speaking, I didn't find anything that suggests my idea, but logically speaking, I find it feasible that creatures resistant or immune to fire damage should be affected differently by the secondary effect of the spell. I want to know about that.



    So, in order to get it clear (RAW/RAI):
    Are creatures that are resistant/immune to fire damage affected differently by the heat metal spell? How does the secondary effect of the spell interact with such a creature?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$


      This is the description for the spell heat metal:




      Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range. You cause the object to glow red-hot. Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell. Until the spell ends, you can use a bonus action on each of your subsequent turns to cause this damage again.



      If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it, the creature must succeed on a Constitution saving throw or drop the object if it can. If it doesn’t drop the object, it has disadvantage on attack rolls and ability checks until the start of your next turn.




      Emphasis mine



      I know that a resistant or immune creature would receive only half or none of the damage from the spell, but I was wondering if the other effect of the spell does work with them.



      Mechanically speaking, I didn't find anything that suggests my idea, but logically speaking, I find it feasible that creatures resistant or immune to fire damage should be affected differently by the secondary effect of the spell. I want to know about that.



      So, in order to get it clear (RAW/RAI):
      Are creatures that are resistant/immune to fire damage affected differently by the heat metal spell? How does the secondary effect of the spell interact with such a creature?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      This is the description for the spell heat metal:




      Choose a manufactured metal object, such as a metal weapon or a suit of heavy or medium metal armor, that you can see within range. You cause the object to glow red-hot. Any creature in physical contact with the object takes 2d8 fire damage when you cast the spell. Until the spell ends, you can use a bonus action on each of your subsequent turns to cause this damage again.



      If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it, the creature must succeed on a Constitution saving throw or drop the object if it can. If it doesn’t drop the object, it has disadvantage on attack rolls and ability checks until the start of your next turn.




      Emphasis mine



      I know that a resistant or immune creature would receive only half or none of the damage from the spell, but I was wondering if the other effect of the spell does work with them.



      Mechanically speaking, I didn't find anything that suggests my idea, but logically speaking, I find it feasible that creatures resistant or immune to fire damage should be affected differently by the secondary effect of the spell. I want to know about that.



      So, in order to get it clear (RAW/RAI):
      Are creatures that are resistant/immune to fire damage affected differently by the heat metal spell? How does the secondary effect of the spell interact with such a creature?







      dnd-5e spells damage damage-resistance immunities






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 19 at 2:38









      V2Blast

      27.7k598169




      27.7k598169










      asked Apr 19 at 1:34









      Ender LookEnder Look

      1,2661835




      1,2661835






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          20












          $begingroup$

          The secondary effect happens only if the creature takes damage from the spell



          The beginning of the second paragraph specifies exactly when it applies:




          If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




          Applying RAW is straightforward: if the creature is immune to fire damage, it takes no damage and is not subject to any of the effects in this paragraph. If it is only resistant, it still takes damage and is subject to the effects as normal, even if you roll a 2 for the damage and the resistant creature takes only a single point of fire damage. As for rules as intended, I can't really speculate on that, but it wouldn't surprise me if a DM decided to use a house rule of giving a fire-resistant creature advantage on the saving throw to avoid dropping the object.



          Note that any other effect that prevents the creature from taking any fire damage would also save them from the secondary effects. For example, an Abjuration wizard with their Arcane Ward active might be able to hold on to the object for several rounds without suffering any ill effects, because their arcane ward will take the damage instead of them.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Just as an interesting sub-question to this - if the creature was wearing armour and were to grapple you, would you take the 2d8 damage?
            $endgroup$
            – Paul
            Apr 20 at 8:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Paul I'd say that's a completely different question. You should ask it if you're interested in an answer (but check for duplicates first).
            $endgroup$
            – Ryan Thompson
            Apr 20 at 14:09












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145447%2fhow-does-the-secondary-effect-of-the-heat-metal-spell-interact-with-a-creature-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          20












          $begingroup$

          The secondary effect happens only if the creature takes damage from the spell



          The beginning of the second paragraph specifies exactly when it applies:




          If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




          Applying RAW is straightforward: if the creature is immune to fire damage, it takes no damage and is not subject to any of the effects in this paragraph. If it is only resistant, it still takes damage and is subject to the effects as normal, even if you roll a 2 for the damage and the resistant creature takes only a single point of fire damage. As for rules as intended, I can't really speculate on that, but it wouldn't surprise me if a DM decided to use a house rule of giving a fire-resistant creature advantage on the saving throw to avoid dropping the object.



          Note that any other effect that prevents the creature from taking any fire damage would also save them from the secondary effects. For example, an Abjuration wizard with their Arcane Ward active might be able to hold on to the object for several rounds without suffering any ill effects, because their arcane ward will take the damage instead of them.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Just as an interesting sub-question to this - if the creature was wearing armour and were to grapple you, would you take the 2d8 damage?
            $endgroup$
            – Paul
            Apr 20 at 8:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Paul I'd say that's a completely different question. You should ask it if you're interested in an answer (but check for duplicates first).
            $endgroup$
            – Ryan Thompson
            Apr 20 at 14:09
















          20












          $begingroup$

          The secondary effect happens only if the creature takes damage from the spell



          The beginning of the second paragraph specifies exactly when it applies:




          If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




          Applying RAW is straightforward: if the creature is immune to fire damage, it takes no damage and is not subject to any of the effects in this paragraph. If it is only resistant, it still takes damage and is subject to the effects as normal, even if you roll a 2 for the damage and the resistant creature takes only a single point of fire damage. As for rules as intended, I can't really speculate on that, but it wouldn't surprise me if a DM decided to use a house rule of giving a fire-resistant creature advantage on the saving throw to avoid dropping the object.



          Note that any other effect that prevents the creature from taking any fire damage would also save them from the secondary effects. For example, an Abjuration wizard with their Arcane Ward active might be able to hold on to the object for several rounds without suffering any ill effects, because their arcane ward will take the damage instead of them.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Just as an interesting sub-question to this - if the creature was wearing armour and were to grapple you, would you take the 2d8 damage?
            $endgroup$
            – Paul
            Apr 20 at 8:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Paul I'd say that's a completely different question. You should ask it if you're interested in an answer (but check for duplicates first).
            $endgroup$
            – Ryan Thompson
            Apr 20 at 14:09














          20












          20








          20





          $begingroup$

          The secondary effect happens only if the creature takes damage from the spell



          The beginning of the second paragraph specifies exactly when it applies:




          If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




          Applying RAW is straightforward: if the creature is immune to fire damage, it takes no damage and is not subject to any of the effects in this paragraph. If it is only resistant, it still takes damage and is subject to the effects as normal, even if you roll a 2 for the damage and the resistant creature takes only a single point of fire damage. As for rules as intended, I can't really speculate on that, but it wouldn't surprise me if a DM decided to use a house rule of giving a fire-resistant creature advantage on the saving throw to avoid dropping the object.



          Note that any other effect that prevents the creature from taking any fire damage would also save them from the secondary effects. For example, an Abjuration wizard with their Arcane Ward active might be able to hold on to the object for several rounds without suffering any ill effects, because their arcane ward will take the damage instead of them.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The secondary effect happens only if the creature takes damage from the spell



          The beginning of the second paragraph specifies exactly when it applies:




          If a creature is holding or wearing the object and takes the damage from it




          Applying RAW is straightforward: if the creature is immune to fire damage, it takes no damage and is not subject to any of the effects in this paragraph. If it is only resistant, it still takes damage and is subject to the effects as normal, even if you roll a 2 for the damage and the resistant creature takes only a single point of fire damage. As for rules as intended, I can't really speculate on that, but it wouldn't surprise me if a DM decided to use a house rule of giving a fire-resistant creature advantage on the saving throw to avoid dropping the object.



          Note that any other effect that prevents the creature from taking any fire damage would also save them from the secondary effects. For example, an Abjuration wizard with their Arcane Ward active might be able to hold on to the object for several rounds without suffering any ill effects, because their arcane ward will take the damage instead of them.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 19 at 2:38

























          answered Apr 19 at 2:32









          Ryan ThompsonRyan Thompson

          12.3k24292




          12.3k24292












          • $begingroup$
            Just as an interesting sub-question to this - if the creature was wearing armour and were to grapple you, would you take the 2d8 damage?
            $endgroup$
            – Paul
            Apr 20 at 8:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Paul I'd say that's a completely different question. You should ask it if you're interested in an answer (but check for duplicates first).
            $endgroup$
            – Ryan Thompson
            Apr 20 at 14:09


















          • $begingroup$
            Just as an interesting sub-question to this - if the creature was wearing armour and were to grapple you, would you take the 2d8 damage?
            $endgroup$
            – Paul
            Apr 20 at 8:38










          • $begingroup$
            @Paul I'd say that's a completely different question. You should ask it if you're interested in an answer (but check for duplicates first).
            $endgroup$
            – Ryan Thompson
            Apr 20 at 14:09
















          $begingroup$
          Just as an interesting sub-question to this - if the creature was wearing armour and were to grapple you, would you take the 2d8 damage?
          $endgroup$
          – Paul
          Apr 20 at 8:38




          $begingroup$
          Just as an interesting sub-question to this - if the creature was wearing armour and were to grapple you, would you take the 2d8 damage?
          $endgroup$
          – Paul
          Apr 20 at 8:38












          $begingroup$
          @Paul I'd say that's a completely different question. You should ask it if you're interested in an answer (but check for duplicates first).
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 20 at 14:09




          $begingroup$
          @Paul I'd say that's a completely different question. You should ask it if you're interested in an answer (but check for duplicates first).
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 20 at 14:09


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145447%2fhow-does-the-secondary-effect-of-the-heat-metal-spell-interact-with-a-creature-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Brian Clough

          Cáceres