If $f_x$ is $T$-measurable, $f^y$ is $S$-measurable, is $f$ $(Stimes T)$-measurable?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Rudin's Real & Complex Analysis Theorem 8.5 states



Let $f$ be an $(Stimes T)$-measurable function on $X times Y$. Then:



a) $forall xin X, f_x $ is $T$-measurable function;



b) $forall yin Y, f^y $ is $S$-measurable function



where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$, $f^y(x)=f(x,y)$.



This statement is simple and nice. I am thinking about is inverse also true? That is, if $f_x$ is $T$-measurable, $f^y$ is $S$-measurable, then $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.
Or we need some more strong condition on $f_x$ and $f^y$ to show $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Rudin's Real & Complex Analysis Theorem 8.5 states



    Let $f$ be an $(Stimes T)$-measurable function on $X times Y$. Then:



    a) $forall xin X, f_x $ is $T$-measurable function;



    b) $forall yin Y, f^y $ is $S$-measurable function



    where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$, $f^y(x)=f(x,y)$.



    This statement is simple and nice. I am thinking about is inverse also true? That is, if $f_x$ is $T$-measurable, $f^y$ is $S$-measurable, then $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.
    Or we need some more strong condition on $f_x$ and $f^y$ to show $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Rudin's Real & Complex Analysis Theorem 8.5 states



      Let $f$ be an $(Stimes T)$-measurable function on $X times Y$. Then:



      a) $forall xin X, f_x $ is $T$-measurable function;



      b) $forall yin Y, f^y $ is $S$-measurable function



      where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$, $f^y(x)=f(x,y)$.



      This statement is simple and nice. I am thinking about is inverse also true? That is, if $f_x$ is $T$-measurable, $f^y$ is $S$-measurable, then $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.
      Or we need some more strong condition on $f_x$ and $f^y$ to show $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Rudin's Real & Complex Analysis Theorem 8.5 states



      Let $f$ be an $(Stimes T)$-measurable function on $X times Y$. Then:



      a) $forall xin X, f_x $ is $T$-measurable function;



      b) $forall yin Y, f^y $ is $S$-measurable function



      where $f_x(y) = f(x,y)$, $f^y(x)=f(x,y)$.



      This statement is simple and nice. I am thinking about is inverse also true? That is, if $f_x$ is $T$-measurable, $f^y$ is $S$-measurable, then $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.
      Or we need some more strong condition on $f_x$ and $f^y$ to show $f$ is $(Stimes T)$-measurable.







      real-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 at 4:08

























      asked Nov 15 at 4:02









      Awoo

      448




      448






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          The inverse statement is false. Let $E$ be a Vitali-set, definie $f(x,y) = 1_{E times E}(x,y)$. Then $f^x(y) = 1$ if $x=y$ and $y in E$, otherwise zero. Thus Borel-measurable, but $f$ is not!



          We need, in fact, stronger condtions:





          1. $S$ is a separable metric space.


          2. $x mapsto f(x,y)$ is continuous for all $y in T$.


          3. $y mapsto f(x,y)$ is measurable for all $x in S$.


          Then $f$ is measurable. (Proof can be found in many standard books on measure theory.)






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999193%2fif-f-x-is-t-measurable-fy-is-s-measurable-is-f-s-times-t-measur%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            The inverse statement is false. Let $E$ be a Vitali-set, definie $f(x,y) = 1_{E times E}(x,y)$. Then $f^x(y) = 1$ if $x=y$ and $y in E$, otherwise zero. Thus Borel-measurable, but $f$ is not!



            We need, in fact, stronger condtions:





            1. $S$ is a separable metric space.


            2. $x mapsto f(x,y)$ is continuous for all $y in T$.


            3. $y mapsto f(x,y)$ is measurable for all $x in S$.


            Then $f$ is measurable. (Proof can be found in many standard books on measure theory.)






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              The inverse statement is false. Let $E$ be a Vitali-set, definie $f(x,y) = 1_{E times E}(x,y)$. Then $f^x(y) = 1$ if $x=y$ and $y in E$, otherwise zero. Thus Borel-measurable, but $f$ is not!



              We need, in fact, stronger condtions:





              1. $S$ is a separable metric space.


              2. $x mapsto f(x,y)$ is continuous for all $y in T$.


              3. $y mapsto f(x,y)$ is measurable for all $x in S$.


              Then $f$ is measurable. (Proof can be found in many standard books on measure theory.)






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                The inverse statement is false. Let $E$ be a Vitali-set, definie $f(x,y) = 1_{E times E}(x,y)$. Then $f^x(y) = 1$ if $x=y$ and $y in E$, otherwise zero. Thus Borel-measurable, but $f$ is not!



                We need, in fact, stronger condtions:





                1. $S$ is a separable metric space.


                2. $x mapsto f(x,y)$ is continuous for all $y in T$.


                3. $y mapsto f(x,y)$ is measurable for all $x in S$.


                Then $f$ is measurable. (Proof can be found in many standard books on measure theory.)






                share|cite|improve this answer














                The inverse statement is false. Let $E$ be a Vitali-set, definie $f(x,y) = 1_{E times E}(x,y)$. Then $f^x(y) = 1$ if $x=y$ and $y in E$, otherwise zero. Thus Borel-measurable, but $f$ is not!



                We need, in fact, stronger condtions:





                1. $S$ is a separable metric space.


                2. $x mapsto f(x,y)$ is continuous for all $y in T$.


                3. $y mapsto f(x,y)$ is measurable for all $x in S$.


                Then $f$ is measurable. (Proof can be found in many standard books on measure theory.)







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 15 at 19:52

























                answered Nov 15 at 10:36









                p4sch

                3,665216




                3,665216






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999193%2fif-f-x-is-t-measurable-fy-is-s-measurable-is-f-s-times-t-measur%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...