How many mmcblk devices is normal?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Why so many mmcblk devices?



/dev/block/mmcblk0
/dev/block/mmcblk0boot0
/dev/block/mmcblk0boot1
/dev/block/mmcblk0p1
/dev/block/mmcblk0p10
/dev/block/mmcblk0p11
/dev/block/mmcblk0p12
/dev/block/mmcblk0p13
/dev/block/mmcblk0p14
/dev/block/mmcblk0p15
/dev/block/mmcblk0p16
/dev/block/mmcblk0p17
/dev/block/mmcblk0p18
/dev/block/mmcblk0p19
/dev/block/mmcblk0p2
/dev/block/mmcblk0p20
/dev/block/mmcblk0p21
/dev/block/mmcblk0p3
/dev/block/mmcblk0p4
/dev/block/mmcblk0p5
/dev/block/mmcblk0p6
/dev/block/mmcblk0p7
/dev/block/mmcblk0p8
/dev/block/mmcblk0p9
/dev/block/mmcblk0rpmb


What is the normal amount of mmcblk devices? I'm having problems booting and I'm wondering if this kind of formatting is normal or not?



When I boot up under TWRP, and adb in. After I run mount -a, I get



/dev/block/mmcblk0p19 on /cache type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
/dev/block/mmcblk0p21 on /data type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
/dev/block/mmcblk0p20 on /system type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime)
/dev/block/mmcblk0p16 on /preload type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)


That only explains four of them though.










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Why so many mmcblk devices?



    /dev/block/mmcblk0
    /dev/block/mmcblk0boot0
    /dev/block/mmcblk0boot1
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p1
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p10
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p11
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p12
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p13
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p14
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p15
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p16
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p17
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p18
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p19
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p2
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p20
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p21
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p3
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p4
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p5
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p6
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p7
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p8
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p9
    /dev/block/mmcblk0rpmb


    What is the normal amount of mmcblk devices? I'm having problems booting and I'm wondering if this kind of formatting is normal or not?



    When I boot up under TWRP, and adb in. After I run mount -a, I get



    /dev/block/mmcblk0p19 on /cache type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p21 on /data type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p20 on /system type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime)
    /dev/block/mmcblk0p16 on /preload type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)


    That only explains four of them though.










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Why so many mmcblk devices?



      /dev/block/mmcblk0
      /dev/block/mmcblk0boot0
      /dev/block/mmcblk0boot1
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p1
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p10
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p11
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p12
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p13
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p14
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p15
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p16
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p17
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p18
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p19
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p2
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p20
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p21
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p3
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p4
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p5
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p6
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p7
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p8
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p9
      /dev/block/mmcblk0rpmb


      What is the normal amount of mmcblk devices? I'm having problems booting and I'm wondering if this kind of formatting is normal or not?



      When I boot up under TWRP, and adb in. After I run mount -a, I get



      /dev/block/mmcblk0p19 on /cache type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p21 on /data type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p20 on /system type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime)
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p16 on /preload type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)


      That only explains four of them though.










      share|improve this question















      Why so many mmcblk devices?



      /dev/block/mmcblk0
      /dev/block/mmcblk0boot0
      /dev/block/mmcblk0boot1
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p1
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p10
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p11
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p12
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p13
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p14
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p15
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p16
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p17
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p18
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p19
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p2
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p20
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p21
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p3
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p4
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p5
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p6
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p7
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p8
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p9
      /dev/block/mmcblk0rpmb


      What is the normal amount of mmcblk devices? I'm having problems booting and I'm wondering if this kind of formatting is normal or not?



      When I boot up under TWRP, and adb in. After I run mount -a, I get



      /dev/block/mmcblk0p19 on /cache type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p21 on /data type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p20 on /system type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime)
      /dev/block/mmcblk0p16 on /preload type ext4 (rw,seclabel,relatime,data=ordered)


      That only explains four of them though.







      samsung partitions






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 4 at 5:43

























      asked Dec 4 at 5:38









      Evan Carroll

      1,845112857




      1,845112857






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          There is nothing abnormal in this case. They is only one device in the first preformatted text, which is /dev/block/mmcblk0 (just like /dev/sda in Linux distros). The rest are the partitions within that device (akin to /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 and so on).



          There is no normal limit, not that I came across, for how many partitions a device can have. It depends upon how developers want to design and provide a functionality. E.g. earlier, there used to be one system and boot partition. But recent Android versions started a new normal of setting up additional boot and system partitions for fail-safe measures.



          Also, mount command only shows the partition which are mounted under /. Some partitions are never needed to be mounted, such as ones concerning bootloader, so you won't see them in mount's output.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Great answer, I'll keep digging.
            – Evan Carroll
            Dec 4 at 6:00










          • @EvanCarroll thanks! I think you would find this Q&A helpful. See android.stackexchange.com/q/92565/96277
            – Firelord
            Dec 4 at 6:03






          • 2




            +1. My device mia1 reports 64!
            – beeshyams
            Dec 4 at 6:06











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "139"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fandroid.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204698%2fhow-many-mmcblk-devices-is-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          There is nothing abnormal in this case. They is only one device in the first preformatted text, which is /dev/block/mmcblk0 (just like /dev/sda in Linux distros). The rest are the partitions within that device (akin to /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 and so on).



          There is no normal limit, not that I came across, for how many partitions a device can have. It depends upon how developers want to design and provide a functionality. E.g. earlier, there used to be one system and boot partition. But recent Android versions started a new normal of setting up additional boot and system partitions for fail-safe measures.



          Also, mount command only shows the partition which are mounted under /. Some partitions are never needed to be mounted, such as ones concerning bootloader, so you won't see them in mount's output.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Great answer, I'll keep digging.
            – Evan Carroll
            Dec 4 at 6:00










          • @EvanCarroll thanks! I think you would find this Q&A helpful. See android.stackexchange.com/q/92565/96277
            – Firelord
            Dec 4 at 6:03






          • 2




            +1. My device mia1 reports 64!
            – beeshyams
            Dec 4 at 6:06















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted










          There is nothing abnormal in this case. They is only one device in the first preformatted text, which is /dev/block/mmcblk0 (just like /dev/sda in Linux distros). The rest are the partitions within that device (akin to /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 and so on).



          There is no normal limit, not that I came across, for how many partitions a device can have. It depends upon how developers want to design and provide a functionality. E.g. earlier, there used to be one system and boot partition. But recent Android versions started a new normal of setting up additional boot and system partitions for fail-safe measures.



          Also, mount command only shows the partition which are mounted under /. Some partitions are never needed to be mounted, such as ones concerning bootloader, so you won't see them in mount's output.






          share|improve this answer





















          • Great answer, I'll keep digging.
            – Evan Carroll
            Dec 4 at 6:00










          • @EvanCarroll thanks! I think you would find this Q&A helpful. See android.stackexchange.com/q/92565/96277
            – Firelord
            Dec 4 at 6:03






          • 2




            +1. My device mia1 reports 64!
            – beeshyams
            Dec 4 at 6:06













          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted






          There is nothing abnormal in this case. They is only one device in the first preformatted text, which is /dev/block/mmcblk0 (just like /dev/sda in Linux distros). The rest are the partitions within that device (akin to /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 and so on).



          There is no normal limit, not that I came across, for how many partitions a device can have. It depends upon how developers want to design and provide a functionality. E.g. earlier, there used to be one system and boot partition. But recent Android versions started a new normal of setting up additional boot and system partitions for fail-safe measures.



          Also, mount command only shows the partition which are mounted under /. Some partitions are never needed to be mounted, such as ones concerning bootloader, so you won't see them in mount's output.






          share|improve this answer












          There is nothing abnormal in this case. They is only one device in the first preformatted text, which is /dev/block/mmcblk0 (just like /dev/sda in Linux distros). The rest are the partitions within that device (akin to /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 and so on).



          There is no normal limit, not that I came across, for how many partitions a device can have. It depends upon how developers want to design and provide a functionality. E.g. earlier, there used to be one system and boot partition. But recent Android versions started a new normal of setting up additional boot and system partitions for fail-safe measures.



          Also, mount command only shows the partition which are mounted under /. Some partitions are never needed to be mounted, such as ones concerning bootloader, so you won't see them in mount's output.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 4 at 5:58









          Firelord

          16.9k1170177




          16.9k1170177












          • Great answer, I'll keep digging.
            – Evan Carroll
            Dec 4 at 6:00










          • @EvanCarroll thanks! I think you would find this Q&A helpful. See android.stackexchange.com/q/92565/96277
            – Firelord
            Dec 4 at 6:03






          • 2




            +1. My device mia1 reports 64!
            – beeshyams
            Dec 4 at 6:06


















          • Great answer, I'll keep digging.
            – Evan Carroll
            Dec 4 at 6:00










          • @EvanCarroll thanks! I think you would find this Q&A helpful. See android.stackexchange.com/q/92565/96277
            – Firelord
            Dec 4 at 6:03






          • 2




            +1. My device mia1 reports 64!
            – beeshyams
            Dec 4 at 6:06
















          Great answer, I'll keep digging.
          – Evan Carroll
          Dec 4 at 6:00




          Great answer, I'll keep digging.
          – Evan Carroll
          Dec 4 at 6:00












          @EvanCarroll thanks! I think you would find this Q&A helpful. See android.stackexchange.com/q/92565/96277
          – Firelord
          Dec 4 at 6:03




          @EvanCarroll thanks! I think you would find this Q&A helpful. See android.stackexchange.com/q/92565/96277
          – Firelord
          Dec 4 at 6:03




          2




          2




          +1. My device mia1 reports 64!
          – beeshyams
          Dec 4 at 6:06




          +1. My device mia1 reports 64!
          – beeshyams
          Dec 4 at 6:06


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Android Enthusiasts Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fandroid.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204698%2fhow-many-mmcblk-devices-is-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...