Is the following function convex F(t;C) in C. Where $F(t;C) = {exp({sum_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi tk)} })}$
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Prove that the following function is convex F(t;C) in C.
Where $F(t;C) = frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi tk)} }}}}$ and $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$.
I tried the convexity definition assuming the domain set is a convex set.
I used the definition let ${C_1} in D$ and ${C_1} in D$ where $D$ is the convex domain then we need to prove
that $F(t;lambda {C_1} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}) le lambda F(t;{C_1}) + (1 - lambda )(F(t;{C_2})$,
where $lambda in [0,1]$ in matrix notation I let ${T_k} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{cos (2ppi t){]^T}}
end{array}}
end{array}$
and ${C_1} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{{c_p}]}
end{array}}
end{array}$ I need to prove $frac{1}{{{e^{lambda {C_1}^T.{T_k} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}} le frac{lambda }{{{e^{{C_1}^T.{T_k}}}}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{{e^{{C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}}$.
Any help will be appreciated thank you all.
convex-analysis
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Prove that the following function is convex F(t;C) in C.
Where $F(t;C) = frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi tk)} }}}}$ and $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$.
I tried the convexity definition assuming the domain set is a convex set.
I used the definition let ${C_1} in D$ and ${C_1} in D$ where $D$ is the convex domain then we need to prove
that $F(t;lambda {C_1} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}) le lambda F(t;{C_1}) + (1 - lambda )(F(t;{C_2})$,
where $lambda in [0,1]$ in matrix notation I let ${T_k} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{cos (2ppi t){]^T}}
end{array}}
end{array}$
and ${C_1} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{{c_p}]}
end{array}}
end{array}$ I need to prove $frac{1}{{{e^{lambda {C_1}^T.{T_k} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}} le frac{lambda }{{{e^{{C_1}^T.{T_k}}}}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{{e^{{C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}}$.
Any help will be appreciated thank you all.
convex-analysis
The rule of of $F(t;C)$ is independent of $t$ besides restriction on the domain?
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 0:49
I'm not sure what you mean. Please if you can elaborate more so I can answer correctly rather than guessing. But there are no restriction on the C's and t is between -0.5 and 0.5.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 0:52
I don't see a $t$ in $frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi fk)} }}}}$. There's $f$ and $p$ though.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 1:01
Really sorry that was my mistake I put an f instead of a t. Thank you for pointing that out.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 1:09
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Prove that the following function is convex F(t;C) in C.
Where $F(t;C) = frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi tk)} }}}}$ and $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$.
I tried the convexity definition assuming the domain set is a convex set.
I used the definition let ${C_1} in D$ and ${C_1} in D$ where $D$ is the convex domain then we need to prove
that $F(t;lambda {C_1} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}) le lambda F(t;{C_1}) + (1 - lambda )(F(t;{C_2})$,
where $lambda in [0,1]$ in matrix notation I let ${T_k} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{cos (2ppi t){]^T}}
end{array}}
end{array}$
and ${C_1} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{{c_p}]}
end{array}}
end{array}$ I need to prove $frac{1}{{{e^{lambda {C_1}^T.{T_k} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}} le frac{lambda }{{{e^{{C_1}^T.{T_k}}}}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{{e^{{C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}}$.
Any help will be appreciated thank you all.
convex-analysis
Prove that the following function is convex F(t;C) in C.
Where $F(t;C) = frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi tk)} }}}}$ and $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$.
I tried the convexity definition assuming the domain set is a convex set.
I used the definition let ${C_1} in D$ and ${C_1} in D$ where $D$ is the convex domain then we need to prove
that $F(t;lambda {C_1} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}) le lambda F(t;{C_1}) + (1 - lambda )(F(t;{C_2})$,
where $lambda in [0,1]$ in matrix notation I let ${T_k} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{cos (2ppi t){]^T}}
end{array}}
end{array}$
and ${C_1} = [begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
.&.&{{c_p}]}
end{array}}
end{array}$ I need to prove $frac{1}{{{e^{lambda {C_1}^T.{T_k} + (1 - lambda ){C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}} le frac{lambda }{{{e^{{C_1}^T.{T_k}}}}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{{e^{{C_2}^T.{T_k}}}}}$.
Any help will be appreciated thank you all.
convex-analysis
convex-analysis
edited Nov 7 at 5:30
asked Nov 7 at 0:40
Jordan
63
63
The rule of of $F(t;C)$ is independent of $t$ besides restriction on the domain?
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 0:49
I'm not sure what you mean. Please if you can elaborate more so I can answer correctly rather than guessing. But there are no restriction on the C's and t is between -0.5 and 0.5.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 0:52
I don't see a $t$ in $frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi fk)} }}}}$. There's $f$ and $p$ though.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 1:01
Really sorry that was my mistake I put an f instead of a t. Thank you for pointing that out.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 1:09
add a comment |
The rule of of $F(t;C)$ is independent of $t$ besides restriction on the domain?
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 0:49
I'm not sure what you mean. Please if you can elaborate more so I can answer correctly rather than guessing. But there are no restriction on the C's and t is between -0.5 and 0.5.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 0:52
I don't see a $t$ in $frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi fk)} }}}}$. There's $f$ and $p$ though.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 1:01
Really sorry that was my mistake I put an f instead of a t. Thank you for pointing that out.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 1:09
The rule of of $F(t;C)$ is independent of $t$ besides restriction on the domain?
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 0:49
The rule of of $F(t;C)$ is independent of $t$ besides restriction on the domain?
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 0:49
I'm not sure what you mean. Please if you can elaborate more so I can answer correctly rather than guessing. But there are no restriction on the C's and t is between -0.5 and 0.5.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 0:52
I'm not sure what you mean. Please if you can elaborate more so I can answer correctly rather than guessing. But there are no restriction on the C's and t is between -0.5 and 0.5.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 0:52
I don't see a $t$ in $frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi fk)} }}}}$. There's $f$ and $p$ though.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 1:01
I don't see a $t$ in $frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi fk)} }}}}$. There's $f$ and $p$ though.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 1:01
Really sorry that was my mistake I put an f instead of a t. Thank you for pointing that out.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 1:09
Really sorry that was my mistake I put an f instead of a t. Thank you for pointing that out.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 1:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
I did solve the problem and just in case somebody else run into the same problem this is how I solved it. We start
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{c_k}cos (2pi kt)} } right)}}$$
where $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$. Before we take the derivative we will do some abbreviation let
$$textbf{C} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}}&.&.&{{c_p}}
end{array}} right]$$
$${textbf{F}_k} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)}&.&.&{cos (2ppi t)}
end{array}} right]$$
then we can write the function as following
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)}}$$
taking the first derivative (Gradient)
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}}} = frac{{ - cos (2pi mt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$ and taking the second derivative (Hessian) $$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
To write the hessian matrix notice
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left{ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{frac{{cos {{(2pi mt)}^2}}}{{exp left( {C cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m = n}\
{frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m ne n}
end{array}} right.$$
let
$$P = exp left( { - textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)$$
writing the Hessian matrix we have
$$H = frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left( {begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
P& ldots &{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}\
vdots & ddots & vdots \
{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}& cdots &{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right)$$
where the diagonal of the matrix is the following
$$Dig = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
P&{cos {{(2pi t)}^2}P}&.&.&{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right]$$
we can see that the diagonal is all positive, also notice that the matrix is real and symmetric. By using the pivots of the matrix for different order you will notice that all the pivots are non negative hence the Hessian is a positive semi definite matrix, which indicate that $w$ is a convex function which mean it satisfies the following, Let $C_1 in D$, and $C_2 in D$ where $D$ is assumed to be a convex set (Domain) then the following is true
$$w(t;lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}) le lambda w(t;{textbf{C}_1}) + (1 - lambda )w(t;{textbf{C}_2})$$
that is
$$frac{1}{{exp left( {left[ {lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}} right] cdot F_k^T} right)}} le frac{lambda }{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_1} cdot F_k^T} right)}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_2} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
I did solve the problem and just in case somebody else run into the same problem this is how I solved it. We start
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{c_k}cos (2pi kt)} } right)}}$$
where $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$. Before we take the derivative we will do some abbreviation let
$$textbf{C} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}}&.&.&{{c_p}}
end{array}} right]$$
$${textbf{F}_k} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)}&.&.&{cos (2ppi t)}
end{array}} right]$$
then we can write the function as following
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)}}$$
taking the first derivative (Gradient)
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}}} = frac{{ - cos (2pi mt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$ and taking the second derivative (Hessian) $$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
To write the hessian matrix notice
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left{ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{frac{{cos {{(2pi mt)}^2}}}{{exp left( {C cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m = n}\
{frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m ne n}
end{array}} right.$$
let
$$P = exp left( { - textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)$$
writing the Hessian matrix we have
$$H = frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left( {begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
P& ldots &{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}\
vdots & ddots & vdots \
{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}& cdots &{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right)$$
where the diagonal of the matrix is the following
$$Dig = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
P&{cos {{(2pi t)}^2}P}&.&.&{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right]$$
we can see that the diagonal is all positive, also notice that the matrix is real and symmetric. By using the pivots of the matrix for different order you will notice that all the pivots are non negative hence the Hessian is a positive semi definite matrix, which indicate that $w$ is a convex function which mean it satisfies the following, Let $C_1 in D$, and $C_2 in D$ where $D$ is assumed to be a convex set (Domain) then the following is true
$$w(t;lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}) le lambda w(t;{textbf{C}_1}) + (1 - lambda )w(t;{textbf{C}_2})$$
that is
$$frac{1}{{exp left( {left[ {lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}} right] cdot F_k^T} right)}} le frac{lambda }{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_1} cdot F_k^T} right)}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_2} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
I did solve the problem and just in case somebody else run into the same problem this is how I solved it. We start
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{c_k}cos (2pi kt)} } right)}}$$
where $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$. Before we take the derivative we will do some abbreviation let
$$textbf{C} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}}&.&.&{{c_p}}
end{array}} right]$$
$${textbf{F}_k} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)}&.&.&{cos (2ppi t)}
end{array}} right]$$
then we can write the function as following
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)}}$$
taking the first derivative (Gradient)
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}}} = frac{{ - cos (2pi mt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$ and taking the second derivative (Hessian) $$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
To write the hessian matrix notice
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left{ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{frac{{cos {{(2pi mt)}^2}}}{{exp left( {C cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m = n}\
{frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m ne n}
end{array}} right.$$
let
$$P = exp left( { - textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)$$
writing the Hessian matrix we have
$$H = frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left( {begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
P& ldots &{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}\
vdots & ddots & vdots \
{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}& cdots &{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right)$$
where the diagonal of the matrix is the following
$$Dig = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
P&{cos {{(2pi t)}^2}P}&.&.&{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right]$$
we can see that the diagonal is all positive, also notice that the matrix is real and symmetric. By using the pivots of the matrix for different order you will notice that all the pivots are non negative hence the Hessian is a positive semi definite matrix, which indicate that $w$ is a convex function which mean it satisfies the following, Let $C_1 in D$, and $C_2 in D$ where $D$ is assumed to be a convex set (Domain) then the following is true
$$w(t;lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}) le lambda w(t;{textbf{C}_1}) + (1 - lambda )w(t;{textbf{C}_2})$$
that is
$$frac{1}{{exp left( {left[ {lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}} right] cdot F_k^T} right)}} le frac{lambda }{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_1} cdot F_k^T} right)}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_2} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
I did solve the problem and just in case somebody else run into the same problem this is how I solved it. We start
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{c_k}cos (2pi kt)} } right)}}$$
where $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$. Before we take the derivative we will do some abbreviation let
$$textbf{C} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}}&.&.&{{c_p}}
end{array}} right]$$
$${textbf{F}_k} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)}&.&.&{cos (2ppi t)}
end{array}} right]$$
then we can write the function as following
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)}}$$
taking the first derivative (Gradient)
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}}} = frac{{ - cos (2pi mt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$ and taking the second derivative (Hessian) $$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
To write the hessian matrix notice
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left{ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{frac{{cos {{(2pi mt)}^2}}}{{exp left( {C cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m = n}\
{frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m ne n}
end{array}} right.$$
let
$$P = exp left( { - textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)$$
writing the Hessian matrix we have
$$H = frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left( {begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
P& ldots &{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}\
vdots & ddots & vdots \
{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}& cdots &{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right)$$
where the diagonal of the matrix is the following
$$Dig = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
P&{cos {{(2pi t)}^2}P}&.&.&{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right]$$
we can see that the diagonal is all positive, also notice that the matrix is real and symmetric. By using the pivots of the matrix for different order you will notice that all the pivots are non negative hence the Hessian is a positive semi definite matrix, which indicate that $w$ is a convex function which mean it satisfies the following, Let $C_1 in D$, and $C_2 in D$ where $D$ is assumed to be a convex set (Domain) then the following is true
$$w(t;lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}) le lambda w(t;{textbf{C}_1}) + (1 - lambda )w(t;{textbf{C}_2})$$
that is
$$frac{1}{{exp left( {left[ {lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}} right] cdot F_k^T} right)}} le frac{lambda }{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_1} cdot F_k^T} right)}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_2} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
I did solve the problem and just in case somebody else run into the same problem this is how I solved it. We start
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{c_k}cos (2pi kt)} } right)}}$$
where $ - frac{1}{2} le t le frac{1}{2}$. Before we take the derivative we will do some abbreviation let
$$textbf{C} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{{c_0}}&{{c_1}}&{{c_2}}&.&.&{{c_p}}
end{array}} right]$$
$${textbf{F}_k} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
1&{cos (2pi t)}&{cos (4pi t)}&.&.&{cos (2ppi t)}
end{array}} right]$$
then we can write the function as following
$$w(t;textbf{C}) = frac{1}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)}}$$
taking the first derivative (Gradient)
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}}} = frac{{ - cos (2pi mt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$ and taking the second derivative (Hessian) $$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
To write the hessian matrix notice
$$frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left{ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
{frac{{cos {{(2pi mt)}^2}}}{{exp left( {C cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m = n}\
{frac{{cos (2pi mt)cos (2pi nt)}}{{exp left( {textbf{C} cdot F_k^T} right)}}}&{m ne n}
end{array}} right.$$
let
$$P = exp left( { - textbf{C} cdot textbf{F}_k^T} right)$$
writing the Hessian matrix we have
$$H = frac{{partial w}}{{partial {C_m}partial {C_n}}} = left( {begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
P& ldots &{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}\
vdots & ddots & vdots \
{cos (2pi t)cos (2ppi t)P}& cdots &{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right)$$
where the diagonal of the matrix is the following
$$Dig = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}{l}}
P&{cos {{(2pi t)}^2}P}&.&.&{cos {{(2ppi t)}^2}P}
end{array}} right]$$
we can see that the diagonal is all positive, also notice that the matrix is real and symmetric. By using the pivots of the matrix for different order you will notice that all the pivots are non negative hence the Hessian is a positive semi definite matrix, which indicate that $w$ is a convex function which mean it satisfies the following, Let $C_1 in D$, and $C_2 in D$ where $D$ is assumed to be a convex set (Domain) then the following is true
$$w(t;lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}) le lambda w(t;{textbf{C}_1}) + (1 - lambda )w(t;{textbf{C}_2})$$
that is
$$frac{1}{{exp left( {left[ {lambda {textbf{C}_1} + (1 - lambda ){textbf{C}_2}} right] cdot F_k^T} right)}} le frac{lambda }{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_1} cdot F_k^T} right)}} + frac{{(1 - lambda )}}{{exp left( {{textbf{C}_2} cdot F_k^T} right)}}$$
edited Nov 18 at 9:11
answered Nov 10 at 6:57
Jordan
63
63
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2987939%2fis-the-following-function-convex-ftc-in-c-where-ftc-exp-sum-k-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The rule of of $F(t;C)$ is independent of $t$ besides restriction on the domain?
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 0:49
I'm not sure what you mean. Please if you can elaborate more so I can answer correctly rather than guessing. But there are no restriction on the C's and t is between -0.5 and 0.5.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 0:52
I don't see a $t$ in $frac{1}{{{e^{sumlimits_{k = 0}^p {{C_k}cos (2pi fk)} }}}}$. There's $f$ and $p$ though.
– Siong Thye Goh
Nov 7 at 1:01
Really sorry that was my mistake I put an f instead of a t. Thank you for pointing that out.
– Jordan
Nov 7 at 1:09