Self-contained powers











up vote
13
down vote

favorite
1












Given integer n, output the smallest exponent e greater than 1 such that n^e contains n as a substring.



For example, for 25, the answer should be 2, as 25 ^ 2 = 625, which contains 25 as a substring, but the answer for 13 should be 10, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849, so 10 is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13 as a substring.



Rules




  • Standard I/O rules

  • Standard loopholes apply

  • Shortest code in bytes wins


  • n will always be an integer greater than 0


Test Cases



1 => 2   (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)


Python script to generate the first 1000 answers










share|improve this question






















  • Related
    – Skidsdev
    Nov 28 at 18:07










  • A045537
    – Shaggy
    Nov 28 at 19:55















up vote
13
down vote

favorite
1












Given integer n, output the smallest exponent e greater than 1 such that n^e contains n as a substring.



For example, for 25, the answer should be 2, as 25 ^ 2 = 625, which contains 25 as a substring, but the answer for 13 should be 10, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849, so 10 is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13 as a substring.



Rules




  • Standard I/O rules

  • Standard loopholes apply

  • Shortest code in bytes wins


  • n will always be an integer greater than 0


Test Cases



1 => 2   (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)


Python script to generate the first 1000 answers










share|improve this question






















  • Related
    – Skidsdev
    Nov 28 at 18:07










  • A045537
    – Shaggy
    Nov 28 at 19:55













up vote
13
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
13
down vote

favorite
1






1





Given integer n, output the smallest exponent e greater than 1 such that n^e contains n as a substring.



For example, for 25, the answer should be 2, as 25 ^ 2 = 625, which contains 25 as a substring, but the answer for 13 should be 10, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849, so 10 is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13 as a substring.



Rules




  • Standard I/O rules

  • Standard loopholes apply

  • Shortest code in bytes wins


  • n will always be an integer greater than 0


Test Cases



1 => 2   (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)


Python script to generate the first 1000 answers










share|improve this question













Given integer n, output the smallest exponent e greater than 1 such that n^e contains n as a substring.



For example, for 25, the answer should be 2, as 25 ^ 2 = 625, which contains 25 as a substring, but the answer for 13 should be 10, as 13 ^ 10 = 137858491849, so 10 is the lowest exponent for which the result contains 13 as a substring.



Rules




  • Standard I/O rules

  • Standard loopholes apply

  • Shortest code in bytes wins


  • n will always be an integer greater than 0


Test Cases



1 => 2   (1 ^ 2 = 1)
2 => 5 (2 ^ 5 = 32)
3 => 5 (3 ^ 5 = 243)
4 => 3 (4 ^ 3 = 64)
5 => 2 (5 ^ 2 = 25)
6 => 2 (6 ^ 2 = 36)
7 => 5 (7 ^ 5 = 16807)
8 => 5 (8 ^ 5 = 32768)
9 => 3 (9 ^ 3 = 729)
10 => 2 (10 ^ 2 = 100)
11 => 11 (11 ^ 11 = 285311670611)
12 => 14 (12 ^ 14 = 1283918464548864)
13 => 10 (13 ^ 10 = 137858491849)
14 => 8 (14 ^ 8 = 1475789056)
15 => 26 (15 ^ 26 = 3787675244106352329254150390625)
16 => 6 (16 ^ 6 = 16777216)
17 => 17 (17 ^ 17 = 827240261886336764177)
18 => 5 (18 ^ 5 = 1889568)
19 => 11 (19 ^ 11 = 116490258898219)
20 => 5 (20 ^ 5 = 3200000)
25 => 2 (25 ^ 2 = 625)
30 => 5 (30 ^ 5 = 24300000)
35 => 10 (35 ^ 10 = 2758547353515625)
40 => 3 (40 ^ 3 = 64000)
45 => 5 (45 ^ 5 = 184528125)
50 => 2 (50 ^ 2 = 2500)
55 => 11 (55 ^ 11 = 13931233916552734375)
60 => 2 (60 ^ 2 = 3600)
65 => 17 (65 ^ 17 = 6599743590836592050933837890625)
70 => 5 (70 ^ 5 = 1680700000)
75 => 3 (75 ^ 3 = 421875)
80 => 5 (80 ^ 5 = 3276800000)
85 => 22 (85 ^ 22 = 2800376120856162211833149645328521728515625)
90 => 3 (90 ^ 3 = 729000)
95 => 13 (95 ^ 13 = 51334208327950511474609375)
100 => 2 (100 ^ 2 = 10000)


Python script to generate the first 1000 answers







code-golf number






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 28 at 18:07









Skidsdev

6,1642870




6,1642870












  • Related
    – Skidsdev
    Nov 28 at 18:07










  • A045537
    – Shaggy
    Nov 28 at 19:55


















  • Related
    – Skidsdev
    Nov 28 at 18:07










  • A045537
    – Shaggy
    Nov 28 at 19:55
















Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07




Related
– Skidsdev
Nov 28 at 18:07












A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55




A045537
– Shaggy
Nov 28 at 19:55










25 Answers
25






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote














Perl 6, 31 bytes



{$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}


Try it online!






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    4
    down vote














    R, 69 44 bytes





    function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}


    Anonymous function. Works on large i when n is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!



    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer























    • 61 bytes -- you had an extra space in n, ?n^i and paste converts to character by default :-)
      – Giuseppe
      Nov 28 at 19:57










    • 56 bytes -- returning i should be sufficient.
      – Giuseppe
      Nov 28 at 19:58






    • 2




      44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
      – digEmAll
      Nov 29 at 7:54












    • The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
      – digEmAll
      Nov 29 at 8:12






    • 1




      @digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting i to a bigZ as well
      – Giuseppe
      Nov 29 at 23:51


















    up vote
    3
    down vote














    Python 2, 42 41 bytes



    -1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y directely)





    f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)


    Try it online!



    Explanation/Ungolfed



    Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:



    # Start recursion with y=2
    def f(x,y=2):
    # If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
    if `x` in `x**y`:
    return y
    # Else we try with next y
    else:
    return f(x, y+1)


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Returning y is shorter
      – Ørjan Johansen
      Nov 28 at 21:44










    • @ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
      – BMO
      Nov 28 at 22:03










    • I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
      – Ørjan Johansen
      Nov 28 at 22:26










    • @ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
      – BMO
      Nov 29 at 0:04


















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js),  41  40 bytes



    Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy



    Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.





    n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
      – Shaggy
      Nov 28 at 20:13










    • @Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount n=>(g=x=>${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
      Nov 28 at 20:17








    • 1




      @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
      – Shaggy
      Nov 28 at 20:19










    • Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
      – Shieru Asakoto
      Nov 29 at 7:53












    • @ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
      – Arnauld
      Nov 29 at 8:11


















    up vote
    3
    down vote














    APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes



    -2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer



    -6 bytes thanks to @ngn



    thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp (print precision)





    ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨


    Try it online!



    ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
    ×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
    by its original value
    ∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
    last old member, returns true
    ÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
    ⍕ formatted as a string
    ⍷ occurrences within...
    0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
    ⊣ ...new member
    ∨/ are there any?
    ⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached





    share|improve this answer























    • This fails for 17 because it it finds 17 in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
      – Cows quack
      Nov 28 at 19:07










    • @Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust ⎕PP I guess
      – Quintec
      Nov 28 at 19:09










    • Oh wait that won't even work
      – Quintec
      Nov 28 at 19:10










    • 23 bytes.
      – Erik the Outgolfer
      Nov 28 at 20:44










    • 19 bytes
      – ngn
      Nov 28 at 21:19




















    up vote
    2
    down vote














    Pyth, 9 bytes



    f}`Q`^QT2


    Try it online!






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      2
      down vote














      05AB1E, 7 bytes



      ∞>.Δm¹å


      Try it online!



      Explanation:



      ∞>.Δm¹å  //full program
      ∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
      > //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
      .Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
      ¹ //input
      å //is in
      m //(implicit) input ** N





      share|improve this answer






























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        SAS, 71 66 bytes



        Edit: Removed ;run; at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.



        data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;


        Input data is entered after the cards; statement, like so:



        data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        12
        13
        14


        Generates a dataset a containing the input n and the output e.



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.


















        • This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie %p(n)) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macros in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
          – Skidsdev
          Nov 29 at 20:28










        • @Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
          – Josh Eller
          Nov 29 at 20:56




















        up vote
        1
        down vote














        Jelly, 7 bytes



        2ẇ*¥@1#


        Try it online!






        share|improve this answer




























          up vote
          1
          down vote














          Clean, 99 bytes



          import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
          $n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]


          Try it online!



          If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then




          Clean, 64 bytes



          import StdEnv,Text
          $n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]


          Try it online!






          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote














            Brachylog, 8 bytes



            ;.^s?∧ℕ₂


            Try it online!



            Explanation



            ;.^         Input ^ Output…
            s? …contains the Input as a substring…
            ∧ …and…
            ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)





            share|improve this answer




























              up vote
              0
              down vote














              Ruby, 37 bytes





              ->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}


              Try it online!






              share|improve this answer




























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Japt, 10 bytes



                @pX søU}a2


                Try it






                share|improve this answer




























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote














                  JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes





                  Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer



                  a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")


                  Try it online!






                  share|improve this answer






























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote














                    Charcoal, 19 bytes



                    W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ


                    Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                    W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞


                    Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...



                    ⊞υIθ


                    ... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.



                    ILυ


                    Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.






                    share|improve this answer




























                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote














                      Python 3, 63 58 bytes





                      def f(n,e=2):
                      while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
                      return e


                      Try it online!



                      Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.






                      share|improve this answer























                      • I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
                        – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                        Nov 28 at 20:05










                      • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare while in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
                        – Gigaflop
                        Nov 28 at 20:07










                      • Maybe some recursive function?
                        – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                        Nov 28 at 20:10






                      • 2




                        Defining e in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)) and n**e should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
                        – BMO
                        Nov 28 at 20:38










                      • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like for or while do not work.
                        – DJMcMayhem
                        Nov 28 at 20:44


















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote














                      MathGolf, 10 bytes



                      ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠


                      Try it online!



                      Explanation



                      This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.



                      ô            start block of length 6
                      k read integer from input
                      ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                      ⌠ increment twice
                      # pop a, b : push(a**b)
                      k read integer from input
                      ╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
                      ▼ do while false with pop
                      ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                      ⌠ increment twice





                      share|improve this answer




























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote














                        Ruby, 41 bytes





                        f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}


                        Try it online!






                        share|improve this answer




























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote














                          C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes





                          a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}


                          Try it online!



                          -1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
                          -14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString() calls



                          Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).



                          Ungolfed:



                          a => {
                          int i = 2; // initialize i

                          while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
                          .Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
                          i++; // increment i

                          return i;
                          }





                          share|improve this answer























                          • You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
                            – Skidsdev
                            Nov 29 at 13:53


















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote














                          Python 2, 47 bytes





                          i,e=input(),2
                          while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
                          print e


                          Try it online!



                          Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.






                          share|improve this answer




























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote














                            Tcl, 69 81 bytes



                            proc S n {incr i
                            while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
                            puts $i}


                            Try it online!






                            share|improve this answer























                            • Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
                              – sergiol
                              Nov 29 at 23:22


















                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote













                            PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes



                            function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}





                            share|improve this answer




























                              up vote
                              0
                              down vote














                              Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes



                              Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.



                              Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal being needed to process the large numbers.





                              n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}


                              Try it online!





                              How it works



                              This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;



                              n->{                                    // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
                              int i=1; // Initialises the count
                              while(! // Loops and increments until
                              (new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
                              .pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
                              .contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
                              );
                              return i; // Return the count
                              }





                              share|improve this answer




























                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Common Lisp, 78 bytes



                                (lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))


                                Try it online!






                                share|improve this answer




























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote














                                  J, 26 bytes



                                  2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]


                                  Try it online!



                                  NOTE: I've changed the final ] to x: in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.






                                  share|improve this answer





















                                    Your Answer





                                    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                                    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                                    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                                    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
                                    });
                                    });
                                    }, "mathjax-editing");

                                    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                                    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                                    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                                    StackExchange.snippets.init();
                                    });
                                    });
                                    }, "code-snippets");

                                    StackExchange.ready(function() {
                                    var channelOptions = {
                                    tags: "".split(" "),
                                    id: "200"
                                    };
                                    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                                    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                                    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                                    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                                    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                                    createEditor();
                                    });
                                    }
                                    else {
                                    createEditor();
                                    }
                                    });

                                    function createEditor() {
                                    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                                    heartbeatType: 'answer',
                                    convertImagesToLinks: false,
                                    noModals: true,
                                    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                                    reputationToPostImages: null,
                                    bindNavPrevention: true,
                                    postfix: "",
                                    imageUploader: {
                                    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                                    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                                    allowUrls: true
                                    },
                                    onDemand: true,
                                    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                                    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                                    });


                                    }
                                    });














                                    draft saved

                                    draft discarded


















                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                    function () {
                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176734%2fself-contained-powers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                    }
                                    );

                                    Post as a guest















                                    Required, but never shown

























                                    25 Answers
                                    25






                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes








                                    25 Answers
                                    25






                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes









                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes






                                    active

                                    oldest

                                    votes








                                    up vote
                                    4
                                    down vote














                                    Perl 6, 31 bytes



                                    {$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}


                                    Try it online!






                                    share|improve this answer

























                                      up vote
                                      4
                                      down vote














                                      Perl 6, 31 bytes



                                      {$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}


                                      Try it online!






                                      share|improve this answer























                                        up vote
                                        4
                                        down vote










                                        up vote
                                        4
                                        down vote










                                        Perl 6, 31 bytes



                                        {$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}


                                        Try it online!






                                        share|improve this answer













                                        Perl 6, 31 bytes



                                        {$^a;first {$a**$_~~/$a/},2..*}


                                        Try it online!







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered Nov 28 at 18:41









                                        Sean

                                        3,18636




                                        3,18636






















                                            up vote
                                            4
                                            down vote














                                            R, 69 44 bytes





                                            function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}


                                            Anonymous function. Works on large i when n is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!



                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer























                                            • 61 bytes -- you had an extra space in n, ?n^i and paste converts to character by default :-)
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:57










                                            • 56 bytes -- returning i should be sufficient.
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:58






                                            • 2




                                              44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 7:54












                                            • The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 8:12






                                            • 1




                                              @digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting i to a bigZ as well
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 29 at 23:51















                                            up vote
                                            4
                                            down vote














                                            R, 69 44 bytes





                                            function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}


                                            Anonymous function. Works on large i when n is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!



                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer























                                            • 61 bytes -- you had an extra space in n, ?n^i and paste converts to character by default :-)
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:57










                                            • 56 bytes -- returning i should be sufficient.
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:58






                                            • 2




                                              44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 7:54












                                            • The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 8:12






                                            • 1




                                              @digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting i to a bigZ as well
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 29 at 23:51













                                            up vote
                                            4
                                            down vote










                                            up vote
                                            4
                                            down vote










                                            R, 69 44 bytes





                                            function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}


                                            Anonymous function. Works on large i when n is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!



                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer















                                            R, 69 44 bytes





                                            function(n,i=2){while(!grepl(n,n^i))i=i+1;i}


                                            Anonymous function. Works on large i when n is converted to BigZ (see TIO). Thanks for teaching me something Giuseppe and digEmAll!



                                            Try it online!







                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited 2 days ago

























                                            answered Nov 28 at 19:36









                                            BLT

                                            876412




                                            876412












                                            • 61 bytes -- you had an extra space in n, ?n^i and paste converts to character by default :-)
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:57










                                            • 56 bytes -- returning i should be sufficient.
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:58






                                            • 2




                                              44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 7:54












                                            • The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 8:12






                                            • 1




                                              @digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting i to a bigZ as well
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 29 at 23:51


















                                            • 61 bytes -- you had an extra space in n, ?n^i and paste converts to character by default :-)
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:57










                                            • 56 bytes -- returning i should be sufficient.
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 28 at 19:58






                                            • 2




                                              44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 7:54












                                            • The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
                                              – digEmAll
                                              Nov 29 at 8:12






                                            • 1




                                              @digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting i to a bigZ as well
                                              – Giuseppe
                                              Nov 29 at 23:51
















                                            61 bytes -- you had an extra space in n, ?n^i and paste converts to character by default :-)
                                            – Giuseppe
                                            Nov 28 at 19:57




                                            61 bytes -- you had an extra space in n, ?n^i and paste converts to character by default :-)
                                            – Giuseppe
                                            Nov 28 at 19:57












                                            56 bytes -- returning i should be sufficient.
                                            – Giuseppe
                                            Nov 28 at 19:58




                                            56 bytes -- returning i should be sufficient.
                                            – Giuseppe
                                            Nov 28 at 19:58




                                            2




                                            2




                                            44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
                                            – digEmAll
                                            Nov 29 at 7:54






                                            44 bytes paste is not necessary, grepl converts to character by default :)
                                            – digEmAll
                                            Nov 29 at 7:54














                                            The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
                                            – digEmAll
                                            Nov 29 at 8:12




                                            The problem is that it is "faulty" when exponents become big because of floating points accuracy and the fact that big numbers are converted to string in scientific notation. For instance 15 returns 17 while it should be 26. So, theoretically this works, but in practice we should use a Big Integer package or something like that...
                                            – digEmAll
                                            Nov 29 at 8:12




                                            1




                                            1




                                            @digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting i to a bigZ as well
                                            – Giuseppe
                                            Nov 29 at 23:51




                                            @digEmAll for BigInt you could just force input to be a bigInt like BigZ from gmp and it should still work, except possibly for converting i to a bigZ as well
                                            – Giuseppe
                                            Nov 29 at 23:51










                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote














                                            Python 2, 42 41 bytes



                                            -1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y directely)





                                            f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)


                                            Try it online!



                                            Explanation/Ungolfed



                                            Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:



                                            # Start recursion with y=2
                                            def f(x,y=2):
                                            # If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
                                            if `x` in `x**y`:
                                            return y
                                            # Else we try with next y
                                            else:
                                            return f(x, y+1)


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              Returning y is shorter
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 21:44










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 28 at 22:03










                                            • I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 22:26










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 29 at 0:04















                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote














                                            Python 2, 42 41 bytes



                                            -1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y directely)





                                            f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)


                                            Try it online!



                                            Explanation/Ungolfed



                                            Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:



                                            # Start recursion with y=2
                                            def f(x,y=2):
                                            # If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
                                            if `x` in `x**y`:
                                            return y
                                            # Else we try with next y
                                            else:
                                            return f(x, y+1)


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              Returning y is shorter
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 21:44










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 28 at 22:03










                                            • I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 22:26










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 29 at 0:04













                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote










                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote










                                            Python 2, 42 41 bytes



                                            -1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y directely)





                                            f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)


                                            Try it online!



                                            Explanation/Ungolfed



                                            Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:



                                            # Start recursion with y=2
                                            def f(x,y=2):
                                            # If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
                                            if `x` in `x**y`:
                                            return y
                                            # Else we try with next y
                                            else:
                                            return f(x, y+1)


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer















                                            Python 2, 42 41 bytes



                                            -1 byte thanks to Ørjan Johansen (returning y directely)





                                            f=lambda x,y=2:y*(`x`in`x**y`)or f(x,y+1)


                                            Try it online!



                                            Explanation/Ungolfed



                                            Recursive function trying from $2,3dots$ until we succeed:



                                            # Start recursion with y=2
                                            def f(x,y=2):
                                            # If we succeed, we arrived at the desired y
                                            if `x` in `x**y`:
                                            return y
                                            # Else we try with next y
                                            else:
                                            return f(x, y+1)


                                            Try it online!







                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Nov 28 at 22:02

























                                            answered Nov 28 at 20:38









                                            BMO

                                            10.7k21881




                                            10.7k21881








                                            • 1




                                              Returning y is shorter
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 21:44










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 28 at 22:03










                                            • I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 22:26










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 29 at 0:04














                                            • 1




                                              Returning y is shorter
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 21:44










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 28 at 22:03










                                            • I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
                                              – Ørjan Johansen
                                              Nov 28 at 22:26










                                            • @ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
                                              – BMO
                                              Nov 29 at 0:04








                                            1




                                            1




                                            Returning y is shorter
                                            – Ørjan Johansen
                                            Nov 28 at 21:44




                                            Returning y is shorter
                                            – Ørjan Johansen
                                            Nov 28 at 21:44












                                            @ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
                                            – BMO
                                            Nov 28 at 22:03




                                            @ØrjanJohansen: Weird, I thought I tried that, not exactly sure what I missed. Thanks a lot!
                                            – BMO
                                            Nov 28 at 22:03












                                            I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
                                            – Ørjan Johansen
                                            Nov 28 at 22:26




                                            I had to swap the multiplication to avoid a space, maybe that was it?
                                            – Ørjan Johansen
                                            Nov 28 at 22:26












                                            @ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
                                            – BMO
                                            Nov 29 at 0:04




                                            @ØrjanJohansen: Probably that was it, yeah.
                                            – BMO
                                            Nov 29 at 0:04










                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote













                                            JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js),  41  40 bytes



                                            Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy



                                            Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.





                                            n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:13










                                            • @Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount n=>(g=x=>${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
                                              – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                              Nov 28 at 20:17








                                            • 1




                                              @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:19










                                            • Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
                                              – Shieru Asakoto
                                              Nov 29 at 7:53












                                            • @ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 29 at 8:11















                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote













                                            JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js),  41  40 bytes



                                            Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy



                                            Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.





                                            n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:13










                                            • @Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount n=>(g=x=>${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
                                              – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                              Nov 28 at 20:17








                                            • 1




                                              @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:19










                                            • Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
                                              – Shieru Asakoto
                                              Nov 29 at 7:53












                                            • @ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 29 at 8:11













                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote










                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote









                                            JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js),  41  40 bytes



                                            Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy



                                            Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.





                                            n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer














                                            JavaScript (ES6 / Node.js),  41  40 bytes



                                            Saved 1 byte thanks to @Shaggy



                                            Takes input as a Number (works for $n<15$) or a BigInt literal.





                                            n=>(g=x=>`${x*=n}`.match(n)?2:-~g(x))(n)


                                            Try it online!







                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Nov 29 at 8:08

























                                            answered Nov 28 at 18:30









                                            Arnauld

                                            70.3k686295




                                            70.3k686295








                                            • 1




                                              Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:13










                                            • @Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount n=>(g=x=>${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
                                              – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                              Nov 28 at 20:17








                                            • 1




                                              @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:19










                                            • Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
                                              – Shieru Asakoto
                                              Nov 29 at 7:53












                                            • @ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 29 at 8:11














                                            • 1




                                              Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:13










                                            • @Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount n=>(g=x=>${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
                                              – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                              Nov 28 at 20:17








                                            • 1




                                              @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
                                              – Shaggy
                                              Nov 28 at 20:19










                                            • Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
                                              – Shieru Asakoto
                                              Nov 29 at 7:53












                                            • @ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
                                              – Arnauld
                                              Nov 29 at 8:11








                                            1




                                            1




                                            Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 28 at 20:13




                                            Ended up with a solution very similar to yours for 40 bytes
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 28 at 20:13












                                            @Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount n=>(g=x=>${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
                                            – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                            Nov 28 at 20:17






                                            @Shaggy You need to use big integers, otherwise it wont return the correct answer in some test cases. At the end it has the same bytecount n=>(g=x=>${x*=n}.match(n)?2n:-~g(x))(n)
                                            – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                            Nov 28 at 20:17






                                            1




                                            1




                                            @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 28 at 20:19




                                            @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz, generally we don't need to worry about precision issues but it will work with BigInts too.
                                            – Shaggy
                                            Nov 28 at 20:19












                                            Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
                                            – Shieru Asakoto
                                            Nov 29 at 7:53






                                            Minor thing but if this uses BigInt shouldn't the title be JavaScript (Node.js)? ES6 doesn't have BigInt yet.
                                            – Shieru Asakoto
                                            Nov 29 at 7:53














                                            @ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Nov 29 at 8:11




                                            @ShieruAsakoto You're right. My initial intention was to explain that it works with either a Number or a BigInt. Now clarified.
                                            – Arnauld
                                            Nov 29 at 8:11










                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote














                                            APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes



                                            -2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer



                                            -6 bytes thanks to @ngn



                                            thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp (print precision)





                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨


                                            Try it online!



                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
                                            ×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
                                            by its original value
                                            ∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
                                            last old member, returns true
                                            ÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
                                            ⍕ formatted as a string
                                            ⍷ occurrences within...
                                            0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
                                            ⊣ ...new member
                                            ∨/ are there any?
                                            ⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached





                                            share|improve this answer























                                            • This fails for 17 because it it finds 17 in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
                                              – Cows quack
                                              Nov 28 at 19:07










                                            • @Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust ⎕PP I guess
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:09










                                            • Oh wait that won't even work
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:10










                                            • 23 bytes.
                                              – Erik the Outgolfer
                                              Nov 28 at 20:44










                                            • 19 bytes
                                              – ngn
                                              Nov 28 at 21:19

















                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote














                                            APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes



                                            -2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer



                                            -6 bytes thanks to @ngn



                                            thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp (print precision)





                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨


                                            Try it online!



                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
                                            ×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
                                            by its original value
                                            ∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
                                            last old member, returns true
                                            ÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
                                            ⍕ formatted as a string
                                            ⍷ occurrences within...
                                            0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
                                            ⊣ ...new member
                                            ∨/ are there any?
                                            ⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached





                                            share|improve this answer























                                            • This fails for 17 because it it finds 17 in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
                                              – Cows quack
                                              Nov 28 at 19:07










                                            • @Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust ⎕PP I guess
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:09










                                            • Oh wait that won't even work
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:10










                                            • 23 bytes.
                                              – Erik the Outgolfer
                                              Nov 28 at 20:44










                                            • 19 bytes
                                              – ngn
                                              Nov 28 at 21:19















                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote










                                            up vote
                                            3
                                            down vote










                                            APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes



                                            -2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer



                                            -6 bytes thanks to @ngn



                                            thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp (print precision)





                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨


                                            Try it online!



                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
                                            ×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
                                            by its original value
                                            ∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
                                            last old member, returns true
                                            ÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
                                            ⍕ formatted as a string
                                            ⍷ occurrences within...
                                            0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
                                            ⊣ ...new member
                                            ∨/ are there any?
                                            ⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached





                                            share|improve this answer















                                            APL (Dyalog Unicode), 25 23 17 bytes



                                            -2 bytes thanks to @Erik the Outgolfer



                                            -6 bytes thanks to @ngn



                                            thanks to @H.PWiz for making the code not require a custom ⎕pp (print precision)





                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨


                                            Try it online!



                                            ⊢⍟×⍣(∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣)⍨
                                            ×⍣( )⍨ generates a geometric progression by repeatedly multiplying the argument
                                            by its original value
                                            ∨/(⍕÷)⍷0⍕⊣ the progression stops when this function, applied between the new and the
                                            last old member, returns true
                                            ÷ the original argument (ratio between two consecutive members)
                                            ⍕ formatted as a string
                                            ⍷ occurrences within...
                                            0⍕ ...the formatted (with 0 digits after the decimal point)...
                                            ⊣ ...new member
                                            ∨/ are there any?
                                            ⊢⍟ use logarithm to determine what power of ⍵ we reached






                                            share|improve this answer














                                            share|improve this answer



                                            share|improve this answer








                                            edited Nov 29 at 15:59

























                                            answered Nov 28 at 18:54









                                            Quintec

                                            1,225518




                                            1,225518












                                            • This fails for 17 because it it finds 17 in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
                                              – Cows quack
                                              Nov 28 at 19:07










                                            • @Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust ⎕PP I guess
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:09










                                            • Oh wait that won't even work
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:10










                                            • 23 bytes.
                                              – Erik the Outgolfer
                                              Nov 28 at 20:44










                                            • 19 bytes
                                              – ngn
                                              Nov 28 at 21:19




















                                            • This fails for 17 because it it finds 17 in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
                                              – Cows quack
                                              Nov 28 at 19:07










                                            • @Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust ⎕PP I guess
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:09










                                            • Oh wait that won't even work
                                              – Quintec
                                              Nov 28 at 19:10










                                            • 23 bytes.
                                              – Erik the Outgolfer
                                              Nov 28 at 20:44










                                            • 19 bytes
                                              – ngn
                                              Nov 28 at 21:19


















                                            This fails for 17 because it it finds 17 in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
                                            – Cows quack
                                            Nov 28 at 19:07




                                            This fails for 17 because it it finds 17 in 17^14=1.6837782655940093E17, but idk to what precision answers should support
                                            – Cows quack
                                            Nov 28 at 19:07












                                            @Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust ⎕PP I guess
                                            – Quintec
                                            Nov 28 at 19:09




                                            @Cowsquack I just have to arbitrarily adjust ⎕PP I guess
                                            – Quintec
                                            Nov 28 at 19:09












                                            Oh wait that won't even work
                                            – Quintec
                                            Nov 28 at 19:10




                                            Oh wait that won't even work
                                            – Quintec
                                            Nov 28 at 19:10












                                            23 bytes.
                                            – Erik the Outgolfer
                                            Nov 28 at 20:44




                                            23 bytes.
                                            – Erik the Outgolfer
                                            Nov 28 at 20:44












                                            19 bytes
                                            – ngn
                                            Nov 28 at 21:19






                                            19 bytes
                                            – ngn
                                            Nov 28 at 21:19












                                            up vote
                                            2
                                            down vote














                                            Pyth, 9 bytes



                                            f}`Q`^QT2


                                            Try it online!






                                            share|improve this answer

























                                              up vote
                                              2
                                              down vote














                                              Pyth, 9 bytes



                                              f}`Q`^QT2


                                              Try it online!






                                              share|improve this answer























                                                up vote
                                                2
                                                down vote










                                                up vote
                                                2
                                                down vote










                                                Pyth, 9 bytes



                                                f}`Q`^QT2


                                                Try it online!






                                                share|improve this answer













                                                Pyth, 9 bytes



                                                f}`Q`^QT2


                                                Try it online!







                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered Nov 28 at 18:55









                                                lirtosiast

                                                15.6k436106




                                                15.6k436106






















                                                    up vote
                                                    2
                                                    down vote














                                                    05AB1E, 7 bytes



                                                    ∞>.Δm¹å


                                                    Try it online!



                                                    Explanation:



                                                    ∞>.Δm¹å  //full program
                                                    ∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
                                                    > //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
                                                    .Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
                                                    ¹ //input
                                                    å //is in
                                                    m //(implicit) input ** N





                                                    share|improve this answer



























                                                      up vote
                                                      2
                                                      down vote














                                                      05AB1E, 7 bytes



                                                      ∞>.Δm¹å


                                                      Try it online!



                                                      Explanation:



                                                      ∞>.Δm¹å  //full program
                                                      ∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
                                                      > //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
                                                      .Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
                                                      ¹ //input
                                                      å //is in
                                                      m //(implicit) input ** N





                                                      share|improve this answer

























                                                        up vote
                                                        2
                                                        down vote










                                                        up vote
                                                        2
                                                        down vote










                                                        05AB1E, 7 bytes



                                                        ∞>.Δm¹å


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        Explanation:



                                                        ∞>.Δm¹å  //full program
                                                        ∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
                                                        > //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
                                                        .Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
                                                        ¹ //input
                                                        å //is in
                                                        m //(implicit) input ** N





                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                        05AB1E, 7 bytes



                                                        ∞>.Δm¹å


                                                        Try it online!



                                                        Explanation:



                                                        ∞>.Δm¹å  //full program
                                                        ∞ //push infinite list, stack = [1,2,3...]
                                                        > //increment, stack is now [2,3,4...]
                                                        .Δ //find the first item N that satisfies the following
                                                        ¹ //input
                                                        å //is in
                                                        m //(implicit) input ** N






                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                        edited Nov 29 at 14:39

























                                                        answered Nov 28 at 21:52









                                                        Cowabunghole

                                                        1,020418




                                                        1,020418






















                                                            up vote
                                                            2
                                                            down vote













                                                            SAS, 71 66 bytes



                                                            Edit: Removed ;run; at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;


                                                            Input data is entered after the cards; statement, like so:



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
                                                            1
                                                            2
                                                            3
                                                            4
                                                            5
                                                            6
                                                            7
                                                            8
                                                            9
                                                            10
                                                            11
                                                            12
                                                            13
                                                            14


                                                            Generates a dataset a containing the input n and the output e.



                                                            enter image description here






                                                            share|improve this answer










                                                            New contributor




                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                                            • This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie %p(n)) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macros in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
                                                              – Skidsdev
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:28










                                                            • @Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
                                                              – Josh Eller
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:56

















                                                            up vote
                                                            2
                                                            down vote













                                                            SAS, 71 66 bytes



                                                            Edit: Removed ;run; at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;


                                                            Input data is entered after the cards; statement, like so:



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
                                                            1
                                                            2
                                                            3
                                                            4
                                                            5
                                                            6
                                                            7
                                                            8
                                                            9
                                                            10
                                                            11
                                                            12
                                                            13
                                                            14


                                                            Generates a dataset a containing the input n and the output e.



                                                            enter image description here






                                                            share|improve this answer










                                                            New contributor




                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                                                            • This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie %p(n)) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macros in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
                                                              – Skidsdev
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:28










                                                            • @Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
                                                              – Josh Eller
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:56















                                                            up vote
                                                            2
                                                            down vote










                                                            up vote
                                                            2
                                                            down vote









                                                            SAS, 71 66 bytes



                                                            Edit: Removed ;run; at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;


                                                            Input data is entered after the cards; statement, like so:



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
                                                            1
                                                            2
                                                            3
                                                            4
                                                            5
                                                            6
                                                            7
                                                            8
                                                            9
                                                            10
                                                            11
                                                            12
                                                            13
                                                            14


                                                            Generates a dataset a containing the input n and the output e.



                                                            enter image description here






                                                            share|improve this answer










                                                            New contributor




                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                            SAS, 71 66 bytes



                                                            Edit: Removed ;run; at the end, since it's implied by the end of inputs.



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;


                                                            Input data is entered after the cards; statement, like so:



                                                            data a;input n;e=1;do until(find(cat(n**e),cat(n)));e+1;end;cards;
                                                            1
                                                            2
                                                            3
                                                            4
                                                            5
                                                            6
                                                            7
                                                            8
                                                            9
                                                            10
                                                            11
                                                            12
                                                            13
                                                            14


                                                            Generates a dataset a containing the input n and the output e.



                                                            enter image description here







                                                            share|improve this answer










                                                            New contributor




                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                            share|improve this answer








                                                            edited Nov 29 at 21:18





















                                                            New contributor




                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                                            answered Nov 29 at 20:26









                                                            Josh Eller

                                                            1413




                                                            1413




                                                            New contributor




                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                                            New contributor





                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                                            Josh Eller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.












                                                            • This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie %p(n)) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macros in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
                                                              – Skidsdev
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:28










                                                            • @Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
                                                              – Josh Eller
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:56




















                                                            • This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie %p(n)) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macros in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
                                                              – Skidsdev
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:28










                                                            • @Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
                                                              – Josh Eller
                                                              Nov 29 at 20:56


















                                                            This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie %p(n)) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macros in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
                                                            – Skidsdev
                                                            Nov 29 at 20:28




                                                            This looks to be a function definition, or equivalent (I assume actually a "macro") This means that requiring it be called with arguments (ie %p(n)) is totally fine, however output depends on whether macros in SAS can return values. If they can return, the "output" should be by returning the result, otherwise it should output it by whatever standard output method is supported
                                                            – Skidsdev
                                                            Nov 29 at 20:28












                                                            @Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
                                                            – Josh Eller
                                                            Nov 29 at 20:56






                                                            @Skidsdev Thanks for the feedback! SAS is a bit weird; macros aren't really functions, they're just a text substitution language that generates 'real' SAS code when compiled. I had a look at how other people have done I/O for SAS in codegolf, and edited my answer based on that, getting rid of the macro statements.
                                                            – Josh Eller
                                                            Nov 29 at 20:56












                                                            up vote
                                                            1
                                                            down vote














                                                            Jelly, 7 bytes



                                                            2ẇ*¥@1#


                                                            Try it online!






                                                            share|improve this answer

























                                                              up vote
                                                              1
                                                              down vote














                                                              Jelly, 7 bytes



                                                              2ẇ*¥@1#


                                                              Try it online!






                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                up vote
                                                                1
                                                                down vote










                                                                up vote
                                                                1
                                                                down vote










                                                                Jelly, 7 bytes



                                                                2ẇ*¥@1#


                                                                Try it online!






                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                Jelly, 7 bytes



                                                                2ẇ*¥@1#


                                                                Try it online!







                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                answered Nov 28 at 20:05









                                                                Erik the Outgolfer

                                                                30.9k429102




                                                                30.9k429102






















                                                                    up vote
                                                                    1
                                                                    down vote














                                                                    Clean, 99 bytes



                                                                    import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
                                                                    $n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]


                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                    If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then




                                                                    Clean, 64 bytes



                                                                    import StdEnv,Text
                                                                    $n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]


                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                    share|improve this answer

























                                                                      up vote
                                                                      1
                                                                      down vote














                                                                      Clean, 99 bytes



                                                                      import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
                                                                      $n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]


                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                      If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then




                                                                      Clean, 64 bytes



                                                                      import StdEnv,Text
                                                                      $n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]


                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                        up vote
                                                                        1
                                                                        down vote










                                                                        up vote
                                                                        1
                                                                        down vote










                                                                        Clean, 99 bytes



                                                                        import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
                                                                        $n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]


                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                        If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then




                                                                        Clean, 64 bytes



                                                                        import StdEnv,Text
                                                                        $n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]


                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                        Clean, 99 bytes



                                                                        import StdEnv,Text,Data.Integer
                                                                        $n=hd[p\p<-[fromInt 2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+prod(repeatn p n))>=0]


                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                        If it doesn't need to work for giant huge numbers, then




                                                                        Clean, 64 bytes



                                                                        import StdEnv,Text
                                                                        $n=hd[p\p<-[2..]|indexOf(""<+n)(""<+n^p)>=0]


                                                                        Try it online!







                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                        answered Nov 28 at 23:24









                                                                        Οurous

                                                                        6,04311032




                                                                        6,04311032






















                                                                            up vote
                                                                            1
                                                                            down vote














                                                                            Brachylog, 8 bytes



                                                                            ;.^s?∧ℕ₂


                                                                            Try it online!



                                                                            Explanation



                                                                            ;.^         Input ^ Output…
                                                                            s? …contains the Input as a substring…
                                                                            ∧ …and…
                                                                            ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)





                                                                            share|improve this answer

























                                                                              up vote
                                                                              1
                                                                              down vote














                                                                              Brachylog, 8 bytes



                                                                              ;.^s?∧ℕ₂


                                                                              Try it online!



                                                                              Explanation



                                                                              ;.^         Input ^ Output…
                                                                              s? …contains the Input as a substring…
                                                                              ∧ …and…
                                                                              ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)





                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                up vote
                                                                                1
                                                                                down vote










                                                                                up vote
                                                                                1
                                                                                down vote










                                                                                Brachylog, 8 bytes



                                                                                ;.^s?∧ℕ₂


                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                Explanation



                                                                                ;.^         Input ^ Output…
                                                                                s? …contains the Input as a substring…
                                                                                ∧ …and…
                                                                                ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)





                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                Brachylog, 8 bytes



                                                                                ;.^s?∧ℕ₂


                                                                                Try it online!



                                                                                Explanation



                                                                                ;.^         Input ^ Output…
                                                                                s? …contains the Input as a substring…
                                                                                ∧ …and…
                                                                                ℕ₂ …the Output is in [2,+∞)






                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                answered Nov 29 at 10:33









                                                                                Fatalize

                                                                                26.8k448134




                                                                                26.8k448134






















                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                    0
                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                    Ruby, 37 bytes





                                                                                    ->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}


                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                    share|improve this answer

























                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                      0
                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                      Ruby, 37 bytes





                                                                                      ->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}


                                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                        0
                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                        0
                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                        Ruby, 37 bytes





                                                                                        ->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}


                                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                        Ruby, 37 bytes





                                                                                        ->n,i=2{i+=1until/#{n}/=~"#{n**i}";i}


                                                                                        Try it online!







                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                        answered Nov 28 at 18:43









                                                                                        Kirill L.

                                                                                        3,3761118




                                                                                        3,3761118






















                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                            0
                                                                                            down vote













                                                                                            Japt, 10 bytes



                                                                                            @pX søU}a2


                                                                                            Try it






                                                                                            share|improve this answer

























                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                              0
                                                                                              down vote













                                                                                              Japt, 10 bytes



                                                                                              @pX søU}a2


                                                                                              Try it






                                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                0
                                                                                                down vote










                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                0
                                                                                                down vote









                                                                                                Japt, 10 bytes



                                                                                                @pX søU}a2


                                                                                                Try it






                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                Japt, 10 bytes



                                                                                                @pX søU}a2


                                                                                                Try it







                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                answered Nov 28 at 18:53









                                                                                                Shaggy

                                                                                                18.4k21663




                                                                                                18.4k21663






















                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                    JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes





                                                                                                    Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer



                                                                                                    a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")


                                                                                                    Try it online!






                                                                                                    share|improve this answer



























                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                      JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes





                                                                                                      Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer



                                                                                                      a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")


                                                                                                      Try it online!






                                                                                                      share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                        JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes





                                                                                                        Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer



                                                                                                        a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")


                                                                                                        Try it online!






                                                                                                        share|improve this answer















                                                                                                        JavaScript (Node.js), 45 bytes





                                                                                                        Test cases taken from @Arnauld's answer



                                                                                                        a=>eval("for(i=1n;!(''+a**++i).match(a););i")


                                                                                                        Try it online!







                                                                                                        share|improve this answer














                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                        share|improve this answer








                                                                                                        edited Nov 28 at 19:56









                                                                                                        Shaggy

                                                                                                        18.4k21663




                                                                                                        18.4k21663










                                                                                                        answered Nov 28 at 18:31









                                                                                                        Luis felipe De jesus Munoz

                                                                                                        4,01921254




                                                                                                        4,01921254






















                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                            down vote














                                                                                                            Charcoal, 19 bytes



                                                                                                            W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ


                                                                                                            Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                            W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞


                                                                                                            Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...



                                                                                                            ⊞υIθ


                                                                                                            ... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.



                                                                                                            ILυ


                                                                                                            Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.






                                                                                                            share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                              0
                                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                                              Charcoal, 19 bytes



                                                                                                              W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ


                                                                                                              Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                              W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞


                                                                                                              Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...



                                                                                                              ⊞υIθ


                                                                                                              ... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.



                                                                                                              ILυ


                                                                                                              Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.






                                                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                down vote










                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                down vote










                                                                                                                Charcoal, 19 bytes



                                                                                                                W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ


                                                                                                                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                                W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞


                                                                                                                Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...



                                                                                                                ⊞υIθ


                                                                                                                ... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.



                                                                                                                ILυ


                                                                                                                Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.






                                                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                Charcoal, 19 bytes



                                                                                                                W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞υIθILυ


                                                                                                                Try it online! Link is to verbose version of code. Explanation:



                                                                                                                W∨‹Lυ²¬№IΠυθ⊞


                                                                                                                Repeat until the the list length is at least 2 and its product contains the input...



                                                                                                                ⊞υIθ


                                                                                                                ... cast the input to integer and push it to the list.



                                                                                                                ILυ


                                                                                                                Cast the length of the list to string and implicitly print it.







                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                answered Nov 28 at 20:06









                                                                                                                Neil

                                                                                                                78.5k744175




                                                                                                                78.5k744175






















                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                    Python 3, 63 58 bytes





                                                                                                                    def f(n,e=2):
                                                                                                                    while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
                                                                                                                    return e


                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                    Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.






                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                    • I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:05










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare while in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
                                                                                                                      – Gigaflop
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:07










                                                                                                                    • Maybe some recursive function?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:10






                                                                                                                    • 2




                                                                                                                      Defining e in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)) and n**e should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:38










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like for or while do not work.
                                                                                                                      – DJMcMayhem
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:44















                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                    Python 3, 63 58 bytes





                                                                                                                    def f(n,e=2):
                                                                                                                    while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
                                                                                                                    return e


                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                    Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.






                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                    • I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:05










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare while in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
                                                                                                                      – Gigaflop
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:07










                                                                                                                    • Maybe some recursive function?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:10






                                                                                                                    • 2




                                                                                                                      Defining e in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)) and n**e should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:38










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like for or while do not work.
                                                                                                                      – DJMcMayhem
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:44













                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                    down vote










                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                    down vote










                                                                                                                    Python 3, 63 58 bytes





                                                                                                                    def f(n,e=2):
                                                                                                                    while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
                                                                                                                    return e


                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                    Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.






                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                    Python 3, 63 58 bytes





                                                                                                                    def f(n,e=2):
                                                                                                                    while str(n)not in str(n**e):e+=1
                                                                                                                    return e


                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                    Python2 would probably be shorter, but I like using 3. Coming up wiht a lambda is difficult, but I'm trying a few things.







                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                    edited Nov 28 at 21:02

























                                                                                                                    answered Nov 28 at 20:00









                                                                                                                    Gigaflop

                                                                                                                    2216




                                                                                                                    2216












                                                                                                                    • I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:05










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare while in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
                                                                                                                      – Gigaflop
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:07










                                                                                                                    • Maybe some recursive function?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:10






                                                                                                                    • 2




                                                                                                                      Defining e in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)) and n**e should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:38










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like for or while do not work.
                                                                                                                      – DJMcMayhem
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:44


















                                                                                                                    • I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:05










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare while in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
                                                                                                                      – Gigaflop
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:07










                                                                                                                    • Maybe some recursive function?
                                                                                                                      – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:10






                                                                                                                    • 2




                                                                                                                      Defining e in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)) and n**e should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
                                                                                                                      – BMO
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:38










                                                                                                                    • @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like for or while do not work.
                                                                                                                      – DJMcMayhem
                                                                                                                      Nov 28 at 20:44
















                                                                                                                    I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
                                                                                                                    – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:05




                                                                                                                    I dont know python but, isn't it shorter using lambda?
                                                                                                                    – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:05












                                                                                                                    @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare while in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
                                                                                                                    – Gigaflop
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:07




                                                                                                                    @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz I started off trying to do that, but IDLE complained about having a bare while in a lambda. Maybe I can try some other ways..
                                                                                                                    – Gigaflop
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:07












                                                                                                                    Maybe some recursive function?
                                                                                                                    – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:10




                                                                                                                    Maybe some recursive function?
                                                                                                                    – Luis felipe De jesus Munoz
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:10




                                                                                                                    2




                                                                                                                    2




                                                                                                                    Defining e in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)) and n**e should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
                                                                                                                    – BMO
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:38




                                                                                                                    Defining e in the arguments-list (ie. def f(n,e=2)) and n**e should save some bytes, Python 2 would indeed save quite some bytes.
                                                                                                                    – BMO
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:38












                                                                                                                    @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like for or while do not work.
                                                                                                                    – DJMcMayhem
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:44




                                                                                                                    @LuisfelipeDejesusMunoz Lambdas are not like functions. The right hand side of a lambda has to be a single expression, and flow-control commands like for or while do not work.
                                                                                                                    – DJMcMayhem
                                                                                                                    Nov 28 at 20:44










                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                    MathGolf, 10 bytes



                                                                                                                    ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠


                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                    Explanation



                                                                                                                    This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.



                                                                                                                    ô            start block of length 6
                                                                                                                    k read integer from input
                                                                                                                    ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                    ⌠ increment twice
                                                                                                                    # pop a, b : push(a**b)
                                                                                                                    k read integer from input
                                                                                                                    ╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
                                                                                                                    ▼ do while false with pop
                                                                                                                    ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                    ⌠ increment twice





                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                      MathGolf, 10 bytes



                                                                                                                      ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠


                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                      Explanation



                                                                                                                      This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.



                                                                                                                      ô            start block of length 6
                                                                                                                      k read integer from input
                                                                                                                      ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                      ⌠ increment twice
                                                                                                                      # pop a, b : push(a**b)
                                                                                                                      k read integer from input
                                                                                                                      ╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
                                                                                                                      ▼ do while false with pop
                                                                                                                      ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                      ⌠ increment twice





                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                        MathGolf, 10 bytes



                                                                                                                        ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠


                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                        Explanation



                                                                                                                        This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.



                                                                                                                        ô            start block of length 6
                                                                                                                        k read integer from input
                                                                                                                        ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                        ⌠ increment twice
                                                                                                                        # pop a, b : push(a**b)
                                                                                                                        k read integer from input
                                                                                                                        ╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
                                                                                                                        ▼ do while false with pop
                                                                                                                        ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                        ⌠ increment twice





                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                        MathGolf, 10 bytes



                                                                                                                        ôkï⌠#k╧▼ï⌠


                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                        Explanation



                                                                                                                        This feels extremely wasteful, having to read the input explicitly twice, having to increment the loop counter twice.



                                                                                                                        ô            start block of length 6
                                                                                                                        k read integer from input
                                                                                                                        ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                        ⌠ increment twice
                                                                                                                        # pop a, b : push(a**b)
                                                                                                                        k read integer from input
                                                                                                                        ╧ pop a, b, a.contains(b)
                                                                                                                        ▼ do while false with pop
                                                                                                                        ï index of current loop, or length of last loop
                                                                                                                        ⌠ increment twice






                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                        answered Nov 29 at 8:21









                                                                                                                        maxb

                                                                                                                        2,3431926




                                                                                                                        2,3431926






















                                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                                            down vote














                                                                                                                            Ruby, 41 bytes





                                                                                                                            f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}


                                                                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                                              0
                                                                                                                              down vote














                                                                                                                              Ruby, 41 bytes





                                                                                                                              f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}


                                                                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                down vote










                                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                down vote










                                                                                                                                Ruby, 41 bytes





                                                                                                                                f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}


                                                                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                Ruby, 41 bytes





                                                                                                                                f=->n,a=n{(a*=n).to_s=~/#{n}/?2:1+f[n,a]}


                                                                                                                                Try it online!







                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                answered Nov 29 at 12:57









                                                                                                                                G B

                                                                                                                                7,5961328




                                                                                                                                7,5961328






















                                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                                    C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes





                                                                                                                                    a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                    -1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
                                                                                                                                    -14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString() calls



                                                                                                                                    Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).



                                                                                                                                    Ungolfed:



                                                                                                                                    a => {
                                                                                                                                    int i = 2; // initialize i

                                                                                                                                    while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
                                                                                                                                    .Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
                                                                                                                                    i++; // increment i

                                                                                                                                    return i;
                                                                                                                                    }





                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                    • You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
                                                                                                                                      – Skidsdev
                                                                                                                                      Nov 29 at 13:53















                                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                                    C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes





                                                                                                                                    a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                    -1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
                                                                                                                                    -14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString() calls



                                                                                                                                    Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).



                                                                                                                                    Ungolfed:



                                                                                                                                    a => {
                                                                                                                                    int i = 2; // initialize i

                                                                                                                                    while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
                                                                                                                                    .Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
                                                                                                                                    i++; // increment i

                                                                                                                                    return i;
                                                                                                                                    }





                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                    • You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
                                                                                                                                      – Skidsdev
                                                                                                                                      Nov 29 at 13:53













                                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                                    down vote










                                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                                    down vote










                                                                                                                                    C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes





                                                                                                                                    a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                    -1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
                                                                                                                                    -14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString() calls



                                                                                                                                    Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).



                                                                                                                                    Ungolfed:



                                                                                                                                    a => {
                                                                                                                                    int i = 2; // initialize i

                                                                                                                                    while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
                                                                                                                                    .Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
                                                                                                                                    i++; // increment i

                                                                                                                                    return i;
                                                                                                                                    }





                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                    C# (.NET Core), 104 89 bytes





                                                                                                                                    a=>{int i=2;while(!(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i)+"").Contains(a+""))i++;return i;}


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                    -1 byte: changed for loop to while (thanks to Skidsdev)
                                                                                                                                    -14 bytes: abused C#'s weird string handling to remove ToString() calls



                                                                                                                                    Need to use C#'s BigInteger library, as the standard numeric C# types (int, double, long, ulong, etc.) fail for some larger numbers (including 12, 15, and 17).



                                                                                                                                    Ungolfed:



                                                                                                                                    a => {
                                                                                                                                    int i = 2; // initialize i

                                                                                                                                    while( !(System.Numerics.BigInteger.Pow(a,i) + "") // n = a^i, convert to string
                                                                                                                                    .Contains(a + "")) // if n doesn't contain a
                                                                                                                                    i++; // increment i

                                                                                                                                    return i;
                                                                                                                                    }






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                    edited Nov 29 at 14:46

























                                                                                                                                    answered Nov 28 at 21:22









                                                                                                                                    Meerkat

                                                                                                                                    3318




                                                                                                                                    3318












                                                                                                                                    • You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
                                                                                                                                      – Skidsdev
                                                                                                                                      Nov 29 at 13:53


















                                                                                                                                    • You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
                                                                                                                                      – Skidsdev
                                                                                                                                      Nov 29 at 13:53
















                                                                                                                                    You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
                                                                                                                                    – Skidsdev
                                                                                                                                    Nov 29 at 13:53




                                                                                                                                    You can save 1 byte by switching to a while loop
                                                                                                                                    – Skidsdev
                                                                                                                                    Nov 29 at 13:53










                                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                                    Python 2, 47 bytes





                                                                                                                                    i,e=input(),2
                                                                                                                                    while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
                                                                                                                                    print e


                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                    Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.






                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                                      Python 2, 47 bytes





                                                                                                                                      i,e=input(),2
                                                                                                                                      while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
                                                                                                                                      print e


                                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                                      Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.






                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                                        Python 2, 47 bytes





                                                                                                                                        i,e=input(),2
                                                                                                                                        while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
                                                                                                                                        print e


                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                        Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.






                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                        Python 2, 47 bytes





                                                                                                                                        i,e=input(),2
                                                                                                                                        while`i`not in`i**e`:e+=1
                                                                                                                                        print e


                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                        Inspired by @Gigaflop's solution.







                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                        answered Nov 29 at 15:39









                                                                                                                                        glietz

                                                                                                                                        816




                                                                                                                                        816






















                                                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                                                            down vote














                                                                                                                                            Tcl, 69 81 bytes



                                                                                                                                            proc S n {incr i
                                                                                                                                            while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
                                                                                                                                            puts $i}


                                                                                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                            • Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
                                                                                                                                              – sergiol
                                                                                                                                              Nov 29 at 23:22















                                                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                                                            down vote














                                                                                                                                            Tcl, 69 81 bytes



                                                                                                                                            proc S n {incr i
                                                                                                                                            while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
                                                                                                                                            puts $i}


                                                                                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                            • Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
                                                                                                                                              – sergiol
                                                                                                                                              Nov 29 at 23:22













                                                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                                                            down vote










                                                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                                                            down vote










                                                                                                                                            Tcl, 69 81 bytes



                                                                                                                                            proc S n {incr i
                                                                                                                                            while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
                                                                                                                                            puts $i}


                                                                                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer















                                                                                                                                            Tcl, 69 81 bytes



                                                                                                                                            proc S n {incr i
                                                                                                                                            while {![regexp $n [expr $n**[incr i]]]} {}
                                                                                                                                            puts $i}


                                                                                                                                            Try it online!







                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer














                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer








                                                                                                                                            edited Nov 29 at 23:17

























                                                                                                                                            answered Nov 29 at 23:01









                                                                                                                                            sergiol

                                                                                                                                            2,2961825




                                                                                                                                            2,2961825












                                                                                                                                            • Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
                                                                                                                                              – sergiol
                                                                                                                                              Nov 29 at 23:22


















                                                                                                                                            • Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
                                                                                                                                              – sergiol
                                                                                                                                              Nov 29 at 23:22
















                                                                                                                                            Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
                                                                                                                                            – sergiol
                                                                                                                                            Nov 29 at 23:22




                                                                                                                                            Same byte count: tio.run/##DY7LaoNQFEXn6yt2IKOMzlGPj@/…
                                                                                                                                            – sergiol
                                                                                                                                            Nov 29 at 23:22










                                                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                                                            down vote













                                                                                                                                            PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes



                                                                                                                                            function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}





                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                                                              0
                                                                                                                                              down vote













                                                                                                                                              PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes



                                                                                                                                              function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}





                                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                                down vote










                                                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                                down vote









                                                                                                                                                PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes



                                                                                                                                                function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}





                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                                PowerShell(V3+), 67 bytes



                                                                                                                                                function f{param($n)$i=1;do{}until([math]::pow($n,++$i)-match$n)$i}






                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                                answered Nov 30 at 0:24









                                                                                                                                                jyao

                                                                                                                                                1314




                                                                                                                                                1314






















                                                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                                                    Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes



                                                                                                                                                    Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.



                                                                                                                                                    Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal being needed to process the large numbers.





                                                                                                                                                    n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}


                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!





                                                                                                                                                    How it works



                                                                                                                                                    This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;



                                                                                                                                                    n->{                                    // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
                                                                                                                                                    int i=1; // Initialises the count
                                                                                                                                                    while(! // Loops and increments until
                                                                                                                                                    (new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
                                                                                                                                                    .pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
                                                                                                                                                    .contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
                                                                                                                                                    );
                                                                                                                                                    return i; // Return the count
                                                                                                                                                    }





                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                                                      Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes



                                                                                                                                                      Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.



                                                                                                                                                      Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal being needed to process the large numbers.





                                                                                                                                                      n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}


                                                                                                                                                      Try it online!





                                                                                                                                                      How it works



                                                                                                                                                      This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;



                                                                                                                                                      n->{                                    // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
                                                                                                                                                      int i=1; // Initialises the count
                                                                                                                                                      while(! // Loops and increments until
                                                                                                                                                      (new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
                                                                                                                                                      .pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
                                                                                                                                                      .contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
                                                                                                                                                      );
                                                                                                                                                      return i; // Return the count
                                                                                                                                                      }





                                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                                                        Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes



                                                                                                                                                        Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.



                                                                                                                                                        Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal being needed to process the large numbers.





                                                                                                                                                        n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}


                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!





                                                                                                                                                        How it works



                                                                                                                                                        This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;



                                                                                                                                                        n->{                                    // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
                                                                                                                                                        int i=1; // Initialises the count
                                                                                                                                                        while(! // Loops and increments until
                                                                                                                                                        (new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
                                                                                                                                                        .pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
                                                                                                                                                        .contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
                                                                                                                                                        );
                                                                                                                                                        return i; // Return the count
                                                                                                                                                        }





                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                                        Java (OpenJDK 8), 84 bytes



                                                                                                                                                        Takes input as a String representing the number and outputs an int.



                                                                                                                                                        Most of the bytes come from the verbosity of the BigDecimal being needed to process the large numbers.





                                                                                                                                                        n->{int i=1;while(!(new java.math.BigDecimal(n).pow(++i)+"").contains(n));return i;}


                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!





                                                                                                                                                        How it works



                                                                                                                                                        This is fairly simple but I'll include the explanation for posterity;



                                                                                                                                                        n->{                                    // Lamdba taking a String and returning an int
                                                                                                                                                        int i=1; // Initialises the count
                                                                                                                                                        while(! // Loops and increments until
                                                                                                                                                        (new java.math.BigDecimal(n) // Creates a new BigDecimal from the input n
                                                                                                                                                        .pow(++i)+"") // Raises it to the power of the current count
                                                                                                                                                        .contains(n) // If that contains the input, end the loop
                                                                                                                                                        );
                                                                                                                                                        return i; // Return the count
                                                                                                                                                        }






                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                                        answered 2 days ago









                                                                                                                                                        Luke Stevens

                                                                                                                                                        704214




                                                                                                                                                        704214






















                                                                                                                                                            up vote
                                                                                                                                                            0
                                                                                                                                                            down vote













                                                                                                                                                            Common Lisp, 78 bytes



                                                                                                                                                            (lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))


                                                                                                                                                            Try it online!






                                                                                                                                                            share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                                                              up vote
                                                                                                                                                              0
                                                                                                                                                              down vote













                                                                                                                                                              Common Lisp, 78 bytes



                                                                                                                                                              (lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))


                                                                                                                                                              Try it online!






                                                                                                                                                              share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                                                down vote










                                                                                                                                                                up vote
                                                                                                                                                                0
                                                                                                                                                                down vote









                                                                                                                                                                Common Lisp, 78 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                (lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))


                                                                                                                                                                Try it online!






                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                                                Common Lisp, 78 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                (lambda(n)(do((e 2(1+ e)))((search(format()"~d"n)(format()"~d"(expt n e)))e)))


                                                                                                                                                                Try it online!







                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                                share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                                                answered 2 days ago









                                                                                                                                                                Renzo

                                                                                                                                                                1,630516




                                                                                                                                                                1,630516






















                                                                                                                                                                    up vote
                                                                                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                                                                                    down vote














                                                                                                                                                                    J, 26 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                    2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]


                                                                                                                                                                    Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                    NOTE: I've changed the final ] to x: in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.






                                                                                                                                                                    share|improve this answer

























                                                                                                                                                                      up vote
                                                                                                                                                                      0
                                                                                                                                                                      down vote














                                                                                                                                                                      J, 26 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                      2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]


                                                                                                                                                                      Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                      NOTE: I've changed the final ] to x: in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.






                                                                                                                                                                      share|improve this answer























                                                                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                                                                        up vote
                                                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                                                        down vote










                                                                                                                                                                        J, 26 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                        2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]


                                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                        NOTE: I've changed the final ] to x: in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.






                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer













                                                                                                                                                                        J, 26 bytes



                                                                                                                                                                        2>:@]^:(0=[+/@E.&":^)^:_~]


                                                                                                                                                                        Try it online!



                                                                                                                                                                        NOTE: I've changed the final ] to x: in the TIO, to make the tests pass for larger integers.







                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer












                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer



                                                                                                                                                                        share|improve this answer










                                                                                                                                                                        answered 2 days ago









                                                                                                                                                                        Jonah

                                                                                                                                                                        1,981816




                                                                                                                                                                        1,981816






























                                                                                                                                                                            draft saved

                                                                                                                                                                            draft discarded




















































                                                                                                                                                                            If this is an answer to a challenge…




                                                                                                                                                                            • …Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.


                                                                                                                                                                            • …Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
                                                                                                                                                                              Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.


                                                                                                                                                                            • …Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.



                                                                                                                                                                            More generally…




                                                                                                                                                                            • …Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.


                                                                                                                                                                            • …Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).






                                                                                                                                                                            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                                                                                                                                            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                                                                                                                                            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                                                                                                                                            But avoid



                                                                                                                                                                            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                                                                                                                                            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                                                                                                                                            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                                                                                                                                            draft saved


                                                                                                                                                                            draft discarded














                                                                                                                                                                            StackExchange.ready(
                                                                                                                                                                            function () {
                                                                                                                                                                            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f176734%2fself-contained-powers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                                                                                                                                            }
                                                                                                                                                                            );

                                                                                                                                                                            Post as a guest















                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown





















































                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown

































                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown














                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown












                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                                                            Required, but never shown







                                                                                                                                                                            Popular posts from this blog

                                                                                                                                                                            Plaza Victoria

                                                                                                                                                                            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                                                                                                                                                                            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...