Wheaton's law rewritten as a company policy / company value
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can not use that verbatim.
What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?
politics company-policy motivation
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can not use that verbatim.
What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?
politics company-policy motivation
1
This seems too broad or opinion-based for this site - there are too many possible answers. Some examples: Be nice, be kind, be respectful, don't be mean, don't be a jerk, treat each other well, be empathetic, act with compassion. You can probably grab a thesaurus to come up with a few dozen more.
– Dukeling
Dec 1 at 12:47
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can not use that verbatim.
What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?
politics company-policy motivation
Wheaton's law: "Don't be a dick", we feel would be a excellent company policy or company value. But for obvious reasons we can not use that verbatim.
What would be a more work appropriate way of phrasing that, while still capturing the simplicity and directness, without being overly prescriptive?
politics company-policy motivation
politics company-policy motivation
edited Dec 1 at 7:40
Kilisi
110k61246427
110k61246427
asked Dec 1 at 4:24
DarcyThomas
1656
1656
1
This seems too broad or opinion-based for this site - there are too many possible answers. Some examples: Be nice, be kind, be respectful, don't be mean, don't be a jerk, treat each other well, be empathetic, act with compassion. You can probably grab a thesaurus to come up with a few dozen more.
– Dukeling
Dec 1 at 12:47
add a comment |
1
This seems too broad or opinion-based for this site - there are too many possible answers. Some examples: Be nice, be kind, be respectful, don't be mean, don't be a jerk, treat each other well, be empathetic, act with compassion. You can probably grab a thesaurus to come up with a few dozen more.
– Dukeling
Dec 1 at 12:47
1
1
This seems too broad or opinion-based for this site - there are too many possible answers. Some examples: Be nice, be kind, be respectful, don't be mean, don't be a jerk, treat each other well, be empathetic, act with compassion. You can probably grab a thesaurus to come up with a few dozen more.
– Dukeling
Dec 1 at 12:47
This seems too broad or opinion-based for this site - there are too many possible answers. Some examples: Be nice, be kind, be respectful, don't be mean, don't be a jerk, treat each other well, be empathetic, act with compassion. You can probably grab a thesaurus to come up with a few dozen more.
– Dukeling
Dec 1 at 12:47
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Wheaton's Law seems mostly to be a variation on the Golden Rule, which you can just use directly:
Treat other the way you want to be treated.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Grow up mate."
is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.
I once saw a sign that said 'We're a team, work together and act like one. Save the BS for outsiders.' I'm unsure what BS means though.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function () {
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function () {
var showEditor = function() {
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
};
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True') {
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup({
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup) {
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
}
})
} else{
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true) {
showEditor();
}
}
});
});
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Wheaton's Law seems mostly to be a variation on the Golden Rule, which you can just use directly:
Treat other the way you want to be treated.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Wheaton's Law seems mostly to be a variation on the Golden Rule, which you can just use directly:
Treat other the way you want to be treated.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Wheaton's Law seems mostly to be a variation on the Golden Rule, which you can just use directly:
Treat other the way you want to be treated.
Wheaton's Law seems mostly to be a variation on the Golden Rule, which you can just use directly:
Treat other the way you want to be treated.
answered Dec 1 at 7:19
Erik
27.2k1873101
27.2k1873101
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Grow up mate."
is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.
I once saw a sign that said 'We're a team, work together and act like one. Save the BS for outsiders.' I'm unsure what BS means though.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Grow up mate."
is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.
I once saw a sign that said 'We're a team, work together and act like one. Save the BS for outsiders.' I'm unsure what BS means though.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
"Grow up mate."
is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.
I once saw a sign that said 'We're a team, work together and act like one. Save the BS for outsiders.' I'm unsure what BS means though.
"Grow up mate."
is my personal favourite, gives the correct message while not being particularly offensive. But any variation on 'act your age' or 'play fair' can be appropriate dependent on the circumstances.
I once saw a sign that said 'We're a team, work together and act like one. Save the BS for outsiders.' I'm unsure what BS means though.
edited Dec 1 at 9:19
answered Dec 1 at 6:52
Kilisi
110k61246427
110k61246427
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.
Wouldn't be useful. Everybody's definition of "dick-like" behavior is different and hence it wouldn't result in a consistent policy or consistent behavior. A good behavioral policy needs to specific enough so that that the judgement of what's acceptable and not acceptable behavior is not open to personal interpretation or definition.
answered Dec 1 at 6:56
Hilmar
23.9k65872
23.9k65872
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f123774%2fwheatons-law-rewritten-as-a-company-policy-company-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
This seems too broad or opinion-based for this site - there are too many possible answers. Some examples: Be nice, be kind, be respectful, don't be mean, don't be a jerk, treat each other well, be empathetic, act with compassion. You can probably grab a thesaurus to come up with a few dozen more.
– Dukeling
Dec 1 at 12:47