Eigenvector, solving Ax=b












0












$begingroup$


Hi I have another question where I don’t really know where to start....



Let A be a symmetric 3x3 matrix, with EV1 being (0,0,1) for $lambda_1$=0 and EV2 b=(2,1,0) for $lambda_2=1$. the third Eigenvalue be negativ.



With b from above give one solution for Ax=b



I honestly have no idea where to start, I can calculate the third eigenvector, and I know that the determinant of A is 0. I first thought of Cramer’s rule, but then I would have to divide by 0.



The only vague thing i could possibly think of is to go back to



$$Ax=lambda x $$



So i know lambda and x that would give me



A * (2,1,0)^t=1 * (2,10)



And this could only be true if A = I



So the solution would be x1=1 x2=1 and x3 = 0,



But i guess this is just stupid



I honestly have no idea...



Many thanks






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You know that $b$ is an eigenvector of $A$ with eigenvalue $1$, correct? If so, then the equation $Ax=b$ has a solution in $x=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:39








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your problem is you have 2 Eigen values and the corresponding eigenvectors and you need to find the 3rd?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:46






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well it follows from the definitions. We know that $b$ has eigenvalue $1$, so we have $Ab=1cdot b=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes that's definitely a way.
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lily No, one eigenvalue of $A$ is $0$, so its determinant is also $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:57
















0












$begingroup$


Hi I have another question where I don’t really know where to start....



Let A be a symmetric 3x3 matrix, with EV1 being (0,0,1) for $lambda_1$=0 and EV2 b=(2,1,0) for $lambda_2=1$. the third Eigenvalue be negativ.



With b from above give one solution for Ax=b



I honestly have no idea where to start, I can calculate the third eigenvector, and I know that the determinant of A is 0. I first thought of Cramer’s rule, but then I would have to divide by 0.



The only vague thing i could possibly think of is to go back to



$$Ax=lambda x $$



So i know lambda and x that would give me



A * (2,1,0)^t=1 * (2,10)



And this could only be true if A = I



So the solution would be x1=1 x2=1 and x3 = 0,



But i guess this is just stupid



I honestly have no idea...



Many thanks






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You know that $b$ is an eigenvector of $A$ with eigenvalue $1$, correct? If so, then the equation $Ax=b$ has a solution in $x=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:39








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your problem is you have 2 Eigen values and the corresponding eigenvectors and you need to find the 3rd?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:46






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well it follows from the definitions. We know that $b$ has eigenvalue $1$, so we have $Ab=1cdot b=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes that's definitely a way.
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lily No, one eigenvalue of $A$ is $0$, so its determinant is also $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:57














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Hi I have another question where I don’t really know where to start....



Let A be a symmetric 3x3 matrix, with EV1 being (0,0,1) for $lambda_1$=0 and EV2 b=(2,1,0) for $lambda_2=1$. the third Eigenvalue be negativ.



With b from above give one solution for Ax=b



I honestly have no idea where to start, I can calculate the third eigenvector, and I know that the determinant of A is 0. I first thought of Cramer’s rule, but then I would have to divide by 0.



The only vague thing i could possibly think of is to go back to



$$Ax=lambda x $$



So i know lambda and x that would give me



A * (2,1,0)^t=1 * (2,10)



And this could only be true if A = I



So the solution would be x1=1 x2=1 and x3 = 0,



But i guess this is just stupid



I honestly have no idea...



Many thanks






linear-algebra







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Hi I have another question where I don’t really know where to start....



Let A be a symmetric 3x3 matrix, with EV1 being (0,0,1) for $lambda_1$=0 and EV2 b=(2,1,0) for $lambda_2=1$. the third Eigenvalue be negativ.



With b from above give one solution for Ax=b



I honestly have no idea where to start, I can calculate the third eigenvector, and I know that the determinant of A is 0. I first thought of Cramer’s rule, but then I would have to divide by 0.



The only vague thing i could possibly think of is to go back to



$$Ax=lambda x $$



So i know lambda and x that would give me



A * (2,1,0)^t=1 * (2,10)



And this could only be true if A = I



So the solution would be x1=1 x2=1 and x3 = 0,



But i guess this is just stupid



I honestly have no idea...



Many thanks






linear-algebra




linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 11 '18 at 16:28









LillysLillys

778




778








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You know that $b$ is an eigenvector of $A$ with eigenvalue $1$, correct? If so, then the equation $Ax=b$ has a solution in $x=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:39








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your problem is you have 2 Eigen values and the corresponding eigenvectors and you need to find the 3rd?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:46






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well it follows from the definitions. We know that $b$ has eigenvalue $1$, so we have $Ab=1cdot b=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes that's definitely a way.
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lily No, one eigenvalue of $A$ is $0$, so its determinant is also $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:57














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You know that $b$ is an eigenvector of $A$ with eigenvalue $1$, correct? If so, then the equation $Ax=b$ has a solution in $x=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:39








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your problem is you have 2 Eigen values and the corresponding eigenvectors and you need to find the 3rd?
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:46






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well it follows from the definitions. We know that $b$ has eigenvalue $1$, so we have $Ab=1cdot b=b$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes that's definitely a way.
    $endgroup$
    – mm-crj
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Lily No, one eigenvalue of $A$ is $0$, so its determinant is also $0$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Dec 11 '18 at 16:57








1




1




$begingroup$
You know that $b$ is an eigenvector of $A$ with eigenvalue $1$, correct? If so, then the equation $Ax=b$ has a solution in $x=b$.
$endgroup$
– Dave
Dec 11 '18 at 16:39






$begingroup$
You know that $b$ is an eigenvector of $A$ with eigenvalue $1$, correct? If so, then the equation $Ax=b$ has a solution in $x=b$.
$endgroup$
– Dave
Dec 11 '18 at 16:39






1




1




$begingroup$
Your problem is you have 2 Eigen values and the corresponding eigenvectors and you need to find the 3rd?
$endgroup$
– mm-crj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:46




$begingroup$
Your problem is you have 2 Eigen values and the corresponding eigenvectors and you need to find the 3rd?
$endgroup$
– mm-crj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:46




2




2




$begingroup$
Well it follows from the definitions. We know that $b$ has eigenvalue $1$, so we have $Ab=1cdot b=b$.
$endgroup$
– Dave
Dec 11 '18 at 16:47




$begingroup$
Well it follows from the definitions. We know that $b$ has eigenvalue $1$, so we have $Ab=1cdot b=b$.
$endgroup$
– Dave
Dec 11 '18 at 16:47




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes that's definitely a way.
$endgroup$
– mm-crj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:49




$begingroup$
Yes that's definitely a way.
$endgroup$
– mm-crj
Dec 11 '18 at 16:49




1




1




$begingroup$
@Lily No, one eigenvalue of $A$ is $0$, so its determinant is also $0$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 11 '18 at 16:57




$begingroup$
@Lily No, one eigenvalue of $A$ is $0$, so its determinant is also $0$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Dec 11 '18 at 16:57










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

For the eigenvector $vec b, Avec b=lambdavec bimpliesvec b=Acdotfrac{vec b}lambda (lambdane0)$



So one solution for the system $Avec x=vec b$ for eigenvector $vec b=[2,1,0]^T$ corresponding to the non-zero eigenvalue $lambda=1$ is $vec b/lambda$. Additionally, since $det A=0$, the system $Avec x=vec b$ can have either no or infinitely many solutions. Since one solution $vec b/lambda$ has been shown to exist, we know that infinitely many solutions exist.



Note that $vec x=frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T,kinBbb R$, will always be a solution to the system as $A(frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T)=vec b+kcdot A[0,0,1]^T=vec b because A[0,0,1]^T=0$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035466%2feigenvector-solving-ax-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    For the eigenvector $vec b, Avec b=lambdavec bimpliesvec b=Acdotfrac{vec b}lambda (lambdane0)$



    So one solution for the system $Avec x=vec b$ for eigenvector $vec b=[2,1,0]^T$ corresponding to the non-zero eigenvalue $lambda=1$ is $vec b/lambda$. Additionally, since $det A=0$, the system $Avec x=vec b$ can have either no or infinitely many solutions. Since one solution $vec b/lambda$ has been shown to exist, we know that infinitely many solutions exist.



    Note that $vec x=frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T,kinBbb R$, will always be a solution to the system as $A(frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T)=vec b+kcdot A[0,0,1]^T=vec b because A[0,0,1]^T=0$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      For the eigenvector $vec b, Avec b=lambdavec bimpliesvec b=Acdotfrac{vec b}lambda (lambdane0)$



      So one solution for the system $Avec x=vec b$ for eigenvector $vec b=[2,1,0]^T$ corresponding to the non-zero eigenvalue $lambda=1$ is $vec b/lambda$. Additionally, since $det A=0$, the system $Avec x=vec b$ can have either no or infinitely many solutions. Since one solution $vec b/lambda$ has been shown to exist, we know that infinitely many solutions exist.



      Note that $vec x=frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T,kinBbb R$, will always be a solution to the system as $A(frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T)=vec b+kcdot A[0,0,1]^T=vec b because A[0,0,1]^T=0$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        For the eigenvector $vec b, Avec b=lambdavec bimpliesvec b=Acdotfrac{vec b}lambda (lambdane0)$



        So one solution for the system $Avec x=vec b$ for eigenvector $vec b=[2,1,0]^T$ corresponding to the non-zero eigenvalue $lambda=1$ is $vec b/lambda$. Additionally, since $det A=0$, the system $Avec x=vec b$ can have either no or infinitely many solutions. Since one solution $vec b/lambda$ has been shown to exist, we know that infinitely many solutions exist.



        Note that $vec x=frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T,kinBbb R$, will always be a solution to the system as $A(frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T)=vec b+kcdot A[0,0,1]^T=vec b because A[0,0,1]^T=0$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For the eigenvector $vec b, Avec b=lambdavec bimpliesvec b=Acdotfrac{vec b}lambda (lambdane0)$



        So one solution for the system $Avec x=vec b$ for eigenvector $vec b=[2,1,0]^T$ corresponding to the non-zero eigenvalue $lambda=1$ is $vec b/lambda$. Additionally, since $det A=0$, the system $Avec x=vec b$ can have either no or infinitely many solutions. Since one solution $vec b/lambda$ has been shown to exist, we know that infinitely many solutions exist.



        Note that $vec x=frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T,kinBbb R$, will always be a solution to the system as $A(frac{vec b}lambda+kcdot[0,0,1]^T)=vec b+kcdot A[0,0,1]^T=vec b because A[0,0,1]^T=0$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 11 '18 at 17:09

























        answered Dec 11 '18 at 17:04









        Shubham JohriShubham Johri

        5,189718




        5,189718






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035466%2feigenvector-solving-ax-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
            Read more

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

            Image
            1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
            Read more