Find the residue of $frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}frac{x^s}{s}$ at $s=0$












1












$begingroup$


Let, $displaystyle f(s)=frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}frac{x^s}{s}$. Prove that $Res(f,s=0)=A-log x$ , for some constant $A$.



At $s=0$ , $zeta(s)$ has a pole of order $1$ and $zeta'(s)$ has a pole of order $2$. So, $frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. Again , $x^s/s$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. So $f$ has a pole of order $2$ at $s=0$. So the residue is given by



$$lim_{sto 0}frac{d}{ds}left{sx^s.frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}right}.$$



I've stuck here ! How can I calculate this to prove the result ?






complex-analysis riemann-zeta zeta-functions







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: The answer should be that A is Euler–Mascheroni constant here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nanayajitzuki
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:06










  • $begingroup$
    $frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}+log x+O(s)$, do the same with $zeta'/zeta(1+s)$ and pick the coef of $1/s$ (which appears when integrating $int_{|s|=epsilon}$)
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:09


















1












$begingroup$


Let, $displaystyle f(s)=frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}frac{x^s}{s}$. Prove that $Res(f,s=0)=A-log x$ , for some constant $A$.



At $s=0$ , $zeta(s)$ has a pole of order $1$ and $zeta'(s)$ has a pole of order $2$. So, $frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. Again , $x^s/s$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. So $f$ has a pole of order $2$ at $s=0$. So the residue is given by



$$lim_{sto 0}frac{d}{ds}left{sx^s.frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}right}.$$



I've stuck here ! How can I calculate this to prove the result ?






complex-analysis riemann-zeta zeta-functions







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: The answer should be that A is Euler–Mascheroni constant here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nanayajitzuki
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:06










  • $begingroup$
    $frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}+log x+O(s)$, do the same with $zeta'/zeta(1+s)$ and pick the coef of $1/s$ (which appears when integrating $int_{|s|=epsilon}$)
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:09
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let, $displaystyle f(s)=frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}frac{x^s}{s}$. Prove that $Res(f,s=0)=A-log x$ , for some constant $A$.



At $s=0$ , $zeta(s)$ has a pole of order $1$ and $zeta'(s)$ has a pole of order $2$. So, $frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. Again , $x^s/s$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. So $f$ has a pole of order $2$ at $s=0$. So the residue is given by



$$lim_{sto 0}frac{d}{ds}left{sx^s.frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}right}.$$



I've stuck here ! How can I calculate this to prove the result ?






complex-analysis riemann-zeta zeta-functions







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let, $displaystyle f(s)=frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}frac{x^s}{s}$. Prove that $Res(f,s=0)=A-log x$ , for some constant $A$.



At $s=0$ , $zeta(s)$ has a pole of order $1$ and $zeta'(s)$ has a pole of order $2$. So, $frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. Again , $x^s/s$ has a simple pole at $s=0$. So $f$ has a pole of order $2$ at $s=0$. So the residue is given by



$$lim_{sto 0}frac{d}{ds}left{sx^s.frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}right}.$$



I've stuck here ! How can I calculate this to prove the result ?






complex-analysis riemann-zeta zeta-functions




complex-analysis riemann-zeta zeta-functions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 9 '18 at 7:30









TopoTopo

323314




323314








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: The answer should be that A is Euler–Mascheroni constant here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nanayajitzuki
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:06










  • $begingroup$
    $frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}+log x+O(s)$, do the same with $zeta'/zeta(1+s)$ and pick the coef of $1/s$ (which appears when integrating $int_{|s|=epsilon}$)
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:09
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: The answer should be that A is Euler–Mascheroni constant here.
    $endgroup$
    – Nanayajitzuki
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:06










  • $begingroup$
    $frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}+log x+O(s)$, do the same with $zeta'/zeta(1+s)$ and pick the coef of $1/s$ (which appears when integrating $int_{|s|=epsilon}$)
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 9 '18 at 8:09










1




1




$begingroup$
Hint: The answer should be that A is Euler–Mascheroni constant here.
$endgroup$
– Nanayajitzuki
Dec 9 '18 at 8:06




$begingroup$
Hint: The answer should be that A is Euler–Mascheroni constant here.
$endgroup$
– Nanayajitzuki
Dec 9 '18 at 8:06












$begingroup$
$frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}+log x+O(s)$, do the same with $zeta'/zeta(1+s)$ and pick the coef of $1/s$ (which appears when integrating $int_{|s|=epsilon}$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 9 '18 at 8:09






$begingroup$
$frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}+log x+O(s)$, do the same with $zeta'/zeta(1+s)$ and pick the coef of $1/s$ (which appears when integrating $int_{|s|=epsilon}$)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 9 '18 at 8:09












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You could get an easy access to answer if you already know the Stieltjes constants which appears in the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$



$$displaystyle zeta (s)={frac{1}{s-1}}+sum _{n=0}^{infty}{frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}}gamma _{n}(s-1)^{n}$$



and you take the first and constant item



$$displaystyle zeta (s+1)={frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)$$



then you can find



$$displaystyle begin{align}
frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}&=frac{dln(zeta(1+s))}{ds}\&=frac{d}{ds}left(ln(1+gamma_{0}s+O(s^2))-ln sright)=frac{d}{ds}left(gamma_{0}s+O(s^2)-ln sright)\&={-frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)
end{align}$$



notice you have



$$displaystyle frac{x^s}{s}=frac{1}{s}+ln x+O(s)$$



so you can easily get



$$displaystyle f(s)=-frac{1}{s^2}+frac{gamma_{0}-ln x}{s}+O(1)$$



here $gamma_{0}$ is Euler–Mascheroni constant, and the simply proof on the constant appears in the series can see another question like this one.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Due to the integral representation for the $zeta$ function, in a neighbourhood of $s=0$ we have
    $$ zeta(s+1)=frac{1}{s}+gamma+(gamma_1+o(1))s = frac{1}{s}left[1+gamma s+O(1)sright]tag{1} $$
    hence by applying $frac{d}{ds}log(cdot)$ to both sides
    $$ frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)} = -frac{1}{s}+gamma+O(1)s tag{2} $$
    while
    $$ frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}exp(slog x)=frac{1}{s}+log x+O(1)slog^2(x)tag{3}$$
    hence by multiplying $(2)$ and $(3)$ we get that $s=0$ is a double pole of $frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)}cdotfrac{x^s}{s}$ with residue $gamma-log x$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032120%2ffind-the-residue-of-frac-zeta1s-zeta1s-fracxss-at-s-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      You could get an easy access to answer if you already know the Stieltjes constants which appears in the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$



      $$displaystyle zeta (s)={frac{1}{s-1}}+sum _{n=0}^{infty}{frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}}gamma _{n}(s-1)^{n}$$



      and you take the first and constant item



      $$displaystyle zeta (s+1)={frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)$$



      then you can find



      $$displaystyle begin{align}
      frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}&=frac{dln(zeta(1+s))}{ds}\&=frac{d}{ds}left(ln(1+gamma_{0}s+O(s^2))-ln sright)=frac{d}{ds}left(gamma_{0}s+O(s^2)-ln sright)\&={-frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)
      end{align}$$



      notice you have



      $$displaystyle frac{x^s}{s}=frac{1}{s}+ln x+O(s)$$



      so you can easily get



      $$displaystyle f(s)=-frac{1}{s^2}+frac{gamma_{0}-ln x}{s}+O(1)$$



      here $gamma_{0}$ is Euler–Mascheroni constant, and the simply proof on the constant appears in the series can see another question like this one.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        You could get an easy access to answer if you already know the Stieltjes constants which appears in the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$



        $$displaystyle zeta (s)={frac{1}{s-1}}+sum _{n=0}^{infty}{frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}}gamma _{n}(s-1)^{n}$$



        and you take the first and constant item



        $$displaystyle zeta (s+1)={frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)$$



        then you can find



        $$displaystyle begin{align}
        frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}&=frac{dln(zeta(1+s))}{ds}\&=frac{d}{ds}left(ln(1+gamma_{0}s+O(s^2))-ln sright)=frac{d}{ds}left(gamma_{0}s+O(s^2)-ln sright)\&={-frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)
        end{align}$$



        notice you have



        $$displaystyle frac{x^s}{s}=frac{1}{s}+ln x+O(s)$$



        so you can easily get



        $$displaystyle f(s)=-frac{1}{s^2}+frac{gamma_{0}-ln x}{s}+O(1)$$



        here $gamma_{0}$ is Euler–Mascheroni constant, and the simply proof on the constant appears in the series can see another question like this one.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You could get an easy access to answer if you already know the Stieltjes constants which appears in the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$



          $$displaystyle zeta (s)={frac{1}{s-1}}+sum _{n=0}^{infty}{frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}}gamma _{n}(s-1)^{n}$$



          and you take the first and constant item



          $$displaystyle zeta (s+1)={frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)$$



          then you can find



          $$displaystyle begin{align}
          frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}&=frac{dln(zeta(1+s))}{ds}\&=frac{d}{ds}left(ln(1+gamma_{0}s+O(s^2))-ln sright)=frac{d}{ds}left(gamma_{0}s+O(s^2)-ln sright)\&={-frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)
          end{align}$$



          notice you have



          $$displaystyle frac{x^s}{s}=frac{1}{s}+ln x+O(s)$$



          so you can easily get



          $$displaystyle f(s)=-frac{1}{s^2}+frac{gamma_{0}-ln x}{s}+O(1)$$



          here $gamma_{0}$ is Euler–Mascheroni constant, and the simply proof on the constant appears in the series can see another question like this one.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You could get an easy access to answer if you already know the Stieltjes constants which appears in the Laurent series expansion of $zeta(s)$



          $$displaystyle zeta (s)={frac{1}{s-1}}+sum _{n=0}^{infty}{frac{(-1)^{n}}{n!}}gamma _{n}(s-1)^{n}$$



          and you take the first and constant item



          $$displaystyle zeta (s+1)={frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)$$



          then you can find



          $$displaystyle begin{align}
          frac{zeta'(1+s)}{zeta(1+s)}&=frac{dln(zeta(1+s))}{ds}\&=frac{d}{ds}left(ln(1+gamma_{0}s+O(s^2))-ln sright)=frac{d}{ds}left(gamma_{0}s+O(s^2)-ln sright)\&={-frac{1}{s}}+gamma_{0}+O(s)
          end{align}$$



          notice you have



          $$displaystyle frac{x^s}{s}=frac{1}{s}+ln x+O(s)$$



          so you can easily get



          $$displaystyle f(s)=-frac{1}{s^2}+frac{gamma_{0}-ln x}{s}+O(1)$$



          here $gamma_{0}$ is Euler–Mascheroni constant, and the simply proof on the constant appears in the series can see another question like this one.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 9 '18 at 11:48

























          answered Dec 9 '18 at 11:40









          NanayajitzukiNanayajitzuki

          3185




          3185























              1












              $begingroup$

              Due to the integral representation for the $zeta$ function, in a neighbourhood of $s=0$ we have
              $$ zeta(s+1)=frac{1}{s}+gamma+(gamma_1+o(1))s = frac{1}{s}left[1+gamma s+O(1)sright]tag{1} $$
              hence by applying $frac{d}{ds}log(cdot)$ to both sides
              $$ frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)} = -frac{1}{s}+gamma+O(1)s tag{2} $$
              while
              $$ frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}exp(slog x)=frac{1}{s}+log x+O(1)slog^2(x)tag{3}$$
              hence by multiplying $(2)$ and $(3)$ we get that $s=0$ is a double pole of $frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)}cdotfrac{x^s}{s}$ with residue $gamma-log x$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Due to the integral representation for the $zeta$ function, in a neighbourhood of $s=0$ we have
                $$ zeta(s+1)=frac{1}{s}+gamma+(gamma_1+o(1))s = frac{1}{s}left[1+gamma s+O(1)sright]tag{1} $$
                hence by applying $frac{d}{ds}log(cdot)$ to both sides
                $$ frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)} = -frac{1}{s}+gamma+O(1)s tag{2} $$
                while
                $$ frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}exp(slog x)=frac{1}{s}+log x+O(1)slog^2(x)tag{3}$$
                hence by multiplying $(2)$ and $(3)$ we get that $s=0$ is a double pole of $frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)}cdotfrac{x^s}{s}$ with residue $gamma-log x$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Due to the integral representation for the $zeta$ function, in a neighbourhood of $s=0$ we have
                  $$ zeta(s+1)=frac{1}{s}+gamma+(gamma_1+o(1))s = frac{1}{s}left[1+gamma s+O(1)sright]tag{1} $$
                  hence by applying $frac{d}{ds}log(cdot)$ to both sides
                  $$ frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)} = -frac{1}{s}+gamma+O(1)s tag{2} $$
                  while
                  $$ frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}exp(slog x)=frac{1}{s}+log x+O(1)slog^2(x)tag{3}$$
                  hence by multiplying $(2)$ and $(3)$ we get that $s=0$ is a double pole of $frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)}cdotfrac{x^s}{s}$ with residue $gamma-log x$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Due to the integral representation for the $zeta$ function, in a neighbourhood of $s=0$ we have
                  $$ zeta(s+1)=frac{1}{s}+gamma+(gamma_1+o(1))s = frac{1}{s}left[1+gamma s+O(1)sright]tag{1} $$
                  hence by applying $frac{d}{ds}log(cdot)$ to both sides
                  $$ frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)} = -frac{1}{s}+gamma+O(1)s tag{2} $$
                  while
                  $$ frac{x^s}{s} = frac{1}{s}exp(slog x)=frac{1}{s}+log x+O(1)slog^2(x)tag{3}$$
                  hence by multiplying $(2)$ and $(3)$ we get that $s=0$ is a double pole of $frac{zeta'(s+1)}{zeta(s+1)}cdotfrac{x^s}{s}$ with residue $gamma-log x$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 9 '18 at 11:31









                  Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

                  290k33282662




                  290k33282662






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3032120%2ffind-the-residue-of-frac-zeta1s-zeta1s-fracxss-at-s-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Image
                      Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
                      Read more

                      In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
                      Read more

                      How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

                      Image
                      1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
                      Read more