Model for symplectic geometry
$begingroup$
An almost symplectic structure on a smooth even dimension manifold $M$ can be viewed as a reduction of structure group $Sp(2n,mathbb{R}) hookrightarrow GL(2n,mathbb{R})$ for the principal frame bundle $mathcal{F}(M)$. If this structure group reduction corresponds to a closed section of $mathcal{F}(M)/Sp(2n,mathbb{R})$ then it is a symplectic structure.
It is claimed in here that, as an integrable $G$-structure, a symplectic manifold is a Cartan geometry.
So, if we want to describe a symplectic manifold as a Cartan geometry of type $(G,H)$ what are the possible choices of Lie groups $G$ and $H$?
Different choices of $G$ and $H$ will give rise to homogeneous spaces $G/H
$ that are related by model mutation. I am primarily concerned with the groups that give rise to a compact model $G/H$ for symplectic manifolds.
differential-geometry symplectic-geometry cartan-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An almost symplectic structure on a smooth even dimension manifold $M$ can be viewed as a reduction of structure group $Sp(2n,mathbb{R}) hookrightarrow GL(2n,mathbb{R})$ for the principal frame bundle $mathcal{F}(M)$. If this structure group reduction corresponds to a closed section of $mathcal{F}(M)/Sp(2n,mathbb{R})$ then it is a symplectic structure.
It is claimed in here that, as an integrable $G$-structure, a symplectic manifold is a Cartan geometry.
So, if we want to describe a symplectic manifold as a Cartan geometry of type $(G,H)$ what are the possible choices of Lie groups $G$ and $H$?
Different choices of $G$ and $H$ will give rise to homogeneous spaces $G/H
$ that are related by model mutation. I am primarily concerned with the groups that give rise to a compact model $G/H$ for symplectic manifolds.
differential-geometry symplectic-geometry cartan-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An almost symplectic structure on a smooth even dimension manifold $M$ can be viewed as a reduction of structure group $Sp(2n,mathbb{R}) hookrightarrow GL(2n,mathbb{R})$ for the principal frame bundle $mathcal{F}(M)$. If this structure group reduction corresponds to a closed section of $mathcal{F}(M)/Sp(2n,mathbb{R})$ then it is a symplectic structure.
It is claimed in here that, as an integrable $G$-structure, a symplectic manifold is a Cartan geometry.
So, if we want to describe a symplectic manifold as a Cartan geometry of type $(G,H)$ what are the possible choices of Lie groups $G$ and $H$?
Different choices of $G$ and $H$ will give rise to homogeneous spaces $G/H
$ that are related by model mutation. I am primarily concerned with the groups that give rise to a compact model $G/H$ for symplectic manifolds.
differential-geometry symplectic-geometry cartan-geometry
$endgroup$
An almost symplectic structure on a smooth even dimension manifold $M$ can be viewed as a reduction of structure group $Sp(2n,mathbb{R}) hookrightarrow GL(2n,mathbb{R})$ for the principal frame bundle $mathcal{F}(M)$. If this structure group reduction corresponds to a closed section of $mathcal{F}(M)/Sp(2n,mathbb{R})$ then it is a symplectic structure.
It is claimed in here that, as an integrable $G$-structure, a symplectic manifold is a Cartan geometry.
So, if we want to describe a symplectic manifold as a Cartan geometry of type $(G,H)$ what are the possible choices of Lie groups $G$ and $H$?
Different choices of $G$ and $H$ will give rise to homogeneous spaces $G/H
$ that are related by model mutation. I am primarily concerned with the groups that give rise to a compact model $G/H$ for symplectic manifolds.
differential-geometry symplectic-geometry cartan-geometry
differential-geometry symplectic-geometry cartan-geometry
edited Sep 11 '18 at 5:54
asked Sep 11 '18 at 5:43
user564024
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is not true in general that an integrable $G$-structure is a Cartan geometry. Indeed, a symplectic structure cannot be described by a finite dimensional Cartan geometry, since it has infinite dimensional automorphism group (the group of symplectomorphisms). It is also not clear, why such a description should be of interest, since symplectic structures do not have local invariants.
In the standard picture of $G$-structures you would be led to consider Cartan geometries of type $(Sp(2n,mathbb R)ltimesmathbb R^{2n},Sp(2n,mathbb R))$. (This is like passing from the orthogonal group to the group of rigid motions.) Cartan geometries of this type have an underlying almost symplectic structure which is symplectic if and only if the Cartan geometry is torsion-free. But such a Cartan geometry also comes with a connection on the tangent bundle with preserves the almost symplectic structure. In the torsion-free case, these are so-called Fedosov connections (torsion-free symplectic connections), so you get Fedosov structures rather than just symplectic structures.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912783%2fmodel-for-symplectic-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It is not true in general that an integrable $G$-structure is a Cartan geometry. Indeed, a symplectic structure cannot be described by a finite dimensional Cartan geometry, since it has infinite dimensional automorphism group (the group of symplectomorphisms). It is also not clear, why such a description should be of interest, since symplectic structures do not have local invariants.
In the standard picture of $G$-structures you would be led to consider Cartan geometries of type $(Sp(2n,mathbb R)ltimesmathbb R^{2n},Sp(2n,mathbb R))$. (This is like passing from the orthogonal group to the group of rigid motions.) Cartan geometries of this type have an underlying almost symplectic structure which is symplectic if and only if the Cartan geometry is torsion-free. But such a Cartan geometry also comes with a connection on the tangent bundle with preserves the almost symplectic structure. In the torsion-free case, these are so-called Fedosov connections (torsion-free symplectic connections), so you get Fedosov structures rather than just symplectic structures.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is not true in general that an integrable $G$-structure is a Cartan geometry. Indeed, a symplectic structure cannot be described by a finite dimensional Cartan geometry, since it has infinite dimensional automorphism group (the group of symplectomorphisms). It is also not clear, why such a description should be of interest, since symplectic structures do not have local invariants.
In the standard picture of $G$-structures you would be led to consider Cartan geometries of type $(Sp(2n,mathbb R)ltimesmathbb R^{2n},Sp(2n,mathbb R))$. (This is like passing from the orthogonal group to the group of rigid motions.) Cartan geometries of this type have an underlying almost symplectic structure which is symplectic if and only if the Cartan geometry is torsion-free. But such a Cartan geometry also comes with a connection on the tangent bundle with preserves the almost symplectic structure. In the torsion-free case, these are so-called Fedosov connections (torsion-free symplectic connections), so you get Fedosov structures rather than just symplectic structures.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is not true in general that an integrable $G$-structure is a Cartan geometry. Indeed, a symplectic structure cannot be described by a finite dimensional Cartan geometry, since it has infinite dimensional automorphism group (the group of symplectomorphisms). It is also not clear, why such a description should be of interest, since symplectic structures do not have local invariants.
In the standard picture of $G$-structures you would be led to consider Cartan geometries of type $(Sp(2n,mathbb R)ltimesmathbb R^{2n},Sp(2n,mathbb R))$. (This is like passing from the orthogonal group to the group of rigid motions.) Cartan geometries of this type have an underlying almost symplectic structure which is symplectic if and only if the Cartan geometry is torsion-free. But such a Cartan geometry also comes with a connection on the tangent bundle with preserves the almost symplectic structure. In the torsion-free case, these are so-called Fedosov connections (torsion-free symplectic connections), so you get Fedosov structures rather than just symplectic structures.
$endgroup$
It is not true in general that an integrable $G$-structure is a Cartan geometry. Indeed, a symplectic structure cannot be described by a finite dimensional Cartan geometry, since it has infinite dimensional automorphism group (the group of symplectomorphisms). It is also not clear, why such a description should be of interest, since symplectic structures do not have local invariants.
In the standard picture of $G$-structures you would be led to consider Cartan geometries of type $(Sp(2n,mathbb R)ltimesmathbb R^{2n},Sp(2n,mathbb R))$. (This is like passing from the orthogonal group to the group of rigid motions.) Cartan geometries of this type have an underlying almost symplectic structure which is symplectic if and only if the Cartan geometry is torsion-free. But such a Cartan geometry also comes with a connection on the tangent bundle with preserves the almost symplectic structure. In the torsion-free case, these are so-called Fedosov connections (torsion-free symplectic connections), so you get Fedosov structures rather than just symplectic structures.
answered Dec 11 '18 at 8:35
Andreas CapAndreas Cap
11.2k923
11.2k923
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2912783%2fmodel-for-symplectic-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown