Birational Equivalence of Diophantine Equations and Elliptic Curves












7












$begingroup$


A while ago I saw this question Quartic diophantine equation: $16r^4+112r^3+200r^2-112r+16=s^2$ which was very relevant to a undergraduate research paper I am currently working on. The answer given for this problem describes a method for determining solutions to diophantine equations by finding a "birational equivalence" to the solution set of an elliptic curve.



The result I am seeking depends on the solution set to a quartic diophantine equation of two variables and I believe that there is only one solution and no more (which was indicated by a program which checked possible values up to a high number).



So my question is, is there a general method for determining such a birational equivalence between solutions sets of diophantine equations and elliptic curves? And where is a good source for an undergraduate to learn to use these tools?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not quite sure what "a birational equivalence" between diophantine equations and elliptic curves should mean. When we want to find integer points on these "elliptic curves", it is a diophantine problem. Generally speaking it is much easier to identify rational points on the curves (and birational parameterization is one way to answer that), and it can be AFAIK a difficult problem to say whether integer points exist even given some rational solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps what you have in mind is the subject discussed here, at Ask SageMath.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certain curves are birationally equivalent to elliptic curves, so in this sense Diophantine equations give rise to elliptic curves. I think this is what the OP meant when he referred to birational equivalence between Diophantine equations and elliptic curves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jan 2 '16 at 18:27












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is exactly it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon Thomas Van Over
    Jan 2 '16 at 20:32
















7












$begingroup$


A while ago I saw this question Quartic diophantine equation: $16r^4+112r^3+200r^2-112r+16=s^2$ which was very relevant to a undergraduate research paper I am currently working on. The answer given for this problem describes a method for determining solutions to diophantine equations by finding a "birational equivalence" to the solution set of an elliptic curve.



The result I am seeking depends on the solution set to a quartic diophantine equation of two variables and I believe that there is only one solution and no more (which was indicated by a program which checked possible values up to a high number).



So my question is, is there a general method for determining such a birational equivalence between solutions sets of diophantine equations and elliptic curves? And where is a good source for an undergraduate to learn to use these tools?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not quite sure what "a birational equivalence" between diophantine equations and elliptic curves should mean. When we want to find integer points on these "elliptic curves", it is a diophantine problem. Generally speaking it is much easier to identify rational points on the curves (and birational parameterization is one way to answer that), and it can be AFAIK a difficult problem to say whether integer points exist even given some rational solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps what you have in mind is the subject discussed here, at Ask SageMath.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certain curves are birationally equivalent to elliptic curves, so in this sense Diophantine equations give rise to elliptic curves. I think this is what the OP meant when he referred to birational equivalence between Diophantine equations and elliptic curves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jan 2 '16 at 18:27












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is exactly it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon Thomas Van Over
    Jan 2 '16 at 20:32














7












7








7


4



$begingroup$


A while ago I saw this question Quartic diophantine equation: $16r^4+112r^3+200r^2-112r+16=s^2$ which was very relevant to a undergraduate research paper I am currently working on. The answer given for this problem describes a method for determining solutions to diophantine equations by finding a "birational equivalence" to the solution set of an elliptic curve.



The result I am seeking depends on the solution set to a quartic diophantine equation of two variables and I believe that there is only one solution and no more (which was indicated by a program which checked possible values up to a high number).



So my question is, is there a general method for determining such a birational equivalence between solutions sets of diophantine equations and elliptic curves? And where is a good source for an undergraduate to learn to use these tools?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A while ago I saw this question Quartic diophantine equation: $16r^4+112r^3+200r^2-112r+16=s^2$ which was very relevant to a undergraduate research paper I am currently working on. The answer given for this problem describes a method for determining solutions to diophantine equations by finding a "birational equivalence" to the solution set of an elliptic curve.



The result I am seeking depends on the solution set to a quartic diophantine equation of two variables and I believe that there is only one solution and no more (which was indicated by a program which checked possible values up to a high number).



So my question is, is there a general method for determining such a birational equivalence between solutions sets of diophantine equations and elliptic curves? And where is a good source for an undergraduate to learn to use these tools?







diophantine-equations elliptic-curves book-recommendation birational-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:21









Community

1




1










asked Dec 28 '15 at 20:23









Brandon Thomas Van OverBrandon Thomas Van Over

3,84221128




3,84221128












  • $begingroup$
    I'm not quite sure what "a birational equivalence" between diophantine equations and elliptic curves should mean. When we want to find integer points on these "elliptic curves", it is a diophantine problem. Generally speaking it is much easier to identify rational points on the curves (and birational parameterization is one way to answer that), and it can be AFAIK a difficult problem to say whether integer points exist even given some rational solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps what you have in mind is the subject discussed here, at Ask SageMath.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certain curves are birationally equivalent to elliptic curves, so in this sense Diophantine equations give rise to elliptic curves. I think this is what the OP meant when he referred to birational equivalence between Diophantine equations and elliptic curves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jan 2 '16 at 18:27












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is exactly it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon Thomas Van Over
    Jan 2 '16 at 20:32


















  • $begingroup$
    I'm not quite sure what "a birational equivalence" between diophantine equations and elliptic curves should mean. When we want to find integer points on these "elliptic curves", it is a diophantine problem. Generally speaking it is much easier to identify rational points on the curves (and birational parameterization is one way to answer that), and it can be AFAIK a difficult problem to say whether integer points exist even given some rational solutions.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:30










  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps what you have in mind is the subject discussed here, at Ask SageMath.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 28 '15 at 20:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certain curves are birationally equivalent to elliptic curves, so in this sense Diophantine equations give rise to elliptic curves. I think this is what the OP meant when he referred to birational equivalence between Diophantine equations and elliptic curves.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
    Jan 2 '16 at 18:27












  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is exactly it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon Thomas Van Over
    Jan 2 '16 at 20:32
















$begingroup$
I'm not quite sure what "a birational equivalence" between diophantine equations and elliptic curves should mean. When we want to find integer points on these "elliptic curves", it is a diophantine problem. Generally speaking it is much easier to identify rational points on the curves (and birational parameterization is one way to answer that), and it can be AFAIK a difficult problem to say whether integer points exist even given some rational solutions.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 28 '15 at 20:30




$begingroup$
I'm not quite sure what "a birational equivalence" between diophantine equations and elliptic curves should mean. When we want to find integer points on these "elliptic curves", it is a diophantine problem. Generally speaking it is much easier to identify rational points on the curves (and birational parameterization is one way to answer that), and it can be AFAIK a difficult problem to say whether integer points exist even given some rational solutions.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 28 '15 at 20:30












$begingroup$
Perhaps what you have in mind is the subject discussed here, at Ask SageMath.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 28 '15 at 20:33




$begingroup$
Perhaps what you have in mind is the subject discussed here, at Ask SageMath.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 28 '15 at 20:33




1




1




$begingroup$
Certain curves are birationally equivalent to elliptic curves, so in this sense Diophantine equations give rise to elliptic curves. I think this is what the OP meant when he referred to birational equivalence between Diophantine equations and elliptic curves.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jan 2 '16 at 18:27






$begingroup$
Certain curves are birationally equivalent to elliptic curves, so in this sense Diophantine equations give rise to elliptic curves. I think this is what the OP meant when he referred to birational equivalence between Diophantine equations and elliptic curves.
$endgroup$
– Jose Arnaldo Bebita Dris
Jan 2 '16 at 18:27














$begingroup$
Yes that is exactly it :)
$endgroup$
– Brandon Thomas Van Over
Jan 2 '16 at 20:32




$begingroup$
Yes that is exactly it :)
$endgroup$
– Brandon Thomas Van Over
Jan 2 '16 at 20:32










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

The following shows how to transform the quartic
begin{equation}
y^2=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e ,
end{equation}
with $a,b,c,d,e in mathbb{Q}$, into an equivalent elliptic curve.




Case 1:




We first consider the case when $a=1$, which is very common. If $a=alpha^2$ for some rational $alpha$, we
substitute $y=Y/alpha$ and $x=X/alpha$, giving
begin{equation*}
Y^2=X^4+frac{b}{alpha}X^3+cX^2+alpha d X+alpha^2 e
end{equation*} Thus, suppose
begin{equation}
y^2=x^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e
end{equation}



We describe the method given by Mordell on page $77$ of his book Diophantine Equations, with some minor modifications.



We first get rid of the cubic term by making the standard substitution $x=z-b/4$ giving
begin{equation*}
y^2=z^4+fz^2+gz+h
end{equation*}
where
begin{equation*}
f=frac{8c-3b^2}{8} hspace{1cm} g=frac{b^3-4bc+8d}{8} hspace{1cm}
h=frac{-(3b^4-16b^2c+64bd-256e)}{256}
end{equation*}



We now get rid off the quartic term by defining $y=z^2+u+k$, where $u$ is a new variable and $k$ is a constant to be
determined. This gives the quadratic in $z$
begin{equation*}
(f-2(k+u))z^2+gz+h-k^2-u(2k+u)=0
end{equation*}



For $x$ to be rational, then $z$ should be rational, so the discriminant of this quadratic would have to be a rational square.
The discriminant is a cubic in $u$. We do not get a term in $u^2$ if we make $k=f/6$, giving
begin{equation*}
D^2=-8u^3+2frac{f^2+12h}{3}u+frac{2f^3-72fh+27g^2}{27}
end{equation*}
and, if we substitute the formulae for $f,g,h$, and clear denominators we have
begin{equation}
G^2=H^3+27(3bd-c^2-12e)H+27(27b^2e-9bcd+2c^3-72ce+27d^2)
end{equation}
with
begin{equation}
x=frac{2G-3bH+9(bc-6d)}{12H-9(3b^2-8c)}
end{equation}
and
begin{equation}
y= pm frac{18x^2+9bx+3c-H}{18}
end{equation}




Case 2:




If $a ne alpha^2$, we need a rational point $(p,q)$ lying on the quartic.



Let $z=1/(x-p)$, so that $x=p+1/z$ giving
begin{equation*}
y^2z^4=(ap^4+bp^3+cp^2+dp+e)z^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)z^3+
end{equation*}
begin{equation*}
(6ap^2+3bp+c)z^2+(4ap+b)z+a
end{equation*}
where the coefficient of $z^4$ is, in fact, $q^2$. Define, $y=w/z^2$, and then
$z=u/q^2, , w=v/q^3$
giving
begin{equation}
v^2=u^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)u^3+q^2(6ap^2+3bp+c)u^2+
end{equation}
begin{equation*}
q^4(4ap+b)u+aq^6 equiv u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k
end{equation*}



We now, essentially, complete the square. We can write
begin{equation*}
y^2=u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k=(u^2+mu+n)^2+(su+t)
end{equation*}
if we set
begin{equation*}
m=frac{f}{2} hspace{1cm} n=frac{4g-f^2}{8} hspace{1cm} s=frac{f^3-4fg+8h}{8}
end{equation*}
and
begin{equation*}
t=frac{-(f^4-8f^2g+16(g^2-4k))}{64}
end{equation*}



This gives
begin{equation*}
(y+u^2+mu+n)(y-u^2-mu-n)=su+t
end{equation*}
and if we define $y+u^2+mu+n=Z$ we have
begin{equation}
2(u^2+mu+n)=Z-frac{su+t}{Z}
end{equation}



Multiply both sides by $Z^2$, giving
begin{equation*}
2u^2Z^2+2muZ^2+suZ=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
end{equation*}
which, on defining $W=uZ$, gives
begin{equation*}
2W^2+2mWZ+sW=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
end{equation*}



Define, $Z=X/2$ and $W=Y/4$ giving
begin{equation}
Y^2+2mXY+2sY=X^3-4nX^2-4tX
end{equation}
which is an elliptic curve. If we define $Y=G-s-mX$, we transform to the form
begin{equation}
G^2=X^3+(m^2-4n)X^2+(2ms-4t)X+s^2
end{equation}



All of the above are easy to program in any symbolic package. Hopefully, I have all the formulae correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for taking the time to explain this in detail and provide a reference. I really appreciate it.
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon Thomas Van Over
    Dec 29 '15 at 14:20










  • $begingroup$
    This will seem to solve one of my longstanding problems. I'm going to try programming this one out and report back.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    May 14 '16 at 15:39



















3












$begingroup$

(This is a long comment re MacLeod's answer.)



We can also combine the two cases together. Assume a quartic polynomial to be made a square,



$$pu^4+qu^3+ru^2+su+t=z_1^2tag1$$



has a known rational point, call it $w$. We substitute $u=v+w$ and collect the new variable $v$,



$$c_4v^4+c_3v^3+c_2v^2+c_1v+color{blue}{c_0^2}=z_2^2tag2$$



where the $c_i$ are polynomials in $w$ and the coefficients of $(1)$. The constant term of $(2)$ turns out to be a square, specifically, $c_0^2:=pw^4+qw^3+rw^2+sw+t$.



Let $v=1/x,,$ $z_2=c_0, z_3/x^2$ and $(2)$ becomes,



$$x^4+d_3x^3+d_2x^2+d_1x+d_0=z_3^2tag3$$



which is the Case 1 and then be solved as explained by MacLeod.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1591990%2fbirational-equivalence-of-diophantine-equations-and-elliptic-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10












    $begingroup$

    The following shows how to transform the quartic
    begin{equation}
    y^2=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e ,
    end{equation}
    with $a,b,c,d,e in mathbb{Q}$, into an equivalent elliptic curve.




    Case 1:




    We first consider the case when $a=1$, which is very common. If $a=alpha^2$ for some rational $alpha$, we
    substitute $y=Y/alpha$ and $x=X/alpha$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    Y^2=X^4+frac{b}{alpha}X^3+cX^2+alpha d X+alpha^2 e
    end{equation*} Thus, suppose
    begin{equation}
    y^2=x^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e
    end{equation}



    We describe the method given by Mordell on page $77$ of his book Diophantine Equations, with some minor modifications.



    We first get rid of the cubic term by making the standard substitution $x=z-b/4$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=z^4+fz^2+gz+h
    end{equation*}
    where
    begin{equation*}
    f=frac{8c-3b^2}{8} hspace{1cm} g=frac{b^3-4bc+8d}{8} hspace{1cm}
    h=frac{-(3b^4-16b^2c+64bd-256e)}{256}
    end{equation*}



    We now get rid off the quartic term by defining $y=z^2+u+k$, where $u$ is a new variable and $k$ is a constant to be
    determined. This gives the quadratic in $z$
    begin{equation*}
    (f-2(k+u))z^2+gz+h-k^2-u(2k+u)=0
    end{equation*}



    For $x$ to be rational, then $z$ should be rational, so the discriminant of this quadratic would have to be a rational square.
    The discriminant is a cubic in $u$. We do not get a term in $u^2$ if we make $k=f/6$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    D^2=-8u^3+2frac{f^2+12h}{3}u+frac{2f^3-72fh+27g^2}{27}
    end{equation*}
    and, if we substitute the formulae for $f,g,h$, and clear denominators we have
    begin{equation}
    G^2=H^3+27(3bd-c^2-12e)H+27(27b^2e-9bcd+2c^3-72ce+27d^2)
    end{equation}
    with
    begin{equation}
    x=frac{2G-3bH+9(bc-6d)}{12H-9(3b^2-8c)}
    end{equation}
    and
    begin{equation}
    y= pm frac{18x^2+9bx+3c-H}{18}
    end{equation}




    Case 2:




    If $a ne alpha^2$, we need a rational point $(p,q)$ lying on the quartic.



    Let $z=1/(x-p)$, so that $x=p+1/z$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2z^4=(ap^4+bp^3+cp^2+dp+e)z^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)z^3+
    end{equation*}
    begin{equation*}
    (6ap^2+3bp+c)z^2+(4ap+b)z+a
    end{equation*}
    where the coefficient of $z^4$ is, in fact, $q^2$. Define, $y=w/z^2$, and then
    $z=u/q^2, , w=v/q^3$
    giving
    begin{equation}
    v^2=u^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)u^3+q^2(6ap^2+3bp+c)u^2+
    end{equation}
    begin{equation*}
    q^4(4ap+b)u+aq^6 equiv u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k
    end{equation*}



    We now, essentially, complete the square. We can write
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k=(u^2+mu+n)^2+(su+t)
    end{equation*}
    if we set
    begin{equation*}
    m=frac{f}{2} hspace{1cm} n=frac{4g-f^2}{8} hspace{1cm} s=frac{f^3-4fg+8h}{8}
    end{equation*}
    and
    begin{equation*}
    t=frac{-(f^4-8f^2g+16(g^2-4k))}{64}
    end{equation*}



    This gives
    begin{equation*}
    (y+u^2+mu+n)(y-u^2-mu-n)=su+t
    end{equation*}
    and if we define $y+u^2+mu+n=Z$ we have
    begin{equation}
    2(u^2+mu+n)=Z-frac{su+t}{Z}
    end{equation}



    Multiply both sides by $Z^2$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    2u^2Z^2+2muZ^2+suZ=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}
    which, on defining $W=uZ$, gives
    begin{equation*}
    2W^2+2mWZ+sW=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}



    Define, $Z=X/2$ and $W=Y/4$ giving
    begin{equation}
    Y^2+2mXY+2sY=X^3-4nX^2-4tX
    end{equation}
    which is an elliptic curve. If we define $Y=G-s-mX$, we transform to the form
    begin{equation}
    G^2=X^3+(m^2-4n)X^2+(2ms-4t)X+s^2
    end{equation}



    All of the above are easy to program in any symbolic package. Hopefully, I have all the formulae correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for taking the time to explain this in detail and provide a reference. I really appreciate it.
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon Thomas Van Over
      Dec 29 '15 at 14:20










    • $begingroup$
      This will seem to solve one of my longstanding problems. I'm going to try programming this one out and report back.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      May 14 '16 at 15:39
















    10












    $begingroup$

    The following shows how to transform the quartic
    begin{equation}
    y^2=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e ,
    end{equation}
    with $a,b,c,d,e in mathbb{Q}$, into an equivalent elliptic curve.




    Case 1:




    We first consider the case when $a=1$, which is very common. If $a=alpha^2$ for some rational $alpha$, we
    substitute $y=Y/alpha$ and $x=X/alpha$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    Y^2=X^4+frac{b}{alpha}X^3+cX^2+alpha d X+alpha^2 e
    end{equation*} Thus, suppose
    begin{equation}
    y^2=x^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e
    end{equation}



    We describe the method given by Mordell on page $77$ of his book Diophantine Equations, with some minor modifications.



    We first get rid of the cubic term by making the standard substitution $x=z-b/4$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=z^4+fz^2+gz+h
    end{equation*}
    where
    begin{equation*}
    f=frac{8c-3b^2}{8} hspace{1cm} g=frac{b^3-4bc+8d}{8} hspace{1cm}
    h=frac{-(3b^4-16b^2c+64bd-256e)}{256}
    end{equation*}



    We now get rid off the quartic term by defining $y=z^2+u+k$, where $u$ is a new variable and $k$ is a constant to be
    determined. This gives the quadratic in $z$
    begin{equation*}
    (f-2(k+u))z^2+gz+h-k^2-u(2k+u)=0
    end{equation*}



    For $x$ to be rational, then $z$ should be rational, so the discriminant of this quadratic would have to be a rational square.
    The discriminant is a cubic in $u$. We do not get a term in $u^2$ if we make $k=f/6$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    D^2=-8u^3+2frac{f^2+12h}{3}u+frac{2f^3-72fh+27g^2}{27}
    end{equation*}
    and, if we substitute the formulae for $f,g,h$, and clear denominators we have
    begin{equation}
    G^2=H^3+27(3bd-c^2-12e)H+27(27b^2e-9bcd+2c^3-72ce+27d^2)
    end{equation}
    with
    begin{equation}
    x=frac{2G-3bH+9(bc-6d)}{12H-9(3b^2-8c)}
    end{equation}
    and
    begin{equation}
    y= pm frac{18x^2+9bx+3c-H}{18}
    end{equation}




    Case 2:




    If $a ne alpha^2$, we need a rational point $(p,q)$ lying on the quartic.



    Let $z=1/(x-p)$, so that $x=p+1/z$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2z^4=(ap^4+bp^3+cp^2+dp+e)z^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)z^3+
    end{equation*}
    begin{equation*}
    (6ap^2+3bp+c)z^2+(4ap+b)z+a
    end{equation*}
    where the coefficient of $z^4$ is, in fact, $q^2$. Define, $y=w/z^2$, and then
    $z=u/q^2, , w=v/q^3$
    giving
    begin{equation}
    v^2=u^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)u^3+q^2(6ap^2+3bp+c)u^2+
    end{equation}
    begin{equation*}
    q^4(4ap+b)u+aq^6 equiv u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k
    end{equation*}



    We now, essentially, complete the square. We can write
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k=(u^2+mu+n)^2+(su+t)
    end{equation*}
    if we set
    begin{equation*}
    m=frac{f}{2} hspace{1cm} n=frac{4g-f^2}{8} hspace{1cm} s=frac{f^3-4fg+8h}{8}
    end{equation*}
    and
    begin{equation*}
    t=frac{-(f^4-8f^2g+16(g^2-4k))}{64}
    end{equation*}



    This gives
    begin{equation*}
    (y+u^2+mu+n)(y-u^2-mu-n)=su+t
    end{equation*}
    and if we define $y+u^2+mu+n=Z$ we have
    begin{equation}
    2(u^2+mu+n)=Z-frac{su+t}{Z}
    end{equation}



    Multiply both sides by $Z^2$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    2u^2Z^2+2muZ^2+suZ=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}
    which, on defining $W=uZ$, gives
    begin{equation*}
    2W^2+2mWZ+sW=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}



    Define, $Z=X/2$ and $W=Y/4$ giving
    begin{equation}
    Y^2+2mXY+2sY=X^3-4nX^2-4tX
    end{equation}
    which is an elliptic curve. If we define $Y=G-s-mX$, we transform to the form
    begin{equation}
    G^2=X^3+(m^2-4n)X^2+(2ms-4t)X+s^2
    end{equation}



    All of the above are easy to program in any symbolic package. Hopefully, I have all the formulae correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for taking the time to explain this in detail and provide a reference. I really appreciate it.
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon Thomas Van Over
      Dec 29 '15 at 14:20










    • $begingroup$
      This will seem to solve one of my longstanding problems. I'm going to try programming this one out and report back.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      May 14 '16 at 15:39














    10












    10








    10





    $begingroup$

    The following shows how to transform the quartic
    begin{equation}
    y^2=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e ,
    end{equation}
    with $a,b,c,d,e in mathbb{Q}$, into an equivalent elliptic curve.




    Case 1:




    We first consider the case when $a=1$, which is very common. If $a=alpha^2$ for some rational $alpha$, we
    substitute $y=Y/alpha$ and $x=X/alpha$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    Y^2=X^4+frac{b}{alpha}X^3+cX^2+alpha d X+alpha^2 e
    end{equation*} Thus, suppose
    begin{equation}
    y^2=x^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e
    end{equation}



    We describe the method given by Mordell on page $77$ of his book Diophantine Equations, with some minor modifications.



    We first get rid of the cubic term by making the standard substitution $x=z-b/4$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=z^4+fz^2+gz+h
    end{equation*}
    where
    begin{equation*}
    f=frac{8c-3b^2}{8} hspace{1cm} g=frac{b^3-4bc+8d}{8} hspace{1cm}
    h=frac{-(3b^4-16b^2c+64bd-256e)}{256}
    end{equation*}



    We now get rid off the quartic term by defining $y=z^2+u+k$, where $u$ is a new variable and $k$ is a constant to be
    determined. This gives the quadratic in $z$
    begin{equation*}
    (f-2(k+u))z^2+gz+h-k^2-u(2k+u)=0
    end{equation*}



    For $x$ to be rational, then $z$ should be rational, so the discriminant of this quadratic would have to be a rational square.
    The discriminant is a cubic in $u$. We do not get a term in $u^2$ if we make $k=f/6$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    D^2=-8u^3+2frac{f^2+12h}{3}u+frac{2f^3-72fh+27g^2}{27}
    end{equation*}
    and, if we substitute the formulae for $f,g,h$, and clear denominators we have
    begin{equation}
    G^2=H^3+27(3bd-c^2-12e)H+27(27b^2e-9bcd+2c^3-72ce+27d^2)
    end{equation}
    with
    begin{equation}
    x=frac{2G-3bH+9(bc-6d)}{12H-9(3b^2-8c)}
    end{equation}
    and
    begin{equation}
    y= pm frac{18x^2+9bx+3c-H}{18}
    end{equation}




    Case 2:




    If $a ne alpha^2$, we need a rational point $(p,q)$ lying on the quartic.



    Let $z=1/(x-p)$, so that $x=p+1/z$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2z^4=(ap^4+bp^3+cp^2+dp+e)z^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)z^3+
    end{equation*}
    begin{equation*}
    (6ap^2+3bp+c)z^2+(4ap+b)z+a
    end{equation*}
    where the coefficient of $z^4$ is, in fact, $q^2$. Define, $y=w/z^2$, and then
    $z=u/q^2, , w=v/q^3$
    giving
    begin{equation}
    v^2=u^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)u^3+q^2(6ap^2+3bp+c)u^2+
    end{equation}
    begin{equation*}
    q^4(4ap+b)u+aq^6 equiv u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k
    end{equation*}



    We now, essentially, complete the square. We can write
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k=(u^2+mu+n)^2+(su+t)
    end{equation*}
    if we set
    begin{equation*}
    m=frac{f}{2} hspace{1cm} n=frac{4g-f^2}{8} hspace{1cm} s=frac{f^3-4fg+8h}{8}
    end{equation*}
    and
    begin{equation*}
    t=frac{-(f^4-8f^2g+16(g^2-4k))}{64}
    end{equation*}



    This gives
    begin{equation*}
    (y+u^2+mu+n)(y-u^2-mu-n)=su+t
    end{equation*}
    and if we define $y+u^2+mu+n=Z$ we have
    begin{equation}
    2(u^2+mu+n)=Z-frac{su+t}{Z}
    end{equation}



    Multiply both sides by $Z^2$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    2u^2Z^2+2muZ^2+suZ=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}
    which, on defining $W=uZ$, gives
    begin{equation*}
    2W^2+2mWZ+sW=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}



    Define, $Z=X/2$ and $W=Y/4$ giving
    begin{equation}
    Y^2+2mXY+2sY=X^3-4nX^2-4tX
    end{equation}
    which is an elliptic curve. If we define $Y=G-s-mX$, we transform to the form
    begin{equation}
    G^2=X^3+(m^2-4n)X^2+(2ms-4t)X+s^2
    end{equation}



    All of the above are easy to program in any symbolic package. Hopefully, I have all the formulae correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The following shows how to transform the quartic
    begin{equation}
    y^2=ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e ,
    end{equation}
    with $a,b,c,d,e in mathbb{Q}$, into an equivalent elliptic curve.




    Case 1:




    We first consider the case when $a=1$, which is very common. If $a=alpha^2$ for some rational $alpha$, we
    substitute $y=Y/alpha$ and $x=X/alpha$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    Y^2=X^4+frac{b}{alpha}X^3+cX^2+alpha d X+alpha^2 e
    end{equation*} Thus, suppose
    begin{equation}
    y^2=x^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e
    end{equation}



    We describe the method given by Mordell on page $77$ of his book Diophantine Equations, with some minor modifications.



    We first get rid of the cubic term by making the standard substitution $x=z-b/4$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=z^4+fz^2+gz+h
    end{equation*}
    where
    begin{equation*}
    f=frac{8c-3b^2}{8} hspace{1cm} g=frac{b^3-4bc+8d}{8} hspace{1cm}
    h=frac{-(3b^4-16b^2c+64bd-256e)}{256}
    end{equation*}



    We now get rid off the quartic term by defining $y=z^2+u+k$, where $u$ is a new variable and $k$ is a constant to be
    determined. This gives the quadratic in $z$
    begin{equation*}
    (f-2(k+u))z^2+gz+h-k^2-u(2k+u)=0
    end{equation*}



    For $x$ to be rational, then $z$ should be rational, so the discriminant of this quadratic would have to be a rational square.
    The discriminant is a cubic in $u$. We do not get a term in $u^2$ if we make $k=f/6$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    D^2=-8u^3+2frac{f^2+12h}{3}u+frac{2f^3-72fh+27g^2}{27}
    end{equation*}
    and, if we substitute the formulae for $f,g,h$, and clear denominators we have
    begin{equation}
    G^2=H^3+27(3bd-c^2-12e)H+27(27b^2e-9bcd+2c^3-72ce+27d^2)
    end{equation}
    with
    begin{equation}
    x=frac{2G-3bH+9(bc-6d)}{12H-9(3b^2-8c)}
    end{equation}
    and
    begin{equation}
    y= pm frac{18x^2+9bx+3c-H}{18}
    end{equation}




    Case 2:




    If $a ne alpha^2$, we need a rational point $(p,q)$ lying on the quartic.



    Let $z=1/(x-p)$, so that $x=p+1/z$ giving
    begin{equation*}
    y^2z^4=(ap^4+bp^3+cp^2+dp+e)z^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)z^3+
    end{equation*}
    begin{equation*}
    (6ap^2+3bp+c)z^2+(4ap+b)z+a
    end{equation*}
    where the coefficient of $z^4$ is, in fact, $q^2$. Define, $y=w/z^2$, and then
    $z=u/q^2, , w=v/q^3$
    giving
    begin{equation}
    v^2=u^4+(4ap^3+3bp^2+2cp+d)u^3+q^2(6ap^2+3bp+c)u^2+
    end{equation}
    begin{equation*}
    q^4(4ap+b)u+aq^6 equiv u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k
    end{equation*}



    We now, essentially, complete the square. We can write
    begin{equation*}
    y^2=u^4+fu^3+gu^2+hu+k=(u^2+mu+n)^2+(su+t)
    end{equation*}
    if we set
    begin{equation*}
    m=frac{f}{2} hspace{1cm} n=frac{4g-f^2}{8} hspace{1cm} s=frac{f^3-4fg+8h}{8}
    end{equation*}
    and
    begin{equation*}
    t=frac{-(f^4-8f^2g+16(g^2-4k))}{64}
    end{equation*}



    This gives
    begin{equation*}
    (y+u^2+mu+n)(y-u^2-mu-n)=su+t
    end{equation*}
    and if we define $y+u^2+mu+n=Z$ we have
    begin{equation}
    2(u^2+mu+n)=Z-frac{su+t}{Z}
    end{equation}



    Multiply both sides by $Z^2$, giving
    begin{equation*}
    2u^2Z^2+2muZ^2+suZ=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}
    which, on defining $W=uZ$, gives
    begin{equation*}
    2W^2+2mWZ+sW=Z^3-2nZ^2-tZ
    end{equation*}



    Define, $Z=X/2$ and $W=Y/4$ giving
    begin{equation}
    Y^2+2mXY+2sY=X^3-4nX^2-4tX
    end{equation}
    which is an elliptic curve. If we define $Y=G-s-mX$, we transform to the form
    begin{equation}
    G^2=X^3+(m^2-4n)X^2+(2ms-4t)X+s^2
    end{equation}



    All of the above are easy to program in any symbolic package. Hopefully, I have all the formulae correct.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jul 25 '16 at 1:06









    Tito Piezas III

    27.6k367176




    27.6k367176










    answered Dec 29 '15 at 12:02









    Allan MacLeodAllan MacLeod

    1,23975




    1,23975












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for taking the time to explain this in detail and provide a reference. I really appreciate it.
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon Thomas Van Over
      Dec 29 '15 at 14:20










    • $begingroup$
      This will seem to solve one of my longstanding problems. I'm going to try programming this one out and report back.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      May 14 '16 at 15:39


















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for taking the time to explain this in detail and provide a reference. I really appreciate it.
      $endgroup$
      – Brandon Thomas Van Over
      Dec 29 '15 at 14:20










    • $begingroup$
      This will seem to solve one of my longstanding problems. I'm going to try programming this one out and report back.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      May 14 '16 at 15:39
















    $begingroup$
    Thank you for taking the time to explain this in detail and provide a reference. I really appreciate it.
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon Thomas Van Over
    Dec 29 '15 at 14:20




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for taking the time to explain this in detail and provide a reference. I really appreciate it.
    $endgroup$
    – Brandon Thomas Van Over
    Dec 29 '15 at 14:20












    $begingroup$
    This will seem to solve one of my longstanding problems. I'm going to try programming this one out and report back.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    May 14 '16 at 15:39




    $begingroup$
    This will seem to solve one of my longstanding problems. I'm going to try programming this one out and report back.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    May 14 '16 at 15:39











    3












    $begingroup$

    (This is a long comment re MacLeod's answer.)



    We can also combine the two cases together. Assume a quartic polynomial to be made a square,



    $$pu^4+qu^3+ru^2+su+t=z_1^2tag1$$



    has a known rational point, call it $w$. We substitute $u=v+w$ and collect the new variable $v$,



    $$c_4v^4+c_3v^3+c_2v^2+c_1v+color{blue}{c_0^2}=z_2^2tag2$$



    where the $c_i$ are polynomials in $w$ and the coefficients of $(1)$. The constant term of $(2)$ turns out to be a square, specifically, $c_0^2:=pw^4+qw^3+rw^2+sw+t$.



    Let $v=1/x,,$ $z_2=c_0, z_3/x^2$ and $(2)$ becomes,



    $$x^4+d_3x^3+d_2x^2+d_1x+d_0=z_3^2tag3$$



    which is the Case 1 and then be solved as explained by MacLeod.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      (This is a long comment re MacLeod's answer.)



      We can also combine the two cases together. Assume a quartic polynomial to be made a square,



      $$pu^4+qu^3+ru^2+su+t=z_1^2tag1$$



      has a known rational point, call it $w$. We substitute $u=v+w$ and collect the new variable $v$,



      $$c_4v^4+c_3v^3+c_2v^2+c_1v+color{blue}{c_0^2}=z_2^2tag2$$



      where the $c_i$ are polynomials in $w$ and the coefficients of $(1)$. The constant term of $(2)$ turns out to be a square, specifically, $c_0^2:=pw^4+qw^3+rw^2+sw+t$.



      Let $v=1/x,,$ $z_2=c_0, z_3/x^2$ and $(2)$ becomes,



      $$x^4+d_3x^3+d_2x^2+d_1x+d_0=z_3^2tag3$$



      which is the Case 1 and then be solved as explained by MacLeod.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        (This is a long comment re MacLeod's answer.)



        We can also combine the two cases together. Assume a quartic polynomial to be made a square,



        $$pu^4+qu^3+ru^2+su+t=z_1^2tag1$$



        has a known rational point, call it $w$. We substitute $u=v+w$ and collect the new variable $v$,



        $$c_4v^4+c_3v^3+c_2v^2+c_1v+color{blue}{c_0^2}=z_2^2tag2$$



        where the $c_i$ are polynomials in $w$ and the coefficients of $(1)$. The constant term of $(2)$ turns out to be a square, specifically, $c_0^2:=pw^4+qw^3+rw^2+sw+t$.



        Let $v=1/x,,$ $z_2=c_0, z_3/x^2$ and $(2)$ becomes,



        $$x^4+d_3x^3+d_2x^2+d_1x+d_0=z_3^2tag3$$



        which is the Case 1 and then be solved as explained by MacLeod.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        (This is a long comment re MacLeod's answer.)



        We can also combine the two cases together. Assume a quartic polynomial to be made a square,



        $$pu^4+qu^3+ru^2+su+t=z_1^2tag1$$



        has a known rational point, call it $w$. We substitute $u=v+w$ and collect the new variable $v$,



        $$c_4v^4+c_3v^3+c_2v^2+c_1v+color{blue}{c_0^2}=z_2^2tag2$$



        where the $c_i$ are polynomials in $w$ and the coefficients of $(1)$. The constant term of $(2)$ turns out to be a square, specifically, $c_0^2:=pw^4+qw^3+rw^2+sw+t$.



        Let $v=1/x,,$ $z_2=c_0, z_3/x^2$ and $(2)$ becomes,



        $$x^4+d_3x^3+d_2x^2+d_1x+d_0=z_3^2tag3$$



        which is the Case 1 and then be solved as explained by MacLeod.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 14 '18 at 3:12

























        answered Jul 25 '16 at 19:10









        Tito Piezas IIITito Piezas III

        27.6k367176




        27.6k367176






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1591990%2fbirational-equivalence-of-diophantine-equations-and-elliptic-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...