Show that $Delta ne 0$ and LI of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are equivalent.











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In Complex Analysis by Freitag it is claimed that $Delta ne 0$ and LI of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are equivalent; that is, if $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ then $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are linearly independent and conversely. But $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ means that only one (up to a multiplication of $Delta$ by a nonzero number) linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero, so how that implies that all linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero? Same question goes for the converse.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Consider the values of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ at the cusp $iinfty$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 18:49










  • @LordSharktheUnknown, both are zero at $iinfty$, am I right? if so it can come from $Delta = 0$ at $iinfty$. However, I can't relate this to the problem of their equivalence.
    – 72D
    Nov 15 at 18:55












  • No, the point is that neither is zero at infinity, but the only linear combination that is is $Delta$ (up to a a constant factor).
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 19:14















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In Complex Analysis by Freitag it is claimed that $Delta ne 0$ and LI of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are equivalent; that is, if $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ then $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are linearly independent and conversely. But $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ means that only one (up to a multiplication of $Delta$ by a nonzero number) linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero, so how that implies that all linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero? Same question goes for the converse.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Consider the values of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ at the cusp $iinfty$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 18:49










  • @LordSharktheUnknown, both are zero at $iinfty$, am I right? if so it can come from $Delta = 0$ at $iinfty$. However, I can't relate this to the problem of their equivalence.
    – 72D
    Nov 15 at 18:55












  • No, the point is that neither is zero at infinity, but the only linear combination that is is $Delta$ (up to a a constant factor).
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 19:14













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











In Complex Analysis by Freitag it is claimed that $Delta ne 0$ and LI of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are equivalent; that is, if $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ then $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are linearly independent and conversely. But $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ means that only one (up to a multiplication of $Delta$ by a nonzero number) linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero, so how that implies that all linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero? Same question goes for the converse.










share|cite|improve this question















In Complex Analysis by Freitag it is claimed that $Delta ne 0$ and LI of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are equivalent; that is, if $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ then $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ are linearly independent and conversely. But $Delta = (60G_4)^3 - 27(140G_6)^2 ne 0$ means that only one (up to a multiplication of $Delta$ by a nonzero number) linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero, so how that implies that all linear combination of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ is nonzero? Same question goes for the converse.







complex-analysis modular-forms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 19:08

























asked Nov 15 at 18:43









72D

52516




52516








  • 1




    Consider the values of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ at the cusp $iinfty$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 18:49










  • @LordSharktheUnknown, both are zero at $iinfty$, am I right? if so it can come from $Delta = 0$ at $iinfty$. However, I can't relate this to the problem of their equivalence.
    – 72D
    Nov 15 at 18:55












  • No, the point is that neither is zero at infinity, but the only linear combination that is is $Delta$ (up to a a constant factor).
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 19:14














  • 1




    Consider the values of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ at the cusp $iinfty$.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 18:49










  • @LordSharktheUnknown, both are zero at $iinfty$, am I right? if so it can come from $Delta = 0$ at $iinfty$. However, I can't relate this to the problem of their equivalence.
    – 72D
    Nov 15 at 18:55












  • No, the point is that neither is zero at infinity, but the only linear combination that is is $Delta$ (up to a a constant factor).
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 15 at 19:14








1




1




Consider the values of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ at the cusp $iinfty$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 15 at 18:49




Consider the values of $G_4^3$ and $G_6^2$ at the cusp $iinfty$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 15 at 18:49












@LordSharktheUnknown, both are zero at $iinfty$, am I right? if so it can come from $Delta = 0$ at $iinfty$. However, I can't relate this to the problem of their equivalence.
– 72D
Nov 15 at 18:55






@LordSharktheUnknown, both are zero at $iinfty$, am I right? if so it can come from $Delta = 0$ at $iinfty$. However, I can't relate this to the problem of their equivalence.
– 72D
Nov 15 at 18:55














No, the point is that neither is zero at infinity, but the only linear combination that is is $Delta$ (up to a a constant factor).
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 15 at 19:14




No, the point is that neither is zero at infinity, but the only linear combination that is is $Delta$ (up to a a constant factor).
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 15 at 19:14















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000104%2fshow-that-delta-ne-0-and-li-of-g-43-and-g-62-are-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000104%2fshow-that-delta-ne-0-and-li-of-g-43-and-g-62-are-equivalent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...