All objects in $bf{FinVect}$ have finite length












0














I want to show that every object $X$ of $bf{FinVect}$ has finite length. i.e. there is a sequence of monos
$$
0=X_0 hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow ... hookrightarrow X_{n-1} hookrightarrow X_n = X
$$

such that $forall i,{X_i}/{X_{i-1}}$ is simple.



I think this is supposed to be a trivial case, but I do not see how. If we use just the zero map $0xrightarrow{0} X$ it does not work, since $X/{0}cong X$ need not be simple.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    What are simple objects in your category? Can you show that any object $X$ in this category is of length $dim(X)$?
    – Batominovski
    Nov 24 at 12:35












  • @Batominovski Thanks, that hint was enough - it feels quite obvious now
    – Soap
    Nov 25 at 10:45
















0














I want to show that every object $X$ of $bf{FinVect}$ has finite length. i.e. there is a sequence of monos
$$
0=X_0 hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow ... hookrightarrow X_{n-1} hookrightarrow X_n = X
$$

such that $forall i,{X_i}/{X_{i-1}}$ is simple.



I think this is supposed to be a trivial case, but I do not see how. If we use just the zero map $0xrightarrow{0} X$ it does not work, since $X/{0}cong X$ need not be simple.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    What are simple objects in your category? Can you show that any object $X$ in this category is of length $dim(X)$?
    – Batominovski
    Nov 24 at 12:35












  • @Batominovski Thanks, that hint was enough - it feels quite obvious now
    – Soap
    Nov 25 at 10:45














0












0








0







I want to show that every object $X$ of $bf{FinVect}$ has finite length. i.e. there is a sequence of monos
$$
0=X_0 hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow ... hookrightarrow X_{n-1} hookrightarrow X_n = X
$$

such that $forall i,{X_i}/{X_{i-1}}$ is simple.



I think this is supposed to be a trivial case, but I do not see how. If we use just the zero map $0xrightarrow{0} X$ it does not work, since $X/{0}cong X$ need not be simple.










share|cite|improve this question















I want to show that every object $X$ of $bf{FinVect}$ has finite length. i.e. there is a sequence of monos
$$
0=X_0 hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow ... hookrightarrow X_{n-1} hookrightarrow X_n = X
$$

such that $forall i,{X_i}/{X_{i-1}}$ is simple.



I think this is supposed to be a trivial case, but I do not see how. If we use just the zero map $0xrightarrow{0} X$ it does not work, since $X/{0}cong X$ need not be simple.







vector-spaces category-theory abelian-categories






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 12:36









user 170039

10.4k42465




10.4k42465










asked Nov 24 at 12:32









Soap

1,027615




1,027615








  • 2




    What are simple objects in your category? Can you show that any object $X$ in this category is of length $dim(X)$?
    – Batominovski
    Nov 24 at 12:35












  • @Batominovski Thanks, that hint was enough - it feels quite obvious now
    – Soap
    Nov 25 at 10:45














  • 2




    What are simple objects in your category? Can you show that any object $X$ in this category is of length $dim(X)$?
    – Batominovski
    Nov 24 at 12:35












  • @Batominovski Thanks, that hint was enough - it feels quite obvious now
    – Soap
    Nov 25 at 10:45








2




2




What are simple objects in your category? Can you show that any object $X$ in this category is of length $dim(X)$?
– Batominovski
Nov 24 at 12:35






What are simple objects in your category? Can you show that any object $X$ in this category is of length $dim(X)$?
– Batominovski
Nov 24 at 12:35














@Batominovski Thanks, that hint was enough - it feels quite obvious now
– Soap
Nov 25 at 10:45




@Batominovski Thanks, that hint was enough - it feels quite obvious now
– Soap
Nov 25 at 10:45










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














The simple objects in $mathbf{FinVect}$ are exactly the 1-dimensional vector spaces. Take any ordered basis $(a_1,ldots,a_n)$ of $X$ (which exists, since $X$ is a finite dimensional vector space), and take $X_k = mathop{mathrm{Span}}{a_1,ldots,a_k}$.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    2














    Hints. Let $mathbb{K}$ be the base field. The simple objects of $mathbf{C}:=mathbf{FinVect}(mathbb{K})$ are $1$-dimensional $mathbb{K}$-vector spaces, i.e., they are all isomorphic to $mathbb{K}$. This shows that, if $Xin mathbf{C}$ has a filtration
    $$0=X_0hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow X_2hookrightarrow ldots hookrightarrow X_{l-1}hookrightarrow X_l=Xtag{*}$$
    in which $X_i/X_{i-1}$ are simple (whence $1$-dimensional), then $$dim_mathbb{K}(X)=dim_mathbb{K}(X_0)+sum_{i=1}^l,dim_mathbb{K}left(X_i/X_{i-1}right)=0+sum_{i=1}^l,1=l,$$
    For convenience, we call (*) a composition series of $X$. Ergo, you have the following statement: "if $Xinmathbb{C}$ has a composition series of length $l$, then $dim_mathbb{K}(X)=l$." How would you show that the converse of this statement is also true? That is, show that any composition series of $Xinmathbf{C}$ exists and is of length $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.




    Try induction on $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.







    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011495%2fall-objects-in-bffinvect-have-finite-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      The simple objects in $mathbf{FinVect}$ are exactly the 1-dimensional vector spaces. Take any ordered basis $(a_1,ldots,a_n)$ of $X$ (which exists, since $X$ is a finite dimensional vector space), and take $X_k = mathop{mathrm{Span}}{a_1,ldots,a_k}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        2














        The simple objects in $mathbf{FinVect}$ are exactly the 1-dimensional vector spaces. Take any ordered basis $(a_1,ldots,a_n)$ of $X$ (which exists, since $X$ is a finite dimensional vector space), and take $X_k = mathop{mathrm{Span}}{a_1,ldots,a_k}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          2












          2








          2






          The simple objects in $mathbf{FinVect}$ are exactly the 1-dimensional vector spaces. Take any ordered basis $(a_1,ldots,a_n)$ of $X$ (which exists, since $X$ is a finite dimensional vector space), and take $X_k = mathop{mathrm{Span}}{a_1,ldots,a_k}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          The simple objects in $mathbf{FinVect}$ are exactly the 1-dimensional vector spaces. Take any ordered basis $(a_1,ldots,a_n)$ of $X$ (which exists, since $X$ is a finite dimensional vector space), and take $X_k = mathop{mathrm{Span}}{a_1,ldots,a_k}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 24 at 12:44









          user3482749

          2,411414




          2,411414























              2














              Hints. Let $mathbb{K}$ be the base field. The simple objects of $mathbf{C}:=mathbf{FinVect}(mathbb{K})$ are $1$-dimensional $mathbb{K}$-vector spaces, i.e., they are all isomorphic to $mathbb{K}$. This shows that, if $Xin mathbf{C}$ has a filtration
              $$0=X_0hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow X_2hookrightarrow ldots hookrightarrow X_{l-1}hookrightarrow X_l=Xtag{*}$$
              in which $X_i/X_{i-1}$ are simple (whence $1$-dimensional), then $$dim_mathbb{K}(X)=dim_mathbb{K}(X_0)+sum_{i=1}^l,dim_mathbb{K}left(X_i/X_{i-1}right)=0+sum_{i=1}^l,1=l,$$
              For convenience, we call (*) a composition series of $X$. Ergo, you have the following statement: "if $Xinmathbb{C}$ has a composition series of length $l$, then $dim_mathbb{K}(X)=l$." How would you show that the converse of this statement is also true? That is, show that any composition series of $Xinmathbf{C}$ exists and is of length $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.




              Try induction on $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.







              share|cite|improve this answer




























                2














                Hints. Let $mathbb{K}$ be the base field. The simple objects of $mathbf{C}:=mathbf{FinVect}(mathbb{K})$ are $1$-dimensional $mathbb{K}$-vector spaces, i.e., they are all isomorphic to $mathbb{K}$. This shows that, if $Xin mathbf{C}$ has a filtration
                $$0=X_0hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow X_2hookrightarrow ldots hookrightarrow X_{l-1}hookrightarrow X_l=Xtag{*}$$
                in which $X_i/X_{i-1}$ are simple (whence $1$-dimensional), then $$dim_mathbb{K}(X)=dim_mathbb{K}(X_0)+sum_{i=1}^l,dim_mathbb{K}left(X_i/X_{i-1}right)=0+sum_{i=1}^l,1=l,$$
                For convenience, we call (*) a composition series of $X$. Ergo, you have the following statement: "if $Xinmathbb{C}$ has a composition series of length $l$, then $dim_mathbb{K}(X)=l$." How would you show that the converse of this statement is also true? That is, show that any composition series of $Xinmathbf{C}$ exists and is of length $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.




                Try induction on $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  Hints. Let $mathbb{K}$ be the base field. The simple objects of $mathbf{C}:=mathbf{FinVect}(mathbb{K})$ are $1$-dimensional $mathbb{K}$-vector spaces, i.e., they are all isomorphic to $mathbb{K}$. This shows that, if $Xin mathbf{C}$ has a filtration
                  $$0=X_0hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow X_2hookrightarrow ldots hookrightarrow X_{l-1}hookrightarrow X_l=Xtag{*}$$
                  in which $X_i/X_{i-1}$ are simple (whence $1$-dimensional), then $$dim_mathbb{K}(X)=dim_mathbb{K}(X_0)+sum_{i=1}^l,dim_mathbb{K}left(X_i/X_{i-1}right)=0+sum_{i=1}^l,1=l,$$
                  For convenience, we call (*) a composition series of $X$. Ergo, you have the following statement: "if $Xinmathbb{C}$ has a composition series of length $l$, then $dim_mathbb{K}(X)=l$." How would you show that the converse of this statement is also true? That is, show that any composition series of $Xinmathbf{C}$ exists and is of length $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.




                  Try induction on $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  Hints. Let $mathbb{K}$ be the base field. The simple objects of $mathbf{C}:=mathbf{FinVect}(mathbb{K})$ are $1$-dimensional $mathbb{K}$-vector spaces, i.e., they are all isomorphic to $mathbb{K}$. This shows that, if $Xin mathbf{C}$ has a filtration
                  $$0=X_0hookrightarrow X_1 hookrightarrow X_2hookrightarrow ldots hookrightarrow X_{l-1}hookrightarrow X_l=Xtag{*}$$
                  in which $X_i/X_{i-1}$ are simple (whence $1$-dimensional), then $$dim_mathbb{K}(X)=dim_mathbb{K}(X_0)+sum_{i=1}^l,dim_mathbb{K}left(X_i/X_{i-1}right)=0+sum_{i=1}^l,1=l,$$
                  For convenience, we call (*) a composition series of $X$. Ergo, you have the following statement: "if $Xinmathbb{C}$ has a composition series of length $l$, then $dim_mathbb{K}(X)=l$." How would you show that the converse of this statement is also true? That is, show that any composition series of $Xinmathbf{C}$ exists and is of length $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.




                  Try induction on $dim_mathbb{K}(X)$.








                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 24 at 12:49

























                  answered Nov 24 at 12:44









                  Batominovski

                  33.7k33292




                  33.7k33292






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011495%2fall-objects-in-bffinvect-have-finite-length%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                      How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...