Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question is from a past year paper: Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
Let $Q$ denote the group of rationals under addition.
Let $Q_{>0}^times$ denote the group of positive rationals under multiplication.
(a) Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
(b) Determine all homomorphisms from$Q_{>0}^times$ to $Q$.
For part (a), I know that any homomorphism $f:Q to Q_{>0}^times$ is determined by $f(1)$, since any other $f(frac{m}{n}) = f(1)^{frac{m}{n}}$. Since the image of f is in rationals, then $f(1)$ must be $1$, otherwise we can find $frac{m}{n}$ such that $f(frac{m}{n})$ is irrational. Is this correct?
(b) I am not sure how to proceed for this part. I think $f$ would be determined by how it acts on this set: ${ p mid text{$p$ is prime} } cup { frac{1}{p} mid text{$p$ is prime} }$.
group-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question is from a past year paper: Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
Let $Q$ denote the group of rationals under addition.
Let $Q_{>0}^times$ denote the group of positive rationals under multiplication.
(a) Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
(b) Determine all homomorphisms from$Q_{>0}^times$ to $Q$.
For part (a), I know that any homomorphism $f:Q to Q_{>0}^times$ is determined by $f(1)$, since any other $f(frac{m}{n}) = f(1)^{frac{m}{n}}$. Since the image of f is in rationals, then $f(1)$ must be $1$, otherwise we can find $frac{m}{n}$ such that $f(frac{m}{n})$ is irrational. Is this correct?
(b) I am not sure how to proceed for this part. I think $f$ would be determined by how it acts on this set: ${ p mid text{$p$ is prime} } cup { frac{1}{p} mid text{$p$ is prime} }$.
group-theory
1
Take a look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/229140/…
– Anurag A
Nov 17 at 3:11
Nice, thanks for the link!
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question is from a past year paper: Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
Let $Q$ denote the group of rationals under addition.
Let $Q_{>0}^times$ denote the group of positive rationals under multiplication.
(a) Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
(b) Determine all homomorphisms from$Q_{>0}^times$ to $Q$.
For part (a), I know that any homomorphism $f:Q to Q_{>0}^times$ is determined by $f(1)$, since any other $f(frac{m}{n}) = f(1)^{frac{m}{n}}$. Since the image of f is in rationals, then $f(1)$ must be $1$, otherwise we can find $frac{m}{n}$ such that $f(frac{m}{n})$ is irrational. Is this correct?
(b) I am not sure how to proceed for this part. I think $f$ would be determined by how it acts on this set: ${ p mid text{$p$ is prime} } cup { frac{1}{p} mid text{$p$ is prime} }$.
group-theory
This question is from a past year paper: Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
Let $Q$ denote the group of rationals under addition.
Let $Q_{>0}^times$ denote the group of positive rationals under multiplication.
(a) Determine all homomorphisms from $Q$ to $Q_{>0}^times$.
(b) Determine all homomorphisms from$Q_{>0}^times$ to $Q$.
For part (a), I know that any homomorphism $f:Q to Q_{>0}^times$ is determined by $f(1)$, since any other $f(frac{m}{n}) = f(1)^{frac{m}{n}}$. Since the image of f is in rationals, then $f(1)$ must be $1$, otherwise we can find $frac{m}{n}$ such that $f(frac{m}{n})$ is irrational. Is this correct?
(b) I am not sure how to proceed for this part. I think $f$ would be determined by how it acts on this set: ${ p mid text{$p$ is prime} } cup { frac{1}{p} mid text{$p$ is prime} }$.
group-theory
group-theory
asked Nov 17 at 3:06
eatfood
1827
1827
1
Take a look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/229140/…
– Anurag A
Nov 17 at 3:11
Nice, thanks for the link!
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
add a comment |
1
Take a look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/229140/…
– Anurag A
Nov 17 at 3:11
Nice, thanks for the link!
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
1
1
Take a look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/229140/…
– Anurag A
Nov 17 at 3:11
Take a look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/229140/…
– Anurag A
Nov 17 at 3:11
Nice, thanks for the link!
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
Nice, thanks for the link!
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The reasoning for the first question is correct : for $a^{frac mn}$ to remain rational for all $m,n$, we must have $a = 1$. Hence any such homomorphism is trivial.
For the other direction, any element of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is of the form $2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}7^{n_4}...$ where $n_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers. Therefore, $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is isomorphic to the group of "eventually zero integer sequences" under componentwise addition, under this isomorphism sending such a number to the corresponding power sequence.
Now, the sequence of eventually constant integer sequences has an integral basis given by $t_i$, where $t_i$ is the sequence having $1$ at the ith position and $0$ elsewhere. Every element is a finite integer linear combination of the $t_i$. Therefore, specifying a homomorphism to $mathbb Q$ is as good as specifying what it does on these $t_i$.
But this is easy : pick any sequence of rationals $q_i in mathbb Q$ and map $t_i to q_i$. This extends to a homomorphism via the map $sum s_it_i to sum s_iq_i$, where $s_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers, ensuring both sides are finite summations.
Via the identification of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ with the space of eventually zero integer sequences, this leads to :
$$
phi (2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}...) to sum q_in_i
$$
For any sequence of rationals $q_i$. Conversely, any homomorphism must be of this form, since the individual prime powers must map somewhere.
You can try to find conditions on $q_i$ which make this map injective/surjective.
Thank you for the detailed answer! this is what i need.
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
But of course, you are welcome!
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Nov 17 at 6:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The reasoning for the first question is correct : for $a^{frac mn}$ to remain rational for all $m,n$, we must have $a = 1$. Hence any such homomorphism is trivial.
For the other direction, any element of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is of the form $2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}7^{n_4}...$ where $n_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers. Therefore, $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is isomorphic to the group of "eventually zero integer sequences" under componentwise addition, under this isomorphism sending such a number to the corresponding power sequence.
Now, the sequence of eventually constant integer sequences has an integral basis given by $t_i$, where $t_i$ is the sequence having $1$ at the ith position and $0$ elsewhere. Every element is a finite integer linear combination of the $t_i$. Therefore, specifying a homomorphism to $mathbb Q$ is as good as specifying what it does on these $t_i$.
But this is easy : pick any sequence of rationals $q_i in mathbb Q$ and map $t_i to q_i$. This extends to a homomorphism via the map $sum s_it_i to sum s_iq_i$, where $s_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers, ensuring both sides are finite summations.
Via the identification of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ with the space of eventually zero integer sequences, this leads to :
$$
phi (2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}...) to sum q_in_i
$$
For any sequence of rationals $q_i$. Conversely, any homomorphism must be of this form, since the individual prime powers must map somewhere.
You can try to find conditions on $q_i$ which make this map injective/surjective.
Thank you for the detailed answer! this is what i need.
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
But of course, you are welcome!
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Nov 17 at 6:43
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The reasoning for the first question is correct : for $a^{frac mn}$ to remain rational for all $m,n$, we must have $a = 1$. Hence any such homomorphism is trivial.
For the other direction, any element of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is of the form $2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}7^{n_4}...$ where $n_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers. Therefore, $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is isomorphic to the group of "eventually zero integer sequences" under componentwise addition, under this isomorphism sending such a number to the corresponding power sequence.
Now, the sequence of eventually constant integer sequences has an integral basis given by $t_i$, where $t_i$ is the sequence having $1$ at the ith position and $0$ elsewhere. Every element is a finite integer linear combination of the $t_i$. Therefore, specifying a homomorphism to $mathbb Q$ is as good as specifying what it does on these $t_i$.
But this is easy : pick any sequence of rationals $q_i in mathbb Q$ and map $t_i to q_i$. This extends to a homomorphism via the map $sum s_it_i to sum s_iq_i$, where $s_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers, ensuring both sides are finite summations.
Via the identification of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ with the space of eventually zero integer sequences, this leads to :
$$
phi (2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}...) to sum q_in_i
$$
For any sequence of rationals $q_i$. Conversely, any homomorphism must be of this form, since the individual prime powers must map somewhere.
You can try to find conditions on $q_i$ which make this map injective/surjective.
Thank you for the detailed answer! this is what i need.
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
But of course, you are welcome!
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Nov 17 at 6:43
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
The reasoning for the first question is correct : for $a^{frac mn}$ to remain rational for all $m,n$, we must have $a = 1$. Hence any such homomorphism is trivial.
For the other direction, any element of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is of the form $2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}7^{n_4}...$ where $n_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers. Therefore, $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is isomorphic to the group of "eventually zero integer sequences" under componentwise addition, under this isomorphism sending such a number to the corresponding power sequence.
Now, the sequence of eventually constant integer sequences has an integral basis given by $t_i$, where $t_i$ is the sequence having $1$ at the ith position and $0$ elsewhere. Every element is a finite integer linear combination of the $t_i$. Therefore, specifying a homomorphism to $mathbb Q$ is as good as specifying what it does on these $t_i$.
But this is easy : pick any sequence of rationals $q_i in mathbb Q$ and map $t_i to q_i$. This extends to a homomorphism via the map $sum s_it_i to sum s_iq_i$, where $s_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers, ensuring both sides are finite summations.
Via the identification of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ with the space of eventually zero integer sequences, this leads to :
$$
phi (2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}...) to sum q_in_i
$$
For any sequence of rationals $q_i$. Conversely, any homomorphism must be of this form, since the individual prime powers must map somewhere.
You can try to find conditions on $q_i$ which make this map injective/surjective.
The reasoning for the first question is correct : for $a^{frac mn}$ to remain rational for all $m,n$, we must have $a = 1$. Hence any such homomorphism is trivial.
For the other direction, any element of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is of the form $2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}7^{n_4}...$ where $n_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers. Therefore, $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ is isomorphic to the group of "eventually zero integer sequences" under componentwise addition, under this isomorphism sending such a number to the corresponding power sequence.
Now, the sequence of eventually constant integer sequences has an integral basis given by $t_i$, where $t_i$ is the sequence having $1$ at the ith position and $0$ elsewhere. Every element is a finite integer linear combination of the $t_i$. Therefore, specifying a homomorphism to $mathbb Q$ is as good as specifying what it does on these $t_i$.
But this is easy : pick any sequence of rationals $q_i in mathbb Q$ and map $t_i to q_i$. This extends to a homomorphism via the map $sum s_it_i to sum s_iq_i$, where $s_i$ is an eventually zero sequence of integers, ensuring both sides are finite summations.
Via the identification of $mathbb Q^+_{>0}$ with the space of eventually zero integer sequences, this leads to :
$$
phi (2^{n_1}3^{n_2}5^{n_3}...) to sum q_in_i
$$
For any sequence of rationals $q_i$. Conversely, any homomorphism must be of this form, since the individual prime powers must map somewhere.
You can try to find conditions on $q_i$ which make this map injective/surjective.
answered Nov 17 at 4:12
астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
36.8k33376
36.8k33376
Thank you for the detailed answer! this is what i need.
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
But of course, you are welcome!
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Nov 17 at 6:43
add a comment |
Thank you for the detailed answer! this is what i need.
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
But of course, you are welcome!
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Nov 17 at 6:43
Thank you for the detailed answer! this is what i need.
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
Thank you for the detailed answer! this is what i need.
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42
But of course, you are welcome!
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Nov 17 at 6:43
But of course, you are welcome!
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Nov 17 at 6:43
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001923%2fdetermine-all-homomorphisms-from-q-to-q-0-times%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Take a look at math.stackexchange.com/questions/229140/…
– Anurag A
Nov 17 at 3:11
Nice, thanks for the link!
– eatfood
Nov 17 at 6:42