Is there any reason not to use the notation $p_{X mid Y = y}(x)$?












2














Suppose that $X$ and $Y$ are discrete random variables with PMFs $p_X$ and $p_Y$. The conditional probability mass function of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $p_{X mid Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $p_Y(y) > 0$). However, is there any reason not to use the notation $p_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? I find the latter notation to be much more clear.



Similarly, if $X$ and $Y$ are jointly continuous random variables with PDFs $f_X$ and $f_Y$, the conditional probability density of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $f_{X|Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $f_Y(y) > 0$). Is there any reason not to use the notation $f_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? It seems more clear, but perhaps I am missing some subtle point.



Are there any textbooks which use the notation $f_{X mid Y=y}(x)$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It is fine to use the latter notation since the argument is $x$.
    – StubbornAtom
    Nov 22 at 6:12










  • Actually I'd almost prefer just dispensing with the '$=y$' bit altogether but definitely like your suggestion (maybe ppl do use it? Have generally seen the more cumbersome version...)
    – Mehness
    Nov 22 at 6:24










  • I remember I have seen it (not sure in text/notes), and I even write $f_{X|Y = y}(x mid y)$...
    – BGM
    Nov 22 at 6:47






  • 1




    I use this notation myself.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Nov 22 at 14:31
















2














Suppose that $X$ and $Y$ are discrete random variables with PMFs $p_X$ and $p_Y$. The conditional probability mass function of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $p_{X mid Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $p_Y(y) > 0$). However, is there any reason not to use the notation $p_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? I find the latter notation to be much more clear.



Similarly, if $X$ and $Y$ are jointly continuous random variables with PDFs $f_X$ and $f_Y$, the conditional probability density of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $f_{X|Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $f_Y(y) > 0$). Is there any reason not to use the notation $f_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? It seems more clear, but perhaps I am missing some subtle point.



Are there any textbooks which use the notation $f_{X mid Y=y}(x)$?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • It is fine to use the latter notation since the argument is $x$.
    – StubbornAtom
    Nov 22 at 6:12










  • Actually I'd almost prefer just dispensing with the '$=y$' bit altogether but definitely like your suggestion (maybe ppl do use it? Have generally seen the more cumbersome version...)
    – Mehness
    Nov 22 at 6:24










  • I remember I have seen it (not sure in text/notes), and I even write $f_{X|Y = y}(x mid y)$...
    – BGM
    Nov 22 at 6:47






  • 1




    I use this notation myself.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Nov 22 at 14:31














2












2








2







Suppose that $X$ and $Y$ are discrete random variables with PMFs $p_X$ and $p_Y$. The conditional probability mass function of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $p_{X mid Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $p_Y(y) > 0$). However, is there any reason not to use the notation $p_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? I find the latter notation to be much more clear.



Similarly, if $X$ and $Y$ are jointly continuous random variables with PDFs $f_X$ and $f_Y$, the conditional probability density of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $f_{X|Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $f_Y(y) > 0$). Is there any reason not to use the notation $f_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? It seems more clear, but perhaps I am missing some subtle point.



Are there any textbooks which use the notation $f_{X mid Y=y}(x)$?










share|cite|improve this question















Suppose that $X$ and $Y$ are discrete random variables with PMFs $p_X$ and $p_Y$. The conditional probability mass function of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $p_{X mid Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $p_Y(y) > 0$). However, is there any reason not to use the notation $p_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? I find the latter notation to be much more clear.



Similarly, if $X$ and $Y$ are jointly continuous random variables with PDFs $f_X$ and $f_Y$, the conditional probability density of $X$ given that $Y = y$ is often denoted $f_{X|Y}(x mid y)$ (assuming that $f_Y(y) > 0$). Is there any reason not to use the notation $f_{X mid Y = y}(x)$ instead? It seems more clear, but perhaps I am missing some subtle point.



Are there any textbooks which use the notation $f_{X mid Y=y}(x)$?







probability notation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 13:29

























asked Nov 22 at 6:06









eternalGoldenBraid

707314




707314












  • It is fine to use the latter notation since the argument is $x$.
    – StubbornAtom
    Nov 22 at 6:12










  • Actually I'd almost prefer just dispensing with the '$=y$' bit altogether but definitely like your suggestion (maybe ppl do use it? Have generally seen the more cumbersome version...)
    – Mehness
    Nov 22 at 6:24










  • I remember I have seen it (not sure in text/notes), and I even write $f_{X|Y = y}(x mid y)$...
    – BGM
    Nov 22 at 6:47






  • 1




    I use this notation myself.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Nov 22 at 14:31


















  • It is fine to use the latter notation since the argument is $x$.
    – StubbornAtom
    Nov 22 at 6:12










  • Actually I'd almost prefer just dispensing with the '$=y$' bit altogether but definitely like your suggestion (maybe ppl do use it? Have generally seen the more cumbersome version...)
    – Mehness
    Nov 22 at 6:24










  • I remember I have seen it (not sure in text/notes), and I even write $f_{X|Y = y}(x mid y)$...
    – BGM
    Nov 22 at 6:47






  • 1




    I use this notation myself.
    – Gabriel Romon
    Nov 22 at 14:31
















It is fine to use the latter notation since the argument is $x$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 22 at 6:12




It is fine to use the latter notation since the argument is $x$.
– StubbornAtom
Nov 22 at 6:12












Actually I'd almost prefer just dispensing with the '$=y$' bit altogether but definitely like your suggestion (maybe ppl do use it? Have generally seen the more cumbersome version...)
– Mehness
Nov 22 at 6:24




Actually I'd almost prefer just dispensing with the '$=y$' bit altogether but definitely like your suggestion (maybe ppl do use it? Have generally seen the more cumbersome version...)
– Mehness
Nov 22 at 6:24












I remember I have seen it (not sure in text/notes), and I even write $f_{X|Y = y}(x mid y)$...
– BGM
Nov 22 at 6:47




I remember I have seen it (not sure in text/notes), and I even write $f_{X|Y = y}(x mid y)$...
– BGM
Nov 22 at 6:47




1




1




I use this notation myself.
– Gabriel Romon
Nov 22 at 14:31




I use this notation myself.
– Gabriel Romon
Nov 22 at 14:31















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008795%2fis-there-any-reason-not-to-use-the-notation-p-x-mid-y-yx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008795%2fis-there-any-reason-not-to-use-the-notation-p-x-mid-y-yx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...