Singular Value Decomposition of a Real Unit Matrix











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Given a real matrix $A in mathbb{R}^{m times n}$ whose entries are all ones, what is the reduced/short/economy singular value decomposition $A = USigma V^T$? I can see that we have a single singular value for $A$, namely $sqrt{mn}$, but I'm having trouble coming up with general formulas for the orthogonal matrices $U$ and $V$ in terms of $m$ and $n$.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • If you already know that there's a single singular value, then you also know that there's a single left singular vector and a single right singular vector, both of which are very easy to compute. Isn't that all the information you need for a reduced SVD?
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 0:46












  • I thought for SVD of any given $m times n$ matrix there will be $m$ left singular vectors and $n$ right singular vectors? I've been trying to determine some kind of pattern by generating various unit matrices and using the svd function in MATLAB, but I can't discern anything reasonable.
    – rcmpgrc
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Yes, that's true of SVD, which is non-unique. But only the singular vectors associated to the nonzero singular values matter; that's the point of the reduced SVD.
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 4:25















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












Given a real matrix $A in mathbb{R}^{m times n}$ whose entries are all ones, what is the reduced/short/economy singular value decomposition $A = USigma V^T$? I can see that we have a single singular value for $A$, namely $sqrt{mn}$, but I'm having trouble coming up with general formulas for the orthogonal matrices $U$ and $V$ in terms of $m$ and $n$.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • If you already know that there's a single singular value, then you also know that there's a single left singular vector and a single right singular vector, both of which are very easy to compute. Isn't that all the information you need for a reduced SVD?
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 0:46












  • I thought for SVD of any given $m times n$ matrix there will be $m$ left singular vectors and $n$ right singular vectors? I've been trying to determine some kind of pattern by generating various unit matrices and using the svd function in MATLAB, but I can't discern anything reasonable.
    – rcmpgrc
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Yes, that's true of SVD, which is non-unique. But only the singular vectors associated to the nonzero singular values matter; that's the point of the reduced SVD.
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 4:25













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





Given a real matrix $A in mathbb{R}^{m times n}$ whose entries are all ones, what is the reduced/short/economy singular value decomposition $A = USigma V^T$? I can see that we have a single singular value for $A$, namely $sqrt{mn}$, but I'm having trouble coming up with general formulas for the orthogonal matrices $U$ and $V$ in terms of $m$ and $n$.










share|cite|improve this question













Given a real matrix $A in mathbb{R}^{m times n}$ whose entries are all ones, what is the reduced/short/economy singular value decomposition $A = USigma V^T$? I can see that we have a single singular value for $A$, namely $sqrt{mn}$, but I'm having trouble coming up with general formulas for the orthogonal matrices $U$ and $V$ in terms of $m$ and $n$.







linear-algebra matrices matrix-decomposition svd






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 at 20:35









rcmpgrc

174




174












  • If you already know that there's a single singular value, then you also know that there's a single left singular vector and a single right singular vector, both of which are very easy to compute. Isn't that all the information you need for a reduced SVD?
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 0:46












  • I thought for SVD of any given $m times n$ matrix there will be $m$ left singular vectors and $n$ right singular vectors? I've been trying to determine some kind of pattern by generating various unit matrices and using the svd function in MATLAB, but I can't discern anything reasonable.
    – rcmpgrc
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Yes, that's true of SVD, which is non-unique. But only the singular vectors associated to the nonzero singular values matter; that's the point of the reduced SVD.
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 4:25


















  • If you already know that there's a single singular value, then you also know that there's a single left singular vector and a single right singular vector, both of which are very easy to compute. Isn't that all the information you need for a reduced SVD?
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 0:46












  • I thought for SVD of any given $m times n$ matrix there will be $m$ left singular vectors and $n$ right singular vectors? I've been trying to determine some kind of pattern by generating various unit matrices and using the svd function in MATLAB, but I can't discern anything reasonable.
    – rcmpgrc
    Nov 21 at 3:14










  • Yes, that's true of SVD, which is non-unique. But only the singular vectors associated to the nonzero singular values matter; that's the point of the reduced SVD.
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 21 at 4:25
















If you already know that there's a single singular value, then you also know that there's a single left singular vector and a single right singular vector, both of which are very easy to compute. Isn't that all the information you need for a reduced SVD?
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 21 at 0:46






If you already know that there's a single singular value, then you also know that there's a single left singular vector and a single right singular vector, both of which are very easy to compute. Isn't that all the information you need for a reduced SVD?
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 21 at 0:46














I thought for SVD of any given $m times n$ matrix there will be $m$ left singular vectors and $n$ right singular vectors? I've been trying to determine some kind of pattern by generating various unit matrices and using the svd function in MATLAB, but I can't discern anything reasonable.
– rcmpgrc
Nov 21 at 3:14




I thought for SVD of any given $m times n$ matrix there will be $m$ left singular vectors and $n$ right singular vectors? I've been trying to determine some kind of pattern by generating various unit matrices and using the svd function in MATLAB, but I can't discern anything reasonable.
– rcmpgrc
Nov 21 at 3:14












Yes, that's true of SVD, which is non-unique. But only the singular vectors associated to the nonzero singular values matter; that's the point of the reduced SVD.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 21 at 4:25




Yes, that's true of SVD, which is non-unique. But only the singular vectors associated to the nonzero singular values matter; that's the point of the reduced SVD.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 21 at 4:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










Suppose $A$ has $k$ nonzero singular values (i.e. $sigma_k>sigma_{k+1}=0$). Partition $U$ as $pmatrix{U_1&U_2}$ and $V$ as $pmatrix{V_1&V_2}$, where each of $U_1$ and $V_1$ has $k$ columns. The so-called reduced/economic SVD is given by $U_1operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)V_1^T$. Note that the result of this matrix product is precisely equal to $A=USV^T$. The terms "reduced" or "economic" refer not to the matrix product, but to the sizes of multiplicands: since $U_1,operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)$ and $V_1$ have smaller sizes than $U,Sigma$ and $V$, it is more economical to store them than to store a full SVD.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006858%2fsingular-value-decomposition-of-a-real-unit-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    Suppose $A$ has $k$ nonzero singular values (i.e. $sigma_k>sigma_{k+1}=0$). Partition $U$ as $pmatrix{U_1&U_2}$ and $V$ as $pmatrix{V_1&V_2}$, where each of $U_1$ and $V_1$ has $k$ columns. The so-called reduced/economic SVD is given by $U_1operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)V_1^T$. Note that the result of this matrix product is precisely equal to $A=USV^T$. The terms "reduced" or "economic" refer not to the matrix product, but to the sizes of multiplicands: since $U_1,operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)$ and $V_1$ have smaller sizes than $U,Sigma$ and $V$, it is more economical to store them than to store a full SVD.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      Suppose $A$ has $k$ nonzero singular values (i.e. $sigma_k>sigma_{k+1}=0$). Partition $U$ as $pmatrix{U_1&U_2}$ and $V$ as $pmatrix{V_1&V_2}$, where each of $U_1$ and $V_1$ has $k$ columns. The so-called reduced/economic SVD is given by $U_1operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)V_1^T$. Note that the result of this matrix product is precisely equal to $A=USV^T$. The terms "reduced" or "economic" refer not to the matrix product, but to the sizes of multiplicands: since $U_1,operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)$ and $V_1$ have smaller sizes than $U,Sigma$ and $V$, it is more economical to store them than to store a full SVD.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        Suppose $A$ has $k$ nonzero singular values (i.e. $sigma_k>sigma_{k+1}=0$). Partition $U$ as $pmatrix{U_1&U_2}$ and $V$ as $pmatrix{V_1&V_2}$, where each of $U_1$ and $V_1$ has $k$ columns. The so-called reduced/economic SVD is given by $U_1operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)V_1^T$. Note that the result of this matrix product is precisely equal to $A=USV^T$. The terms "reduced" or "economic" refer not to the matrix product, but to the sizes of multiplicands: since $U_1,operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)$ and $V_1$ have smaller sizes than $U,Sigma$ and $V$, it is more economical to store them than to store a full SVD.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Suppose $A$ has $k$ nonzero singular values (i.e. $sigma_k>sigma_{k+1}=0$). Partition $U$ as $pmatrix{U_1&U_2}$ and $V$ as $pmatrix{V_1&V_2}$, where each of $U_1$ and $V_1$ has $k$ columns. The so-called reduced/economic SVD is given by $U_1operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)V_1^T$. Note that the result of this matrix product is precisely equal to $A=USV^T$. The terms "reduced" or "economic" refer not to the matrix product, but to the sizes of multiplicands: since $U_1,operatorname{diag}(sigma_1,ldots,sigma_k)$ and $V_1$ have smaller sizes than $U,Sigma$ and $V$, it is more economical to store them than to store a full SVD.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 at 3:35









        user1551

        71.1k566125




        71.1k566125






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006858%2fsingular-value-decomposition-of-a-real-unit-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...