Check if the estimator is unbiased












0














For $X_isim U[0,a]$ where $i=1,2,dots,n$ so, $E(X_i)=dfrac a2$.



Is $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}$ an unbiased estimator of $a$?



This is what I thought.



Since $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}=X_k$ such that $X_kge X_h$ for any $h$,



$E(a')=E(X_k)=dfrac a2$.



Therefore $a'$ is not an unbiased estimator.



However, I don't think it is properly solved...






estimation parameter-estimation mean-square-error







share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    For $X_isim U[0,a]$ where $i=1,2,dots,n$ so, $E(X_i)=dfrac a2$.



    Is $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}$ an unbiased estimator of $a$?



    This is what I thought.



    Since $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}=X_k$ such that $X_kge X_h$ for any $h$,



    $E(a')=E(X_k)=dfrac a2$.



    Therefore $a'$ is not an unbiased estimator.



    However, I don't think it is properly solved...






    estimation parameter-estimation mean-square-error







    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      For $X_isim U[0,a]$ where $i=1,2,dots,n$ so, $E(X_i)=dfrac a2$.



      Is $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}$ an unbiased estimator of $a$?



      This is what I thought.



      Since $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}=X_k$ such that $X_kge X_h$ for any $h$,



      $E(a')=E(X_k)=dfrac a2$.



      Therefore $a'$ is not an unbiased estimator.



      However, I don't think it is properly solved...






      estimation parameter-estimation mean-square-error







      share|cite|improve this question















      For $X_isim U[0,a]$ where $i=1,2,dots,n$ so, $E(X_i)=dfrac a2$.



      Is $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}$ an unbiased estimator of $a$?



      This is what I thought.



      Since $a'=max{X_1,X_2,dots,X_n}=X_k$ such that $X_kge X_h$ for any $h$,



      $E(a')=E(X_k)=dfrac a2$.



      Therefore $a'$ is not an unbiased estimator.



      However, I don't think it is properly solved...






      estimation parameter-estimation mean-square-error




      estimation parameter-estimation mean-square-error






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 27 '18 at 11:19









      Tianlalu

      3,09621038




      3,09621038










      asked Nov 27 '18 at 10:27









      NewtNewt

      207




      207






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          The $text{cdf}$ of the maximum of $n$ iid random variables is the $n^{th}$ power of the single $text{cdf}$. In this case,
          $$text{cdf}(X)=left(frac xaright)^n.$$



          The expectation is



          $$int_0^a xfrac naleft(frac xaright)^{n-1}dx=frac{na^{n+1}}{(n+1)a^n},$$ which is smaller than $a$ (but asymptotically unbiaised for large $n$).




          Your reasoning is wrong in that the distribution of $max{X_k}$ is not the same as that of a single $X_k$ (obviously the $max$ favors the larger values), and the expectations do not match.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Isn't pdf of the X then becomes (n/a)(x/a)^(n-1)??
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:57










          • The link between cdf and bias is not clear to me. Is there a reference available?
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:06










          • @JanRothkegel: the link is between the expectation and the bias.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:49










          • @Newt: right, fixed.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 14:27



















          0














          By definition, $B_a(a')$ is the bias of the estimator $a'$ for $a$. That is,
          $$B_a(a')=mathbb E left [a'-a right]$$
          Always, $a' < a$, because $P(X=a)=0$. Therefore $B_a(a')<0$ and (more important) $B_a(a') ne 0$. It follows that $a'$ is biased.



          By the way: $a'$ is the MLE of $a$. Asymptotically (or approximately for large samples) it is unbiased.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • But why does a′<a hold?
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:40












          • Because $max{X_1,X_2,...,X_n}<a$ or as described in my post: $P(X=a)=0$. You never hit the parameter.
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:46













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015608%2fcheck-if-the-estimator-is-unbiased%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          The $text{cdf}$ of the maximum of $n$ iid random variables is the $n^{th}$ power of the single $text{cdf}$. In this case,
          $$text{cdf}(X)=left(frac xaright)^n.$$



          The expectation is



          $$int_0^a xfrac naleft(frac xaright)^{n-1}dx=frac{na^{n+1}}{(n+1)a^n},$$ which is smaller than $a$ (but asymptotically unbiaised for large $n$).




          Your reasoning is wrong in that the distribution of $max{X_k}$ is not the same as that of a single $X_k$ (obviously the $max$ favors the larger values), and the expectations do not match.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Isn't pdf of the X then becomes (n/a)(x/a)^(n-1)??
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:57










          • The link between cdf and bias is not clear to me. Is there a reference available?
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:06










          • @JanRothkegel: the link is between the expectation and the bias.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:49










          • @Newt: right, fixed.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 14:27
















          0














          The $text{cdf}$ of the maximum of $n$ iid random variables is the $n^{th}$ power of the single $text{cdf}$. In this case,
          $$text{cdf}(X)=left(frac xaright)^n.$$



          The expectation is



          $$int_0^a xfrac naleft(frac xaright)^{n-1}dx=frac{na^{n+1}}{(n+1)a^n},$$ which is smaller than $a$ (but asymptotically unbiaised for large $n$).




          Your reasoning is wrong in that the distribution of $max{X_k}$ is not the same as that of a single $X_k$ (obviously the $max$ favors the larger values), and the expectations do not match.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Isn't pdf of the X then becomes (n/a)(x/a)^(n-1)??
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:57










          • The link between cdf and bias is not clear to me. Is there a reference available?
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:06










          • @JanRothkegel: the link is between the expectation and the bias.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:49










          • @Newt: right, fixed.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 14:27














          0












          0








          0






          The $text{cdf}$ of the maximum of $n$ iid random variables is the $n^{th}$ power of the single $text{cdf}$. In this case,
          $$text{cdf}(X)=left(frac xaright)^n.$$



          The expectation is



          $$int_0^a xfrac naleft(frac xaright)^{n-1}dx=frac{na^{n+1}}{(n+1)a^n},$$ which is smaller than $a$ (but asymptotically unbiaised for large $n$).




          Your reasoning is wrong in that the distribution of $max{X_k}$ is not the same as that of a single $X_k$ (obviously the $max$ favors the larger values), and the expectations do not match.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The $text{cdf}$ of the maximum of $n$ iid random variables is the $n^{th}$ power of the single $text{cdf}$. In this case,
          $$text{cdf}(X)=left(frac xaright)^n.$$



          The expectation is



          $$int_0^a xfrac naleft(frac xaright)^{n-1}dx=frac{na^{n+1}}{(n+1)a^n},$$ which is smaller than $a$ (but asymptotically unbiaised for large $n$).




          Your reasoning is wrong in that the distribution of $max{X_k}$ is not the same as that of a single $X_k$ (obviously the $max$ favors the larger values), and the expectations do not match.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 27 '18 at 14:31

























          answered Nov 27 '18 at 11:15









          Yves DaoustYves Daoust

          124k671222




          124k671222












          • Isn't pdf of the X then becomes (n/a)(x/a)^(n-1)??
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:57










          • The link between cdf and bias is not clear to me. Is there a reference available?
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:06










          • @JanRothkegel: the link is between the expectation and the bias.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:49










          • @Newt: right, fixed.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 14:27


















          • Isn't pdf of the X then becomes (n/a)(x/a)^(n-1)??
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:57










          • The link between cdf and bias is not clear to me. Is there a reference available?
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:06










          • @JanRothkegel: the link is between the expectation and the bias.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 12:49










          • @Newt: right, fixed.
            – Yves Daoust
            Nov 27 '18 at 14:27
















          Isn't pdf of the X then becomes (n/a)(x/a)^(n-1)??
          – Newt
          Nov 27 '18 at 11:57




          Isn't pdf of the X then becomes (n/a)(x/a)^(n-1)??
          – Newt
          Nov 27 '18 at 11:57












          The link between cdf and bias is not clear to me. Is there a reference available?
          – Jan Rothkegel
          Nov 27 '18 at 12:06




          The link between cdf and bias is not clear to me. Is there a reference available?
          – Jan Rothkegel
          Nov 27 '18 at 12:06












          @JanRothkegel: the link is between the expectation and the bias.
          – Yves Daoust
          Nov 27 '18 at 12:49




          @JanRothkegel: the link is between the expectation and the bias.
          – Yves Daoust
          Nov 27 '18 at 12:49












          @Newt: right, fixed.
          – Yves Daoust
          Nov 27 '18 at 14:27




          @Newt: right, fixed.
          – Yves Daoust
          Nov 27 '18 at 14:27











          0














          By definition, $B_a(a')$ is the bias of the estimator $a'$ for $a$. That is,
          $$B_a(a')=mathbb E left [a'-a right]$$
          Always, $a' < a$, because $P(X=a)=0$. Therefore $B_a(a')<0$ and (more important) $B_a(a') ne 0$. It follows that $a'$ is biased.



          By the way: $a'$ is the MLE of $a$. Asymptotically (or approximately for large samples) it is unbiased.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • But why does a′<a hold?
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:40












          • Because $max{X_1,X_2,...,X_n}<a$ or as described in my post: $P(X=a)=0$. You never hit the parameter.
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:46


















          0














          By definition, $B_a(a')$ is the bias of the estimator $a'$ for $a$. That is,
          $$B_a(a')=mathbb E left [a'-a right]$$
          Always, $a' < a$, because $P(X=a)=0$. Therefore $B_a(a')<0$ and (more important) $B_a(a') ne 0$. It follows that $a'$ is biased.



          By the way: $a'$ is the MLE of $a$. Asymptotically (or approximately for large samples) it is unbiased.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • But why does a′<a hold?
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:40












          • Because $max{X_1,X_2,...,X_n}<a$ or as described in my post: $P(X=a)=0$. You never hit the parameter.
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:46
















          0












          0








          0






          By definition, $B_a(a')$ is the bias of the estimator $a'$ for $a$. That is,
          $$B_a(a')=mathbb E left [a'-a right]$$
          Always, $a' < a$, because $P(X=a)=0$. Therefore $B_a(a')<0$ and (more important) $B_a(a') ne 0$. It follows that $a'$ is biased.



          By the way: $a'$ is the MLE of $a$. Asymptotically (or approximately for large samples) it is unbiased.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          By definition, $B_a(a')$ is the bias of the estimator $a'$ for $a$. That is,
          $$B_a(a')=mathbb E left [a'-a right]$$
          Always, $a' < a$, because $P(X=a)=0$. Therefore $B_a(a')<0$ and (more important) $B_a(a') ne 0$. It follows that $a'$ is biased.



          By the way: $a'$ is the MLE of $a$. Asymptotically (or approximately for large samples) it is unbiased.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 27 '18 at 12:19

























          answered Nov 27 '18 at 11:37









          Jan RothkegelJan Rothkegel

          1235




          1235












          • But why does a′<a hold?
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:40












          • Because $max{X_1,X_2,...,X_n}<a$ or as described in my post: $P(X=a)=0$. You never hit the parameter.
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:46




















          • But why does a′<a hold?
            – Newt
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:40












          • Because $max{X_1,X_2,...,X_n}<a$ or as described in my post: $P(X=a)=0$. You never hit the parameter.
            – Jan Rothkegel
            Nov 27 '18 at 11:46


















          But why does a′<a hold?
          – Newt
          Nov 27 '18 at 11:40






          But why does a′<a hold?
          – Newt
          Nov 27 '18 at 11:40














          Because $max{X_1,X_2,...,X_n}<a$ or as described in my post: $P(X=a)=0$. You never hit the parameter.
          – Jan Rothkegel
          Nov 27 '18 at 11:46






          Because $max{X_1,X_2,...,X_n}<a$ or as described in my post: $P(X=a)=0$. You never hit the parameter.
          – Jan Rothkegel
          Nov 27 '18 at 11:46




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015608%2fcheck-if-the-estimator-is-unbiased%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Image
          Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
          Read more

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
          Read more

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

          Image
          1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
          Read more