Reflexive property of relations? [duplicate]












0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35


















0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35
















0












0








0





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?





This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers








relations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 1 '18 at 1:25









Justin DeeJustin Dee

615




615




marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35










1




1




$begingroup$
let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 1 '18 at 1:28




$begingroup$
let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 1 '18 at 1:28




1




1




$begingroup$
An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Dec 1 '18 at 1:35






$begingroup$
An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Dec 1 '18 at 1:35












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



[1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



    Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



    So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



    Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



    [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



      Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



      So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



      Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



      [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



        Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



        So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



        Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



        [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



        Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



        So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



        Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



        [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 1 '18 at 5:14









        fleabloodfleablood

        69.2k22685




        69.2k22685















            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...