Reflexive property of relations? [duplicate]












0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35


















0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35
















0












0








0





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers




If a relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, isn't it always reflexive? I am supposed to consider a set, S, where some Relation A is both symmetric and anti-symmetric. I thought that anti-symmetric means that if (x, y) is in the relation, then (y, x) cannot be in it unless x = y. So, wouldn't it hold that it is reflexive?





This question already has an answer here:




  • Whats the difference between Antisymmetric and reflexive? (Set Theory/Discrete math)

    3 answers








relations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 1 '18 at 1:25









Justin DeeJustin Dee

615




615




marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Brian Borchers, Misha Lavrov, Chinnapparaj R, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus Dec 1 '18 at 7:14


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Dec 1 '18 at 1:35










1




1




$begingroup$
let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 1 '18 at 1:28




$begingroup$
let $A={1,2}$ and the relation be ${(1,1)}$. this is both symmetric and anti-symmetric but not reflexive.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Dec 1 '18 at 1:28




1




1




$begingroup$
An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Dec 1 '18 at 1:35






$begingroup$
An empty relation is symmetric and anti-symmetric. Any sub-relation of the equality relation is both symmetric and anti-symmetric, and these are the only such relations.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Dec 1 '18 at 1:35












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



[1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



    Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



    So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



    Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



    [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



      Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



      So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



      Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



      [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



        Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



        So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



        Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



        [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Reflexive means for all elements must be related to themselves but that other elements may (or may not) be related to each other.



        Both Symmetric and anti-symmetric means elements can only be related to the themselves (thought they don't need to be) and cant be related to any other elements[1].



        So a relation that is symmetric and anti-symmetric need not be reflexive if not all elements are related to themselves. (This would mean those elements are not related to anything.)



        Example: If you have a set $S={1,2}$ and $1 sim 1$ but $2$ is not related to anything that is symmetric. (As every case $a sim b$ then $a =b = 1$ and $b sim 1$.) And antismmetric. (As $asim b$ and $bsim a$ means $a = b =1$). But it is not reflexive as $2not sim 2$.



        [1]. Symmetric means if $a sim b$ then $b sim a$. Anti-symmetry means if $a sim b$ and $bsim a$ then $a =b$. If a relation is both then $a sim b implies bsim a implies a = b$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 1 '18 at 5:14









        fleabloodfleablood

        69.2k22685




        69.2k22685















            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            How to extract passwords from Mobaxterm Free Version

            IC on Digikey is 5x more expensive than board containing same IC on Alibaba: How? [on hold]