Exterior derivative is linear PDO of order $1$












1












$begingroup$


I am using this definition of PDO on page 19.



I want to verify my understanding by the example of exetior derivative.





The exterior derivative $d:Omega^p(M) rightarrow Omega^{p+1}(M)$ can locally be given by, for a $p$-form,
$$ w = sum_{|I|=p} a_I dx_I mapsto sum_{|I|=p} sum_{j=1}^n frac{partial{a_I}}{partial x_j} dx_j wedge dx_I$$



where $I$ subset of ${0,ldots, n }$, $n = dim M$.




Claim: $d$ is a linear PDO of order $1$.






The definition of PDO requiries that locally $P$ looks like
$$f mapsto sum _{|alpha| le k } A^alpha (y) frac{partial^{alpha}}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$





So I think it is not obvious what $A^alpha$s are where $alpha = (0,ldots, 1, ldots, 0)$, $1$ in the $j$th position.






  1. In these coordinates. $frac{partial w}{partial x_j}$
    is $sum_{|I|=p} frac{partial a_I}{partial x_j} dx_I$


  2. Depending on $n$, $A^alpha$ is a matrix with values in $pm1$, $0$.





Is my line of thought correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it is the one in page 19. I edited.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:21
















1












$begingroup$


I am using this definition of PDO on page 19.



I want to verify my understanding by the example of exetior derivative.





The exterior derivative $d:Omega^p(M) rightarrow Omega^{p+1}(M)$ can locally be given by, for a $p$-form,
$$ w = sum_{|I|=p} a_I dx_I mapsto sum_{|I|=p} sum_{j=1}^n frac{partial{a_I}}{partial x_j} dx_j wedge dx_I$$



where $I$ subset of ${0,ldots, n }$, $n = dim M$.




Claim: $d$ is a linear PDO of order $1$.






The definition of PDO requiries that locally $P$ looks like
$$f mapsto sum _{|alpha| le k } A^alpha (y) frac{partial^{alpha}}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$





So I think it is not obvious what $A^alpha$s are where $alpha = (0,ldots, 1, ldots, 0)$, $1$ in the $j$th position.






  1. In these coordinates. $frac{partial w}{partial x_j}$
    is $sum_{|I|=p} frac{partial a_I}{partial x_j} dx_I$


  2. Depending on $n$, $A^alpha$ is a matrix with values in $pm1$, $0$.





Is my line of thought correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it is the one in page 19. I edited.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:21














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am using this definition of PDO on page 19.



I want to verify my understanding by the example of exetior derivative.





The exterior derivative $d:Omega^p(M) rightarrow Omega^{p+1}(M)$ can locally be given by, for a $p$-form,
$$ w = sum_{|I|=p} a_I dx_I mapsto sum_{|I|=p} sum_{j=1}^n frac{partial{a_I}}{partial x_j} dx_j wedge dx_I$$



where $I$ subset of ${0,ldots, n }$, $n = dim M$.




Claim: $d$ is a linear PDO of order $1$.






The definition of PDO requiries that locally $P$ looks like
$$f mapsto sum _{|alpha| le k } A^alpha (y) frac{partial^{alpha}}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$





So I think it is not obvious what $A^alpha$s are where $alpha = (0,ldots, 1, ldots, 0)$, $1$ in the $j$th position.






  1. In these coordinates. $frac{partial w}{partial x_j}$
    is $sum_{|I|=p} frac{partial a_I}{partial x_j} dx_I$


  2. Depending on $n$, $A^alpha$ is a matrix with values in $pm1$, $0$.





Is my line of thought correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am using this definition of PDO on page 19.



I want to verify my understanding by the example of exetior derivative.





The exterior derivative $d:Omega^p(M) rightarrow Omega^{p+1}(M)$ can locally be given by, for a $p$-form,
$$ w = sum_{|I|=p} a_I dx_I mapsto sum_{|I|=p} sum_{j=1}^n frac{partial{a_I}}{partial x_j} dx_j wedge dx_I$$



where $I$ subset of ${0,ldots, n }$, $n = dim M$.




Claim: $d$ is a linear PDO of order $1$.






The definition of PDO requiries that locally $P$ looks like
$$f mapsto sum _{|alpha| le k } A^alpha (y) frac{partial^{alpha}}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$





So I think it is not obvious what $A^alpha$s are where $alpha = (0,ldots, 1, ldots, 0)$, $1$ in the $j$th position.






  1. In these coordinates. $frac{partial w}{partial x_j}$
    is $sum_{|I|=p} frac{partial a_I}{partial x_j} dx_I$


  2. Depending on $n$, $A^alpha$ is a matrix with values in $pm1$, $0$.





Is my line of thought correct?







differential-geometry differential-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 7 '18 at 22:21







CL.

















asked Dec 7 '18 at 15:47









CL.CL.

2,2382825




2,2382825












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it is the one in page 19. I edited.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:21


















  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it is the one in page 19. I edited.
    $endgroup$
    – CL.
    Dec 7 '18 at 22:21
















$begingroup$
Sorry, it is the one in page 19. I edited.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Dec 7 '18 at 22:21




$begingroup$
Sorry, it is the one in page 19. I edited.
$endgroup$
– CL.
Dec 7 '18 at 22:21










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Your thoughts look correct. I'll just (attempt) to set the record straight.



In local coordinates $x_1,ldots,x_n$, we can write
$$dleft(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright)=sum_{j=1}^ndx_jwedgeleft[frac{partial}{partial x_j}sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright]=sum_{j=1}^nA^jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}left(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright) .$$
We have $n$ different $binom{n}{p+1}timesbinom{n}{p}$ matrices $A^1,ldots A^n$, which we can conveniently index by $p-$ and $(p+1)-$element subsets of ${1,ldots,n}$. For $I,Jsubset{1,ldots,n}$ with $|I|=p$, $|J|=p+1$, the $(J,I)$-entry of $A^j$ will be $pm 1$ if $J=Icup{j}$ (with the sign of the entry depending on $I$ in the obvious way), and $0$ otherwise.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030034%2fexterior-derivative-is-linear-pdo-of-order-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Your thoughts look correct. I'll just (attempt) to set the record straight.



    In local coordinates $x_1,ldots,x_n$, we can write
    $$dleft(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright)=sum_{j=1}^ndx_jwedgeleft[frac{partial}{partial x_j}sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright]=sum_{j=1}^nA^jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}left(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright) .$$
    We have $n$ different $binom{n}{p+1}timesbinom{n}{p}$ matrices $A^1,ldots A^n$, which we can conveniently index by $p-$ and $(p+1)-$element subsets of ${1,ldots,n}$. For $I,Jsubset{1,ldots,n}$ with $|I|=p$, $|J|=p+1$, the $(J,I)$-entry of $A^j$ will be $pm 1$ if $J=Icup{j}$ (with the sign of the entry depending on $I$ in the obvious way), and $0$ otherwise.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Your thoughts look correct. I'll just (attempt) to set the record straight.



      In local coordinates $x_1,ldots,x_n$, we can write
      $$dleft(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright)=sum_{j=1}^ndx_jwedgeleft[frac{partial}{partial x_j}sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright]=sum_{j=1}^nA^jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}left(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright) .$$
      We have $n$ different $binom{n}{p+1}timesbinom{n}{p}$ matrices $A^1,ldots A^n$, which we can conveniently index by $p-$ and $(p+1)-$element subsets of ${1,ldots,n}$. For $I,Jsubset{1,ldots,n}$ with $|I|=p$, $|J|=p+1$, the $(J,I)$-entry of $A^j$ will be $pm 1$ if $J=Icup{j}$ (with the sign of the entry depending on $I$ in the obvious way), and $0$ otherwise.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Your thoughts look correct. I'll just (attempt) to set the record straight.



        In local coordinates $x_1,ldots,x_n$, we can write
        $$dleft(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright)=sum_{j=1}^ndx_jwedgeleft[frac{partial}{partial x_j}sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright]=sum_{j=1}^nA^jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}left(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright) .$$
        We have $n$ different $binom{n}{p+1}timesbinom{n}{p}$ matrices $A^1,ldots A^n$, which we can conveniently index by $p-$ and $(p+1)-$element subsets of ${1,ldots,n}$. For $I,Jsubset{1,ldots,n}$ with $|I|=p$, $|J|=p+1$, the $(J,I)$-entry of $A^j$ will be $pm 1$ if $J=Icup{j}$ (with the sign of the entry depending on $I$ in the obvious way), and $0$ otherwise.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your thoughts look correct. I'll just (attempt) to set the record straight.



        In local coordinates $x_1,ldots,x_n$, we can write
        $$dleft(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright)=sum_{j=1}^ndx_jwedgeleft[frac{partial}{partial x_j}sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright]=sum_{j=1}^nA^jfrac{partial}{partial x_j}left(sum_{|I|=p}a_Idx_Iright) .$$
        We have $n$ different $binom{n}{p+1}timesbinom{n}{p}$ matrices $A^1,ldots A^n$, which we can conveniently index by $p-$ and $(p+1)-$element subsets of ${1,ldots,n}$. For $I,Jsubset{1,ldots,n}$ with $|I|=p$, $|J|=p+1$, the $(J,I)$-entry of $A^j$ will be $pm 1$ if $J=Icup{j}$ (with the sign of the entry depending on $I$ in the obvious way), and $0$ otherwise.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 8 '18 at 21:29









        AweyganAweygan

        14.2k21441




        14.2k21441






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030034%2fexterior-derivative-is-linear-pdo-of-order-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...