How can I enhance the gray text on scanned crumpled receipts?












2















Consider the following snippet of a receipt I've scanned:



enter image description here



usually when I scan receipts I manage to separate the text and the background using something like a color-range selection tool, selection expansion, feathering, then inverting the selection and painting the background white. Then I can play with the image's levels without worrying about over-emphasizing the background. I do all this with Gimp (and Photoshop does these kinds of things too).



But when my scanned image is crumpled, its scan has highlighting and shadows which tend to confuse color-value-based selection. Still, the shapes of the letter do stand out enough to make reasonable distinctions.



My question is: What can I do to emphasize the gray text in these kinds of images while not also emphasizing the crumples / shadows on the page?



Notes:




  • The color is the back of the receipt, not a watermark, but it might as well have been a watermark.

  • This is probably thermal paper, but the question is relevant for non-thermal paper as well.

  • I don't need to OCR anything.

  • It's important to me not to lose pieces of letters, even at the price of having a few non-text artifacts remaining.

  • This text is Hebrew but it shouldn't matter.

  • The example is already after a bit of playing with the levels.










share|improve this question

























  • Have you tried flattening before scanning (with an Iron maybe)?

    – DavidPostill
    Jan 13 at 21:04






  • 1





    @DavidPostill: With an iron? It'll burn... but: 1. Yes I have. I suppose I could put more weight on top of the scanner. 2. For the purposes of this question, assume the image is as it is.

    – einpoklum
    Jan 13 at 21:24






  • 2





    It's possible that is thermal paper. If so, ironing would be kinda counter-productive.

    – fixer1234
    Jan 14 at 0:08
















2















Consider the following snippet of a receipt I've scanned:



enter image description here



usually when I scan receipts I manage to separate the text and the background using something like a color-range selection tool, selection expansion, feathering, then inverting the selection and painting the background white. Then I can play with the image's levels without worrying about over-emphasizing the background. I do all this with Gimp (and Photoshop does these kinds of things too).



But when my scanned image is crumpled, its scan has highlighting and shadows which tend to confuse color-value-based selection. Still, the shapes of the letter do stand out enough to make reasonable distinctions.



My question is: What can I do to emphasize the gray text in these kinds of images while not also emphasizing the crumples / shadows on the page?



Notes:




  • The color is the back of the receipt, not a watermark, but it might as well have been a watermark.

  • This is probably thermal paper, but the question is relevant for non-thermal paper as well.

  • I don't need to OCR anything.

  • It's important to me not to lose pieces of letters, even at the price of having a few non-text artifacts remaining.

  • This text is Hebrew but it shouldn't matter.

  • The example is already after a bit of playing with the levels.










share|improve this question

























  • Have you tried flattening before scanning (with an Iron maybe)?

    – DavidPostill
    Jan 13 at 21:04






  • 1





    @DavidPostill: With an iron? It'll burn... but: 1. Yes I have. I suppose I could put more weight on top of the scanner. 2. For the purposes of this question, assume the image is as it is.

    – einpoklum
    Jan 13 at 21:24






  • 2





    It's possible that is thermal paper. If so, ironing would be kinda counter-productive.

    – fixer1234
    Jan 14 at 0:08














2












2








2








Consider the following snippet of a receipt I've scanned:



enter image description here



usually when I scan receipts I manage to separate the text and the background using something like a color-range selection tool, selection expansion, feathering, then inverting the selection and painting the background white. Then I can play with the image's levels without worrying about over-emphasizing the background. I do all this with Gimp (and Photoshop does these kinds of things too).



But when my scanned image is crumpled, its scan has highlighting and shadows which tend to confuse color-value-based selection. Still, the shapes of the letter do stand out enough to make reasonable distinctions.



My question is: What can I do to emphasize the gray text in these kinds of images while not also emphasizing the crumples / shadows on the page?



Notes:




  • The color is the back of the receipt, not a watermark, but it might as well have been a watermark.

  • This is probably thermal paper, but the question is relevant for non-thermal paper as well.

  • I don't need to OCR anything.

  • It's important to me not to lose pieces of letters, even at the price of having a few non-text artifacts remaining.

  • This text is Hebrew but it shouldn't matter.

  • The example is already after a bit of playing with the levels.










share|improve this question
















Consider the following snippet of a receipt I've scanned:



enter image description here



usually when I scan receipts I manage to separate the text and the background using something like a color-range selection tool, selection expansion, feathering, then inverting the selection and painting the background white. Then I can play with the image's levels without worrying about over-emphasizing the background. I do all this with Gimp (and Photoshop does these kinds of things too).



But when my scanned image is crumpled, its scan has highlighting and shadows which tend to confuse color-value-based selection. Still, the shapes of the letter do stand out enough to make reasonable distinctions.



My question is: What can I do to emphasize the gray text in these kinds of images while not also emphasizing the crumples / shadows on the page?



Notes:




  • The color is the back of the receipt, not a watermark, but it might as well have been a watermark.

  • This is probably thermal paper, but the question is relevant for non-thermal paper as well.

  • I don't need to OCR anything.

  • It's important to me not to lose pieces of letters, even at the price of having a few non-text artifacts remaining.

  • This text is Hebrew but it shouldn't matter.

  • The example is already after a bit of playing with the levels.







images colors adobe-photoshop gimp image-processing






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 14 at 8:52







einpoklum

















asked Jan 13 at 19:57









einpoklumeinpoklum

2,02672968




2,02672968













  • Have you tried flattening before scanning (with an Iron maybe)?

    – DavidPostill
    Jan 13 at 21:04






  • 1





    @DavidPostill: With an iron? It'll burn... but: 1. Yes I have. I suppose I could put more weight on top of the scanner. 2. For the purposes of this question, assume the image is as it is.

    – einpoklum
    Jan 13 at 21:24






  • 2





    It's possible that is thermal paper. If so, ironing would be kinda counter-productive.

    – fixer1234
    Jan 14 at 0:08



















  • Have you tried flattening before scanning (with an Iron maybe)?

    – DavidPostill
    Jan 13 at 21:04






  • 1





    @DavidPostill: With an iron? It'll burn... but: 1. Yes I have. I suppose I could put more weight on top of the scanner. 2. For the purposes of this question, assume the image is as it is.

    – einpoklum
    Jan 13 at 21:24






  • 2





    It's possible that is thermal paper. If so, ironing would be kinda counter-productive.

    – fixer1234
    Jan 14 at 0:08

















Have you tried flattening before scanning (with an Iron maybe)?

– DavidPostill
Jan 13 at 21:04





Have you tried flattening before scanning (with an Iron maybe)?

– DavidPostill
Jan 13 at 21:04




1




1





@DavidPostill: With an iron? It'll burn... but: 1. Yes I have. I suppose I could put more weight on top of the scanner. 2. For the purposes of this question, assume the image is as it is.

– einpoklum
Jan 13 at 21:24





@DavidPostill: With an iron? It'll burn... but: 1. Yes I have. I suppose I could put more weight on top of the scanner. 2. For the purposes of this question, assume the image is as it is.

– einpoklum
Jan 13 at 21:24




2




2





It's possible that is thermal paper. If so, ironing would be kinda counter-productive.

– fixer1234
Jan 14 at 0:08





It's possible that is thermal paper. If so, ironing would be kinda counter-productive.

– fixer1234
Jan 14 at 0:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Your technique sounds like you're on the right track, but you may need to isolate areas with color and shading differences and treat them differently. It's a lot of work. I tried it without going that route, and even with the noisy background, it didn't come out too bad.



Color is often a key to cleanup. Look at the individual color channels in different color spaces. Find the ones with the most contrast between print and background and use gamma, color curves, or contrast to improve it there. You can fine-tune the curve to create the most stretch in the range where you need to enhance discrimination. Actually, any tool or combinations of tools that can be used to improve discrimination between print and background will help if you're working with isolated areas. You can often improve it with successive passes, and alternating color spaces.



If certain color channels have very low contrast, they may be contributing noise. If you can't tease the print and background apart via color curves, you might improve it by reducing or eliminating the channel.



Adjusting color curves in this way will produce weird coloring. Convert the result to grayscale or use the luminance channel. From there, use a similar color curve tool to optimize contrast.



You might need to use the eraser tool, or select an area of background and delete, to manually remove noise that is too much like the printing.



If you need to get aggressive to eliminate heavy background, like in your sample image, you may end up with clean printing, but gaps where parts of the characters were too similar to the background. Use the select-by-color tool and set the tolerance number very high (broad color range; at this point, anything with color remotely similar to the printing should be printing). Select the printing. Use the feathering tool to grow the boundary a few pixels, which will add a lot of the gaps.



Use that as a mask on the original to extract the printing. You can also then blend both versions (I typically use luminance), which will combine the benefits of each.



But start with the cleanest image you can get by getting rid of as much of the wrinkling as possible. If you are going to try ironing the receipt, try it first in an area far removed from any printing. If it is thermal paper, you will turn it dark. BTW, tape or cold lamination film will darken thermal paper, also. Even some types of non-thermal paper can darken from heat.



I didn't do any cleanup within individual characters. I just used color channels and curves, then chopped out a few large, dark background stains. Then I made a mask from the result, used it to extract the printing from the original, and blended both versions, which produced this:



enter image description here



When you have parts of characters that closely match the background (light print on a background of similar color and darkness), there isn't a practical way to remove the background without taking some of the light printing with it (that's where isolating different areas lets you fine tune the cleanup in a way that you can't do treating the entire image the same). However, be aware that you will also be fighting an optical illusion.



When there are print characters on a background of similar hue, and especially if you are familiar with the characters, your brain will fill in imperfections. If you magnify your image, you'll see small gaps in the characters with the background color showing through. The gaps will be much more obvious when you look at individual color channels.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Looking at the original at a normal viewing distance, the characters appear more complete than they actually are. If you do a good job of removing all of the background, so you have what looks like black printing on white paper, the imperfections in the characters will be much more visible.



enter image description hereenter image description here



If needed, you can "retouch" the result by manually filling in obvious gaps on the magnified image.






share|improve this answer

































    1














    Globally adjusting the contrast (using IrfanView, below) produced an image that seemed to me to be clearer. Though this might not meet your needs at these settings, you can adjust the contrast and see the changes real-time. Also, eliminating red and green channels might get rid of the blue creases. BTW, IrfanView runs well under wine, as well as in Windows, though it's not nearly as powerful an image editor as the GIMP.



    IrfanView adjustments






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "3"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1393873%2fhow-can-i-enhance-the-gray-text-on-scanned-crumpled-receipts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      Your technique sounds like you're on the right track, but you may need to isolate areas with color and shading differences and treat them differently. It's a lot of work. I tried it without going that route, and even with the noisy background, it didn't come out too bad.



      Color is often a key to cleanup. Look at the individual color channels in different color spaces. Find the ones with the most contrast between print and background and use gamma, color curves, or contrast to improve it there. You can fine-tune the curve to create the most stretch in the range where you need to enhance discrimination. Actually, any tool or combinations of tools that can be used to improve discrimination between print and background will help if you're working with isolated areas. You can often improve it with successive passes, and alternating color spaces.



      If certain color channels have very low contrast, they may be contributing noise. If you can't tease the print and background apart via color curves, you might improve it by reducing or eliminating the channel.



      Adjusting color curves in this way will produce weird coloring. Convert the result to grayscale or use the luminance channel. From there, use a similar color curve tool to optimize contrast.



      You might need to use the eraser tool, or select an area of background and delete, to manually remove noise that is too much like the printing.



      If you need to get aggressive to eliminate heavy background, like in your sample image, you may end up with clean printing, but gaps where parts of the characters were too similar to the background. Use the select-by-color tool and set the tolerance number very high (broad color range; at this point, anything with color remotely similar to the printing should be printing). Select the printing. Use the feathering tool to grow the boundary a few pixels, which will add a lot of the gaps.



      Use that as a mask on the original to extract the printing. You can also then blend both versions (I typically use luminance), which will combine the benefits of each.



      But start with the cleanest image you can get by getting rid of as much of the wrinkling as possible. If you are going to try ironing the receipt, try it first in an area far removed from any printing. If it is thermal paper, you will turn it dark. BTW, tape or cold lamination film will darken thermal paper, also. Even some types of non-thermal paper can darken from heat.



      I didn't do any cleanup within individual characters. I just used color channels and curves, then chopped out a few large, dark background stains. Then I made a mask from the result, used it to extract the printing from the original, and blended both versions, which produced this:



      enter image description here



      When you have parts of characters that closely match the background (light print on a background of similar color and darkness), there isn't a practical way to remove the background without taking some of the light printing with it (that's where isolating different areas lets you fine tune the cleanup in a way that you can't do treating the entire image the same). However, be aware that you will also be fighting an optical illusion.



      When there are print characters on a background of similar hue, and especially if you are familiar with the characters, your brain will fill in imperfections. If you magnify your image, you'll see small gaps in the characters with the background color showing through. The gaps will be much more obvious when you look at individual color channels.



      enter image description hereenter image description here



      Looking at the original at a normal viewing distance, the characters appear more complete than they actually are. If you do a good job of removing all of the background, so you have what looks like black printing on white paper, the imperfections in the characters will be much more visible.



      enter image description hereenter image description here



      If needed, you can "retouch" the result by manually filling in obvious gaps on the magnified image.






      share|improve this answer






























        2














        Your technique sounds like you're on the right track, but you may need to isolate areas with color and shading differences and treat them differently. It's a lot of work. I tried it without going that route, and even with the noisy background, it didn't come out too bad.



        Color is often a key to cleanup. Look at the individual color channels in different color spaces. Find the ones with the most contrast between print and background and use gamma, color curves, or contrast to improve it there. You can fine-tune the curve to create the most stretch in the range where you need to enhance discrimination. Actually, any tool or combinations of tools that can be used to improve discrimination between print and background will help if you're working with isolated areas. You can often improve it with successive passes, and alternating color spaces.



        If certain color channels have very low contrast, they may be contributing noise. If you can't tease the print and background apart via color curves, you might improve it by reducing or eliminating the channel.



        Adjusting color curves in this way will produce weird coloring. Convert the result to grayscale or use the luminance channel. From there, use a similar color curve tool to optimize contrast.



        You might need to use the eraser tool, or select an area of background and delete, to manually remove noise that is too much like the printing.



        If you need to get aggressive to eliminate heavy background, like in your sample image, you may end up with clean printing, but gaps where parts of the characters were too similar to the background. Use the select-by-color tool and set the tolerance number very high (broad color range; at this point, anything with color remotely similar to the printing should be printing). Select the printing. Use the feathering tool to grow the boundary a few pixels, which will add a lot of the gaps.



        Use that as a mask on the original to extract the printing. You can also then blend both versions (I typically use luminance), which will combine the benefits of each.



        But start with the cleanest image you can get by getting rid of as much of the wrinkling as possible. If you are going to try ironing the receipt, try it first in an area far removed from any printing. If it is thermal paper, you will turn it dark. BTW, tape or cold lamination film will darken thermal paper, also. Even some types of non-thermal paper can darken from heat.



        I didn't do any cleanup within individual characters. I just used color channels and curves, then chopped out a few large, dark background stains. Then I made a mask from the result, used it to extract the printing from the original, and blended both versions, which produced this:



        enter image description here



        When you have parts of characters that closely match the background (light print on a background of similar color and darkness), there isn't a practical way to remove the background without taking some of the light printing with it (that's where isolating different areas lets you fine tune the cleanup in a way that you can't do treating the entire image the same). However, be aware that you will also be fighting an optical illusion.



        When there are print characters on a background of similar hue, and especially if you are familiar with the characters, your brain will fill in imperfections. If you magnify your image, you'll see small gaps in the characters with the background color showing through. The gaps will be much more obvious when you look at individual color channels.



        enter image description hereenter image description here



        Looking at the original at a normal viewing distance, the characters appear more complete than they actually are. If you do a good job of removing all of the background, so you have what looks like black printing on white paper, the imperfections in the characters will be much more visible.



        enter image description hereenter image description here



        If needed, you can "retouch" the result by manually filling in obvious gaps on the magnified image.






        share|improve this answer




























          2












          2








          2







          Your technique sounds like you're on the right track, but you may need to isolate areas with color and shading differences and treat them differently. It's a lot of work. I tried it without going that route, and even with the noisy background, it didn't come out too bad.



          Color is often a key to cleanup. Look at the individual color channels in different color spaces. Find the ones with the most contrast between print and background and use gamma, color curves, or contrast to improve it there. You can fine-tune the curve to create the most stretch in the range where you need to enhance discrimination. Actually, any tool or combinations of tools that can be used to improve discrimination between print and background will help if you're working with isolated areas. You can often improve it with successive passes, and alternating color spaces.



          If certain color channels have very low contrast, they may be contributing noise. If you can't tease the print and background apart via color curves, you might improve it by reducing or eliminating the channel.



          Adjusting color curves in this way will produce weird coloring. Convert the result to grayscale or use the luminance channel. From there, use a similar color curve tool to optimize contrast.



          You might need to use the eraser tool, or select an area of background and delete, to manually remove noise that is too much like the printing.



          If you need to get aggressive to eliminate heavy background, like in your sample image, you may end up with clean printing, but gaps where parts of the characters were too similar to the background. Use the select-by-color tool and set the tolerance number very high (broad color range; at this point, anything with color remotely similar to the printing should be printing). Select the printing. Use the feathering tool to grow the boundary a few pixels, which will add a lot of the gaps.



          Use that as a mask on the original to extract the printing. You can also then blend both versions (I typically use luminance), which will combine the benefits of each.



          But start with the cleanest image you can get by getting rid of as much of the wrinkling as possible. If you are going to try ironing the receipt, try it first in an area far removed from any printing. If it is thermal paper, you will turn it dark. BTW, tape or cold lamination film will darken thermal paper, also. Even some types of non-thermal paper can darken from heat.



          I didn't do any cleanup within individual characters. I just used color channels and curves, then chopped out a few large, dark background stains. Then I made a mask from the result, used it to extract the printing from the original, and blended both versions, which produced this:



          enter image description here



          When you have parts of characters that closely match the background (light print on a background of similar color and darkness), there isn't a practical way to remove the background without taking some of the light printing with it (that's where isolating different areas lets you fine tune the cleanup in a way that you can't do treating the entire image the same). However, be aware that you will also be fighting an optical illusion.



          When there are print characters on a background of similar hue, and especially if you are familiar with the characters, your brain will fill in imperfections. If you magnify your image, you'll see small gaps in the characters with the background color showing through. The gaps will be much more obvious when you look at individual color channels.



          enter image description hereenter image description here



          Looking at the original at a normal viewing distance, the characters appear more complete than they actually are. If you do a good job of removing all of the background, so you have what looks like black printing on white paper, the imperfections in the characters will be much more visible.



          enter image description hereenter image description here



          If needed, you can "retouch" the result by manually filling in obvious gaps on the magnified image.






          share|improve this answer















          Your technique sounds like you're on the right track, but you may need to isolate areas with color and shading differences and treat them differently. It's a lot of work. I tried it without going that route, and even with the noisy background, it didn't come out too bad.



          Color is often a key to cleanup. Look at the individual color channels in different color spaces. Find the ones with the most contrast between print and background and use gamma, color curves, or contrast to improve it there. You can fine-tune the curve to create the most stretch in the range where you need to enhance discrimination. Actually, any tool or combinations of tools that can be used to improve discrimination between print and background will help if you're working with isolated areas. You can often improve it with successive passes, and alternating color spaces.



          If certain color channels have very low contrast, they may be contributing noise. If you can't tease the print and background apart via color curves, you might improve it by reducing or eliminating the channel.



          Adjusting color curves in this way will produce weird coloring. Convert the result to grayscale or use the luminance channel. From there, use a similar color curve tool to optimize contrast.



          You might need to use the eraser tool, or select an area of background and delete, to manually remove noise that is too much like the printing.



          If you need to get aggressive to eliminate heavy background, like in your sample image, you may end up with clean printing, but gaps where parts of the characters were too similar to the background. Use the select-by-color tool and set the tolerance number very high (broad color range; at this point, anything with color remotely similar to the printing should be printing). Select the printing. Use the feathering tool to grow the boundary a few pixels, which will add a lot of the gaps.



          Use that as a mask on the original to extract the printing. You can also then blend both versions (I typically use luminance), which will combine the benefits of each.



          But start with the cleanest image you can get by getting rid of as much of the wrinkling as possible. If you are going to try ironing the receipt, try it first in an area far removed from any printing. If it is thermal paper, you will turn it dark. BTW, tape or cold lamination film will darken thermal paper, also. Even some types of non-thermal paper can darken from heat.



          I didn't do any cleanup within individual characters. I just used color channels and curves, then chopped out a few large, dark background stains. Then I made a mask from the result, used it to extract the printing from the original, and blended both versions, which produced this:



          enter image description here



          When you have parts of characters that closely match the background (light print on a background of similar color and darkness), there isn't a practical way to remove the background without taking some of the light printing with it (that's where isolating different areas lets you fine tune the cleanup in a way that you can't do treating the entire image the same). However, be aware that you will also be fighting an optical illusion.



          When there are print characters on a background of similar hue, and especially if you are familiar with the characters, your brain will fill in imperfections. If you magnify your image, you'll see small gaps in the characters with the background color showing through. The gaps will be much more obvious when you look at individual color channels.



          enter image description hereenter image description here



          Looking at the original at a normal viewing distance, the characters appear more complete than they actually are. If you do a good job of removing all of the background, so you have what looks like black printing on white paper, the imperfections in the characters will be much more visible.



          enter image description hereenter image description here



          If needed, you can "retouch" the result by manually filling in obvious gaps on the magnified image.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 14 at 11:26

























          answered Jan 14 at 1:12









          fixer1234fixer1234

          18.8k144982




          18.8k144982

























              1














              Globally adjusting the contrast (using IrfanView, below) produced an image that seemed to me to be clearer. Though this might not meet your needs at these settings, you can adjust the contrast and see the changes real-time. Also, eliminating red and green channels might get rid of the blue creases. BTW, IrfanView runs well under wine, as well as in Windows, though it's not nearly as powerful an image editor as the GIMP.



              IrfanView adjustments






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                Globally adjusting the contrast (using IrfanView, below) produced an image that seemed to me to be clearer. Though this might not meet your needs at these settings, you can adjust the contrast and see the changes real-time. Also, eliminating red and green channels might get rid of the blue creases. BTW, IrfanView runs well under wine, as well as in Windows, though it's not nearly as powerful an image editor as the GIMP.



                IrfanView adjustments






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Globally adjusting the contrast (using IrfanView, below) produced an image that seemed to me to be clearer. Though this might not meet your needs at these settings, you can adjust the contrast and see the changes real-time. Also, eliminating red and green channels might get rid of the blue creases. BTW, IrfanView runs well under wine, as well as in Windows, though it's not nearly as powerful an image editor as the GIMP.



                  IrfanView adjustments






                  share|improve this answer













                  Globally adjusting the contrast (using IrfanView, below) produced an image that seemed to me to be clearer. Though this might not meet your needs at these settings, you can adjust the contrast and see the changes real-time. Also, eliminating red and green channels might get rid of the blue creases. BTW, IrfanView runs well under wine, as well as in Windows, though it's not nearly as powerful an image editor as the GIMP.



                  IrfanView adjustments







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 14 at 0:39









                  DrMoishe PippikDrMoishe Pippik

                  10.2k21432




                  10.2k21432






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1393873%2fhow-can-i-enhance-the-gray-text-on-scanned-crumpled-receipts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Brian Clough

                      Cáceres