Linear Algebra Invertible Matrix Theorem Proof
$begingroup$
Part of the proof for this theorem asks you to show that if $A$ is an $n times n$-matrix and there exists an $n times n$-matrix $D$ such that $AD = I$ (the $n times n$-identity matrix), then the equation $Ax = b$ has at least one solution for each $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
In order to prove this, I simply started with the hypothesis that $AD = I$ and right-multiplied each side of the equation by the $mathbb{R}^n$ vector $b$ to get:
$AD(b) = I(b) = b.$
By the associative property for matrix multiplication, this leads to $A(Db) = b$, which means that for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$, the vector $Db$ is a solution so that $Ax = b$ has at least that one solution for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
I'm pretty sure that's one way of proving it, but can anyone give me any hints about a different or possibly more insightful way of proving this step? It's definitely one of the least straight-forward inferences in the theorem.
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Part of the proof for this theorem asks you to show that if $A$ is an $n times n$-matrix and there exists an $n times n$-matrix $D$ such that $AD = I$ (the $n times n$-identity matrix), then the equation $Ax = b$ has at least one solution for each $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
In order to prove this, I simply started with the hypothesis that $AD = I$ and right-multiplied each side of the equation by the $mathbb{R}^n$ vector $b$ to get:
$AD(b) = I(b) = b.$
By the associative property for matrix multiplication, this leads to $A(Db) = b$, which means that for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$, the vector $Db$ is a solution so that $Ax = b$ has at least that one solution for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
I'm pretty sure that's one way of proving it, but can anyone give me any hints about a different or possibly more insightful way of proving this step? It's definitely one of the least straight-forward inferences in the theorem.
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct although (depending on your professor) it can be written much more succinctly. For example: for all $binmathbb{R}^n$, if we let $x=Dbinmathbb{R}^n$, then $Ax=A(Db)=(AD)b=Ib=b$.
$endgroup$
– yurnero
Oct 19 '15 at 0:10
3
$begingroup$
@Meta = welcome to math.stackexchange! This is correct and it is probably the most straight forward way to prove it. I also like the good pace (no gaps, no jumps, no stalling) in your argument.
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Oct 19 '15 at 0:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Part of the proof for this theorem asks you to show that if $A$ is an $n times n$-matrix and there exists an $n times n$-matrix $D$ such that $AD = I$ (the $n times n$-identity matrix), then the equation $Ax = b$ has at least one solution for each $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
In order to prove this, I simply started with the hypothesis that $AD = I$ and right-multiplied each side of the equation by the $mathbb{R}^n$ vector $b$ to get:
$AD(b) = I(b) = b.$
By the associative property for matrix multiplication, this leads to $A(Db) = b$, which means that for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$, the vector $Db$ is a solution so that $Ax = b$ has at least that one solution for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
I'm pretty sure that's one way of proving it, but can anyone give me any hints about a different or possibly more insightful way of proving this step? It's definitely one of the least straight-forward inferences in the theorem.
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
Part of the proof for this theorem asks you to show that if $A$ is an $n times n$-matrix and there exists an $n times n$-matrix $D$ such that $AD = I$ (the $n times n$-identity matrix), then the equation $Ax = b$ has at least one solution for each $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
In order to prove this, I simply started with the hypothesis that $AD = I$ and right-multiplied each side of the equation by the $mathbb{R}^n$ vector $b$ to get:
$AD(b) = I(b) = b.$
By the associative property for matrix multiplication, this leads to $A(Db) = b$, which means that for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$, the vector $Db$ is a solution so that $Ax = b$ has at least that one solution for every $b$ in $mathbb{R}^n$.
I'm pretty sure that's one way of proving it, but can anyone give me any hints about a different or possibly more insightful way of proving this step? It's definitely one of the least straight-forward inferences in the theorem.
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
edited Oct 19 '15 at 0:58
Martin Argerami
127k1182183
127k1182183
asked Oct 19 '15 at 0:06
MetaMeta
334
334
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct although (depending on your professor) it can be written much more succinctly. For example: for all $binmathbb{R}^n$, if we let $x=Dbinmathbb{R}^n$, then $Ax=A(Db)=(AD)b=Ib=b$.
$endgroup$
– yurnero
Oct 19 '15 at 0:10
3
$begingroup$
@Meta = welcome to math.stackexchange! This is correct and it is probably the most straight forward way to prove it. I also like the good pace (no gaps, no jumps, no stalling) in your argument.
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Oct 19 '15 at 0:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct although (depending on your professor) it can be written much more succinctly. For example: for all $binmathbb{R}^n$, if we let $x=Dbinmathbb{R}^n$, then $Ax=A(Db)=(AD)b=Ib=b$.
$endgroup$
– yurnero
Oct 19 '15 at 0:10
3
$begingroup$
@Meta = welcome to math.stackexchange! This is correct and it is probably the most straight forward way to prove it. I also like the good pace (no gaps, no jumps, no stalling) in your argument.
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Oct 19 '15 at 0:11
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct although (depending on your professor) it can be written much more succinctly. For example: for all $binmathbb{R}^n$, if we let $x=Dbinmathbb{R}^n$, then $Ax=A(Db)=(AD)b=Ib=b$.
$endgroup$
– yurnero
Oct 19 '15 at 0:10
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct although (depending on your professor) it can be written much more succinctly. For example: for all $binmathbb{R}^n$, if we let $x=Dbinmathbb{R}^n$, then $Ax=A(Db)=(AD)b=Ib=b$.
$endgroup$
– yurnero
Oct 19 '15 at 0:10
3
3
$begingroup$
@Meta = welcome to math.stackexchange! This is correct and it is probably the most straight forward way to prove it. I also like the good pace (no gaps, no jumps, no stalling) in your argument.
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Oct 19 '15 at 0:11
$begingroup$
@Meta = welcome to math.stackexchange! This is correct and it is probably the most straight forward way to prove it. I also like the good pace (no gaps, no jumps, no stalling) in your argument.
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Oct 19 '15 at 0:11
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The OP thought that his proof/argument was somehow not straightforward. Actually, in the theory of sets it is well known that $f circ g = 1_{id} text{ iff } f text{ is surjective and } g text{ is injective}$. His argument actually does not use linear algebra and is used in the more general context.
So, in passing, I felt obliged to mention that the argument is indeed straightforward, albeit abstract.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a hint to another approach: There exists a $D$ such that $AD = I$ if and only if the column space of $A$ is all of $mathbb{R}^n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1486709%2flinear-algebra-invertible-matrix-theorem-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The OP thought that his proof/argument was somehow not straightforward. Actually, in the theory of sets it is well known that $f circ g = 1_{id} text{ iff } f text{ is surjective and } g text{ is injective}$. His argument actually does not use linear algebra and is used in the more general context.
So, in passing, I felt obliged to mention that the argument is indeed straightforward, albeit abstract.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The OP thought that his proof/argument was somehow not straightforward. Actually, in the theory of sets it is well known that $f circ g = 1_{id} text{ iff } f text{ is surjective and } g text{ is injective}$. His argument actually does not use linear algebra and is used in the more general context.
So, in passing, I felt obliged to mention that the argument is indeed straightforward, albeit abstract.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The OP thought that his proof/argument was somehow not straightforward. Actually, in the theory of sets it is well known that $f circ g = 1_{id} text{ iff } f text{ is surjective and } g text{ is injective}$. His argument actually does not use linear algebra and is used in the more general context.
So, in passing, I felt obliged to mention that the argument is indeed straightforward, albeit abstract.
$endgroup$
The OP thought that his proof/argument was somehow not straightforward. Actually, in the theory of sets it is well known that $f circ g = 1_{id} text{ iff } f text{ is surjective and } g text{ is injective}$. His argument actually does not use linear algebra and is used in the more general context.
So, in passing, I felt obliged to mention that the argument is indeed straightforward, albeit abstract.
answered Jan 5 '18 at 2:29
CopyPasteItCopyPasteIt
4,2031628
4,2031628
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a hint to another approach: There exists a $D$ such that $AD = I$ if and only if the column space of $A$ is all of $mathbb{R}^n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a hint to another approach: There exists a $D$ such that $AD = I$ if and only if the column space of $A$ is all of $mathbb{R}^n$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's a hint to another approach: There exists a $D$ such that $AD = I$ if and only if the column space of $A$ is all of $mathbb{R}^n$.
$endgroup$
Here's a hint to another approach: There exists a $D$ such that $AD = I$ if and only if the column space of $A$ is all of $mathbb{R}^n$.
answered Oct 19 '15 at 0:17
Michael BiroMichael Biro
10.8k21831
10.8k21831
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1486709%2flinear-algebra-invertible-matrix-theorem-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct although (depending on your professor) it can be written much more succinctly. For example: for all $binmathbb{R}^n$, if we let $x=Dbinmathbb{R}^n$, then $Ax=A(Db)=(AD)b=Ib=b$.
$endgroup$
– yurnero
Oct 19 '15 at 0:10
3
$begingroup$
@Meta = welcome to math.stackexchange! This is correct and it is probably the most straight forward way to prove it. I also like the good pace (no gaps, no jumps, no stalling) in your argument.
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Oct 19 '15 at 0:11