If $xR=I$ we can say that $xin I$?












5












$begingroup$


Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.



If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 21 '18 at 16:45


















5












$begingroup$


Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.



If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 21 '18 at 16:45
















5












5








5





$begingroup$


Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.



If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.



If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?







abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 21 '18 at 3:37







Masacroso

















asked Dec 21 '18 at 2:16









MasacrosoMasacroso

13.1k41748




13.1k41748








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 21 '18 at 16:45
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 21 '18 at 2:21






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Dec 21 '18 at 16:45










1




1




$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21




$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21




8




8




$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21




$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21




3




3




$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45






$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.




If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?




Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.



One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)



But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.



Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048119%2fif-xr-i-we-can-say-that-x-in-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.




      If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?




      Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.



      One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)



      But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.



      Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.




        If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?




        Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.



        One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)



        But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.



        Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.




          If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?




          Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.



          One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)



          But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.



          Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.




          If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?




          Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.



          One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)



          But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.



          Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 21 '18 at 16:41

























          answered Dec 21 '18 at 14:31









          rschwiebrschwieb

          108k12103253




          108k12103253























              2












              $begingroup$

              Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 21 '18 at 7:37









                  YiFanYiFan

                  5,2882728




                  5,2882728






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048119%2fif-xr-i-we-can-say-that-x-in-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Puebla de Zaragoza

                      Musa