If $xR=I$ we can say that $xin I$?
$begingroup$
Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
8
$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
3
$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals
$endgroup$
Probably this is a dumb question, I lack knowledge on abstract algebra. Suppose that $R$ is a ring without unity and $Isubset R$ is a non-trivial ideal.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals
edited Dec 21 '18 at 3:37
Masacroso
asked Dec 21 '18 at 2:16
MasacrosoMasacroso
13.1k41748
13.1k41748
1
$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
8
$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
3
$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
8
$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
3
$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45
1
1
$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
8
8
$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
3
3
$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.
One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)
But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.
Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048119%2fif-xr-i-we-can-say-that-x-in-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.
One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)
But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.
Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.
One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)
But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.
Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.
One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)
But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.
Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.
$endgroup$
The request for a counterexample has already been amply covered by existing answers/comments mentioning subrngs of $mathbb Z$.
If $xR=Rx=I$ for some $xin R$, we can says that $xin I$? If not, there is some other conditions that ensures that $xin I$?
Trivially $R$ having identity ensures this, but I understand you're probably interested in weaker conditions.
One interesting condition that jumps to mind for me is for $I$ to be a modular ideal. If $I$ is left modular, that means that there exists $ein R$ such that $re-rin I$ for all $rin R$. (Said another way, $R/I$ has a right identity.)
But now look at what that would mean for $I=xR=Rx$: you'd have $xe-xin I$, but you already know $xein I$, so that would mean $xin I$ as well.
Obviously being right modular would suffice as well, given your assumption that $Rx=I$.
edited Dec 21 '18 at 16:41
answered Dec 21 '18 at 14:31
rschwiebrschwieb
108k12103253
108k12103253
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.
$endgroup$
Per Michael Burr's suggestion in the comments, look at $R=2mathbb Z$, $I=4mathbb Z$, and $x=2$. $xR=Rx=4mathbb Z=I$, but obviously, $2notin4mathbb Z$.
answered Dec 21 '18 at 7:37
YiFanYiFan
5,2882728
5,2882728
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048119%2fif-xr-i-we-can-say-that-x-in-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It is a reasonable question. If you want to think about it, consider $R$ to be a proper ideal of a your favorite ring with unity. Then $xR$ will be an ideal of $R$, and a suitable choice of $x$ will give you an answer.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
8
$begingroup$
Suppose $R=2mathbb{Z}$, $I=4mathbb{Z}$, and $x=2$.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 21 '18 at 2:21
3
$begingroup$
@hardmath I hope their favorite ring is a nonfield domain! If they only like von Neumann regular rings they won't find a counterexample with that hint.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Dec 21 '18 at 16:45