Precipitating silver(I) salts from the solution of barium(II) cyanate and iodide












3












$begingroup$



Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




The answer was only $ce{AgCN}$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ce{AgI}$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ce{AgNO3}$ available to precipitate with both $ce{I-}$ and $ce{CN-}$?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    Apr 15 at 16:16






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_{mathrm{sp}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:28
















3












$begingroup$



Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




The answer was only $ce{AgCN}$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ce{AgI}$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ce{AgNO3}$ available to precipitate with both $ce{I-}$ and $ce{CN-}$?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    Apr 15 at 16:16






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_{mathrm{sp}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:28














3












3








3





$begingroup$



Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




The answer was only $ce{AgCN}$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ce{AgI}$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ce{AgNO3}$ available to precipitate with both $ce{I-}$ and $ce{CN-}$?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$





Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




The answer was only $ce{AgCN}$ will precipitate, but I don't understand why $ce{AgI}$ wouldn't precipitate as well since there is more than enough excess $ce{AgNO3}$ available to precipitate with both $ce{I-}$ and $ce{CN-}$?







inorganic-chemistry aqueous-solution solubility






share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 15 at 16:30









andselisk

19.7k665128




19.7k665128






New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 15 at 16:04









user77021user77021

211




211




New contributor




user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user77021 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    Apr 15 at 16:16






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_{mathrm{sp}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:28














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
    $endgroup$
    – user77021
    Apr 15 at 16:16






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_{mathrm{sp}}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zhe
    Apr 15 at 16:28








2




2




$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
Apr 15 at 16:08




$begingroup$
"There is more than enough." How did you determine that with out any quantitative calculations?
$endgroup$
– Zhe
Apr 15 at 16:08












$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
Apr 15 at 16:16




$begingroup$
I did calculate that max CN- that could be precipitated as AgCN is 2 x 10-12 mol. This leaves 3.498 x10-9 mol Ag+ remaining to react with I-
$endgroup$
– user77021
Apr 15 at 16:16




4




4




$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_{mathrm{sp}}$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
Apr 15 at 16:28




$begingroup$
Only if the concentrations are such that the solubility product exceeds $K_{mathrm{sp}}$.
$endgroup$
– Zhe
Apr 15 at 16:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$


Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



$K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




Assuming that $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ dissociate completely.



$ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i =} 2cdot10^{-10}$ molar



Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ will be



$ce{[Ag+]_i} = dfrac{3.5cdot10^{-9}pu{mol}}{0.010pu{L}} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



Now if both the $ce{CN-}$ and $ce{I-}$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ce{Ag+}$ must be removed.



$ce{[CN-]_i + [I-]_i =} 4cdot10^{-10}$ molar



$ce{[Ag+]_f} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M} - 4cdot10^{-10}pu{M} approx 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



So the final concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



The final concentration of $ce{CN-}$ is



$ce{[CN-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{6.0cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{1.7e-10}$



The the final concentration of $ce{I-}$ is



$ce{[I-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{8.5cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{2.4e-10}$



Conclusion:



Since $ce{[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f}$ some $ce{AgCN}$ will ppt.



Since $ce{[I-]_i < [I-]_f}$ no $ce{AgI}$ will ppt.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    Alternative method to MaxW method:



    Assume that an initial $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution of $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ in each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



    $$ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i} = pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



    Suppose when $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



    $$ce{[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i} = dfrac{pu{3.5cdot10^{-9} mol}}{pu{0.010 L}} = pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



    For precipitation of $ce{AgCN(s)}$:



    $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[CN-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} gt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



    Therefore, $ce{AgCN(s)}$ will precipitate.



    For precipitation of $ce{AgI(s)}$:



    $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[I-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} lt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN})=pu{8.5cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



    Therefore, $ce{AgI(s)}$ will not precipitate in this condition.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "431"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$


      Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



      $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




      Assuming that $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ dissociate completely.



      $ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i =} 2cdot10^{-10}$ molar



      Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ will be



      $ce{[Ag+]_i} = dfrac{3.5cdot10^{-9}pu{mol}}{0.010pu{L}} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



      Now if both the $ce{CN-}$ and $ce{I-}$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ce{Ag+}$ must be removed.



      $ce{[CN-]_i + [I-]_i =} 4cdot10^{-10}$ molar



      $ce{[Ag+]_f} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M} - 4cdot10^{-10}pu{M} approx 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



      So the final concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



      The final concentration of $ce{CN-}$ is



      $ce{[CN-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{6.0cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{1.7e-10}$



      The the final concentration of $ce{I-}$ is



      $ce{[I-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{8.5cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{2.4e-10}$



      Conclusion:



      Since $ce{[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f}$ some $ce{AgCN}$ will ppt.



      Since $ce{[I-]_i < [I-]_f}$ no $ce{AgI}$ will ppt.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        5












        $begingroup$


        Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



        $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




        Assuming that $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ dissociate completely.



        $ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i =} 2cdot10^{-10}$ molar



        Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ will be



        $ce{[Ag+]_i} = dfrac{3.5cdot10^{-9}pu{mol}}{0.010pu{L}} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



        Now if both the $ce{CN-}$ and $ce{I-}$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ce{Ag+}$ must be removed.



        $ce{[CN-]_i + [I-]_i =} 4cdot10^{-10}$ molar



        $ce{[Ag+]_f} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M} - 4cdot10^{-10}pu{M} approx 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



        So the final concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



        The final concentration of $ce{CN-}$ is



        $ce{[CN-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{6.0cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{1.7e-10}$



        The the final concentration of $ce{I-}$ is



        $ce{[I-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{8.5cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{2.4e-10}$



        Conclusion:



        Since $ce{[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f}$ some $ce{AgCN}$ will ppt.



        Since $ce{[I-]_i < [I-]_f}$ no $ce{AgI}$ will ppt.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$


          Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



          $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




          Assuming that $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ dissociate completely.



          $ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i =} 2cdot10^{-10}$ molar



          Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ will be



          $ce{[Ag+]_i} = dfrac{3.5cdot10^{-9}pu{mol}}{0.010pu{L}} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



          Now if both the $ce{CN-}$ and $ce{I-}$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ce{Ag+}$ must be removed.



          $ce{[CN-]_i + [I-]_i =} 4cdot10^{-10}$ molar



          $ce{[Ag+]_f} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M} - 4cdot10^{-10}pu{M} approx 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



          So the final concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



          The final concentration of $ce{CN-}$ is



          $ce{[CN-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{6.0cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{1.7e-10}$



          The the final concentration of $ce{I-}$ is



          $ce{[I-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{8.5cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{2.4e-10}$



          Conclusion:



          Since $ce{[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f}$ some $ce{AgCN}$ will ppt.



          Since $ce{[I-]_i < [I-]_f}$ no $ce{AgI}$ will ppt.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          Consider a $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution containing $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$. If $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, will any precipitate(s) form? If yes, what compound(s) will precipitate?



          $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0e-17}$; $K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgI}) = pu{8.5e-17}$.




          Assuming that $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ dissociate completely.



          $ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i =} 2cdot10^{-10}$ molar



          Neglecting any volume change of solution the initial concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ will be



          $ce{[Ag+]_i} = dfrac{3.5cdot10^{-9}pu{mol}}{0.010pu{L}} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



          Now if both the $ce{CN-}$ and $ce{I-}$ are quantitatively removed then the same amount of $ce{Ag+}$ must be removed.



          $ce{[CN-]_i + [I-]_i =} 4cdot10^{-10}$ molar



          $ce{[Ag+]_f} = 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M} - 4cdot10^{-10}pu{M} approx 3.5cdot10^{-7}pu{M}$



          So the final concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ is essentially the same as the initial concentration. The concentration of $ce{Ag+}$ with the Ksp's can now be used to calculated how much of the two anions can remain in solution.



          The final concentration of $ce{CN-}$ is



          $ce{[CN-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{6.0cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{1.7e-10}$



          The the final concentration of $ce{I-}$ is



          $ce{[I-]_f} = dfrac{K_{sp}}{ce{[Ag+]_f}} = dfrac{8.5cdot10^{-17}}{3.5cdot10^{-7}} = pu{2.4e-10}$



          Conclusion:



          Since $ce{[CN-]_i > [CN-]_f}$ some $ce{AgCN}$ will ppt.



          Since $ce{[I-]_i < [I-]_f}$ no $ce{AgI}$ will ppt.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 15 at 17:28

























          answered Apr 15 at 17:07









          MaxWMaxW

          15.8k22261




          15.8k22261























              3












              $begingroup$

              Alternative method to MaxW method:



              Assume that an initial $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution of $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ in each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



              $$ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i} = pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



              Suppose when $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



              $$ce{[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i} = dfrac{pu{3.5cdot10^{-9} mol}}{pu{0.010 L}} = pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



              For precipitation of $ce{AgCN(s)}$:



              $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[CN-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} gt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



              Therefore, $ce{AgCN(s)}$ will precipitate.



              For precipitation of $ce{AgI(s)}$:



              $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[I-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} lt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN})=pu{8.5cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



              Therefore, $ce{AgI(s)}$ will not precipitate in this condition.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                Alternative method to MaxW method:



                Assume that an initial $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution of $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ in each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



                $$ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i} = pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



                Suppose when $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



                $$ce{[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i} = dfrac{pu{3.5cdot10^{-9} mol}}{pu{0.010 L}} = pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



                For precipitation of $ce{AgCN(s)}$:



                $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[CN-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} gt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



                Therefore, $ce{AgCN(s)}$ will precipitate.



                For precipitation of $ce{AgI(s)}$:



                $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[I-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} lt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN})=pu{8.5cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



                Therefore, $ce{AgI(s)}$ will not precipitate in this condition.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Alternative method to MaxW method:



                  Assume that an initial $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution of $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ in each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



                  $$ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i} = pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



                  Suppose when $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



                  $$ce{[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i} = dfrac{pu{3.5cdot10^{-9} mol}}{pu{0.010 L}} = pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



                  For precipitation of $ce{AgCN(s)}$:



                  $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[CN-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} gt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



                  Therefore, $ce{AgCN(s)}$ will precipitate.



                  For precipitation of $ce{AgI(s)}$:



                  $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[I-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} lt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN})=pu{8.5cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



                  Therefore, $ce{AgI(s)}$ will not precipitate in this condition.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Alternative method to MaxW method:



                  Assume that an initial $pu{10.0 mL}$ solution of $pu{1.0e-10 M}$ in each of $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ is clear (homogeneous). That means $ce{Ba(CN)2}$ and $ce{BaI2}$ have dissociated completely. Thus concentrations of ions are as follows:



                  $$ce{[CN-]_i = [I-]_i} = pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



                  Suppose when $pu{3.5e-9 mol}$ of $ce{AgNO3(s)}$ is added to this solution, no volume change has occured. Thus, the initial concentration of added ions in the solution will be:



                  $$ce{[Ag+]_i = [NO3-]_i} = dfrac{pu{3.5cdot10^{-9} mol}}{pu{0.010 L}} = pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}}$$



                  For precipitation of $ce{AgCN(s)}$:



                  $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[CN-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} gt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN}) = pu{6.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



                  Therefore, $ce{AgCN(s)}$ will precipitate.



                  For precipitation of $ce{AgI(s)}$:



                  $$Q_mathrm{sp} = ce{[Ag+]_i}cdot ce{[I-]_i} = (pu{3.5cdot10^{-7} mol ! L^{-1}})(pu{2cdot10^{-10} mol ! L^{-1}}) \ = pu{7.0cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} lt K_mathrm{sp}(ce{AgCN})=pu{8.5cdot10^{-17} mol^2 ! L^{-2}} $$



                  Therefore, $ce{AgI(s)}$ will not precipitate in this condition.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 15 at 19:38

























                  answered Apr 15 at 19:33









                  Mathew MahindaratneMathew Mahindaratne

                  6,442725




                  6,442725






















                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      user77021 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f112803%2fprecipitating-silveri-salts-from-the-solution-of-bariumii-cyanate-and-iodide%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Puebla de Zaragoza

                      Musa