Add new boot entry in BIOS using efibootmgr
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to add boot entry for MBR table (shadow) in SSD.
Using bcfg it is possible to browse to device
fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi (pressing tab will show all the device in current directory).
But we don't have bcfg in our BIOS.
I've tried to add new boot entry as following:
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 0 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
and also the following (tried partition 0 instead of 1)
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 1 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
But in both cases the UIEFI boot fails to start.
I guess I might need to add it using --device bau I don't know which device match the MBR shadow.
Is it possible to do the "browse" (with TABs) or to find a file in a device using efibootmgr , so that we can configure new boot entry as required ?
bios uefi efi
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to add boot entry for MBR table (shadow) in SSD.
Using bcfg it is possible to browse to device
fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi (pressing tab will show all the device in current directory).
But we don't have bcfg in our BIOS.
I've tried to add new boot entry as following:
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 0 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
and also the following (tried partition 0 instead of 1)
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 1 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
But in both cases the UIEFI boot fails to start.
I guess I might need to add it using --device bau I don't know which device match the MBR shadow.
Is it possible to do the "browse" (with TABs) or to find a file in a device using efibootmgr , so that we can configure new boot entry as required ?
bios uefi efi
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
From what I understand, the shadow MBR is mapped in transparently. As such, no special support would be required.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 11:28
Thanks, I've edited the question,
– ransh
Nov 18 at 14:27
Ah, so you’re talking about UEFI boot. That’s a very different concern then. It won’t (readily) work with MBR shadowing, though I guess it could still be made to work if you get creative.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 16:02
The title is of this question is not too proper. What OS are you trying to boot ? Did you determine which is the actual partition ? You can't just try for it.
– Overmind
Nov 19 at 8:05
The actual partition is fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi , and it is a MBR table (used with SED). I find it with simple ls from efi shell, but the problem is that I can't add new entery with bcfg becuase it is missing in this shell capability
– ransh
Nov 19 at 11:02
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am trying to add boot entry for MBR table (shadow) in SSD.
Using bcfg it is possible to browse to device
fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi (pressing tab will show all the device in current directory).
But we don't have bcfg in our BIOS.
I've tried to add new boot entry as following:
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 0 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
and also the following (tried partition 0 instead of 1)
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 1 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
But in both cases the UIEFI boot fails to start.
I guess I might need to add it using --device bau I don't know which device match the MBR shadow.
Is it possible to do the "browse" (with TABs) or to find a file in a device using efibootmgr , so that we can configure new boot entry as required ?
bios uefi efi
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
I am trying to add boot entry for MBR table (shadow) in SSD.
Using bcfg it is possible to browse to device
fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi (pressing tab will show all the device in current directory).
But we don't have bcfg in our BIOS.
I've tried to add new boot entry as following:
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 0 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
and also the following (tried partition 0 instead of 1)
efibootmgr -c -d /dev/sda -p 1 -L "mypba" -l "EFIbootbootx64.efi"
But in both cases the UIEFI boot fails to start.
I guess I might need to add it using --device bau I don't know which device match the MBR shadow.
Is it possible to do the "browse" (with TABs) or to find a file in a device using efibootmgr , so that we can configure new boot entry as required ?
bios uefi efi
bios uefi efi
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
edited Nov 19 at 5:58
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
asked Nov 18 at 10:44
ransh
1497
1497
From what I understand, the shadow MBR is mapped in transparently. As such, no special support would be required.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 11:28
Thanks, I've edited the question,
– ransh
Nov 18 at 14:27
Ah, so you’re talking about UEFI boot. That’s a very different concern then. It won’t (readily) work with MBR shadowing, though I guess it could still be made to work if you get creative.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 16:02
The title is of this question is not too proper. What OS are you trying to boot ? Did you determine which is the actual partition ? You can't just try for it.
– Overmind
Nov 19 at 8:05
The actual partition is fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi , and it is a MBR table (used with SED). I find it with simple ls from efi shell, but the problem is that I can't add new entery with bcfg becuase it is missing in this shell capability
– ransh
Nov 19 at 11:02
add a comment |
From what I understand, the shadow MBR is mapped in transparently. As such, no special support would be required.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 11:28
Thanks, I've edited the question,
– ransh
Nov 18 at 14:27
Ah, so you’re talking about UEFI boot. That’s a very different concern then. It won’t (readily) work with MBR shadowing, though I guess it could still be made to work if you get creative.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 16:02
The title is of this question is not too proper. What OS are you trying to boot ? Did you determine which is the actual partition ? You can't just try for it.
– Overmind
Nov 19 at 8:05
The actual partition is fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi , and it is a MBR table (used with SED). I find it with simple ls from efi shell, but the problem is that I can't add new entery with bcfg becuase it is missing in this shell capability
– ransh
Nov 19 at 11:02
From what I understand, the shadow MBR is mapped in transparently. As such, no special support would be required.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 11:28
From what I understand, the shadow MBR is mapped in transparently. As such, no special support would be required.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 11:28
Thanks, I've edited the question,
– ransh
Nov 18 at 14:27
Thanks, I've edited the question,
– ransh
Nov 18 at 14:27
Ah, so you’re talking about UEFI boot. That’s a very different concern then. It won’t (readily) work with MBR shadowing, though I guess it could still be made to work if you get creative.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 16:02
Ah, so you’re talking about UEFI boot. That’s a very different concern then. It won’t (readily) work with MBR shadowing, though I guess it could still be made to work if you get creative.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 16:02
The title is of this question is not too proper. What OS are you trying to boot ? Did you determine which is the actual partition ? You can't just try for it.
– Overmind
Nov 19 at 8:05
The title is of this question is not too proper. What OS are you trying to boot ? Did you determine which is the actual partition ? You can't just try for it.
– Overmind
Nov 19 at 8:05
The actual partition is fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi , and it is a MBR table (used with SED). I find it with simple ls from efi shell, but the problem is that I can't add new entery with bcfg becuase it is missing in this shell capability
– ransh
Nov 19 at 11:02
The actual partition is fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi , and it is a MBR table (used with SED). I find it with simple ls from efi shell, but the problem is that I can't add new entery with bcfg becuase it is missing in this shell capability
– ransh
Nov 19 at 11:02
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1376412%2fadd-new-boot-entry-in-bios-using-efibootmgr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
From what I understand, the shadow MBR is mapped in transparently. As such, no special support would be required.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 11:28
Thanks, I've edited the question,
– ransh
Nov 18 at 14:27
Ah, so you’re talking about UEFI boot. That’s a very different concern then. It won’t (readily) work with MBR shadowing, though I guess it could still be made to work if you get creative.
– Daniel B
Nov 18 at 16:02
The title is of this question is not too proper. What OS are you trying to boot ? Did you determine which is the actual partition ? You can't just try for it.
– Overmind
Nov 19 at 8:05
The actual partition is fs0:EFIbootbootx64.efi , and it is a MBR table (used with SED). I find it with simple ls from efi shell, but the problem is that I can't add new entery with bcfg becuase it is missing in this shell capability
– ransh
Nov 19 at 11:02