find the dimension of the given space?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












let $W_1$ be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices of such that the sum the sum of the entries in each row is $0 $. let $W_2$be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices such that the sum of the entries in each column is zero .find the dimension of the space $W _1 cap W_2$



my attempts :$max[0,dim(W_1)+dim(W_2)- 5] le dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) le min[ dim(W_1) ,dim (W_2),]$



so $dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) = 2$



Am i right ?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    You are not. I suppose that You calculate $dim(W_1)$ and $dim(W_2)$ in a wrong way. $dim(W_2)$ is much larger than $2$.
    – Logic_Problem_42
    May 8 at 5:34








  • 1




    I think the answer is 4. A row vector sums to 0 means it must have dimension 4. And since the columns sum to 0 once the first row is fixed the next row is negative of the first row.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    May 8 at 5:38















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












let $W_1$ be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices of such that the sum the sum of the entries in each row is $0 $. let $W_2$be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices such that the sum of the entries in each column is zero .find the dimension of the space $W _1 cap W_2$



my attempts :$max[0,dim(W_1)+dim(W_2)- 5] le dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) le min[ dim(W_1) ,dim (W_2),]$



so $dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) = 2$



Am i right ?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    You are not. I suppose that You calculate $dim(W_1)$ and $dim(W_2)$ in a wrong way. $dim(W_2)$ is much larger than $2$.
    – Logic_Problem_42
    May 8 at 5:34








  • 1




    I think the answer is 4. A row vector sums to 0 means it must have dimension 4. And since the columns sum to 0 once the first row is fixed the next row is negative of the first row.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    May 8 at 5:38













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











let $W_1$ be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices of such that the sum the sum of the entries in each row is $0 $. let $W_2$be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices such that the sum of the entries in each column is zero .find the dimension of the space $W _1 cap W_2$



my attempts :$max[0,dim(W_1)+dim(W_2)- 5] le dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) le min[ dim(W_1) ,dim (W_2),]$



so $dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) = 2$



Am i right ?










share|cite|improve this question















let $W_1$ be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices of such that the sum the sum of the entries in each row is $0 $. let $W_2$be the real vector space of all $5 times 2$ matrices such that the sum of the entries in each column is zero .find the dimension of the space $W _1 cap W_2$



my attempts :$max[0,dim(W_1)+dim(W_2)- 5] le dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) le min[ dim(W_1) ,dim (W_2),]$



so $dim(W_1 ∩ W_2) = 2$



Am i right ?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 16:00

























asked May 8 at 5:30









jasmine

1,331416




1,331416








  • 1




    You are not. I suppose that You calculate $dim(W_1)$ and $dim(W_2)$ in a wrong way. $dim(W_2)$ is much larger than $2$.
    – Logic_Problem_42
    May 8 at 5:34








  • 1




    I think the answer is 4. A row vector sums to 0 means it must have dimension 4. And since the columns sum to 0 once the first row is fixed the next row is negative of the first row.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    May 8 at 5:38














  • 1




    You are not. I suppose that You calculate $dim(W_1)$ and $dim(W_2)$ in a wrong way. $dim(W_2)$ is much larger than $2$.
    – Logic_Problem_42
    May 8 at 5:34








  • 1




    I think the answer is 4. A row vector sums to 0 means it must have dimension 4. And since the columns sum to 0 once the first row is fixed the next row is negative of the first row.
    – Piyush Divyanakar
    May 8 at 5:38








1




1




You are not. I suppose that You calculate $dim(W_1)$ and $dim(W_2)$ in a wrong way. $dim(W_2)$ is much larger than $2$.
– Logic_Problem_42
May 8 at 5:34






You are not. I suppose that You calculate $dim(W_1)$ and $dim(W_2)$ in a wrong way. $dim(W_2)$ is much larger than $2$.
– Logic_Problem_42
May 8 at 5:34






1




1




I think the answer is 4. A row vector sums to 0 means it must have dimension 4. And since the columns sum to 0 once the first row is fixed the next row is negative of the first row.
– Piyush Divyanakar
May 8 at 5:38




I think the answer is 4. A row vector sums to 0 means it must have dimension 4. And since the columns sum to 0 once the first row is fixed the next row is negative of the first row.
– Piyush Divyanakar
May 8 at 5:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Elements of $W_1 cap W_2$ satisfy the condition that the sum of each row and each column is $0$.



Hence the first row completely determines the next row and the first $4$ entries of the first row would determine the $5$ element, hence the dimension is $4$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • thanks Siong THye
    – jasmine
    May 8 at 7:43











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2771706%2ffind-the-dimension-of-the-given-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Elements of $W_1 cap W_2$ satisfy the condition that the sum of each row and each column is $0$.



Hence the first row completely determines the next row and the first $4$ entries of the first row would determine the $5$ element, hence the dimension is $4$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • thanks Siong THye
    – jasmine
    May 8 at 7:43















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Elements of $W_1 cap W_2$ satisfy the condition that the sum of each row and each column is $0$.



Hence the first row completely determines the next row and the first $4$ entries of the first row would determine the $5$ element, hence the dimension is $4$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • thanks Siong THye
    – jasmine
    May 8 at 7:43













up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






Elements of $W_1 cap W_2$ satisfy the condition that the sum of each row and each column is $0$.



Hence the first row completely determines the next row and the first $4$ entries of the first row would determine the $5$ element, hence the dimension is $4$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Elements of $W_1 cap W_2$ satisfy the condition that the sum of each row and each column is $0$.



Hence the first row completely determines the next row and the first $4$ entries of the first row would determine the $5$ element, hence the dimension is $4$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered May 8 at 6:23









Siong Thye Goh

94.3k1462114




94.3k1462114












  • thanks Siong THye
    – jasmine
    May 8 at 7:43


















  • thanks Siong THye
    – jasmine
    May 8 at 7:43
















thanks Siong THye
– jasmine
May 8 at 7:43




thanks Siong THye
– jasmine
May 8 at 7:43


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2771706%2ffind-the-dimension-of-the-given-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa