Base change morphisms for higher pushforwards











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider a Cartesian diagram consisting of morphisms of schemes. StackExchange doesn't support TikzCD, but the following hopefully suffices.
$$begin{array}{ll}
X' & stackrel{psi'}{rightarrow} & X \
downarrow{f'} & & downarrow{f} \
S' & stackrel{psi}{rightarrow} & S \
end{array}$$

Let $mathcal{F}$ be a quasicoherent sheaf on $X$. I am looking for a construction of the morphism $psi^*(R^i f_* mathcal{F}) to R^i f'_* (psi')^* mathcal{F}$ of sheaves on $S'$. This is essentially the content of Exercise 18.8.B(a) of Vakil's FoAG. Despite being condescendingly called 'easy' I am entirely unable to find the construction.



What I know. One way to describe the map is by using the Grothendieck spectral sequence together with abstract pullback-pushforward adjunctions, and in fact, from this point of view one does not even need to assume that the diagram is Cartesian. But for the purposes of doing calculations, this is not of much help, and probably it's not the intended approach.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Maybe this could be of some help virtualmath1.stanford.edu/~conrad/248BPage/handouts/…
    – random123
    Nov 14 at 16:14















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Consider a Cartesian diagram consisting of morphisms of schemes. StackExchange doesn't support TikzCD, but the following hopefully suffices.
$$begin{array}{ll}
X' & stackrel{psi'}{rightarrow} & X \
downarrow{f'} & & downarrow{f} \
S' & stackrel{psi}{rightarrow} & S \
end{array}$$

Let $mathcal{F}$ be a quasicoherent sheaf on $X$. I am looking for a construction of the morphism $psi^*(R^i f_* mathcal{F}) to R^i f'_* (psi')^* mathcal{F}$ of sheaves on $S'$. This is essentially the content of Exercise 18.8.B(a) of Vakil's FoAG. Despite being condescendingly called 'easy' I am entirely unable to find the construction.



What I know. One way to describe the map is by using the Grothendieck spectral sequence together with abstract pullback-pushforward adjunctions, and in fact, from this point of view one does not even need to assume that the diagram is Cartesian. But for the purposes of doing calculations, this is not of much help, and probably it's not the intended approach.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Maybe this could be of some help virtualmath1.stanford.edu/~conrad/248BPage/handouts/…
    – random123
    Nov 14 at 16:14













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Consider a Cartesian diagram consisting of morphisms of schemes. StackExchange doesn't support TikzCD, but the following hopefully suffices.
$$begin{array}{ll}
X' & stackrel{psi'}{rightarrow} & X \
downarrow{f'} & & downarrow{f} \
S' & stackrel{psi}{rightarrow} & S \
end{array}$$

Let $mathcal{F}$ be a quasicoherent sheaf on $X$. I am looking for a construction of the morphism $psi^*(R^i f_* mathcal{F}) to R^i f'_* (psi')^* mathcal{F}$ of sheaves on $S'$. This is essentially the content of Exercise 18.8.B(a) of Vakil's FoAG. Despite being condescendingly called 'easy' I am entirely unable to find the construction.



What I know. One way to describe the map is by using the Grothendieck spectral sequence together with abstract pullback-pushforward adjunctions, and in fact, from this point of view one does not even need to assume that the diagram is Cartesian. But for the purposes of doing calculations, this is not of much help, and probably it's not the intended approach.










share|cite|improve this question















Consider a Cartesian diagram consisting of morphisms of schemes. StackExchange doesn't support TikzCD, but the following hopefully suffices.
$$begin{array}{ll}
X' & stackrel{psi'}{rightarrow} & X \
downarrow{f'} & & downarrow{f} \
S' & stackrel{psi}{rightarrow} & S \
end{array}$$

Let $mathcal{F}$ be a quasicoherent sheaf on $X$. I am looking for a construction of the morphism $psi^*(R^i f_* mathcal{F}) to R^i f'_* (psi')^* mathcal{F}$ of sheaves on $S'$. This is essentially the content of Exercise 18.8.B(a) of Vakil's FoAG. Despite being condescendingly called 'easy' I am entirely unable to find the construction.



What I know. One way to describe the map is by using the Grothendieck spectral sequence together with abstract pullback-pushforward adjunctions, and in fact, from this point of view one does not even need to assume that the diagram is Cartesian. But for the purposes of doing calculations, this is not of much help, and probably it's not the intended approach.







algebraic-geometry homology-cohomology sheaf-cohomology derived-functors






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 20:58









KReiser

9,02711233




9,02711233










asked Nov 14 at 10:38









guest

833




833












  • Maybe this could be of some help virtualmath1.stanford.edu/~conrad/248BPage/handouts/…
    – random123
    Nov 14 at 16:14


















  • Maybe this could be of some help virtualmath1.stanford.edu/~conrad/248BPage/handouts/…
    – random123
    Nov 14 at 16:14
















Maybe this could be of some help virtualmath1.stanford.edu/~conrad/248BPage/handouts/…
– random123
Nov 14 at 16:14




Maybe this could be of some help virtualmath1.stanford.edu/~conrad/248BPage/handouts/…
– random123
Nov 14 at 16:14















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998110%2fbase-change-morphisms-for-higher-pushforwards%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998110%2fbase-change-morphisms-for-higher-pushforwards%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...