How do I find a vector x such that $x'Ax < 0 $ or make the matrix $A $ no longer SPD?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.
Any tips on how to approach this would be great!
numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.
Any tips on how to approach this would be great!
numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.
Any tips on how to approach this would be great!
numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra
New contributor
I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.
Any tips on how to approach this would be great!
numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra
numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra
New contributor
New contributor
edited Nov 14 at 10:56
dmtri
1,2261521
1,2261521
New contributor
asked Nov 14 at 10:44
user208691
6
6
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :
(a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.
(b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.
Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :
(a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.
(b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.
Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :
(a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.
(b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.
Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :
(a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.
(b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.
Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)
First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :
(a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.
(b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.
Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)
edited 2 days ago
answered Nov 17 at 22:18
Jean Marie
28.1k41848
28.1k41848
add a comment |
add a comment |
user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998116%2fhow-do-i-find-a-vector-x-such-that-xax-0-or-make-the-matrix-a-no-longer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown