How do I find a vector x such that $x'Ax < 0 $ or make the matrix $A $ no longer SPD?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.



Any tips on how to approach this would be great!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.



    Any tips on how to approach this would be great!










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.



      Any tips on how to approach this would be great!










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I'm given a matrix a 3x3 matrix $A $ , where I need to find a vector x such that $x'Ax $ it gives me a negative number (or x'Ax < 0). I was thinking I have a vector x set to x = [a, b, c] and perform gaussian elimination but not sure where to go from there.



      Any tips on how to approach this would be great!







      numerical-methods numerical-linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 14 at 10:56









      dmtri

      1,2261521




      1,2261521






      New contributor




      user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Nov 14 at 10:44









      user208691

      6




      6




      New contributor




      user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      user208691 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :




          • (a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.


          • (b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.



          Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998116%2fhow-do-i-find-a-vector-x-such-that-xax-0-or-make-the-matrix-a-no-longer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :




            • (a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.


            • (b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.



            Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :




              • (a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.


              • (b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.



              Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :




                • (a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.


                • (b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.



                Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)






                share|cite|improve this answer














                First of all, find the eigenvalues $lambda_k$ and eigenvectors $V_k$ associated with them. Two cases :




                • (a) either all $lambda_k$s are $geq 0$ , in such a case, you will never find an $X$ such that $X^TAX <0$.


                • (b) or one at least of the eigenvalues, say $lambda_1$ is $<0$, in this case, take $X=V_1$. Indeed, $X^TAX=V_1^T(AV_1)=V_1^T(lambda_1 V_1)$ (by definition of an eigenvector), which gives $lambda_1 |V_1|^2 < 0$. That's all.



                Considering the alternative you give in your title (find a way to make $A$ "no longer Symmetric Positive Definite"), you just have to "shift left" the spectrum of $A$. For example, if Spec$(A)={2,3,7}$, replace $A$ by, say, $A-2.001 I_3$, the spectrum of the new matrix will be shifted by $-2$ , i.e., will become${-0.001,0.999,4.999}$, and we are now in case (b)







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered Nov 17 at 22:18









                Jean Marie

                28.1k41848




                28.1k41848






















                    user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    user208691 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998116%2fhow-do-i-find-a-vector-x-such-that-xax-0-or-make-the-matrix-a-no-longer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...