Hermitian Property of a Householder Transform on a Complex Field











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












Let $mathbf{H}$ be a Householder (i.e. elementary reflector), such that $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, for an $mathbf{x} in Bbb{C}^n$, having $|mathbf{x}|_2 = 1$.



For this I have defined $mathbf{H} = e^{itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$, where $e^{itheta} = frac{overline{x_1}}{|x_1|}$ and $mathbf{u} = mathbf{x} - e^{itheta}|mathbf{x}|_2mathbf{e}_1$. I am indeed getting the expected result of $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, but my trouble is figuring out how to enforce the property that $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H}^*$. Can anyone please point me in the right direction?



I have also checked that this $mathbf{H}$ is unitary, since $mathbf{H}^* = mathbf{H^{-1}} = e^{-itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$ and $mathbf{H}^*mathbf{H} = mathbf{I}$, but again, I don't see how $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H^{-1}}$. I even get that $mathbf{H}^{-1}mathbf{e}_1 = mathbf{x}$, which should be expected.



Any help is really well appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • A Householder reflection $H$ by definition is a linear operator that is a reflection ($xmapsto-x$) on some one-dimensional subspace and an identity map on the orthogonal hyperplane. So, by definition, it must be Hermitian. It follows that if $Hx=y$, then $x^ast y (=x^ast Hx)$ must be real. In your case, if $x_1$ is not real, $H$ simply does not exist. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and your problem is automatically resolved.
    – user1551
    Nov 15 at 12:08












  • @user1551 To corroborate what you have kindly provided, then, I can't build an $mathbf{H}$ with the Hermitian property if the working field is complex, right?
    – Im YoungMin
    Nov 15 at 18:47










  • Sometimes you can and sometimes you cannot. That depends on whether $x_1$ (the first element of $x$ is real). You can always construct $H$ in the way outlined in your question, but unless $e^{itheta}$ is real, the resulting $H$ is not Hermitian (and strictly speaking, it is not a reflection either). Rather it is a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian unitary matrix.
    – user1551
    Nov 16 at 1:52















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












Let $mathbf{H}$ be a Householder (i.e. elementary reflector), such that $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, for an $mathbf{x} in Bbb{C}^n$, having $|mathbf{x}|_2 = 1$.



For this I have defined $mathbf{H} = e^{itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$, where $e^{itheta} = frac{overline{x_1}}{|x_1|}$ and $mathbf{u} = mathbf{x} - e^{itheta}|mathbf{x}|_2mathbf{e}_1$. I am indeed getting the expected result of $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, but my trouble is figuring out how to enforce the property that $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H}^*$. Can anyone please point me in the right direction?



I have also checked that this $mathbf{H}$ is unitary, since $mathbf{H}^* = mathbf{H^{-1}} = e^{-itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$ and $mathbf{H}^*mathbf{H} = mathbf{I}$, but again, I don't see how $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H^{-1}}$. I even get that $mathbf{H}^{-1}mathbf{e}_1 = mathbf{x}$, which should be expected.



Any help is really well appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • A Householder reflection $H$ by definition is a linear operator that is a reflection ($xmapsto-x$) on some one-dimensional subspace and an identity map on the orthogonal hyperplane. So, by definition, it must be Hermitian. It follows that if $Hx=y$, then $x^ast y (=x^ast Hx)$ must be real. In your case, if $x_1$ is not real, $H$ simply does not exist. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and your problem is automatically resolved.
    – user1551
    Nov 15 at 12:08












  • @user1551 To corroborate what you have kindly provided, then, I can't build an $mathbf{H}$ with the Hermitian property if the working field is complex, right?
    – Im YoungMin
    Nov 15 at 18:47










  • Sometimes you can and sometimes you cannot. That depends on whether $x_1$ (the first element of $x$ is real). You can always construct $H$ in the way outlined in your question, but unless $e^{itheta}$ is real, the resulting $H$ is not Hermitian (and strictly speaking, it is not a reflection either). Rather it is a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian unitary matrix.
    – user1551
    Nov 16 at 1:52













up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2






2





Let $mathbf{H}$ be a Householder (i.e. elementary reflector), such that $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, for an $mathbf{x} in Bbb{C}^n$, having $|mathbf{x}|_2 = 1$.



For this I have defined $mathbf{H} = e^{itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$, where $e^{itheta} = frac{overline{x_1}}{|x_1|}$ and $mathbf{u} = mathbf{x} - e^{itheta}|mathbf{x}|_2mathbf{e}_1$. I am indeed getting the expected result of $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, but my trouble is figuring out how to enforce the property that $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H}^*$. Can anyone please point me in the right direction?



I have also checked that this $mathbf{H}$ is unitary, since $mathbf{H}^* = mathbf{H^{-1}} = e^{-itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$ and $mathbf{H}^*mathbf{H} = mathbf{I}$, but again, I don't see how $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H^{-1}}$. I even get that $mathbf{H}^{-1}mathbf{e}_1 = mathbf{x}$, which should be expected.



Any help is really well appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $mathbf{H}$ be a Householder (i.e. elementary reflector), such that $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, for an $mathbf{x} in Bbb{C}^n$, having $|mathbf{x}|_2 = 1$.



For this I have defined $mathbf{H} = e^{itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$, where $e^{itheta} = frac{overline{x_1}}{|x_1|}$ and $mathbf{u} = mathbf{x} - e^{itheta}|mathbf{x}|_2mathbf{e}_1$. I am indeed getting the expected result of $mathbf{Hx} = mathbf{e}_1$, but my trouble is figuring out how to enforce the property that $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H}^*$. Can anyone please point me in the right direction?



I have also checked that this $mathbf{H}$ is unitary, since $mathbf{H}^* = mathbf{H^{-1}} = e^{-itheta}left(mathbf{I} - 2frac{mathbf{u}mathbf{u}^*}{mathbf{u}^*mathbf{u}}right)$ and $mathbf{H}^*mathbf{H} = mathbf{I}$, but again, I don't see how $mathbf{H} = mathbf{H^{-1}}$. I even get that $mathbf{H}^{-1}mathbf{e}_1 = mathbf{x}$, which should be expected.



Any help is really well appreciated.







linear-algebra transformation reflection






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 18:39

























asked Nov 15 at 8:53









Im YoungMin

134




134












  • A Householder reflection $H$ by definition is a linear operator that is a reflection ($xmapsto-x$) on some one-dimensional subspace and an identity map on the orthogonal hyperplane. So, by definition, it must be Hermitian. It follows that if $Hx=y$, then $x^ast y (=x^ast Hx)$ must be real. In your case, if $x_1$ is not real, $H$ simply does not exist. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and your problem is automatically resolved.
    – user1551
    Nov 15 at 12:08












  • @user1551 To corroborate what you have kindly provided, then, I can't build an $mathbf{H}$ with the Hermitian property if the working field is complex, right?
    – Im YoungMin
    Nov 15 at 18:47










  • Sometimes you can and sometimes you cannot. That depends on whether $x_1$ (the first element of $x$ is real). You can always construct $H$ in the way outlined in your question, but unless $e^{itheta}$ is real, the resulting $H$ is not Hermitian (and strictly speaking, it is not a reflection either). Rather it is a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian unitary matrix.
    – user1551
    Nov 16 at 1:52


















  • A Householder reflection $H$ by definition is a linear operator that is a reflection ($xmapsto-x$) on some one-dimensional subspace and an identity map on the orthogonal hyperplane. So, by definition, it must be Hermitian. It follows that if $Hx=y$, then $x^ast y (=x^ast Hx)$ must be real. In your case, if $x_1$ is not real, $H$ simply does not exist. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and your problem is automatically resolved.
    – user1551
    Nov 15 at 12:08












  • @user1551 To corroborate what you have kindly provided, then, I can't build an $mathbf{H}$ with the Hermitian property if the working field is complex, right?
    – Im YoungMin
    Nov 15 at 18:47










  • Sometimes you can and sometimes you cannot. That depends on whether $x_1$ (the first element of $x$ is real). You can always construct $H$ in the way outlined in your question, but unless $e^{itheta}$ is real, the resulting $H$ is not Hermitian (and strictly speaking, it is not a reflection either). Rather it is a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian unitary matrix.
    – user1551
    Nov 16 at 1:52
















A Householder reflection $H$ by definition is a linear operator that is a reflection ($xmapsto-x$) on some one-dimensional subspace and an identity map on the orthogonal hyperplane. So, by definition, it must be Hermitian. It follows that if $Hx=y$, then $x^ast y (=x^ast Hx)$ must be real. In your case, if $x_1$ is not real, $H$ simply does not exist. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and your problem is automatically resolved.
– user1551
Nov 15 at 12:08






A Householder reflection $H$ by definition is a linear operator that is a reflection ($xmapsto-x$) on some one-dimensional subspace and an identity map on the orthogonal hyperplane. So, by definition, it must be Hermitian. It follows that if $Hx=y$, then $x^ast y (=x^ast Hx)$ must be real. In your case, if $x_1$ is not real, $H$ simply does not exist. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and your problem is automatically resolved.
– user1551
Nov 15 at 12:08














@user1551 To corroborate what you have kindly provided, then, I can't build an $mathbf{H}$ with the Hermitian property if the working field is complex, right?
– Im YoungMin
Nov 15 at 18:47




@user1551 To corroborate what you have kindly provided, then, I can't build an $mathbf{H}$ with the Hermitian property if the working field is complex, right?
– Im YoungMin
Nov 15 at 18:47












Sometimes you can and sometimes you cannot. That depends on whether $x_1$ (the first element of $x$ is real). You can always construct $H$ in the way outlined in your question, but unless $e^{itheta}$ is real, the resulting $H$ is not Hermitian (and strictly speaking, it is not a reflection either). Rather it is a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian unitary matrix.
– user1551
Nov 16 at 1:52




Sometimes you can and sometimes you cannot. That depends on whether $x_1$ (the first element of $x$ is real). You can always construct $H$ in the way outlined in your question, but unless $e^{itheta}$ is real, the resulting $H$ is not Hermitian (and strictly speaking, it is not a reflection either). Rather it is a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian unitary matrix.
– user1551
Nov 16 at 1:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










It is not always possible to construct a Householder reflection that maps a prespecified unit vector in $mathbb C^n$ to another.



A Householder reflection $H$, by definition, is a linear operator whose restrictions are $-operatorname{Id}$ on $V$ and $operatorname{Id}$ on $V^perp$ for some one-dimensional subspace $Vsubseteqmathbb C^n$. For any $x,yinmathbb C^n$, if we write $x=u_x+v_x$ and $y=u_y+v_y$ where $u_x,u_yin V^perp$ and $v_x,v_yin V$, then
$$
langle Hx,yrangle
=langle u_x-v_x,u_y+v_yrangle
=langle u_x,u_yrangle - langle v_x,v_yrangle
=langle u_x+v_x,u_y-v_yrangle
=langle x,Hyrangle.
$$

It follows that $H$ is necessarily Hermitian. Being Hermitian is not an optional property, but a must.



Consequently, if $y=Hx$ for some unit vectors $x$ and $y$, then $langle x,yrangle=langle x,Hxrangle$ must be real. In other words, you can construct a Householder reflection that maps $x$ to $y$ only when $langle x,yrangle$ is real.



This is an often neglected point. People usually only deal with Householder reflection over the reals. Since $langle x,yrangle$ is real in this case, they don't realise that the story is a bit different over $mathbb C$.



In your case, if you want $Hx=e_1$, we need $langle x,e_1rangle=x_1$ to be real. If $x_1$ is not real, you cannot construct $H$. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and all apparent difficulties in your question vanish. The construction is then analogous to that over $mathbb R$. Just replace any matrix/vector transpose by conjugate transpose.



Some people do try to generalise Householder reflection in the real case to the complex case in a similar manner to your question. Now the construction is always possible. However, the resulting $H$ in general is neither Hermitian nor a reflection, but a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian Householder reflection.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999435%2fhermitian-property-of-a-householder-transform-on-a-complex-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    It is not always possible to construct a Householder reflection that maps a prespecified unit vector in $mathbb C^n$ to another.



    A Householder reflection $H$, by definition, is a linear operator whose restrictions are $-operatorname{Id}$ on $V$ and $operatorname{Id}$ on $V^perp$ for some one-dimensional subspace $Vsubseteqmathbb C^n$. For any $x,yinmathbb C^n$, if we write $x=u_x+v_x$ and $y=u_y+v_y$ where $u_x,u_yin V^perp$ and $v_x,v_yin V$, then
    $$
    langle Hx,yrangle
    =langle u_x-v_x,u_y+v_yrangle
    =langle u_x,u_yrangle - langle v_x,v_yrangle
    =langle u_x+v_x,u_y-v_yrangle
    =langle x,Hyrangle.
    $$

    It follows that $H$ is necessarily Hermitian. Being Hermitian is not an optional property, but a must.



    Consequently, if $y=Hx$ for some unit vectors $x$ and $y$, then $langle x,yrangle=langle x,Hxrangle$ must be real. In other words, you can construct a Householder reflection that maps $x$ to $y$ only when $langle x,yrangle$ is real.



    This is an often neglected point. People usually only deal with Householder reflection over the reals. Since $langle x,yrangle$ is real in this case, they don't realise that the story is a bit different over $mathbb C$.



    In your case, if you want $Hx=e_1$, we need $langle x,e_1rangle=x_1$ to be real. If $x_1$ is not real, you cannot construct $H$. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and all apparent difficulties in your question vanish. The construction is then analogous to that over $mathbb R$. Just replace any matrix/vector transpose by conjugate transpose.



    Some people do try to generalise Householder reflection in the real case to the complex case in a similar manner to your question. Now the construction is always possible. However, the resulting $H$ in general is neither Hermitian nor a reflection, but a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian Householder reflection.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote



      accepted










      It is not always possible to construct a Householder reflection that maps a prespecified unit vector in $mathbb C^n$ to another.



      A Householder reflection $H$, by definition, is a linear operator whose restrictions are $-operatorname{Id}$ on $V$ and $operatorname{Id}$ on $V^perp$ for some one-dimensional subspace $Vsubseteqmathbb C^n$. For any $x,yinmathbb C^n$, if we write $x=u_x+v_x$ and $y=u_y+v_y$ where $u_x,u_yin V^perp$ and $v_x,v_yin V$, then
      $$
      langle Hx,yrangle
      =langle u_x-v_x,u_y+v_yrangle
      =langle u_x,u_yrangle - langle v_x,v_yrangle
      =langle u_x+v_x,u_y-v_yrangle
      =langle x,Hyrangle.
      $$

      It follows that $H$ is necessarily Hermitian. Being Hermitian is not an optional property, but a must.



      Consequently, if $y=Hx$ for some unit vectors $x$ and $y$, then $langle x,yrangle=langle x,Hxrangle$ must be real. In other words, you can construct a Householder reflection that maps $x$ to $y$ only when $langle x,yrangle$ is real.



      This is an often neglected point. People usually only deal with Householder reflection over the reals. Since $langle x,yrangle$ is real in this case, they don't realise that the story is a bit different over $mathbb C$.



      In your case, if you want $Hx=e_1$, we need $langle x,e_1rangle=x_1$ to be real. If $x_1$ is not real, you cannot construct $H$. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and all apparent difficulties in your question vanish. The construction is then analogous to that over $mathbb R$. Just replace any matrix/vector transpose by conjugate transpose.



      Some people do try to generalise Householder reflection in the real case to the complex case in a similar manner to your question. Now the construction is always possible. However, the resulting $H$ in general is neither Hermitian nor a reflection, but a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian Householder reflection.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        0
        down vote



        accepted






        It is not always possible to construct a Householder reflection that maps a prespecified unit vector in $mathbb C^n$ to another.



        A Householder reflection $H$, by definition, is a linear operator whose restrictions are $-operatorname{Id}$ on $V$ and $operatorname{Id}$ on $V^perp$ for some one-dimensional subspace $Vsubseteqmathbb C^n$. For any $x,yinmathbb C^n$, if we write $x=u_x+v_x$ and $y=u_y+v_y$ where $u_x,u_yin V^perp$ and $v_x,v_yin V$, then
        $$
        langle Hx,yrangle
        =langle u_x-v_x,u_y+v_yrangle
        =langle u_x,u_yrangle - langle v_x,v_yrangle
        =langle u_x+v_x,u_y-v_yrangle
        =langle x,Hyrangle.
        $$

        It follows that $H$ is necessarily Hermitian. Being Hermitian is not an optional property, but a must.



        Consequently, if $y=Hx$ for some unit vectors $x$ and $y$, then $langle x,yrangle=langle x,Hxrangle$ must be real. In other words, you can construct a Householder reflection that maps $x$ to $y$ only when $langle x,yrangle$ is real.



        This is an often neglected point. People usually only deal with Householder reflection over the reals. Since $langle x,yrangle$ is real in this case, they don't realise that the story is a bit different over $mathbb C$.



        In your case, if you want $Hx=e_1$, we need $langle x,e_1rangle=x_1$ to be real. If $x_1$ is not real, you cannot construct $H$. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and all apparent difficulties in your question vanish. The construction is then analogous to that over $mathbb R$. Just replace any matrix/vector transpose by conjugate transpose.



        Some people do try to generalise Householder reflection in the real case to the complex case in a similar manner to your question. Now the construction is always possible. However, the resulting $H$ in general is neither Hermitian nor a reflection, but a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian Householder reflection.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        It is not always possible to construct a Householder reflection that maps a prespecified unit vector in $mathbb C^n$ to another.



        A Householder reflection $H$, by definition, is a linear operator whose restrictions are $-operatorname{Id}$ on $V$ and $operatorname{Id}$ on $V^perp$ for some one-dimensional subspace $Vsubseteqmathbb C^n$. For any $x,yinmathbb C^n$, if we write $x=u_x+v_x$ and $y=u_y+v_y$ where $u_x,u_yin V^perp$ and $v_x,v_yin V$, then
        $$
        langle Hx,yrangle
        =langle u_x-v_x,u_y+v_yrangle
        =langle u_x,u_yrangle - langle v_x,v_yrangle
        =langle u_x+v_x,u_y-v_yrangle
        =langle x,Hyrangle.
        $$

        It follows that $H$ is necessarily Hermitian. Being Hermitian is not an optional property, but a must.



        Consequently, if $y=Hx$ for some unit vectors $x$ and $y$, then $langle x,yrangle=langle x,Hxrangle$ must be real. In other words, you can construct a Householder reflection that maps $x$ to $y$ only when $langle x,yrangle$ is real.



        This is an often neglected point. People usually only deal with Householder reflection over the reals. Since $langle x,yrangle$ is real in this case, they don't realise that the story is a bit different over $mathbb C$.



        In your case, if you want $Hx=e_1$, we need $langle x,e_1rangle=x_1$ to be real. If $x_1$ is not real, you cannot construct $H$. If $x_1$ is real instead, then $e^{itheta}=1$ and all apparent difficulties in your question vanish. The construction is then analogous to that over $mathbb R$. Just replace any matrix/vector transpose by conjugate transpose.



        Some people do try to generalise Householder reflection in the real case to the complex case in a similar manner to your question. Now the construction is always possible. However, the resulting $H$ in general is neither Hermitian nor a reflection, but a complex scalar multiple of a Hermitian Householder reflection.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 16 at 1:41

























        answered Nov 16 at 1:28









        user1551

        70.3k566125




        70.3k566125






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999435%2fhermitian-property-of-a-householder-transform-on-a-complex-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...