Is it more accurate to use the term Geometric Growth or Exponential Growth?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












On Wikipedia, the terms Exponential Growth and Geometric Growth are listed as synonymous, and defined as when the growth rate of the value of a mathematical function is proportional to the function's current value but I question whether one term is more mathematically correct than the other? For example, there is a Geometric Progression but no Exponential Progression article on Wikipedia, so perhaps the term Geometric is a bit more accurate, mathematically speaking? Why are there two terms for this type of growth? Perhaps exponential growth is more popular in common parlance, and geometric in mathematical circles?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I don't think there's a difference, but I use "exponential" if talking about the growth rate of something, but when talking about series like $1+a+a^2+a^3+cdots+a^n$, it's usually named a "geometric" series, or even the "geometric mean", also having to do with multiplication. It's useful to know both, but in terms of growth, I'd use "exponential".
    – vrugtehagel
    Jan 13 '16 at 18:07















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












On Wikipedia, the terms Exponential Growth and Geometric Growth are listed as synonymous, and defined as when the growth rate of the value of a mathematical function is proportional to the function's current value but I question whether one term is more mathematically correct than the other? For example, there is a Geometric Progression but no Exponential Progression article on Wikipedia, so perhaps the term Geometric is a bit more accurate, mathematically speaking? Why are there two terms for this type of growth? Perhaps exponential growth is more popular in common parlance, and geometric in mathematical circles?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • I don't think there's a difference, but I use "exponential" if talking about the growth rate of something, but when talking about series like $1+a+a^2+a^3+cdots+a^n$, it's usually named a "geometric" series, or even the "geometric mean", also having to do with multiplication. It's useful to know both, but in terms of growth, I'd use "exponential".
    – vrugtehagel
    Jan 13 '16 at 18:07













up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





On Wikipedia, the terms Exponential Growth and Geometric Growth are listed as synonymous, and defined as when the growth rate of the value of a mathematical function is proportional to the function's current value but I question whether one term is more mathematically correct than the other? For example, there is a Geometric Progression but no Exponential Progression article on Wikipedia, so perhaps the term Geometric is a bit more accurate, mathematically speaking? Why are there two terms for this type of growth? Perhaps exponential growth is more popular in common parlance, and geometric in mathematical circles?










share|cite|improve this question













On Wikipedia, the terms Exponential Growth and Geometric Growth are listed as synonymous, and defined as when the growth rate of the value of a mathematical function is proportional to the function's current value but I question whether one term is more mathematically correct than the other? For example, there is a Geometric Progression but no Exponential Progression article on Wikipedia, so perhaps the term Geometric is a bit more accurate, mathematically speaking? Why are there two terms for this type of growth? Perhaps exponential growth is more popular in common parlance, and geometric in mathematical circles?







terminology exponential-function geometric-progressions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 13 '16 at 18:00









WilliamKF

259259




259259












  • I don't think there's a difference, but I use "exponential" if talking about the growth rate of something, but when talking about series like $1+a+a^2+a^3+cdots+a^n$, it's usually named a "geometric" series, or even the "geometric mean", also having to do with multiplication. It's useful to know both, but in terms of growth, I'd use "exponential".
    – vrugtehagel
    Jan 13 '16 at 18:07


















  • I don't think there's a difference, but I use "exponential" if talking about the growth rate of something, but when talking about series like $1+a+a^2+a^3+cdots+a^n$, it's usually named a "geometric" series, or even the "geometric mean", also having to do with multiplication. It's useful to know both, but in terms of growth, I'd use "exponential".
    – vrugtehagel
    Jan 13 '16 at 18:07
















I don't think there's a difference, but I use "exponential" if talking about the growth rate of something, but when talking about series like $1+a+a^2+a^3+cdots+a^n$, it's usually named a "geometric" series, or even the "geometric mean", also having to do with multiplication. It's useful to know both, but in terms of growth, I'd use "exponential".
– vrugtehagel
Jan 13 '16 at 18:07




I don't think there's a difference, but I use "exponential" if talking about the growth rate of something, but when talking about series like $1+a+a^2+a^3+cdots+a^n$, it's usually named a "geometric" series, or even the "geometric mean", also having to do with multiplication. It's useful to know both, but in terms of growth, I'd use "exponential".
– vrugtehagel
Jan 13 '16 at 18:07










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










In my 50 or so years of studying mathematics, I've never encountered "geometric growth", but often have met "exponential growth". So that's one small bit of evidence that if you want to sound like most mathematicians, you should use "exponential growth." I wouldn't say either is "more mathematically correct," for the assignment of words as names for concepts is not one that's subject to mathematical evaluation. (Is "continuous" really the right word for the thing we call continuity? Perhaps not...consider a function like
$$
f(x)= begin{cases}
frac{1}{2^k} & text{ if $x = frac{p}{2^k}$ in lowest terms} \
0 & text{otherwise}
end{cases}
$$
which is continuous at every irrational, and at no rational. But if you used any term other than "continuous" for this thing, mathematicians would regard it as somewhere between "peculiar" and "redundant" and "wrong" :) . )






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    NO.



    Geometric and exponential growth are different.



    The exponent in geometric sequence formula is always integer.
    Hence if you plot the sequence you get step-function kind of discrete plot with sudden jumps.



    The exponent of exponential growth is real number. So we have differential (smooth) and continuous plot for the exponential growth.



    In compound interest problem, for the finite number of compounding periods, the plot is discrete and it is geometric growth (not continuous)
    But if you compound interest continuously (infinite number of compounding periods), you get exponential e in the formula and the growth is exponential.



    Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compound_Interest_with_Varying_Frequencies.svg



    For further info visit: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • The domain of exponential function is R, and that of geometric sequence is N. Personal opinion is one thing, but to broaden the perspective, one should look at others' point of view also. If one is open for the Truth, convention is sidelined.
      – xChintan Joshi
      Mar 29 '16 at 9:11










    • You are right, I have to learn a lot, from you also. Your convention is that you have seen only exponential growth. I say geometrical growth also exists.
      – xChintan Joshi
      Mar 29 '16 at 9:23










    • If you want to say geometrical growth is a special case of exponential growth, please provide the proof.
      – xChintan Joshi
      Mar 29 '16 at 9:39


















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    FROM MATHONTHEWEB.COM



    12.3 - Exponential Functions



    Exponential functions are closely related to geometric sequences. A geometric sequence of numbers is one in which each successive number of the sequence is obtained by multiplying the previous number by a fixed factor $m$. An example is the sequence ${1, 3, 9, 27, 81, dots }$. If we label the numbers in the sequence as ${y_0, y_1, y_2, dots }$ then their values are given by the formula:
    $$y_n = y_0 m^n.$$
    The geometric sequence is completely described by giving its starting value $y_0 $and the multiplication factor $m$. For the above example $y_0 = 1$ and $m = 3$. Another example is the geometric sequence ${40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, dots }$ for which $y_0 = 40$ and $m = 0.5$.



    The exponential function is simply the generalization of the geometric sequence in which the counting integer n is replaced by the real variable $x$. We define an exponential function to be any function of the form:
    $$y = y_0 m^x.$$
    It gets its name from the fact that the variable $x$ is in the exponent. The “starting value” $y_0$ may be any real constant but the base $m$ must be a positive real constant to avoid taking roots of negative numbers.



    The exponential function $y = y_0 m^x$ has these two properties:
    When $x = 0$ then $y = y_0$.



    When $x$ is increased by $1$ then $y$ is multiplied by a factor of $m$. This is true for any real value of $x$, not just integer values of $x$. To prove this suppose that $y$ has some value $y_a$ when $x$ has some value $x_a$ . That is:



    Now increase $x$ from $x_a$ to $x_{a}+1$. We get:



    We see that $y$ is now $m$ times its previous value of $y_a$. If the multiplication factor $m > 1$ then we say that $y$ grows exponentially, and if $m < 1$ then we say that $y$ decays exponentially.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • So, this is a verbatim quote?
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Aug 29 '17 at 23:52






    • 1




      Hello and welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! To get you started, we have set your mathematics in MathJax. A nice guide is here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. Also, it would be helpful if you could write a concise sentence to directly answer the question. Something like "The more accurate term is ...".
      – dantopa
      Aug 30 '17 at 0:04











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1611050%2fis-it-more-accurate-to-use-the-term-geometric-growth-or-exponential-growth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    In my 50 or so years of studying mathematics, I've never encountered "geometric growth", but often have met "exponential growth". So that's one small bit of evidence that if you want to sound like most mathematicians, you should use "exponential growth." I wouldn't say either is "more mathematically correct," for the assignment of words as names for concepts is not one that's subject to mathematical evaluation. (Is "continuous" really the right word for the thing we call continuity? Perhaps not...consider a function like
    $$
    f(x)= begin{cases}
    frac{1}{2^k} & text{ if $x = frac{p}{2^k}$ in lowest terms} \
    0 & text{otherwise}
    end{cases}
    $$
    which is continuous at every irrational, and at no rational. But if you used any term other than "continuous" for this thing, mathematicians would regard it as somewhere between "peculiar" and "redundant" and "wrong" :) . )






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      In my 50 or so years of studying mathematics, I've never encountered "geometric growth", but often have met "exponential growth". So that's one small bit of evidence that if you want to sound like most mathematicians, you should use "exponential growth." I wouldn't say either is "more mathematically correct," for the assignment of words as names for concepts is not one that's subject to mathematical evaluation. (Is "continuous" really the right word for the thing we call continuity? Perhaps not...consider a function like
      $$
      f(x)= begin{cases}
      frac{1}{2^k} & text{ if $x = frac{p}{2^k}$ in lowest terms} \
      0 & text{otherwise}
      end{cases}
      $$
      which is continuous at every irrational, and at no rational. But if you used any term other than "continuous" for this thing, mathematicians would regard it as somewhere between "peculiar" and "redundant" and "wrong" :) . )






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted






        In my 50 or so years of studying mathematics, I've never encountered "geometric growth", but often have met "exponential growth". So that's one small bit of evidence that if you want to sound like most mathematicians, you should use "exponential growth." I wouldn't say either is "more mathematically correct," for the assignment of words as names for concepts is not one that's subject to mathematical evaluation. (Is "continuous" really the right word for the thing we call continuity? Perhaps not...consider a function like
        $$
        f(x)= begin{cases}
        frac{1}{2^k} & text{ if $x = frac{p}{2^k}$ in lowest terms} \
        0 & text{otherwise}
        end{cases}
        $$
        which is continuous at every irrational, and at no rational. But if you used any term other than "continuous" for this thing, mathematicians would regard it as somewhere between "peculiar" and "redundant" and "wrong" :) . )






        share|cite|improve this answer












        In my 50 or so years of studying mathematics, I've never encountered "geometric growth", but often have met "exponential growth". So that's one small bit of evidence that if you want to sound like most mathematicians, you should use "exponential growth." I wouldn't say either is "more mathematically correct," for the assignment of words as names for concepts is not one that's subject to mathematical evaluation. (Is "continuous" really the right word for the thing we call continuity? Perhaps not...consider a function like
        $$
        f(x)= begin{cases}
        frac{1}{2^k} & text{ if $x = frac{p}{2^k}$ in lowest terms} \
        0 & text{otherwise}
        end{cases}
        $$
        which is continuous at every irrational, and at no rational. But if you used any term other than "continuous" for this thing, mathematicians would regard it as somewhere between "peculiar" and "redundant" and "wrong" :) . )







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 13 '16 at 18:05









        John Hughes

        61.6k24089




        61.6k24089






















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            NO.



            Geometric and exponential growth are different.



            The exponent in geometric sequence formula is always integer.
            Hence if you plot the sequence you get step-function kind of discrete plot with sudden jumps.



            The exponent of exponential growth is real number. So we have differential (smooth) and continuous plot for the exponential growth.



            In compound interest problem, for the finite number of compounding periods, the plot is discrete and it is geometric growth (not continuous)
            But if you compound interest continuously (infinite number of compounding periods), you get exponential e in the formula and the growth is exponential.



            Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compound_Interest_with_Varying_Frequencies.svg



            For further info visit: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • The domain of exponential function is R, and that of geometric sequence is N. Personal opinion is one thing, but to broaden the perspective, one should look at others' point of view also. If one is open for the Truth, convention is sidelined.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:11










            • You are right, I have to learn a lot, from you also. Your convention is that you have seen only exponential growth. I say geometrical growth also exists.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:23










            • If you want to say geometrical growth is a special case of exponential growth, please provide the proof.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:39















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            NO.



            Geometric and exponential growth are different.



            The exponent in geometric sequence formula is always integer.
            Hence if you plot the sequence you get step-function kind of discrete plot with sudden jumps.



            The exponent of exponential growth is real number. So we have differential (smooth) and continuous plot for the exponential growth.



            In compound interest problem, for the finite number of compounding periods, the plot is discrete and it is geometric growth (not continuous)
            But if you compound interest continuously (infinite number of compounding periods), you get exponential e in the formula and the growth is exponential.



            Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compound_Interest_with_Varying_Frequencies.svg



            For further info visit: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • The domain of exponential function is R, and that of geometric sequence is N. Personal opinion is one thing, but to broaden the perspective, one should look at others' point of view also. If one is open for the Truth, convention is sidelined.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:11










            • You are right, I have to learn a lot, from you also. Your convention is that you have seen only exponential growth. I say geometrical growth also exists.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:23










            • If you want to say geometrical growth is a special case of exponential growth, please provide the proof.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:39













            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            NO.



            Geometric and exponential growth are different.



            The exponent in geometric sequence formula is always integer.
            Hence if you plot the sequence you get step-function kind of discrete plot with sudden jumps.



            The exponent of exponential growth is real number. So we have differential (smooth) and continuous plot for the exponential growth.



            In compound interest problem, for the finite number of compounding periods, the plot is discrete and it is geometric growth (not continuous)
            But if you compound interest continuously (infinite number of compounding periods), you get exponential e in the formula and the growth is exponential.



            Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compound_Interest_with_Varying_Frequencies.svg



            For further info visit: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/






            share|cite|improve this answer












            NO.



            Geometric and exponential growth are different.



            The exponent in geometric sequence formula is always integer.
            Hence if you plot the sequence you get step-function kind of discrete plot with sudden jumps.



            The exponent of exponential growth is real number. So we have differential (smooth) and continuous plot for the exponential growth.



            In compound interest problem, for the finite number of compounding periods, the plot is discrete and it is geometric growth (not continuous)
            But if you compound interest continuously (infinite number of compounding periods), you get exponential e in the formula and the growth is exponential.



            Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Compound_Interest_with_Varying_Frequencies.svg



            For further info visit: http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-guide-to-exponential-functions-e/







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 29 '16 at 6:12









            xChintan Joshi

            334




            334












            • The domain of exponential function is R, and that of geometric sequence is N. Personal opinion is one thing, but to broaden the perspective, one should look at others' point of view also. If one is open for the Truth, convention is sidelined.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:11










            • You are right, I have to learn a lot, from you also. Your convention is that you have seen only exponential growth. I say geometrical growth also exists.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:23










            • If you want to say geometrical growth is a special case of exponential growth, please provide the proof.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:39


















            • The domain of exponential function is R, and that of geometric sequence is N. Personal opinion is one thing, but to broaden the perspective, one should look at others' point of view also. If one is open for the Truth, convention is sidelined.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:11










            • You are right, I have to learn a lot, from you also. Your convention is that you have seen only exponential growth. I say geometrical growth also exists.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:23










            • If you want to say geometrical growth is a special case of exponential growth, please provide the proof.
              – xChintan Joshi
              Mar 29 '16 at 9:39
















            The domain of exponential function is R, and that of geometric sequence is N. Personal opinion is one thing, but to broaden the perspective, one should look at others' point of view also. If one is open for the Truth, convention is sidelined.
            – xChintan Joshi
            Mar 29 '16 at 9:11




            The domain of exponential function is R, and that of geometric sequence is N. Personal opinion is one thing, but to broaden the perspective, one should look at others' point of view also. If one is open for the Truth, convention is sidelined.
            – xChintan Joshi
            Mar 29 '16 at 9:11












            You are right, I have to learn a lot, from you also. Your convention is that you have seen only exponential growth. I say geometrical growth also exists.
            – xChintan Joshi
            Mar 29 '16 at 9:23




            You are right, I have to learn a lot, from you also. Your convention is that you have seen only exponential growth. I say geometrical growth also exists.
            – xChintan Joshi
            Mar 29 '16 at 9:23












            If you want to say geometrical growth is a special case of exponential growth, please provide the proof.
            – xChintan Joshi
            Mar 29 '16 at 9:39




            If you want to say geometrical growth is a special case of exponential growth, please provide the proof.
            – xChintan Joshi
            Mar 29 '16 at 9:39










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            FROM MATHONTHEWEB.COM



            12.3 - Exponential Functions



            Exponential functions are closely related to geometric sequences. A geometric sequence of numbers is one in which each successive number of the sequence is obtained by multiplying the previous number by a fixed factor $m$. An example is the sequence ${1, 3, 9, 27, 81, dots }$. If we label the numbers in the sequence as ${y_0, y_1, y_2, dots }$ then their values are given by the formula:
            $$y_n = y_0 m^n.$$
            The geometric sequence is completely described by giving its starting value $y_0 $and the multiplication factor $m$. For the above example $y_0 = 1$ and $m = 3$. Another example is the geometric sequence ${40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, dots }$ for which $y_0 = 40$ and $m = 0.5$.



            The exponential function is simply the generalization of the geometric sequence in which the counting integer n is replaced by the real variable $x$. We define an exponential function to be any function of the form:
            $$y = y_0 m^x.$$
            It gets its name from the fact that the variable $x$ is in the exponent. The “starting value” $y_0$ may be any real constant but the base $m$ must be a positive real constant to avoid taking roots of negative numbers.



            The exponential function $y = y_0 m^x$ has these two properties:
            When $x = 0$ then $y = y_0$.



            When $x$ is increased by $1$ then $y$ is multiplied by a factor of $m$. This is true for any real value of $x$, not just integer values of $x$. To prove this suppose that $y$ has some value $y_a$ when $x$ has some value $x_a$ . That is:



            Now increase $x$ from $x_a$ to $x_{a}+1$. We get:



            We see that $y$ is now $m$ times its previous value of $y_a$. If the multiplication factor $m > 1$ then we say that $y$ grows exponentially, and if $m < 1$ then we say that $y$ decays exponentially.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • So, this is a verbatim quote?
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Aug 29 '17 at 23:52






            • 1




              Hello and welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! To get you started, we have set your mathematics in MathJax. A nice guide is here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. Also, it would be helpful if you could write a concise sentence to directly answer the question. Something like "The more accurate term is ...".
              – dantopa
              Aug 30 '17 at 0:04















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            FROM MATHONTHEWEB.COM



            12.3 - Exponential Functions



            Exponential functions are closely related to geometric sequences. A geometric sequence of numbers is one in which each successive number of the sequence is obtained by multiplying the previous number by a fixed factor $m$. An example is the sequence ${1, 3, 9, 27, 81, dots }$. If we label the numbers in the sequence as ${y_0, y_1, y_2, dots }$ then their values are given by the formula:
            $$y_n = y_0 m^n.$$
            The geometric sequence is completely described by giving its starting value $y_0 $and the multiplication factor $m$. For the above example $y_0 = 1$ and $m = 3$. Another example is the geometric sequence ${40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, dots }$ for which $y_0 = 40$ and $m = 0.5$.



            The exponential function is simply the generalization of the geometric sequence in which the counting integer n is replaced by the real variable $x$. We define an exponential function to be any function of the form:
            $$y = y_0 m^x.$$
            It gets its name from the fact that the variable $x$ is in the exponent. The “starting value” $y_0$ may be any real constant but the base $m$ must be a positive real constant to avoid taking roots of negative numbers.



            The exponential function $y = y_0 m^x$ has these two properties:
            When $x = 0$ then $y = y_0$.



            When $x$ is increased by $1$ then $y$ is multiplied by a factor of $m$. This is true for any real value of $x$, not just integer values of $x$. To prove this suppose that $y$ has some value $y_a$ when $x$ has some value $x_a$ . That is:



            Now increase $x$ from $x_a$ to $x_{a}+1$. We get:



            We see that $y$ is now $m$ times its previous value of $y_a$. If the multiplication factor $m > 1$ then we say that $y$ grows exponentially, and if $m < 1$ then we say that $y$ decays exponentially.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • So, this is a verbatim quote?
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Aug 29 '17 at 23:52






            • 1




              Hello and welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! To get you started, we have set your mathematics in MathJax. A nice guide is here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. Also, it would be helpful if you could write a concise sentence to directly answer the question. Something like "The more accurate term is ...".
              – dantopa
              Aug 30 '17 at 0:04













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            FROM MATHONTHEWEB.COM



            12.3 - Exponential Functions



            Exponential functions are closely related to geometric sequences. A geometric sequence of numbers is one in which each successive number of the sequence is obtained by multiplying the previous number by a fixed factor $m$. An example is the sequence ${1, 3, 9, 27, 81, dots }$. If we label the numbers in the sequence as ${y_0, y_1, y_2, dots }$ then their values are given by the formula:
            $$y_n = y_0 m^n.$$
            The geometric sequence is completely described by giving its starting value $y_0 $and the multiplication factor $m$. For the above example $y_0 = 1$ and $m = 3$. Another example is the geometric sequence ${40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, dots }$ for which $y_0 = 40$ and $m = 0.5$.



            The exponential function is simply the generalization of the geometric sequence in which the counting integer n is replaced by the real variable $x$. We define an exponential function to be any function of the form:
            $$y = y_0 m^x.$$
            It gets its name from the fact that the variable $x$ is in the exponent. The “starting value” $y_0$ may be any real constant but the base $m$ must be a positive real constant to avoid taking roots of negative numbers.



            The exponential function $y = y_0 m^x$ has these two properties:
            When $x = 0$ then $y = y_0$.



            When $x$ is increased by $1$ then $y$ is multiplied by a factor of $m$. This is true for any real value of $x$, not just integer values of $x$. To prove this suppose that $y$ has some value $y_a$ when $x$ has some value $x_a$ . That is:



            Now increase $x$ from $x_a$ to $x_{a}+1$. We get:



            We see that $y$ is now $m$ times its previous value of $y_a$. If the multiplication factor $m > 1$ then we say that $y$ grows exponentially, and if $m < 1$ then we say that $y$ decays exponentially.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            FROM MATHONTHEWEB.COM



            12.3 - Exponential Functions



            Exponential functions are closely related to geometric sequences. A geometric sequence of numbers is one in which each successive number of the sequence is obtained by multiplying the previous number by a fixed factor $m$. An example is the sequence ${1, 3, 9, 27, 81, dots }$. If we label the numbers in the sequence as ${y_0, y_1, y_2, dots }$ then their values are given by the formula:
            $$y_n = y_0 m^n.$$
            The geometric sequence is completely described by giving its starting value $y_0 $and the multiplication factor $m$. For the above example $y_0 = 1$ and $m = 3$. Another example is the geometric sequence ${40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, dots }$ for which $y_0 = 40$ and $m = 0.5$.



            The exponential function is simply the generalization of the geometric sequence in which the counting integer n is replaced by the real variable $x$. We define an exponential function to be any function of the form:
            $$y = y_0 m^x.$$
            It gets its name from the fact that the variable $x$ is in the exponent. The “starting value” $y_0$ may be any real constant but the base $m$ must be a positive real constant to avoid taking roots of negative numbers.



            The exponential function $y = y_0 m^x$ has these two properties:
            When $x = 0$ then $y = y_0$.



            When $x$ is increased by $1$ then $y$ is multiplied by a factor of $m$. This is true for any real value of $x$, not just integer values of $x$. To prove this suppose that $y$ has some value $y_a$ when $x$ has some value $x_a$ . That is:



            Now increase $x$ from $x_a$ to $x_{a}+1$. We get:



            We see that $y$ is now $m$ times its previous value of $y_a$. If the multiplication factor $m > 1$ then we say that $y$ grows exponentially, and if $m < 1$ then we say that $y$ decays exponentially.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 15 at 4:39









            Inhabitant

            1032




            1032










            answered Aug 29 '17 at 23:27









            WJO

            111




            111












            • So, this is a verbatim quote?
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Aug 29 '17 at 23:52






            • 1




              Hello and welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! To get you started, we have set your mathematics in MathJax. A nice guide is here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. Also, it would be helpful if you could write a concise sentence to directly answer the question. Something like "The more accurate term is ...".
              – dantopa
              Aug 30 '17 at 0:04


















            • So, this is a verbatim quote?
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Aug 29 '17 at 23:52






            • 1




              Hello and welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! To get you started, we have set your mathematics in MathJax. A nice guide is here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. Also, it would be helpful if you could write a concise sentence to directly answer the question. Something like "The more accurate term is ...".
              – dantopa
              Aug 30 '17 at 0:04
















            So, this is a verbatim quote?
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Aug 29 '17 at 23:52




            So, this is a verbatim quote?
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Aug 29 '17 at 23:52




            1




            1




            Hello and welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! To get you started, we have set your mathematics in MathJax. A nice guide is here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. Also, it would be helpful if you could write a concise sentence to directly answer the question. Something like "The more accurate term is ...".
            – dantopa
            Aug 30 '17 at 0:04




            Hello and welcome to Mathematics StackExchange! To get you started, we have set your mathematics in MathJax. A nice guide is here: math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/…. Also, it would be helpful if you could write a concise sentence to directly answer the question. Something like "The more accurate term is ...".
            – dantopa
            Aug 30 '17 at 0:04


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1611050%2fis-it-more-accurate-to-use-the-term-geometric-growth-or-exponential-growth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa