Recurrence relations (finding the solution)
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $k in mathbb{N}$ with $k geq 2$.
$x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}x_{k-2}$
$x_0=0$
$x_1=1$
How to find the solution for $lbrace x_k rbrace _{k in mathbb{N_0}}$?
Since it's for $k geq 2$ I got:
$k=2:$
$x_2=frac{2}{3}x_1+frac{1}{3}x_0=frac{2}{3}$
But how to continue to find the solution? I thought about using induction and I get as result:
$x_{k+1}= frac{2}{3}x_k+frac{1}{3}x_{k-1}$
Here I don't know what to do next.
calculus recurrence-relations
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $k in mathbb{N}$ with $k geq 2$.
$x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}x_{k-2}$
$x_0=0$
$x_1=1$
How to find the solution for $lbrace x_k rbrace _{k in mathbb{N_0}}$?
Since it's for $k geq 2$ I got:
$k=2:$
$x_2=frac{2}{3}x_1+frac{1}{3}x_0=frac{2}{3}$
But how to continue to find the solution? I thought about using induction and I get as result:
$x_{k+1}= frac{2}{3}x_k+frac{1}{3}x_{k-1}$
Here I don't know what to do next.
calculus recurrence-relations
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $k in mathbb{N}$ with $k geq 2$.
$x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}x_{k-2}$
$x_0=0$
$x_1=1$
How to find the solution for $lbrace x_k rbrace _{k in mathbb{N_0}}$?
Since it's for $k geq 2$ I got:
$k=2:$
$x_2=frac{2}{3}x_1+frac{1}{3}x_0=frac{2}{3}$
But how to continue to find the solution? I thought about using induction and I get as result:
$x_{k+1}= frac{2}{3}x_k+frac{1}{3}x_{k-1}$
Here I don't know what to do next.
calculus recurrence-relations
Let $k in mathbb{N}$ with $k geq 2$.
$x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}x_{k-2}$
$x_0=0$
$x_1=1$
How to find the solution for $lbrace x_k rbrace _{k in mathbb{N_0}}$?
Since it's for $k geq 2$ I got:
$k=2:$
$x_2=frac{2}{3}x_1+frac{1}{3}x_0=frac{2}{3}$
But how to continue to find the solution? I thought about using induction and I get as result:
$x_{k+1}= frac{2}{3}x_k+frac{1}{3}x_{k-1}$
Here I don't know what to do next.
calculus recurrence-relations
calculus recurrence-relations
asked Nov 15 at 20:48
Hertul
425
425
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Write $$
x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}y_{k-1}\
y_k = x_{k-1}
$$
so
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right) left(x_{k-1} atop y_{k-1} right)
$$
which gives you
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right)^k left(x_{0} atop x_1 right)
$$
So you need the powers of the matrix which can be found by eigenvalues. They are $1$ and $ - frac13$. So you can as well make the ansatz
$$
x_k = a + b (-frac13)^k
$$
solving for $a$ and $b$ gives
$$
0 = x_0 = a + b \
1 = x_1 = a + -frac{b}{3}
$$
So
$$
x_k = frac34 (1 - (-frac13)^k)
$$
+1. It make sense to write it as a system of equations because the theory is well developed for solving a system of first order difference equations. See here for all the steps.
– Mason
Nov 15 at 21:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Write $$
x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}y_{k-1}\
y_k = x_{k-1}
$$
so
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right) left(x_{k-1} atop y_{k-1} right)
$$
which gives you
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right)^k left(x_{0} atop x_1 right)
$$
So you need the powers of the matrix which can be found by eigenvalues. They are $1$ and $ - frac13$. So you can as well make the ansatz
$$
x_k = a + b (-frac13)^k
$$
solving for $a$ and $b$ gives
$$
0 = x_0 = a + b \
1 = x_1 = a + -frac{b}{3}
$$
So
$$
x_k = frac34 (1 - (-frac13)^k)
$$
+1. It make sense to write it as a system of equations because the theory is well developed for solving a system of first order difference equations. See here for all the steps.
– Mason
Nov 15 at 21:00
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Write $$
x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}y_{k-1}\
y_k = x_{k-1}
$$
so
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right) left(x_{k-1} atop y_{k-1} right)
$$
which gives you
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right)^k left(x_{0} atop x_1 right)
$$
So you need the powers of the matrix which can be found by eigenvalues. They are $1$ and $ - frac13$. So you can as well make the ansatz
$$
x_k = a + b (-frac13)^k
$$
solving for $a$ and $b$ gives
$$
0 = x_0 = a + b \
1 = x_1 = a + -frac{b}{3}
$$
So
$$
x_k = frac34 (1 - (-frac13)^k)
$$
+1. It make sense to write it as a system of equations because the theory is well developed for solving a system of first order difference equations. See here for all the steps.
– Mason
Nov 15 at 21:00
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Write $$
x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}y_{k-1}\
y_k = x_{k-1}
$$
so
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right) left(x_{k-1} atop y_{k-1} right)
$$
which gives you
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right)^k left(x_{0} atop x_1 right)
$$
So you need the powers of the matrix which can be found by eigenvalues. They are $1$ and $ - frac13$. So you can as well make the ansatz
$$
x_k = a + b (-frac13)^k
$$
solving for $a$ and $b$ gives
$$
0 = x_0 = a + b \
1 = x_1 = a + -frac{b}{3}
$$
So
$$
x_k = frac34 (1 - (-frac13)^k)
$$
Write $$
x_k=frac{2}{3}x_{k-1}+frac{1}{3}y_{k-1}\
y_k = x_{k-1}
$$
so
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right) left(x_{k-1} atop y_{k-1} right)
$$
which gives you
$$
left(x_k atop y_k right)=left({frac23 quad frac13 } atop {1 quad 0 } right)^k left(x_{0} atop x_1 right)
$$
So you need the powers of the matrix which can be found by eigenvalues. They are $1$ and $ - frac13$. So you can as well make the ansatz
$$
x_k = a + b (-frac13)^k
$$
solving for $a$ and $b$ gives
$$
0 = x_0 = a + b \
1 = x_1 = a + -frac{b}{3}
$$
So
$$
x_k = frac34 (1 - (-frac13)^k)
$$
edited Nov 15 at 21:08
answered Nov 15 at 20:58
Andreas
7,5441037
7,5441037
+1. It make sense to write it as a system of equations because the theory is well developed for solving a system of first order difference equations. See here for all the steps.
– Mason
Nov 15 at 21:00
add a comment |
+1. It make sense to write it as a system of equations because the theory is well developed for solving a system of first order difference equations. See here for all the steps.
– Mason
Nov 15 at 21:00
+1. It make sense to write it as a system of equations because the theory is well developed for solving a system of first order difference equations. See here for all the steps.
– Mason
Nov 15 at 21:00
+1. It make sense to write it as a system of equations because the theory is well developed for solving a system of first order difference equations. See here for all the steps.
– Mason
Nov 15 at 21:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000305%2frecurrence-relations-finding-the-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown