Value of operator norm when $mathcal{T}f(x)=int^{x}_{0} f(t)dt$











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6












Let $mathcal{C}$ be the space of continuous functions on $[0,1]$ equipped with the norm $|f|=int^{1}_{0}|f(t)|dt$. Define a linear map $mathcal{T}:mathcal{C}rightarrow mathcal{C}$ by
$$ mathcal{T}f(x)=int^{x}_{0}f(t)dt. $$
Show that $mathcal{T}$ is well-defined and bounded and determine the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$.





I proved the first two parts myself, but I am having trouble with determining the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$. I was able to show that it is bounded by $1$ though. Observe that



$$|mathcal{T}f|=int^{1}_{0}left|int^{x}_{0}f(t)dtright|dxleq int^{1}_{0}|f|dx = |f| $$
Therefore,



$$ |mathcal{T}|_{text{op}} = underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|mathcal{T}f|}{|f|}leq underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|f|}{|f|}=1 $$



I tried seeing if I could then construct a function where the operator equals $1$, but I've had no success. Anybody have any solutions or hints? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Sorry, had to make another edit due to a typo...
    – Joe Man Analysis
    Nov 14 at 2:21










  • see volterra integral operator
    – qbert
    Nov 14 at 3:08








  • 1




    Maybe, take $f_n=1_{[0,1/n]}$. Compute the norm of $f_n$ and of $Tf_n$.
    – Shalop
    Nov 14 at 3:17










  • @Shalop. That's not a sequence of continuous functions.
    – md2perpe
    2 days ago










  • @md2perpe fine. Then take $f_n(x)=max{1-nx,0}$ I suppose. And $(1-x)^n$ probably works too. It’s a bit silly since continuous functions are dense in L^1 anyways, so it doesn’t matter much.
    – Shalop
    2 days ago

















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6












Let $mathcal{C}$ be the space of continuous functions on $[0,1]$ equipped with the norm $|f|=int^{1}_{0}|f(t)|dt$. Define a linear map $mathcal{T}:mathcal{C}rightarrow mathcal{C}$ by
$$ mathcal{T}f(x)=int^{x}_{0}f(t)dt. $$
Show that $mathcal{T}$ is well-defined and bounded and determine the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$.





I proved the first two parts myself, but I am having trouble with determining the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$. I was able to show that it is bounded by $1$ though. Observe that



$$|mathcal{T}f|=int^{1}_{0}left|int^{x}_{0}f(t)dtright|dxleq int^{1}_{0}|f|dx = |f| $$
Therefore,



$$ |mathcal{T}|_{text{op}} = underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|mathcal{T}f|}{|f|}leq underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|f|}{|f|}=1 $$



I tried seeing if I could then construct a function where the operator equals $1$, but I've had no success. Anybody have any solutions or hints? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Sorry, had to make another edit due to a typo...
    – Joe Man Analysis
    Nov 14 at 2:21










  • see volterra integral operator
    – qbert
    Nov 14 at 3:08








  • 1




    Maybe, take $f_n=1_{[0,1/n]}$. Compute the norm of $f_n$ and of $Tf_n$.
    – Shalop
    Nov 14 at 3:17










  • @Shalop. That's not a sequence of continuous functions.
    – md2perpe
    2 days ago










  • @md2perpe fine. Then take $f_n(x)=max{1-nx,0}$ I suppose. And $(1-x)^n$ probably works too. It’s a bit silly since continuous functions are dense in L^1 anyways, so it doesn’t matter much.
    – Shalop
    2 days ago















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
6






6





Let $mathcal{C}$ be the space of continuous functions on $[0,1]$ equipped with the norm $|f|=int^{1}_{0}|f(t)|dt$. Define a linear map $mathcal{T}:mathcal{C}rightarrow mathcal{C}$ by
$$ mathcal{T}f(x)=int^{x}_{0}f(t)dt. $$
Show that $mathcal{T}$ is well-defined and bounded and determine the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$.





I proved the first two parts myself, but I am having trouble with determining the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$. I was able to show that it is bounded by $1$ though. Observe that



$$|mathcal{T}f|=int^{1}_{0}left|int^{x}_{0}f(t)dtright|dxleq int^{1}_{0}|f|dx = |f| $$
Therefore,



$$ |mathcal{T}|_{text{op}} = underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|mathcal{T}f|}{|f|}leq underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|f|}{|f|}=1 $$



I tried seeing if I could then construct a function where the operator equals $1$, but I've had no success. Anybody have any solutions or hints? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $mathcal{C}$ be the space of continuous functions on $[0,1]$ equipped with the norm $|f|=int^{1}_{0}|f(t)|dt$. Define a linear map $mathcal{T}:mathcal{C}rightarrow mathcal{C}$ by
$$ mathcal{T}f(x)=int^{x}_{0}f(t)dt. $$
Show that $mathcal{T}$ is well-defined and bounded and determine the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$.





I proved the first two parts myself, but I am having trouble with determining the value of $|mathcal{T}|_{text{op}}$. I was able to show that it is bounded by $1$ though. Observe that



$$|mathcal{T}f|=int^{1}_{0}left|int^{x}_{0}f(t)dtright|dxleq int^{1}_{0}|f|dx = |f| $$
Therefore,



$$ |mathcal{T}|_{text{op}} = underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|mathcal{T}f|}{|f|}leq underset{|f|=1}{sup}frac{|f|}{|f|}=1 $$



I tried seeing if I could then construct a function where the operator equals $1$, but I've had no success. Anybody have any solutions or hints? Any help is appreciated.







real-analysis functional-analysis operator-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 2:36









Jimmy R.

32.7k42156




32.7k42156










asked Nov 14 at 2:06









Joe Man Analysis

23319




23319








  • 2




    Sorry, had to make another edit due to a typo...
    – Joe Man Analysis
    Nov 14 at 2:21










  • see volterra integral operator
    – qbert
    Nov 14 at 3:08








  • 1




    Maybe, take $f_n=1_{[0,1/n]}$. Compute the norm of $f_n$ and of $Tf_n$.
    – Shalop
    Nov 14 at 3:17










  • @Shalop. That's not a sequence of continuous functions.
    – md2perpe
    2 days ago










  • @md2perpe fine. Then take $f_n(x)=max{1-nx,0}$ I suppose. And $(1-x)^n$ probably works too. It’s a bit silly since continuous functions are dense in L^1 anyways, so it doesn’t matter much.
    – Shalop
    2 days ago
















  • 2




    Sorry, had to make another edit due to a typo...
    – Joe Man Analysis
    Nov 14 at 2:21










  • see volterra integral operator
    – qbert
    Nov 14 at 3:08








  • 1




    Maybe, take $f_n=1_{[0,1/n]}$. Compute the norm of $f_n$ and of $Tf_n$.
    – Shalop
    Nov 14 at 3:17










  • @Shalop. That's not a sequence of continuous functions.
    – md2perpe
    2 days ago










  • @md2perpe fine. Then take $f_n(x)=max{1-nx,0}$ I suppose. And $(1-x)^n$ probably works too. It’s a bit silly since continuous functions are dense in L^1 anyways, so it doesn’t matter much.
    – Shalop
    2 days ago










2




2




Sorry, had to make another edit due to a typo...
– Joe Man Analysis
Nov 14 at 2:21




Sorry, had to make another edit due to a typo...
– Joe Man Analysis
Nov 14 at 2:21












see volterra integral operator
– qbert
Nov 14 at 3:08






see volterra integral operator
– qbert
Nov 14 at 3:08






1




1




Maybe, take $f_n=1_{[0,1/n]}$. Compute the norm of $f_n$ and of $Tf_n$.
– Shalop
Nov 14 at 3:17




Maybe, take $f_n=1_{[0,1/n]}$. Compute the norm of $f_n$ and of $Tf_n$.
– Shalop
Nov 14 at 3:17












@Shalop. That's not a sequence of continuous functions.
– md2perpe
2 days ago




@Shalop. That's not a sequence of continuous functions.
– md2perpe
2 days ago












@md2perpe fine. Then take $f_n(x)=max{1-nx,0}$ I suppose. And $(1-x)^n$ probably works too. It’s a bit silly since continuous functions are dense in L^1 anyways, so it doesn’t matter much.
– Shalop
2 days ago






@md2perpe fine. Then take $f_n(x)=max{1-nx,0}$ I suppose. And $(1-x)^n$ probably works too. It’s a bit silly since continuous functions are dense in L^1 anyways, so it doesn’t matter much.
– Shalop
2 days ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










For $nin Bbb N:$ Let $K_n=frac {1}{n+1}+frac {1}{(n+1)^2}.$ Let $f_n(x)=n+1$ for $xin [0,frac {1}{n+1}].$ Let $f_n(x)=0$ for $xin [K_n,1].$ Let $f_n(x)$ be linear for $xin [frac {1}{n+1},K_n].$



We have $|f_n|=1+frac {1}{2(n+1)}.$



For $xin [frac {1}{n+1},1]$ we have $(Tf_n)(x)geq (Tf_n)(frac {1}{n+1})=1.$ $$text {So }quad |Tf_n|geq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 (Tf_n)(x)dxgeq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 1cdot dx=$$ $$=1-frac {1}{n+1}.$$



$$text {So} quad frac {|Tf_n|}{|f_n|}geq frac {1-frac {1}{n+1}}{ 1+frac {1}{2(n+1) }}.$$






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    It might be hard (or impossible) to find a function for which $ ||mathcal{T}f||$ is exactly equal to $||f||$, but you only need to find a sequence of functions $f_n$, such that $$frac{||mathcal{T}f_n||}{||f_n||} to 1quad text{as } n to infty.$$



    Note that you do not need the limit of the $f_n$ to be a continuous function!



    You should try to construct one such sequence using elementary functions. Try to write down a few examples with some free parameters, and see if you can cook up such a sequence!






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I feel sure that $|Tf|< |f| $ when $fne 0,$ which is not unusual in infinite-dimensional spaces, but I haven't verified it
      – DanielWainfleet
      2 days ago










    • Yes, but that does not mean that $||mathcal{T}f||$ could not be arbitrarily close to $||f||$ (which would imply $||mathcal{T}||_{op}=1$).
      – Angelo Lucia
      2 days ago












    • Seems like your functions aren’t continuous on [0,1]$ but only on $(0,1]$.
      – Shalop
      2 days ago










    • You are right, my mistake. I have removed my example.
      – Angelo Lucia
      2 days ago










    • In reply to your reply to my comment: Yes. And the norm of $T$ is $1$
      – DanielWainfleet
      yesterday











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997663%2fvalue-of-operator-norm-when-mathcaltfx-intx-0-ftdt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    For $nin Bbb N:$ Let $K_n=frac {1}{n+1}+frac {1}{(n+1)^2}.$ Let $f_n(x)=n+1$ for $xin [0,frac {1}{n+1}].$ Let $f_n(x)=0$ for $xin [K_n,1].$ Let $f_n(x)$ be linear for $xin [frac {1}{n+1},K_n].$



    We have $|f_n|=1+frac {1}{2(n+1)}.$



    For $xin [frac {1}{n+1},1]$ we have $(Tf_n)(x)geq (Tf_n)(frac {1}{n+1})=1.$ $$text {So }quad |Tf_n|geq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 (Tf_n)(x)dxgeq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 1cdot dx=$$ $$=1-frac {1}{n+1}.$$



    $$text {So} quad frac {|Tf_n|}{|f_n|}geq frac {1-frac {1}{n+1}}{ 1+frac {1}{2(n+1) }}.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      For $nin Bbb N:$ Let $K_n=frac {1}{n+1}+frac {1}{(n+1)^2}.$ Let $f_n(x)=n+1$ for $xin [0,frac {1}{n+1}].$ Let $f_n(x)=0$ for $xin [K_n,1].$ Let $f_n(x)$ be linear for $xin [frac {1}{n+1},K_n].$



      We have $|f_n|=1+frac {1}{2(n+1)}.$



      For $xin [frac {1}{n+1},1]$ we have $(Tf_n)(x)geq (Tf_n)(frac {1}{n+1})=1.$ $$text {So }quad |Tf_n|geq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 (Tf_n)(x)dxgeq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 1cdot dx=$$ $$=1-frac {1}{n+1}.$$



      $$text {So} quad frac {|Tf_n|}{|f_n|}geq frac {1-frac {1}{n+1}}{ 1+frac {1}{2(n+1) }}.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        For $nin Bbb N:$ Let $K_n=frac {1}{n+1}+frac {1}{(n+1)^2}.$ Let $f_n(x)=n+1$ for $xin [0,frac {1}{n+1}].$ Let $f_n(x)=0$ for $xin [K_n,1].$ Let $f_n(x)$ be linear for $xin [frac {1}{n+1},K_n].$



        We have $|f_n|=1+frac {1}{2(n+1)}.$



        For $xin [frac {1}{n+1},1]$ we have $(Tf_n)(x)geq (Tf_n)(frac {1}{n+1})=1.$ $$text {So }quad |Tf_n|geq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 (Tf_n)(x)dxgeq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 1cdot dx=$$ $$=1-frac {1}{n+1}.$$



        $$text {So} quad frac {|Tf_n|}{|f_n|}geq frac {1-frac {1}{n+1}}{ 1+frac {1}{2(n+1) }}.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        For $nin Bbb N:$ Let $K_n=frac {1}{n+1}+frac {1}{(n+1)^2}.$ Let $f_n(x)=n+1$ for $xin [0,frac {1}{n+1}].$ Let $f_n(x)=0$ for $xin [K_n,1].$ Let $f_n(x)$ be linear for $xin [frac {1}{n+1},K_n].$



        We have $|f_n|=1+frac {1}{2(n+1)}.$



        For $xin [frac {1}{n+1},1]$ we have $(Tf_n)(x)geq (Tf_n)(frac {1}{n+1})=1.$ $$text {So }quad |Tf_n|geq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 (Tf_n)(x)dxgeq int_{1/(n+1)}^1 1cdot dx=$$ $$=1-frac {1}{n+1}.$$



        $$text {So} quad frac {|Tf_n|}{|f_n|}geq frac {1-frac {1}{n+1}}{ 1+frac {1}{2(n+1) }}.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered 2 days ago









        DanielWainfleet

        33.3k31647




        33.3k31647






















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It might be hard (or impossible) to find a function for which $ ||mathcal{T}f||$ is exactly equal to $||f||$, but you only need to find a sequence of functions $f_n$, such that $$frac{||mathcal{T}f_n||}{||f_n||} to 1quad text{as } n to infty.$$



            Note that you do not need the limit of the $f_n$ to be a continuous function!



            You should try to construct one such sequence using elementary functions. Try to write down a few examples with some free parameters, and see if you can cook up such a sequence!






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • I feel sure that $|Tf|< |f| $ when $fne 0,$ which is not unusual in infinite-dimensional spaces, but I haven't verified it
              – DanielWainfleet
              2 days ago










            • Yes, but that does not mean that $||mathcal{T}f||$ could not be arbitrarily close to $||f||$ (which would imply $||mathcal{T}||_{op}=1$).
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago












            • Seems like your functions aren’t continuous on [0,1]$ but only on $(0,1]$.
              – Shalop
              2 days ago










            • You are right, my mistake. I have removed my example.
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago










            • In reply to your reply to my comment: Yes. And the norm of $T$ is $1$
              – DanielWainfleet
              yesterday















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It might be hard (or impossible) to find a function for which $ ||mathcal{T}f||$ is exactly equal to $||f||$, but you only need to find a sequence of functions $f_n$, such that $$frac{||mathcal{T}f_n||}{||f_n||} to 1quad text{as } n to infty.$$



            Note that you do not need the limit of the $f_n$ to be a continuous function!



            You should try to construct one such sequence using elementary functions. Try to write down a few examples with some free parameters, and see if you can cook up such a sequence!






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • I feel sure that $|Tf|< |f| $ when $fne 0,$ which is not unusual in infinite-dimensional spaces, but I haven't verified it
              – DanielWainfleet
              2 days ago










            • Yes, but that does not mean that $||mathcal{T}f||$ could not be arbitrarily close to $||f||$ (which would imply $||mathcal{T}||_{op}=1$).
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago












            • Seems like your functions aren’t continuous on [0,1]$ but only on $(0,1]$.
              – Shalop
              2 days ago










            • You are right, my mistake. I have removed my example.
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago










            • In reply to your reply to my comment: Yes. And the norm of $T$ is $1$
              – DanielWainfleet
              yesterday













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            It might be hard (or impossible) to find a function for which $ ||mathcal{T}f||$ is exactly equal to $||f||$, but you only need to find a sequence of functions $f_n$, such that $$frac{||mathcal{T}f_n||}{||f_n||} to 1quad text{as } n to infty.$$



            Note that you do not need the limit of the $f_n$ to be a continuous function!



            You should try to construct one such sequence using elementary functions. Try to write down a few examples with some free parameters, and see if you can cook up such a sequence!






            share|cite|improve this answer














            It might be hard (or impossible) to find a function for which $ ||mathcal{T}f||$ is exactly equal to $||f||$, but you only need to find a sequence of functions $f_n$, such that $$frac{||mathcal{T}f_n||}{||f_n||} to 1quad text{as } n to infty.$$



            Note that you do not need the limit of the $f_n$ to be a continuous function!



            You should try to construct one such sequence using elementary functions. Try to write down a few examples with some free parameters, and see if you can cook up such a sequence!







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered Nov 14 at 3:04









            Angelo Lucia

            558213




            558213












            • I feel sure that $|Tf|< |f| $ when $fne 0,$ which is not unusual in infinite-dimensional spaces, but I haven't verified it
              – DanielWainfleet
              2 days ago










            • Yes, but that does not mean that $||mathcal{T}f||$ could not be arbitrarily close to $||f||$ (which would imply $||mathcal{T}||_{op}=1$).
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago












            • Seems like your functions aren’t continuous on [0,1]$ but only on $(0,1]$.
              – Shalop
              2 days ago










            • You are right, my mistake. I have removed my example.
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago










            • In reply to your reply to my comment: Yes. And the norm of $T$ is $1$
              – DanielWainfleet
              yesterday


















            • I feel sure that $|Tf|< |f| $ when $fne 0,$ which is not unusual in infinite-dimensional spaces, but I haven't verified it
              – DanielWainfleet
              2 days ago










            • Yes, but that does not mean that $||mathcal{T}f||$ could not be arbitrarily close to $||f||$ (which would imply $||mathcal{T}||_{op}=1$).
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago












            • Seems like your functions aren’t continuous on [0,1]$ but only on $(0,1]$.
              – Shalop
              2 days ago










            • You are right, my mistake. I have removed my example.
              – Angelo Lucia
              2 days ago










            • In reply to your reply to my comment: Yes. And the norm of $T$ is $1$
              – DanielWainfleet
              yesterday
















            I feel sure that $|Tf|< |f| $ when $fne 0,$ which is not unusual in infinite-dimensional spaces, but I haven't verified it
            – DanielWainfleet
            2 days ago




            I feel sure that $|Tf|< |f| $ when $fne 0,$ which is not unusual in infinite-dimensional spaces, but I haven't verified it
            – DanielWainfleet
            2 days ago












            Yes, but that does not mean that $||mathcal{T}f||$ could not be arbitrarily close to $||f||$ (which would imply $||mathcal{T}||_{op}=1$).
            – Angelo Lucia
            2 days ago






            Yes, but that does not mean that $||mathcal{T}f||$ could not be arbitrarily close to $||f||$ (which would imply $||mathcal{T}||_{op}=1$).
            – Angelo Lucia
            2 days ago














            Seems like your functions aren’t continuous on [0,1]$ but only on $(0,1]$.
            – Shalop
            2 days ago




            Seems like your functions aren’t continuous on [0,1]$ but only on $(0,1]$.
            – Shalop
            2 days ago












            You are right, my mistake. I have removed my example.
            – Angelo Lucia
            2 days ago




            You are right, my mistake. I have removed my example.
            – Angelo Lucia
            2 days ago












            In reply to your reply to my comment: Yes. And the norm of $T$ is $1$
            – DanielWainfleet
            yesterday




            In reply to your reply to my comment: Yes. And the norm of $T$ is $1$
            – DanielWainfleet
            yesterday


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997663%2fvalue-of-operator-norm-when-mathcaltfx-intx-0-ftdt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa