3.5mm Analog Audio vs. Bluetooth Audio Quality
I want to buy a wireless Bluetooth headset, but I am worried about the sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth. All other things being equal (e.g. the quality of the headphones themselves is the same), is there a noticeable impact on sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth, compared to an analog audio jack? What about between the Bluetooth headset and a wired headset when the Bluetooth headset is wired (plugged into the jack)?
I am looking for knowledge about the pros and cons of Bluetooth audio and analog audio in terms of quality.
audio bluetooth headphones
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
add a comment |
I want to buy a wireless Bluetooth headset, but I am worried about the sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth. All other things being equal (e.g. the quality of the headphones themselves is the same), is there a noticeable impact on sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth, compared to an analog audio jack? What about between the Bluetooth headset and a wired headset when the Bluetooth headset is wired (plugged into the jack)?
I am looking for knowledge about the pros and cons of Bluetooth audio and analog audio in terms of quality.
audio bluetooth headphones
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
15
To reviewers: Instead of voting to close this question, please feel free to edit the question to remove the shopping recommendation. Look at my answer: there is a general, non-shopping lesson to be taught here about 3.5mm TRS vs. bluetooth audio. It's on-topic for SU when you take away the product comparison and talk about the underlying technologies. If anyone can reshape the question in that light, be my guest. But I'd recommend against voting to close.
– allquixotic
Aug 21 '12 at 14:20
I recently bought a Bluetooth speaker and sound quality is noticeably worse than when using the jack. Also there is about half a second lag, which makes watching videos impossible (lips don't move in sync with speech). Of course this will depend on the codec and device, but overall I would advise against it.
– Laurent
Sep 1 '13 at 13:32
add a comment |
I want to buy a wireless Bluetooth headset, but I am worried about the sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth. All other things being equal (e.g. the quality of the headphones themselves is the same), is there a noticeable impact on sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth, compared to an analog audio jack? What about between the Bluetooth headset and a wired headset when the Bluetooth headset is wired (plugged into the jack)?
I am looking for knowledge about the pros and cons of Bluetooth audio and analog audio in terms of quality.
audio bluetooth headphones
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
I want to buy a wireless Bluetooth headset, but I am worried about the sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth. All other things being equal (e.g. the quality of the headphones themselves is the same), is there a noticeable impact on sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth, compared to an analog audio jack? What about between the Bluetooth headset and a wired headset when the Bluetooth headset is wired (plugged into the jack)?
I am looking for knowledge about the pros and cons of Bluetooth audio and analog audio in terms of quality.
audio bluetooth headphones
audio bluetooth headphones
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
edited Dec 11 '18 at 14:19
Twisty Impersonator
17.8k146495
17.8k146495
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
asked Aug 21 '12 at 13:48
Lenus
175125
175125
15
To reviewers: Instead of voting to close this question, please feel free to edit the question to remove the shopping recommendation. Look at my answer: there is a general, non-shopping lesson to be taught here about 3.5mm TRS vs. bluetooth audio. It's on-topic for SU when you take away the product comparison and talk about the underlying technologies. If anyone can reshape the question in that light, be my guest. But I'd recommend against voting to close.
– allquixotic
Aug 21 '12 at 14:20
I recently bought a Bluetooth speaker and sound quality is noticeably worse than when using the jack. Also there is about half a second lag, which makes watching videos impossible (lips don't move in sync with speech). Of course this will depend on the codec and device, but overall I would advise against it.
– Laurent
Sep 1 '13 at 13:32
add a comment |
15
To reviewers: Instead of voting to close this question, please feel free to edit the question to remove the shopping recommendation. Look at my answer: there is a general, non-shopping lesson to be taught here about 3.5mm TRS vs. bluetooth audio. It's on-topic for SU when you take away the product comparison and talk about the underlying technologies. If anyone can reshape the question in that light, be my guest. But I'd recommend against voting to close.
– allquixotic
Aug 21 '12 at 14:20
I recently bought a Bluetooth speaker and sound quality is noticeably worse than when using the jack. Also there is about half a second lag, which makes watching videos impossible (lips don't move in sync with speech). Of course this will depend on the codec and device, but overall I would advise against it.
– Laurent
Sep 1 '13 at 13:32
15
15
To reviewers: Instead of voting to close this question, please feel free to edit the question to remove the shopping recommendation. Look at my answer: there is a general, non-shopping lesson to be taught here about 3.5mm TRS vs. bluetooth audio. It's on-topic for SU when you take away the product comparison and talk about the underlying technologies. If anyone can reshape the question in that light, be my guest. But I'd recommend against voting to close.
– allquixotic
Aug 21 '12 at 14:20
To reviewers: Instead of voting to close this question, please feel free to edit the question to remove the shopping recommendation. Look at my answer: there is a general, non-shopping lesson to be taught here about 3.5mm TRS vs. bluetooth audio. It's on-topic for SU when you take away the product comparison and talk about the underlying technologies. If anyone can reshape the question in that light, be my guest. But I'd recommend against voting to close.
– allquixotic
Aug 21 '12 at 14:20
I recently bought a Bluetooth speaker and sound quality is noticeably worse than when using the jack. Also there is about half a second lag, which makes watching videos impossible (lips don't move in sync with speech). Of course this will depend on the codec and device, but overall I would advise against it.
– Laurent
Sep 1 '13 at 13:32
I recently bought a Bluetooth speaker and sound quality is noticeably worse than when using the jack. Also there is about half a second lag, which makes watching videos impossible (lips don't move in sync with speech). Of course this will depend on the codec and device, but overall I would advise against it.
– Laurent
Sep 1 '13 at 13:32
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Option 1: Bluetooth audio.
Option 2: 3.5mm TRS analog audio connector (wired).
Facts about Bluetooth:
- Bluetooth audio protocol is lossy, meaning that some of the data is lost. However, it is digital, meaning that the audio reproduction in the headset is bit-exact the same data that was transmitted.
- The data is encoded to a digital format that is compressed in a way that loses some of the source data (but hopefully not enough that you can perceive it); but the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering, which means that you are unlikely to notice even if some other electromagnetic frequency transmission interferes with your bluetooth (temporarily).
- See A2DP at Wikipedia for more information about Bluetooth audio. To put it simply, there are more than one supported audio codec, and they have varying pros and cons in terms of bandwidth consumed, energy consumed, compatibility across devices, and quality. Some of the newer codecs such as apt-X produce what many consider to be superior audio quality, but device support is limited compared to the older codecs, or SBC which is required by the A2DP standard.
Facts about analog audio:
- Analog audio over a standard 3.5mm headphone jack (technically called a "TRS" connector) can be very high quality if the audio playback device has a good DAC. An amplifier (separate or built-in) can make the signal sound even better.
- A "good pair of cans" (good headphones) can sound amazing with this dated analog mode of transmitting audio down a cable. If you are using a very high quality DAC on the source audio device, chances are it's better than the DAC that has to be in the bluetooth headphones to convert the bluetooth digital data to analog, because the in-headphones DAC is limited by battery power and size constraints -- but a sound card in a computer is much less constrained. Even sound chips in smartphones are great these days.
- All analog audio is subject to interference with the audio cable. Most audio cables are not shielded from external electromagnetic interference, and certain models of computers (especially Core 2 Duo era CPUs with on-board graphics) have been known to spew electromagnetic frequencies that are picked up as a "grinding" or "buzzing" noise on the analog headphone wire, if it is near enough to the computer. Some LCDs can do the same. Depending on your situation, this interference can be even worse than the loss of audio quality of bluetooth's lossy encoding.
The answer is that it heavily depends on your situation, and exactly how sensitive your headphones are, and exactly how good the Digital-Analog Converter (DAC) in the bluetooth headset is, and which codecs the bluetooth headset supports, and........ (many other things). If you're using the headphones in a way that a wire would get near certain models of LCD or computers, the analog signal quality may be terrible due to interference. If you're using the bluetooth in a way that it's in a heavily saturated 2.4 GHz environment (e.g. lots of WiFi signals, microwaves, cordless phones around), it may drop out due to heavy interference and crosstalk. Also you have to be able to live with the quality loss of lossy encoding for one of the bluetooth A2DP codecs, if you go that route. You probably can't detect it if you listen to lossy audio vs. lossless, but some people like to fake themselves out and say that they can tell ;)
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
1
+1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
– Dave M
Aug 21 '12 at 14:18
2
+1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
– N_Lindz
Aug 21 '12 at 14:41
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
– Joe
Aug 27 '12 at 19:09
That's a separate question, though it sounds more like a shopping recommendation question... TBH it's hard to find detailed specs about the freq response of bluetooth cans, even on the manufacturer's website, sometimes you have to dig deep or just pass up the ones that you can't find any info about.
– allquixotic
Aug 28 '12 at 13:36
1
Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
– Pere
Dec 19 '16 at 21:49
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f464388%2f3-5mm-analog-audio-vs-bluetooth-audio-quality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Option 1: Bluetooth audio.
Option 2: 3.5mm TRS analog audio connector (wired).
Facts about Bluetooth:
- Bluetooth audio protocol is lossy, meaning that some of the data is lost. However, it is digital, meaning that the audio reproduction in the headset is bit-exact the same data that was transmitted.
- The data is encoded to a digital format that is compressed in a way that loses some of the source data (but hopefully not enough that you can perceive it); but the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering, which means that you are unlikely to notice even if some other electromagnetic frequency transmission interferes with your bluetooth (temporarily).
- See A2DP at Wikipedia for more information about Bluetooth audio. To put it simply, there are more than one supported audio codec, and they have varying pros and cons in terms of bandwidth consumed, energy consumed, compatibility across devices, and quality. Some of the newer codecs such as apt-X produce what many consider to be superior audio quality, but device support is limited compared to the older codecs, or SBC which is required by the A2DP standard.
Facts about analog audio:
- Analog audio over a standard 3.5mm headphone jack (technically called a "TRS" connector) can be very high quality if the audio playback device has a good DAC. An amplifier (separate or built-in) can make the signal sound even better.
- A "good pair of cans" (good headphones) can sound amazing with this dated analog mode of transmitting audio down a cable. If you are using a very high quality DAC on the source audio device, chances are it's better than the DAC that has to be in the bluetooth headphones to convert the bluetooth digital data to analog, because the in-headphones DAC is limited by battery power and size constraints -- but a sound card in a computer is much less constrained. Even sound chips in smartphones are great these days.
- All analog audio is subject to interference with the audio cable. Most audio cables are not shielded from external electromagnetic interference, and certain models of computers (especially Core 2 Duo era CPUs with on-board graphics) have been known to spew electromagnetic frequencies that are picked up as a "grinding" or "buzzing" noise on the analog headphone wire, if it is near enough to the computer. Some LCDs can do the same. Depending on your situation, this interference can be even worse than the loss of audio quality of bluetooth's lossy encoding.
The answer is that it heavily depends on your situation, and exactly how sensitive your headphones are, and exactly how good the Digital-Analog Converter (DAC) in the bluetooth headset is, and which codecs the bluetooth headset supports, and........ (many other things). If you're using the headphones in a way that a wire would get near certain models of LCD or computers, the analog signal quality may be terrible due to interference. If you're using the bluetooth in a way that it's in a heavily saturated 2.4 GHz environment (e.g. lots of WiFi signals, microwaves, cordless phones around), it may drop out due to heavy interference and crosstalk. Also you have to be able to live with the quality loss of lossy encoding for one of the bluetooth A2DP codecs, if you go that route. You probably can't detect it if you listen to lossy audio vs. lossless, but some people like to fake themselves out and say that they can tell ;)
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
1
+1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
– Dave M
Aug 21 '12 at 14:18
2
+1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
– N_Lindz
Aug 21 '12 at 14:41
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
– Joe
Aug 27 '12 at 19:09
That's a separate question, though it sounds more like a shopping recommendation question... TBH it's hard to find detailed specs about the freq response of bluetooth cans, even on the manufacturer's website, sometimes you have to dig deep or just pass up the ones that you can't find any info about.
– allquixotic
Aug 28 '12 at 13:36
1
Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
– Pere
Dec 19 '16 at 21:49
|
show 2 more comments
Option 1: Bluetooth audio.
Option 2: 3.5mm TRS analog audio connector (wired).
Facts about Bluetooth:
- Bluetooth audio protocol is lossy, meaning that some of the data is lost. However, it is digital, meaning that the audio reproduction in the headset is bit-exact the same data that was transmitted.
- The data is encoded to a digital format that is compressed in a way that loses some of the source data (but hopefully not enough that you can perceive it); but the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering, which means that you are unlikely to notice even if some other electromagnetic frequency transmission interferes with your bluetooth (temporarily).
- See A2DP at Wikipedia for more information about Bluetooth audio. To put it simply, there are more than one supported audio codec, and they have varying pros and cons in terms of bandwidth consumed, energy consumed, compatibility across devices, and quality. Some of the newer codecs such as apt-X produce what many consider to be superior audio quality, but device support is limited compared to the older codecs, or SBC which is required by the A2DP standard.
Facts about analog audio:
- Analog audio over a standard 3.5mm headphone jack (technically called a "TRS" connector) can be very high quality if the audio playback device has a good DAC. An amplifier (separate or built-in) can make the signal sound even better.
- A "good pair of cans" (good headphones) can sound amazing with this dated analog mode of transmitting audio down a cable. If you are using a very high quality DAC on the source audio device, chances are it's better than the DAC that has to be in the bluetooth headphones to convert the bluetooth digital data to analog, because the in-headphones DAC is limited by battery power and size constraints -- but a sound card in a computer is much less constrained. Even sound chips in smartphones are great these days.
- All analog audio is subject to interference with the audio cable. Most audio cables are not shielded from external electromagnetic interference, and certain models of computers (especially Core 2 Duo era CPUs with on-board graphics) have been known to spew electromagnetic frequencies that are picked up as a "grinding" or "buzzing" noise on the analog headphone wire, if it is near enough to the computer. Some LCDs can do the same. Depending on your situation, this interference can be even worse than the loss of audio quality of bluetooth's lossy encoding.
The answer is that it heavily depends on your situation, and exactly how sensitive your headphones are, and exactly how good the Digital-Analog Converter (DAC) in the bluetooth headset is, and which codecs the bluetooth headset supports, and........ (many other things). If you're using the headphones in a way that a wire would get near certain models of LCD or computers, the analog signal quality may be terrible due to interference. If you're using the bluetooth in a way that it's in a heavily saturated 2.4 GHz environment (e.g. lots of WiFi signals, microwaves, cordless phones around), it may drop out due to heavy interference and crosstalk. Also you have to be able to live with the quality loss of lossy encoding for one of the bluetooth A2DP codecs, if you go that route. You probably can't detect it if you listen to lossy audio vs. lossless, but some people like to fake themselves out and say that they can tell ;)
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
1
+1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
– Dave M
Aug 21 '12 at 14:18
2
+1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
– N_Lindz
Aug 21 '12 at 14:41
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
– Joe
Aug 27 '12 at 19:09
That's a separate question, though it sounds more like a shopping recommendation question... TBH it's hard to find detailed specs about the freq response of bluetooth cans, even on the manufacturer's website, sometimes you have to dig deep or just pass up the ones that you can't find any info about.
– allquixotic
Aug 28 '12 at 13:36
1
Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
– Pere
Dec 19 '16 at 21:49
|
show 2 more comments
Option 1: Bluetooth audio.
Option 2: 3.5mm TRS analog audio connector (wired).
Facts about Bluetooth:
- Bluetooth audio protocol is lossy, meaning that some of the data is lost. However, it is digital, meaning that the audio reproduction in the headset is bit-exact the same data that was transmitted.
- The data is encoded to a digital format that is compressed in a way that loses some of the source data (but hopefully not enough that you can perceive it); but the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering, which means that you are unlikely to notice even if some other electromagnetic frequency transmission interferes with your bluetooth (temporarily).
- See A2DP at Wikipedia for more information about Bluetooth audio. To put it simply, there are more than one supported audio codec, and they have varying pros and cons in terms of bandwidth consumed, energy consumed, compatibility across devices, and quality. Some of the newer codecs such as apt-X produce what many consider to be superior audio quality, but device support is limited compared to the older codecs, or SBC which is required by the A2DP standard.
Facts about analog audio:
- Analog audio over a standard 3.5mm headphone jack (technically called a "TRS" connector) can be very high quality if the audio playback device has a good DAC. An amplifier (separate or built-in) can make the signal sound even better.
- A "good pair of cans" (good headphones) can sound amazing with this dated analog mode of transmitting audio down a cable. If you are using a very high quality DAC on the source audio device, chances are it's better than the DAC that has to be in the bluetooth headphones to convert the bluetooth digital data to analog, because the in-headphones DAC is limited by battery power and size constraints -- but a sound card in a computer is much less constrained. Even sound chips in smartphones are great these days.
- All analog audio is subject to interference with the audio cable. Most audio cables are not shielded from external electromagnetic interference, and certain models of computers (especially Core 2 Duo era CPUs with on-board graphics) have been known to spew electromagnetic frequencies that are picked up as a "grinding" or "buzzing" noise on the analog headphone wire, if it is near enough to the computer. Some LCDs can do the same. Depending on your situation, this interference can be even worse than the loss of audio quality of bluetooth's lossy encoding.
The answer is that it heavily depends on your situation, and exactly how sensitive your headphones are, and exactly how good the Digital-Analog Converter (DAC) in the bluetooth headset is, and which codecs the bluetooth headset supports, and........ (many other things). If you're using the headphones in a way that a wire would get near certain models of LCD or computers, the analog signal quality may be terrible due to interference. If you're using the bluetooth in a way that it's in a heavily saturated 2.4 GHz environment (e.g. lots of WiFi signals, microwaves, cordless phones around), it may drop out due to heavy interference and crosstalk. Also you have to be able to live with the quality loss of lossy encoding for one of the bluetooth A2DP codecs, if you go that route. You probably can't detect it if you listen to lossy audio vs. lossless, but some people like to fake themselves out and say that they can tell ;)
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
Option 1: Bluetooth audio.
Option 2: 3.5mm TRS analog audio connector (wired).
Facts about Bluetooth:
- Bluetooth audio protocol is lossy, meaning that some of the data is lost. However, it is digital, meaning that the audio reproduction in the headset is bit-exact the same data that was transmitted.
- The data is encoded to a digital format that is compressed in a way that loses some of the source data (but hopefully not enough that you can perceive it); but the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering, which means that you are unlikely to notice even if some other electromagnetic frequency transmission interferes with your bluetooth (temporarily).
- See A2DP at Wikipedia for more information about Bluetooth audio. To put it simply, there are more than one supported audio codec, and they have varying pros and cons in terms of bandwidth consumed, energy consumed, compatibility across devices, and quality. Some of the newer codecs such as apt-X produce what many consider to be superior audio quality, but device support is limited compared to the older codecs, or SBC which is required by the A2DP standard.
Facts about analog audio:
- Analog audio over a standard 3.5mm headphone jack (technically called a "TRS" connector) can be very high quality if the audio playback device has a good DAC. An amplifier (separate or built-in) can make the signal sound even better.
- A "good pair of cans" (good headphones) can sound amazing with this dated analog mode of transmitting audio down a cable. If you are using a very high quality DAC on the source audio device, chances are it's better than the DAC that has to be in the bluetooth headphones to convert the bluetooth digital data to analog, because the in-headphones DAC is limited by battery power and size constraints -- but a sound card in a computer is much less constrained. Even sound chips in smartphones are great these days.
- All analog audio is subject to interference with the audio cable. Most audio cables are not shielded from external electromagnetic interference, and certain models of computers (especially Core 2 Duo era CPUs with on-board graphics) have been known to spew electromagnetic frequencies that are picked up as a "grinding" or "buzzing" noise on the analog headphone wire, if it is near enough to the computer. Some LCDs can do the same. Depending on your situation, this interference can be even worse than the loss of audio quality of bluetooth's lossy encoding.
The answer is that it heavily depends on your situation, and exactly how sensitive your headphones are, and exactly how good the Digital-Analog Converter (DAC) in the bluetooth headset is, and which codecs the bluetooth headset supports, and........ (many other things). If you're using the headphones in a way that a wire would get near certain models of LCD or computers, the analog signal quality may be terrible due to interference. If you're using the bluetooth in a way that it's in a heavily saturated 2.4 GHz environment (e.g. lots of WiFi signals, microwaves, cordless phones around), it may drop out due to heavy interference and crosstalk. Also you have to be able to live with the quality loss of lossy encoding for one of the bluetooth A2DP codecs, if you go that route. You probably can't detect it if you listen to lossy audio vs. lossless, but some people like to fake themselves out and say that they can tell ;)
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
edited Aug 21 '12 at 14:33
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
answered Aug 21 '12 at 14:16
allquixotic
30.5k694126
30.5k694126
1
+1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
– Dave M
Aug 21 '12 at 14:18
2
+1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
– N_Lindz
Aug 21 '12 at 14:41
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
– Joe
Aug 27 '12 at 19:09
That's a separate question, though it sounds more like a shopping recommendation question... TBH it's hard to find detailed specs about the freq response of bluetooth cans, even on the manufacturer's website, sometimes you have to dig deep or just pass up the ones that you can't find any info about.
– allquixotic
Aug 28 '12 at 13:36
1
Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
– Pere
Dec 19 '16 at 21:49
|
show 2 more comments
1
+1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
– Dave M
Aug 21 '12 at 14:18
2
+1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
– N_Lindz
Aug 21 '12 at 14:41
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
– Joe
Aug 27 '12 at 19:09
That's a separate question, though it sounds more like a shopping recommendation question... TBH it's hard to find detailed specs about the freq response of bluetooth cans, even on the manufacturer's website, sometimes you have to dig deep or just pass up the ones that you can't find any info about.
– allquixotic
Aug 28 '12 at 13:36
1
Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
– Pere
Dec 19 '16 at 21:49
1
1
+1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
– Dave M
Aug 21 '12 at 14:18
+1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
– Dave M
Aug 21 '12 at 14:18
2
2
+1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
– N_Lindz
Aug 21 '12 at 14:41
+1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
– N_Lindz
Aug 21 '12 at 14:41
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
– Joe
Aug 27 '12 at 19:09
I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
– Joe
Aug 27 '12 at 19:09
That's a separate question, though it sounds more like a shopping recommendation question... TBH it's hard to find detailed specs about the freq response of bluetooth cans, even on the manufacturer's website, sometimes you have to dig deep or just pass up the ones that you can't find any info about.
– allquixotic
Aug 28 '12 at 13:36
That's a separate question, though it sounds more like a shopping recommendation question... TBH it's hard to find detailed specs about the freq response of bluetooth cans, even on the manufacturer's website, sometimes you have to dig deep or just pass up the ones that you can't find any info about.
– allquixotic
Aug 28 '12 at 13:36
1
1
Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
– Pere
Dec 19 '16 at 21:49
Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
– Pere
Dec 19 '16 at 21:49
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f464388%2f3-5mm-analog-audio-vs-bluetooth-audio-quality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
15
To reviewers: Instead of voting to close this question, please feel free to edit the question to remove the shopping recommendation. Look at my answer: there is a general, non-shopping lesson to be taught here about 3.5mm TRS vs. bluetooth audio. It's on-topic for SU when you take away the product comparison and talk about the underlying technologies. If anyone can reshape the question in that light, be my guest. But I'd recommend against voting to close.
– allquixotic
Aug 21 '12 at 14:20
I recently bought a Bluetooth speaker and sound quality is noticeably worse than when using the jack. Also there is about half a second lag, which makes watching videos impossible (lips don't move in sync with speech). Of course this will depend on the codec and device, but overall I would advise against it.
– Laurent
Sep 1 '13 at 13:32