Can $int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(nx)dx=frac{pi}{n!}$ be extened to non-integers?












2












$begingroup$


It is well known that the fourier series for $e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))$ is $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{sin(ntheta)}{n!}$ which implies that



$$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(ntheta)dx=frac{pi}{n!}$$ for $n>0$. My question is if this identity can be extended to fractional values such as $$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(frac{theta}{2})dtheta=2sqrt{pi} $$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    No! Try expanding with the half-angle formulas
    $endgroup$
    – TheOscillator
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:59












  • $begingroup$
    Numerical evidence suggests that $$ int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta} sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta simeq fracpi{n!} - frac34frac{sin((n-1)pi)}{n^2+1}, $$ where of course $n!=Gamma(n+1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:33












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it should be $+tfrac34dots$, not $-$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:43
















2












$begingroup$


It is well known that the fourier series for $e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))$ is $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{sin(ntheta)}{n!}$ which implies that



$$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(ntheta)dx=frac{pi}{n!}$$ for $n>0$. My question is if this identity can be extended to fractional values such as $$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(frac{theta}{2})dtheta=2sqrt{pi} $$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    No! Try expanding with the half-angle formulas
    $endgroup$
    – TheOscillator
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:59












  • $begingroup$
    Numerical evidence suggests that $$ int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta} sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta simeq fracpi{n!} - frac34frac{sin((n-1)pi)}{n^2+1}, $$ where of course $n!=Gamma(n+1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:33












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it should be $+tfrac34dots$, not $-$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:43














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


It is well known that the fourier series for $e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))$ is $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{sin(ntheta)}{n!}$ which implies that



$$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(ntheta)dx=frac{pi}{n!}$$ for $n>0$. My question is if this identity can be extended to fractional values such as $$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(frac{theta}{2})dtheta=2sqrt{pi} $$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




It is well known that the fourier series for $e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))$ is $sum_{n=1}^infty frac{sin(ntheta)}{n!}$ which implies that



$$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(ntheta)dx=frac{pi}{n!}$$ for $n>0$. My question is if this identity can be extended to fractional values such as $$int_{-pi}^pi e^{cos(theta)}sin(sin(theta))sin(frac{theta}{2})dtheta=2sqrt{pi} $$







definite-integrals fourier-series gamma-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 29 '18 at 15:50









aledenaleden

2,017511




2,017511












  • $begingroup$
    No! Try expanding with the half-angle formulas
    $endgroup$
    – TheOscillator
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:59












  • $begingroup$
    Numerical evidence suggests that $$ int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta} sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta simeq fracpi{n!} - frac34frac{sin((n-1)pi)}{n^2+1}, $$ where of course $n!=Gamma(n+1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:33












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it should be $+tfrac34dots$, not $-$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:43


















  • $begingroup$
    No! Try expanding with the half-angle formulas
    $endgroup$
    – TheOscillator
    Nov 29 '18 at 15:59












  • $begingroup$
    Numerical evidence suggests that $$ int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta} sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta simeq fracpi{n!} - frac34frac{sin((n-1)pi)}{n^2+1}, $$ where of course $n!=Gamma(n+1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:33












  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, it should be $+tfrac34dots$, not $-$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:43
















$begingroup$
No! Try expanding with the half-angle formulas
$endgroup$
– TheOscillator
Nov 29 '18 at 15:59






$begingroup$
No! Try expanding with the half-angle formulas
$endgroup$
– TheOscillator
Nov 29 '18 at 15:59














$begingroup$
Numerical evidence suggests that $$ int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta} sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta simeq fracpi{n!} - frac34frac{sin((n-1)pi)}{n^2+1}, $$ where of course $n!=Gamma(n+1)$
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 16:33






$begingroup$
Numerical evidence suggests that $$ int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta} sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta simeq fracpi{n!} - frac34frac{sin((n-1)pi)}{n^2+1}, $$ where of course $n!=Gamma(n+1)$
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 16:33














$begingroup$
Sorry, it should be $+tfrac34dots$, not $-$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 16:43




$begingroup$
Sorry, it should be $+tfrac34dots$, not $-$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 16:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Incomplete answer: only numerical experiments.



Let me define
$$
s(n) = int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta}sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta
$$

and
$$
g(n) = frac{s(n)-frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)}}{sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}.
$$

Numerical evidence suggests that $g(n)to0$; but how fast? Let's try to extract some more information.



Here I plot $-logbigl(g(n)bigr)$ for $nin[1,20]$:
enter image description here



It looks like a logarithm, so it seems natural to try to fit it with
$$
-logbigl(g(n)bigr) = a+blog(n+c).
$$



By fiddling a bit (and looking at larger ranges of $n$) one can see that $b$ has to be $2$, so we have $a+2log(n+c)$. The value $g(1)$ seems to be around $0.5$, a bit less, so we impose $a+2log(1+b)=log(2)$. Moreover, by looking at large values, we deduce that $a=1-log(2)$ seems a good value. Therefore our approximation is
$$
g(n) simeq frac{2}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2},
$$

which leads to
$$
s(n) simeq frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)} + frac{2sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2} .
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see, so at integer value it is equal to $frac{pi}{n!}$ but otherwise it is not.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Even just at $n=1/2$, we get $s(1/2)=tfrac2e + sqrtpi mathrm{erf}(1)$ instead of $2sqrtpi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    I'm still intrigued to find a closed expression for $s(n)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:43











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018807%2fcan-int-pi-pi-e-cos-theta-sin-sin-theta-sinnxdx-frac-pin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Incomplete answer: only numerical experiments.



Let me define
$$
s(n) = int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta}sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta
$$

and
$$
g(n) = frac{s(n)-frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)}}{sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}.
$$

Numerical evidence suggests that $g(n)to0$; but how fast? Let's try to extract some more information.



Here I plot $-logbigl(g(n)bigr)$ for $nin[1,20]$:
enter image description here



It looks like a logarithm, so it seems natural to try to fit it with
$$
-logbigl(g(n)bigr) = a+blog(n+c).
$$



By fiddling a bit (and looking at larger ranges of $n$) one can see that $b$ has to be $2$, so we have $a+2log(n+c)$. The value $g(1)$ seems to be around $0.5$, a bit less, so we impose $a+2log(1+b)=log(2)$. Moreover, by looking at large values, we deduce that $a=1-log(2)$ seems a good value. Therefore our approximation is
$$
g(n) simeq frac{2}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2},
$$

which leads to
$$
s(n) simeq frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)} + frac{2sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2} .
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see, so at integer value it is equal to $frac{pi}{n!}$ but otherwise it is not.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Even just at $n=1/2$, we get $s(1/2)=tfrac2e + sqrtpi mathrm{erf}(1)$ instead of $2sqrtpi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    I'm still intrigued to find a closed expression for $s(n)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:43
















2












$begingroup$

Incomplete answer: only numerical experiments.



Let me define
$$
s(n) = int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta}sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta
$$

and
$$
g(n) = frac{s(n)-frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)}}{sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}.
$$

Numerical evidence suggests that $g(n)to0$; but how fast? Let's try to extract some more information.



Here I plot $-logbigl(g(n)bigr)$ for $nin[1,20]$:
enter image description here



It looks like a logarithm, so it seems natural to try to fit it with
$$
-logbigl(g(n)bigr) = a+blog(n+c).
$$



By fiddling a bit (and looking at larger ranges of $n$) one can see that $b$ has to be $2$, so we have $a+2log(n+c)$. The value $g(1)$ seems to be around $0.5$, a bit less, so we impose $a+2log(1+b)=log(2)$. Moreover, by looking at large values, we deduce that $a=1-log(2)$ seems a good value. Therefore our approximation is
$$
g(n) simeq frac{2}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2},
$$

which leads to
$$
s(n) simeq frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)} + frac{2sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2} .
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see, so at integer value it is equal to $frac{pi}{n!}$ but otherwise it is not.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Even just at $n=1/2$, we get $s(1/2)=tfrac2e + sqrtpi mathrm{erf}(1)$ instead of $2sqrtpi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    I'm still intrigued to find a closed expression for $s(n)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:43














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Incomplete answer: only numerical experiments.



Let me define
$$
s(n) = int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta}sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta
$$

and
$$
g(n) = frac{s(n)-frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)}}{sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}.
$$

Numerical evidence suggests that $g(n)to0$; but how fast? Let's try to extract some more information.



Here I plot $-logbigl(g(n)bigr)$ for $nin[1,20]$:
enter image description here



It looks like a logarithm, so it seems natural to try to fit it with
$$
-logbigl(g(n)bigr) = a+blog(n+c).
$$



By fiddling a bit (and looking at larger ranges of $n$) one can see that $b$ has to be $2$, so we have $a+2log(n+c)$. The value $g(1)$ seems to be around $0.5$, a bit less, so we impose $a+2log(1+b)=log(2)$. Moreover, by looking at large values, we deduce that $a=1-log(2)$ seems a good value. Therefore our approximation is
$$
g(n) simeq frac{2}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2},
$$

which leads to
$$
s(n) simeq frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)} + frac{2sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2} .
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Incomplete answer: only numerical experiments.



Let me define
$$
s(n) = int_{-pi}^pi e^{costheta}sin(sintheta)sin(ntheta),dtheta
$$

and
$$
g(n) = frac{s(n)-frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)}}{sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}.
$$

Numerical evidence suggests that $g(n)to0$; but how fast? Let's try to extract some more information.



Here I plot $-logbigl(g(n)bigr)$ for $nin[1,20]$:
enter image description here



It looks like a logarithm, so it seems natural to try to fit it with
$$
-logbigl(g(n)bigr) = a+blog(n+c).
$$



By fiddling a bit (and looking at larger ranges of $n$) one can see that $b$ has to be $2$, so we have $a+2log(n+c)$. The value $g(1)$ seems to be around $0.5$, a bit less, so we impose $a+2log(1+b)=log(2)$. Moreover, by looking at large values, we deduce that $a=1-log(2)$ seems a good value. Therefore our approximation is
$$
g(n) simeq frac{2}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2},
$$

which leads to
$$
s(n) simeq frac{pi}{Gamma(n+1)} + frac{2sinbigl((n-1)pibigr)}{bigl(2+sqrt e(n-1)bigr)^2} .
$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 29 '18 at 17:35









FedericoFederico

4,899514




4,899514












  • $begingroup$
    I see, so at integer value it is equal to $frac{pi}{n!}$ but otherwise it is not.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Even just at $n=1/2$, we get $s(1/2)=tfrac2e + sqrtpi mathrm{erf}(1)$ instead of $2sqrtpi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    I'm still intrigued to find a closed expression for $s(n)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:43


















  • $begingroup$
    I see, so at integer value it is equal to $frac{pi}{n!}$ but otherwise it is not.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. Even just at $n=1/2$, we get $s(1/2)=tfrac2e + sqrtpi mathrm{erf}(1)$ instead of $2sqrtpi$.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:42










  • $begingroup$
    I'm still intrigued to find a closed expression for $s(n)$
    $endgroup$
    – Federico
    Nov 29 '18 at 17:43
















$begingroup$
I see, so at integer value it is equal to $frac{pi}{n!}$ but otherwise it is not.
$endgroup$
– aleden
Nov 29 '18 at 17:39




$begingroup$
I see, so at integer value it is equal to $frac{pi}{n!}$ but otherwise it is not.
$endgroup$
– aleden
Nov 29 '18 at 17:39












$begingroup$
Yes. Even just at $n=1/2$, we get $s(1/2)=tfrac2e + sqrtpi mathrm{erf}(1)$ instead of $2sqrtpi$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 17:42




$begingroup$
Yes. Even just at $n=1/2$, we get $s(1/2)=tfrac2e + sqrtpi mathrm{erf}(1)$ instead of $2sqrtpi$.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 17:42












$begingroup$
I'm still intrigued to find a closed expression for $s(n)$
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 17:43




$begingroup$
I'm still intrigued to find a closed expression for $s(n)$
$endgroup$
– Federico
Nov 29 '18 at 17:43


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018807%2fcan-int-pi-pi-e-cos-theta-sin-sin-theta-sinnxdx-frac-pin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...