Why this constraint is crucial in a Lagrange multiplier problem?
0
Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?
lagrange-multiplier
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
add a comment |
0
Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?
lagrange-multiplier
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31
@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06
After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06
add a comment |
0
0
0
Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?
lagrange-multiplier
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
Consider we need to find the max. and min. values of this function $ f(x,y)=xy $ subject to the constraint $x^2-y=12$.Why it is necessary to assume that $ yleq0$?
lagrange-multiplier
lagrange-multiplier
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
edited Nov 24 at 1:27
Bernard
118k639111
118k639111
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
asked Nov 24 at 1:19
John adams
206
206
Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31
@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06
After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06
add a comment |
Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31
@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06
After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06
Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31
Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31
@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06
@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06
After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06
After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011059%2fwhy-this-constraint-is-crucial-in-a-lagrange-multiplier-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011059%2fwhy-this-constraint-is-crucial-in-a-lagrange-multiplier-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Did you construct the Lagrangian and compute it's derivatives? It should be clear then.
– Mattos
Nov 24 at 1:31
@Mattos yes i did so and while i am solving, I didnot make use this assumption , but i was wondering why this assumption is stated in the question.
– John adams
Nov 24 at 3:06
After taking derivatives of the Lagrangian, you should get a condition that $y + 2x^2 = 0$...
– Mattos
Nov 25 at 7:06