Hyperbolic tangents as a dense subset of smooth functions satisfying certain conditions












0












$begingroup$


Edit: The original question contained some errors that lead to some comments and answers that do not apply anymore. I thank those that took time to read the question and pointed out the errors. I tried to be more precise this time.



Let $V$ be the set of smooth (infinitely differentiable) functions $f:[0,+infty)rightarrowmathbb{R}$ that satisfy the following conditions:




  • $f(0)=0$

  • $f'(x)geq 0, forall x$


  • $f''(x)leq 0$, $forall x$


  • $lim_{xrightarrow+infty}f(x)$ is a real number


I'd like to find a dense subset $Asubseteq V$ (w.r.t. to the $L^2$ norm, say), where $A$ is a family of functions depending only on some real-valued parameters.



My first guess was to take the family ${atanh(sx): a,sgeq0}$, but after some numerical computations I saw it doesn't work: e.g. $arctan(x)in V$ cannot be arbitrarily approximated by functions of the form $atanh(sx)$.



My questions are:




  1. Can we find a dense $A$ as described above (depending only on some real parameters).

  2. In case that the answer to the previous question is "yes", can the hyperbolic tangents family I described be easily modified to become a dense subset?

  3. What if we change the definition domain from $[0,+infty)$ to $[0,B]$ for some real number $B>0$? Does this compactness condition help in being able to find a dense subset?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But functions with $f''(x) > 0$ do not form a vector space, multiplying a function $f in V$ by a negative scalar reverses the inequality. Do you perhaps mean $V$ to be some sort of a cone?
    $endgroup$
    – Bartosz Malman
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    @BartoszMalman: You're right. I edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:00
















0












$begingroup$


Edit: The original question contained some errors that lead to some comments and answers that do not apply anymore. I thank those that took time to read the question and pointed out the errors. I tried to be more precise this time.



Let $V$ be the set of smooth (infinitely differentiable) functions $f:[0,+infty)rightarrowmathbb{R}$ that satisfy the following conditions:




  • $f(0)=0$

  • $f'(x)geq 0, forall x$


  • $f''(x)leq 0$, $forall x$


  • $lim_{xrightarrow+infty}f(x)$ is a real number


I'd like to find a dense subset $Asubseteq V$ (w.r.t. to the $L^2$ norm, say), where $A$ is a family of functions depending only on some real-valued parameters.



My first guess was to take the family ${atanh(sx): a,sgeq0}$, but after some numerical computations I saw it doesn't work: e.g. $arctan(x)in V$ cannot be arbitrarily approximated by functions of the form $atanh(sx)$.



My questions are:




  1. Can we find a dense $A$ as described above (depending only on some real parameters).

  2. In case that the answer to the previous question is "yes", can the hyperbolic tangents family I described be easily modified to become a dense subset?

  3. What if we change the definition domain from $[0,+infty)$ to $[0,B]$ for some real number $B>0$? Does this compactness condition help in being able to find a dense subset?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But functions with $f''(x) > 0$ do not form a vector space, multiplying a function $f in V$ by a negative scalar reverses the inequality. Do you perhaps mean $V$ to be some sort of a cone?
    $endgroup$
    – Bartosz Malman
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    @BartoszMalman: You're right. I edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:00














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Edit: The original question contained some errors that lead to some comments and answers that do not apply anymore. I thank those that took time to read the question and pointed out the errors. I tried to be more precise this time.



Let $V$ be the set of smooth (infinitely differentiable) functions $f:[0,+infty)rightarrowmathbb{R}$ that satisfy the following conditions:




  • $f(0)=0$

  • $f'(x)geq 0, forall x$


  • $f''(x)leq 0$, $forall x$


  • $lim_{xrightarrow+infty}f(x)$ is a real number


I'd like to find a dense subset $Asubseteq V$ (w.r.t. to the $L^2$ norm, say), where $A$ is a family of functions depending only on some real-valued parameters.



My first guess was to take the family ${atanh(sx): a,sgeq0}$, but after some numerical computations I saw it doesn't work: e.g. $arctan(x)in V$ cannot be arbitrarily approximated by functions of the form $atanh(sx)$.



My questions are:




  1. Can we find a dense $A$ as described above (depending only on some real parameters).

  2. In case that the answer to the previous question is "yes", can the hyperbolic tangents family I described be easily modified to become a dense subset?

  3. What if we change the definition domain from $[0,+infty)$ to $[0,B]$ for some real number $B>0$? Does this compactness condition help in being able to find a dense subset?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Edit: The original question contained some errors that lead to some comments and answers that do not apply anymore. I thank those that took time to read the question and pointed out the errors. I tried to be more precise this time.



Let $V$ be the set of smooth (infinitely differentiable) functions $f:[0,+infty)rightarrowmathbb{R}$ that satisfy the following conditions:




  • $f(0)=0$

  • $f'(x)geq 0, forall x$


  • $f''(x)leq 0$, $forall x$


  • $lim_{xrightarrow+infty}f(x)$ is a real number


I'd like to find a dense subset $Asubseteq V$ (w.r.t. to the $L^2$ norm, say), where $A$ is a family of functions depending only on some real-valued parameters.



My first guess was to take the family ${atanh(sx): a,sgeq0}$, but after some numerical computations I saw it doesn't work: e.g. $arctan(x)in V$ cannot be arbitrarily approximated by functions of the form $atanh(sx)$.



My questions are:




  1. Can we find a dense $A$ as described above (depending only on some real parameters).

  2. In case that the answer to the previous question is "yes", can the hyperbolic tangents family I described be easily modified to become a dense subset?

  3. What if we change the definition domain from $[0,+infty)$ to $[0,B]$ for some real number $B>0$? Does this compactness condition help in being able to find a dense subset?







functional-analysis banach-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 30 '18 at 15:18







A. Bellmunt

















asked Nov 29 '18 at 15:32









A. BellmuntA. Bellmunt

895515




895515












  • $begingroup$
    But functions with $f''(x) > 0$ do not form a vector space, multiplying a function $f in V$ by a negative scalar reverses the inequality. Do you perhaps mean $V$ to be some sort of a cone?
    $endgroup$
    – Bartosz Malman
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    @BartoszMalman: You're right. I edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:00


















  • $begingroup$
    But functions with $f''(x) > 0$ do not form a vector space, multiplying a function $f in V$ by a negative scalar reverses the inequality. Do you perhaps mean $V$ to be some sort of a cone?
    $endgroup$
    – Bartosz Malman
    Nov 29 '18 at 16:08










  • $begingroup$
    @BartoszMalman: You're right. I edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 29 '18 at 18:00
















$begingroup$
But functions with $f''(x) > 0$ do not form a vector space, multiplying a function $f in V$ by a negative scalar reverses the inequality. Do you perhaps mean $V$ to be some sort of a cone?
$endgroup$
– Bartosz Malman
Nov 29 '18 at 16:08




$begingroup$
But functions with $f''(x) > 0$ do not form a vector space, multiplying a function $f in V$ by a negative scalar reverses the inequality. Do you perhaps mean $V$ to be some sort of a cone?
$endgroup$
– Bartosz Malman
Nov 29 '18 at 16:08












$begingroup$
@BartoszMalman: You're right. I edited the question.
$endgroup$
– A. Bellmunt
Nov 29 '18 at 18:00




$begingroup$
@BartoszMalman: You're right. I edited the question.
$endgroup$
– A. Bellmunt
Nov 29 '18 at 18:00










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Edit: The following argument has been rendered moot by an edit to the question.



The claim is vacuously true; $V$ is empty.



From the limit condition at $infty$, there is some $u>0$ with $f(u)>0$. Then, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $vin (0,u)$ with $f'(v) = frac{f(u)}{u}>0$. Now, for all $x>v$, $f(x)ge f(v) + (x-v)f'(v)$, which goes to $infty$ as $xtoinfty$. Our function, which was supposed to have a finite limit at $infty$, instead goes to $infty$. There's nothing there - including that $f_{a,s}$ is never in $V$. In fact, for positive $a$ and $s$, the second derivative of $f_{a,s}$ is negative on $(0,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Oh, god... you're absolutely right. The inequality of the second derivative should be the other way around... I already edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:03











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018781%2fhyperbolic-tangents-as-a-dense-subset-of-smooth-functions-satisfying-certain-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Edit: The following argument has been rendered moot by an edit to the question.



The claim is vacuously true; $V$ is empty.



From the limit condition at $infty$, there is some $u>0$ with $f(u)>0$. Then, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $vin (0,u)$ with $f'(v) = frac{f(u)}{u}>0$. Now, for all $x>v$, $f(x)ge f(v) + (x-v)f'(v)$, which goes to $infty$ as $xtoinfty$. Our function, which was supposed to have a finite limit at $infty$, instead goes to $infty$. There's nothing there - including that $f_{a,s}$ is never in $V$. In fact, for positive $a$ and $s$, the second derivative of $f_{a,s}$ is negative on $(0,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Oh, god... you're absolutely right. The inequality of the second derivative should be the other way around... I already edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:03
















0












$begingroup$

Edit: The following argument has been rendered moot by an edit to the question.



The claim is vacuously true; $V$ is empty.



From the limit condition at $infty$, there is some $u>0$ with $f(u)>0$. Then, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $vin (0,u)$ with $f'(v) = frac{f(u)}{u}>0$. Now, for all $x>v$, $f(x)ge f(v) + (x-v)f'(v)$, which goes to $infty$ as $xtoinfty$. Our function, which was supposed to have a finite limit at $infty$, instead goes to $infty$. There's nothing there - including that $f_{a,s}$ is never in $V$. In fact, for positive $a$ and $s$, the second derivative of $f_{a,s}$ is negative on $(0,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Oh, god... you're absolutely right. The inequality of the second derivative should be the other way around... I already edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:03














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Edit: The following argument has been rendered moot by an edit to the question.



The claim is vacuously true; $V$ is empty.



From the limit condition at $infty$, there is some $u>0$ with $f(u)>0$. Then, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $vin (0,u)$ with $f'(v) = frac{f(u)}{u}>0$. Now, for all $x>v$, $f(x)ge f(v) + (x-v)f'(v)$, which goes to $infty$ as $xtoinfty$. Our function, which was supposed to have a finite limit at $infty$, instead goes to $infty$. There's nothing there - including that $f_{a,s}$ is never in $V$. In fact, for positive $a$ and $s$, the second derivative of $f_{a,s}$ is negative on $(0,infty)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Edit: The following argument has been rendered moot by an edit to the question.



The claim is vacuously true; $V$ is empty.



From the limit condition at $infty$, there is some $u>0$ with $f(u)>0$. Then, by the Mean Value Theorem, there is some $vin (0,u)$ with $f'(v) = frac{f(u)}{u}>0$. Now, for all $x>v$, $f(x)ge f(v) + (x-v)f'(v)$, which goes to $infty$ as $xtoinfty$. Our function, which was supposed to have a finite limit at $infty$, instead goes to $infty$. There's nothing there - including that $f_{a,s}$ is never in $V$. In fact, for positive $a$ and $s$, the second derivative of $f_{a,s}$ is negative on $(0,infty)$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 30 '18 at 11:17

























answered Nov 29 '18 at 20:07









jmerryjmerry

3,737514




3,737514












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, god... you're absolutely right. The inequality of the second derivative should be the other way around... I already edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:03


















  • $begingroup$
    Oh, god... you're absolutely right. The inequality of the second derivative should be the other way around... I already edited the question.
    $endgroup$
    – A. Bellmunt
    Nov 30 '18 at 9:03
















$begingroup$
Oh, god... you're absolutely right. The inequality of the second derivative should be the other way around... I already edited the question.
$endgroup$
– A. Bellmunt
Nov 30 '18 at 9:03




$begingroup$
Oh, god... you're absolutely right. The inequality of the second derivative should be the other way around... I already edited the question.
$endgroup$
– A. Bellmunt
Nov 30 '18 at 9:03


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3018781%2fhyperbolic-tangents-as-a-dense-subset-of-smooth-functions-satisfying-certain-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa