Is there any non-complete metric on $Bbb R^2$?












0














I've read several books with this content:




Let $g = dr^2 + f^2(r)dtheta^2$ be a smooth metric on $Bbb R^2$ expressed in
polar coordinates. This metric is complete and the volume can be finite even though this manifold is not-compact.




I thought that $Bbb R^2$ always have infinite volume.




Question: Why authors emphasize that this metric is complete while we know that $Bbb R^2$ is complete topological space. Is there any non-complete metric on $Bbb R^2$?











share|cite|improve this question
























  • Does the author mean Cauchy complete or geodesic complete?
    – edm
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:36










  • is there difference between them? I think geo. complete.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:39






  • 1




    Completeness is not a property of topological spaces so I don't know what you mean by "$mathbb{R}^2$ is complete topological space."
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:47






  • 1




    @edm According to Hopf–Rinow, those are equivalent.
    – Akiva Weinberger
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:59










  • @QiaochuYuan, Thank you for your remark.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:07
















0














I've read several books with this content:




Let $g = dr^2 + f^2(r)dtheta^2$ be a smooth metric on $Bbb R^2$ expressed in
polar coordinates. This metric is complete and the volume can be finite even though this manifold is not-compact.




I thought that $Bbb R^2$ always have infinite volume.




Question: Why authors emphasize that this metric is complete while we know that $Bbb R^2$ is complete topological space. Is there any non-complete metric on $Bbb R^2$?











share|cite|improve this question
























  • Does the author mean Cauchy complete or geodesic complete?
    – edm
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:36










  • is there difference between them? I think geo. complete.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:39






  • 1




    Completeness is not a property of topological spaces so I don't know what you mean by "$mathbb{R}^2$ is complete topological space."
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:47






  • 1




    @edm According to Hopf–Rinow, those are equivalent.
    – Akiva Weinberger
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:59










  • @QiaochuYuan, Thank you for your remark.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:07














0












0








0







I've read several books with this content:




Let $g = dr^2 + f^2(r)dtheta^2$ be a smooth metric on $Bbb R^2$ expressed in
polar coordinates. This metric is complete and the volume can be finite even though this manifold is not-compact.




I thought that $Bbb R^2$ always have infinite volume.




Question: Why authors emphasize that this metric is complete while we know that $Bbb R^2$ is complete topological space. Is there any non-complete metric on $Bbb R^2$?











share|cite|improve this question















I've read several books with this content:




Let $g = dr^2 + f^2(r)dtheta^2$ be a smooth metric on $Bbb R^2$ expressed in
polar coordinates. This metric is complete and the volume can be finite even though this manifold is not-compact.




I thought that $Bbb R^2$ always have infinite volume.




Question: Why authors emphasize that this metric is complete while we know that $Bbb R^2$ is complete topological space. Is there any non-complete metric on $Bbb R^2$?








differential-geometry riemannian-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 28 '18 at 5:47







C.F.G

















asked Nov 28 '18 at 5:30









C.F.GC.F.G

1,4281821




1,4281821












  • Does the author mean Cauchy complete or geodesic complete?
    – edm
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:36










  • is there difference between them? I think geo. complete.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:39






  • 1




    Completeness is not a property of topological spaces so I don't know what you mean by "$mathbb{R}^2$ is complete topological space."
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:47






  • 1




    @edm According to Hopf–Rinow, those are equivalent.
    – Akiva Weinberger
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:59










  • @QiaochuYuan, Thank you for your remark.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:07


















  • Does the author mean Cauchy complete or geodesic complete?
    – edm
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:36










  • is there difference between them? I think geo. complete.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:39






  • 1




    Completeness is not a property of topological spaces so I don't know what you mean by "$mathbb{R}^2$ is complete topological space."
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:47






  • 1




    @edm According to Hopf–Rinow, those are equivalent.
    – Akiva Weinberger
    Nov 28 '18 at 5:59










  • @QiaochuYuan, Thank you for your remark.
    – C.F.G
    Nov 28 '18 at 6:07
















Does the author mean Cauchy complete or geodesic complete?
– edm
Nov 28 '18 at 5:36




Does the author mean Cauchy complete or geodesic complete?
– edm
Nov 28 '18 at 5:36












is there difference between them? I think geo. complete.
– C.F.G
Nov 28 '18 at 5:39




is there difference between them? I think geo. complete.
– C.F.G
Nov 28 '18 at 5:39




1




1




Completeness is not a property of topological spaces so I don't know what you mean by "$mathbb{R}^2$ is complete topological space."
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '18 at 5:47




Completeness is not a property of topological spaces so I don't know what you mean by "$mathbb{R}^2$ is complete topological space."
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 28 '18 at 5:47




1




1




@edm According to Hopf–Rinow, those are equivalent.
– Akiva Weinberger
Nov 28 '18 at 5:59




@edm According to Hopf–Rinow, those are equivalent.
– Akiva Weinberger
Nov 28 '18 at 5:59












@QiaochuYuan, Thank you for your remark.
– C.F.G
Nov 28 '18 at 6:07




@QiaochuYuan, Thank you for your remark.
– C.F.G
Nov 28 '18 at 6:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














There exists a diffeomorphism from $Bbb R^2$ to the open unit disc. One such function, given in polar form, is $(r,theta)mapsto(tanh r,theta)$. You can replace $tanh$ with your favorite sigmoid function. Give the open unit disc the standard metric, and then give $Bbb R^2$ the metric it inherits from the diffeomorphism. This metric is not complete.



This doesn't contradict the author's statement, because metrics of the form $dr^2+f^2(r )dtheta^2$ do not change the lengths of rays from the origin, and so the metric I described above is not of this form.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016748%2fis-there-any-non-complete-metric-on-bbb-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    There exists a diffeomorphism from $Bbb R^2$ to the open unit disc. One such function, given in polar form, is $(r,theta)mapsto(tanh r,theta)$. You can replace $tanh$ with your favorite sigmoid function. Give the open unit disc the standard metric, and then give $Bbb R^2$ the metric it inherits from the diffeomorphism. This metric is not complete.



    This doesn't contradict the author's statement, because metrics of the form $dr^2+f^2(r )dtheta^2$ do not change the lengths of rays from the origin, and so the metric I described above is not of this form.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      There exists a diffeomorphism from $Bbb R^2$ to the open unit disc. One such function, given in polar form, is $(r,theta)mapsto(tanh r,theta)$. You can replace $tanh$ with your favorite sigmoid function. Give the open unit disc the standard metric, and then give $Bbb R^2$ the metric it inherits from the diffeomorphism. This metric is not complete.



      This doesn't contradict the author's statement, because metrics of the form $dr^2+f^2(r )dtheta^2$ do not change the lengths of rays from the origin, and so the metric I described above is not of this form.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        There exists a diffeomorphism from $Bbb R^2$ to the open unit disc. One such function, given in polar form, is $(r,theta)mapsto(tanh r,theta)$. You can replace $tanh$ with your favorite sigmoid function. Give the open unit disc the standard metric, and then give $Bbb R^2$ the metric it inherits from the diffeomorphism. This metric is not complete.



        This doesn't contradict the author's statement, because metrics of the form $dr^2+f^2(r )dtheta^2$ do not change the lengths of rays from the origin, and so the metric I described above is not of this form.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        There exists a diffeomorphism from $Bbb R^2$ to the open unit disc. One such function, given in polar form, is $(r,theta)mapsto(tanh r,theta)$. You can replace $tanh$ with your favorite sigmoid function. Give the open unit disc the standard metric, and then give $Bbb R^2$ the metric it inherits from the diffeomorphism. This metric is not complete.



        This doesn't contradict the author's statement, because metrics of the form $dr^2+f^2(r )dtheta^2$ do not change the lengths of rays from the origin, and so the metric I described above is not of this form.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 28 '18 at 6:03









        Akiva WeinbergerAkiva Weinberger

        13.8k12167




        13.8k12167






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016748%2fis-there-any-non-complete-metric-on-bbb-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa