Proving continuity of $f$ at exactly one point
$begingroup$
We can check if some function $g(x) =...$ (some random function, irrelevant to this case) is continuous at a given point $x_{0}=c iff lim_{xto c^+} g(x) = g(c) quadlandquad lim_{xto c^-} g(x) = g(c).$
If both conditions are satisfied, then the function is continuous at such point $x_{0} = c$. I suppose so far everything is correct, I hope?
I need to prove that the function $f(x) = begin{cases}
x & text{if } x in mathbb{Q} \
0 & text{if } x in mathbb{R}/mathbb{Q}
end{cases} quad$ is continuous exactly at one point $x_{0}=0$. The domain is $D_{f}=mathbb{R}$.
I am struggling because this is a function that is "made out of two sub-functions".
It is clear to me that the reason why this function is continuous only at $x_{0}=0$ is because $0$ is a rational number, so we get $f(0)=0$ for both "sub-functions" - and that is the only point in the graph where both "sub functions" (how do I call it properly?) are in the same spot (touching each other). Thus, function is continuous only at that specific point.
How can I finish the proof in a good, math-fashioned style using limits?
I came up with: $$ x_{0}=0in mathbb{Q} rightarrow lim_{xto 0^+} x = 0 quad land quad lim_{xto 0^-} x = 0,$$hence function is continuous at $x_{0}=0$. But I am afraid it's not good enough to be a completed proof.
Hints, tips, advices to formalize this proof are appreciated. Thanks.
real-analysis limits continuity graphing-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can check if some function $g(x) =...$ (some random function, irrelevant to this case) is continuous at a given point $x_{0}=c iff lim_{xto c^+} g(x) = g(c) quadlandquad lim_{xto c^-} g(x) = g(c).$
If both conditions are satisfied, then the function is continuous at such point $x_{0} = c$. I suppose so far everything is correct, I hope?
I need to prove that the function $f(x) = begin{cases}
x & text{if } x in mathbb{Q} \
0 & text{if } x in mathbb{R}/mathbb{Q}
end{cases} quad$ is continuous exactly at one point $x_{0}=0$. The domain is $D_{f}=mathbb{R}$.
I am struggling because this is a function that is "made out of two sub-functions".
It is clear to me that the reason why this function is continuous only at $x_{0}=0$ is because $0$ is a rational number, so we get $f(0)=0$ for both "sub-functions" - and that is the only point in the graph where both "sub functions" (how do I call it properly?) are in the same spot (touching each other). Thus, function is continuous only at that specific point.
How can I finish the proof in a good, math-fashioned style using limits?
I came up with: $$ x_{0}=0in mathbb{Q} rightarrow lim_{xto 0^+} x = 0 quad land quad lim_{xto 0^-} x = 0,$$hence function is continuous at $x_{0}=0$. But I am afraid it's not good enough to be a completed proof.
Hints, tips, advices to formalize this proof are appreciated. Thanks.
real-analysis limits continuity graphing-functions
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
An $varepsilon-delta$ proof is the easiest way to do this, I think, and it is, in fact, very easy.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 0:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can check if some function $g(x) =...$ (some random function, irrelevant to this case) is continuous at a given point $x_{0}=c iff lim_{xto c^+} g(x) = g(c) quadlandquad lim_{xto c^-} g(x) = g(c).$
If both conditions are satisfied, then the function is continuous at such point $x_{0} = c$. I suppose so far everything is correct, I hope?
I need to prove that the function $f(x) = begin{cases}
x & text{if } x in mathbb{Q} \
0 & text{if } x in mathbb{R}/mathbb{Q}
end{cases} quad$ is continuous exactly at one point $x_{0}=0$. The domain is $D_{f}=mathbb{R}$.
I am struggling because this is a function that is "made out of two sub-functions".
It is clear to me that the reason why this function is continuous only at $x_{0}=0$ is because $0$ is a rational number, so we get $f(0)=0$ for both "sub-functions" - and that is the only point in the graph where both "sub functions" (how do I call it properly?) are in the same spot (touching each other). Thus, function is continuous only at that specific point.
How can I finish the proof in a good, math-fashioned style using limits?
I came up with: $$ x_{0}=0in mathbb{Q} rightarrow lim_{xto 0^+} x = 0 quad land quad lim_{xto 0^-} x = 0,$$hence function is continuous at $x_{0}=0$. But I am afraid it's not good enough to be a completed proof.
Hints, tips, advices to formalize this proof are appreciated. Thanks.
real-analysis limits continuity graphing-functions
$endgroup$
We can check if some function $g(x) =...$ (some random function, irrelevant to this case) is continuous at a given point $x_{0}=c iff lim_{xto c^+} g(x) = g(c) quadlandquad lim_{xto c^-} g(x) = g(c).$
If both conditions are satisfied, then the function is continuous at such point $x_{0} = c$. I suppose so far everything is correct, I hope?
I need to prove that the function $f(x) = begin{cases}
x & text{if } x in mathbb{Q} \
0 & text{if } x in mathbb{R}/mathbb{Q}
end{cases} quad$ is continuous exactly at one point $x_{0}=0$. The domain is $D_{f}=mathbb{R}$.
I am struggling because this is a function that is "made out of two sub-functions".
It is clear to me that the reason why this function is continuous only at $x_{0}=0$ is because $0$ is a rational number, so we get $f(0)=0$ for both "sub-functions" - and that is the only point in the graph where both "sub functions" (how do I call it properly?) are in the same spot (touching each other). Thus, function is continuous only at that specific point.
How can I finish the proof in a good, math-fashioned style using limits?
I came up with: $$ x_{0}=0in mathbb{Q} rightarrow lim_{xto 0^+} x = 0 quad land quad lim_{xto 0^-} x = 0,$$hence function is continuous at $x_{0}=0$. But I am afraid it's not good enough to be a completed proof.
Hints, tips, advices to formalize this proof are appreciated. Thanks.
real-analysis limits continuity graphing-functions
real-analysis limits continuity graphing-functions
asked Dec 2 '18 at 0:13
wenoweno
1349
1349
3
$begingroup$
An $varepsilon-delta$ proof is the easiest way to do this, I think, and it is, in fact, very easy.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 0:17
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
An $varepsilon-delta$ proof is the easiest way to do this, I think, and it is, in fact, very easy.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 0:17
3
3
$begingroup$
An $varepsilon-delta$ proof is the easiest way to do this, I think, and it is, in fact, very easy.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 0:17
$begingroup$
An $varepsilon-delta$ proof is the easiest way to do this, I think, and it is, in fact, very easy.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 0:17
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $x in mathbb R$, $x$ constant. If $(rho_n)$ be a sequence of rational numbers with $$lim rho_n = x Rightarrow lim f(rho_n) = lim rho_n = x$$
If $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers with
$$lim a_n = x Rightarrow lim f(a_n) = 0$$
then, it is
$$lim f(rho_n)neqlim f(a_n) Leftrightarrow x neq 0$$
Thus, $f$ is not continuous at $mathbb R setminus {0}$.
We will now show that $f$ is continuous at $0$. It is $f(0) =0$. For all $|x| < 1$, we have :
$$|f(x) - f(0)| = |f(x)| leq max{|x|,0} = |x|$$
thus $lim_{xto 0} f(x) = f(0)$ which means that $f$ is continuous at $0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your input. May I ask why is it $lim a_{n}=x$ rather than $lim a_{n}=0$? Also, what does the $maxbig(|x|,0 )$ notation mean?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:29
1
$begingroup$
@weno $(a_n)$ is just a sequence defined to converge at some real (irrational) number $x$. That's why. Then $lim f(a_n) = f(x)$. But $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers, which means that $f(x) = 0$. Finally, the notation $max{|x|,0}$ means you're picking the maximum element out of $|x|$ and $0$. But $|x| geq 0, ; forall x in mathbb R$. Note that it comes handy since the absolute value of a function $f(x)$ can never be bigger than its own maximum.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thanks, that makes sense. Just one more question: why below the $lim$ notations does it not say that $n rightarrow infty$?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:36
1
$begingroup$
@weno It indeed is $lim_{n to infty} (...)$ but I skipped it for the sake of simplification (it's oftenly skipped when talking about sequences because the limit of a sequence is its limit to infinity anyway).
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
By the way, if any answer to your posts answers the best to your question, you may accept it using the tick button below the votes.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to deal with a point $ainmathbb{R} $ and consider the case $a=0$ and $aneq 0$.
The use of $epsilon, delta$ definition is particularly very easy here and hence we follow that approach. Let's first prove that $f$ is continuous at $a=0$. Clearly we have $f(a) =f(0)=0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given and we choose $delta =epsilon $. If $0<|x-a|=|x|<delta$ then for irrational $x$ we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |=|x|<delta =epsilon $$ and for rational $x$ we have $|f(x) - f(a) |=0<epsilon $ therefore by definition $lim_{xto a} f(x) =f(a) $ and $f$ is continuous at $a=0$.
For $aneq 0$ we need to consider the cases when $a$ is rational and when $a$ is irrational. I show here the case when $a$ is rational and $aneq 0$. Here $f(a) =0$ and $|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |$. Let $epsilon=|a|/2$ and choose any arbitrary $delta>0$. Then there is an irrational number $x$ which satisfies $$0<|x-a|<min(epsilon,delta)$$ and we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|x|=|a-(a-x) |geq |a|-|a-x|>|a|-epsilon=epsilon$$ Thus the limit of $f(x) $ as $xto a$ is not $f(a) $ and $f$ is discontinuous at $a$. You should prove in similar manner that $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ if $a$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022044%2fproving-continuity-of-f-at-exactly-one-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $x in mathbb R$, $x$ constant. If $(rho_n)$ be a sequence of rational numbers with $$lim rho_n = x Rightarrow lim f(rho_n) = lim rho_n = x$$
If $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers with
$$lim a_n = x Rightarrow lim f(a_n) = 0$$
then, it is
$$lim f(rho_n)neqlim f(a_n) Leftrightarrow x neq 0$$
Thus, $f$ is not continuous at $mathbb R setminus {0}$.
We will now show that $f$ is continuous at $0$. It is $f(0) =0$. For all $|x| < 1$, we have :
$$|f(x) - f(0)| = |f(x)| leq max{|x|,0} = |x|$$
thus $lim_{xto 0} f(x) = f(0)$ which means that $f$ is continuous at $0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your input. May I ask why is it $lim a_{n}=x$ rather than $lim a_{n}=0$? Also, what does the $maxbig(|x|,0 )$ notation mean?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:29
1
$begingroup$
@weno $(a_n)$ is just a sequence defined to converge at some real (irrational) number $x$. That's why. Then $lim f(a_n) = f(x)$. But $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers, which means that $f(x) = 0$. Finally, the notation $max{|x|,0}$ means you're picking the maximum element out of $|x|$ and $0$. But $|x| geq 0, ; forall x in mathbb R$. Note that it comes handy since the absolute value of a function $f(x)$ can never be bigger than its own maximum.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thanks, that makes sense. Just one more question: why below the $lim$ notations does it not say that $n rightarrow infty$?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:36
1
$begingroup$
@weno It indeed is $lim_{n to infty} (...)$ but I skipped it for the sake of simplification (it's oftenly skipped when talking about sequences because the limit of a sequence is its limit to infinity anyway).
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
By the way, if any answer to your posts answers the best to your question, you may accept it using the tick button below the votes.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in mathbb R$, $x$ constant. If $(rho_n)$ be a sequence of rational numbers with $$lim rho_n = x Rightarrow lim f(rho_n) = lim rho_n = x$$
If $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers with
$$lim a_n = x Rightarrow lim f(a_n) = 0$$
then, it is
$$lim f(rho_n)neqlim f(a_n) Leftrightarrow x neq 0$$
Thus, $f$ is not continuous at $mathbb R setminus {0}$.
We will now show that $f$ is continuous at $0$. It is $f(0) =0$. For all $|x| < 1$, we have :
$$|f(x) - f(0)| = |f(x)| leq max{|x|,0} = |x|$$
thus $lim_{xto 0} f(x) = f(0)$ which means that $f$ is continuous at $0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your input. May I ask why is it $lim a_{n}=x$ rather than $lim a_{n}=0$? Also, what does the $maxbig(|x|,0 )$ notation mean?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:29
1
$begingroup$
@weno $(a_n)$ is just a sequence defined to converge at some real (irrational) number $x$. That's why. Then $lim f(a_n) = f(x)$. But $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers, which means that $f(x) = 0$. Finally, the notation $max{|x|,0}$ means you're picking the maximum element out of $|x|$ and $0$. But $|x| geq 0, ; forall x in mathbb R$. Note that it comes handy since the absolute value of a function $f(x)$ can never be bigger than its own maximum.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thanks, that makes sense. Just one more question: why below the $lim$ notations does it not say that $n rightarrow infty$?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:36
1
$begingroup$
@weno It indeed is $lim_{n to infty} (...)$ but I skipped it for the sake of simplification (it's oftenly skipped when talking about sequences because the limit of a sequence is its limit to infinity anyway).
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
By the way, if any answer to your posts answers the best to your question, you may accept it using the tick button below the votes.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in mathbb R$, $x$ constant. If $(rho_n)$ be a sequence of rational numbers with $$lim rho_n = x Rightarrow lim f(rho_n) = lim rho_n = x$$
If $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers with
$$lim a_n = x Rightarrow lim f(a_n) = 0$$
then, it is
$$lim f(rho_n)neqlim f(a_n) Leftrightarrow x neq 0$$
Thus, $f$ is not continuous at $mathbb R setminus {0}$.
We will now show that $f$ is continuous at $0$. It is $f(0) =0$. For all $|x| < 1$, we have :
$$|f(x) - f(0)| = |f(x)| leq max{|x|,0} = |x|$$
thus $lim_{xto 0} f(x) = f(0)$ which means that $f$ is continuous at $0$.
$endgroup$
Let $x in mathbb R$, $x$ constant. If $(rho_n)$ be a sequence of rational numbers with $$lim rho_n = x Rightarrow lim f(rho_n) = lim rho_n = x$$
If $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers with
$$lim a_n = x Rightarrow lim f(a_n) = 0$$
then, it is
$$lim f(rho_n)neqlim f(a_n) Leftrightarrow x neq 0$$
Thus, $f$ is not continuous at $mathbb R setminus {0}$.
We will now show that $f$ is continuous at $0$. It is $f(0) =0$. For all $|x| < 1$, we have :
$$|f(x) - f(0)| = |f(x)| leq max{|x|,0} = |x|$$
thus $lim_{xto 0} f(x) = f(0)$ which means that $f$ is continuous at $0$.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 0:21
RebellosRebellos
14.5k31246
14.5k31246
$begingroup$
Thanks for your input. May I ask why is it $lim a_{n}=x$ rather than $lim a_{n}=0$? Also, what does the $maxbig(|x|,0 )$ notation mean?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:29
1
$begingroup$
@weno $(a_n)$ is just a sequence defined to converge at some real (irrational) number $x$. That's why. Then $lim f(a_n) = f(x)$. But $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers, which means that $f(x) = 0$. Finally, the notation $max{|x|,0}$ means you're picking the maximum element out of $|x|$ and $0$. But $|x| geq 0, ; forall x in mathbb R$. Note that it comes handy since the absolute value of a function $f(x)$ can never be bigger than its own maximum.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thanks, that makes sense. Just one more question: why below the $lim$ notations does it not say that $n rightarrow infty$?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:36
1
$begingroup$
@weno It indeed is $lim_{n to infty} (...)$ but I skipped it for the sake of simplification (it's oftenly skipped when talking about sequences because the limit of a sequence is its limit to infinity anyway).
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
By the way, if any answer to your posts answers the best to your question, you may accept it using the tick button below the votes.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for your input. May I ask why is it $lim a_{n}=x$ rather than $lim a_{n}=0$? Also, what does the $maxbig(|x|,0 )$ notation mean?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:29
1
$begingroup$
@weno $(a_n)$ is just a sequence defined to converge at some real (irrational) number $x$. That's why. Then $lim f(a_n) = f(x)$. But $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers, which means that $f(x) = 0$. Finally, the notation $max{|x|,0}$ means you're picking the maximum element out of $|x|$ and $0$. But $|x| geq 0, ; forall x in mathbb R$. Note that it comes handy since the absolute value of a function $f(x)$ can never be bigger than its own maximum.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thanks, that makes sense. Just one more question: why below the $lim$ notations does it not say that $n rightarrow infty$?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:36
1
$begingroup$
@weno It indeed is $lim_{n to infty} (...)$ but I skipped it for the sake of simplification (it's oftenly skipped when talking about sequences because the limit of a sequence is its limit to infinity anyway).
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
By the way, if any answer to your posts answers the best to your question, you may accept it using the tick button below the votes.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:52
$begingroup$
Thanks for your input. May I ask why is it $lim a_{n}=x$ rather than $lim a_{n}=0$? Also, what does the $maxbig(|x|,0 )$ notation mean?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:29
$begingroup$
Thanks for your input. May I ask why is it $lim a_{n}=x$ rather than $lim a_{n}=0$? Also, what does the $maxbig(|x|,0 )$ notation mean?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:29
1
1
$begingroup$
@weno $(a_n)$ is just a sequence defined to converge at some real (irrational) number $x$. That's why. Then $lim f(a_n) = f(x)$. But $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers, which means that $f(x) = 0$. Finally, the notation $max{|x|,0}$ means you're picking the maximum element out of $|x|$ and $0$. But $|x| geq 0, ; forall x in mathbb R$. Note that it comes handy since the absolute value of a function $f(x)$ can never be bigger than its own maximum.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
@weno $(a_n)$ is just a sequence defined to converge at some real (irrational) number $x$. That's why. Then $lim f(a_n) = f(x)$. But $(a_n)$ is a sequence of irrational numbers, which means that $f(x) = 0$. Finally, the notation $max{|x|,0}$ means you're picking the maximum element out of $|x|$ and $0$. But $|x| geq 0, ; forall x in mathbb R$. Note that it comes handy since the absolute value of a function $f(x)$ can never be bigger than its own maximum.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Thanks, that makes sense. Just one more question: why below the $lim$ notations does it not say that $n rightarrow infty$?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:36
$begingroup$
Thanks, that makes sense. Just one more question: why below the $lim$ notations does it not say that $n rightarrow infty$?
$endgroup$
– weno
Dec 2 '18 at 0:36
1
1
$begingroup$
@weno It indeed is $lim_{n to infty} (...)$ but I skipped it for the sake of simplification (it's oftenly skipped when talking about sequences because the limit of a sequence is its limit to infinity anyway).
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
@weno It indeed is $lim_{n to infty} (...)$ but I skipped it for the sake of simplification (it's oftenly skipped when talking about sequences because the limit of a sequence is its limit to infinity anyway).
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:38
$begingroup$
By the way, if any answer to your posts answers the best to your question, you may accept it using the tick button below the votes.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:52
$begingroup$
By the way, if any answer to your posts answers the best to your question, you may accept it using the tick button below the votes.
$endgroup$
– Rebellos
Dec 2 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to deal with a point $ainmathbb{R} $ and consider the case $a=0$ and $aneq 0$.
The use of $epsilon, delta$ definition is particularly very easy here and hence we follow that approach. Let's first prove that $f$ is continuous at $a=0$. Clearly we have $f(a) =f(0)=0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given and we choose $delta =epsilon $. If $0<|x-a|=|x|<delta$ then for irrational $x$ we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |=|x|<delta =epsilon $$ and for rational $x$ we have $|f(x) - f(a) |=0<epsilon $ therefore by definition $lim_{xto a} f(x) =f(a) $ and $f$ is continuous at $a=0$.
For $aneq 0$ we need to consider the cases when $a$ is rational and when $a$ is irrational. I show here the case when $a$ is rational and $aneq 0$. Here $f(a) =0$ and $|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |$. Let $epsilon=|a|/2$ and choose any arbitrary $delta>0$. Then there is an irrational number $x$ which satisfies $$0<|x-a|<min(epsilon,delta)$$ and we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|x|=|a-(a-x) |geq |a|-|a-x|>|a|-epsilon=epsilon$$ Thus the limit of $f(x) $ as $xto a$ is not $f(a) $ and $f$ is discontinuous at $a$. You should prove in similar manner that $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ if $a$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to deal with a point $ainmathbb{R} $ and consider the case $a=0$ and $aneq 0$.
The use of $epsilon, delta$ definition is particularly very easy here and hence we follow that approach. Let's first prove that $f$ is continuous at $a=0$. Clearly we have $f(a) =f(0)=0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given and we choose $delta =epsilon $. If $0<|x-a|=|x|<delta$ then for irrational $x$ we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |=|x|<delta =epsilon $$ and for rational $x$ we have $|f(x) - f(a) |=0<epsilon $ therefore by definition $lim_{xto a} f(x) =f(a) $ and $f$ is continuous at $a=0$.
For $aneq 0$ we need to consider the cases when $a$ is rational and when $a$ is irrational. I show here the case when $a$ is rational and $aneq 0$. Here $f(a) =0$ and $|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |$. Let $epsilon=|a|/2$ and choose any arbitrary $delta>0$. Then there is an irrational number $x$ which satisfies $$0<|x-a|<min(epsilon,delta)$$ and we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|x|=|a-(a-x) |geq |a|-|a-x|>|a|-epsilon=epsilon$$ Thus the limit of $f(x) $ as $xto a$ is not $f(a) $ and $f$ is discontinuous at $a$. You should prove in similar manner that $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ if $a$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You need to deal with a point $ainmathbb{R} $ and consider the case $a=0$ and $aneq 0$.
The use of $epsilon, delta$ definition is particularly very easy here and hence we follow that approach. Let's first prove that $f$ is continuous at $a=0$. Clearly we have $f(a) =f(0)=0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given and we choose $delta =epsilon $. If $0<|x-a|=|x|<delta$ then for irrational $x$ we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |=|x|<delta =epsilon $$ and for rational $x$ we have $|f(x) - f(a) |=0<epsilon $ therefore by definition $lim_{xto a} f(x) =f(a) $ and $f$ is continuous at $a=0$.
For $aneq 0$ we need to consider the cases when $a$ is rational and when $a$ is irrational. I show here the case when $a$ is rational and $aneq 0$. Here $f(a) =0$ and $|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |$. Let $epsilon=|a|/2$ and choose any arbitrary $delta>0$. Then there is an irrational number $x$ which satisfies $$0<|x-a|<min(epsilon,delta)$$ and we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|x|=|a-(a-x) |geq |a|-|a-x|>|a|-epsilon=epsilon$$ Thus the limit of $f(x) $ as $xto a$ is not $f(a) $ and $f$ is discontinuous at $a$. You should prove in similar manner that $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ if $a$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
You need to deal with a point $ainmathbb{R} $ and consider the case $a=0$ and $aneq 0$.
The use of $epsilon, delta$ definition is particularly very easy here and hence we follow that approach. Let's first prove that $f$ is continuous at $a=0$. Clearly we have $f(a) =f(0)=0$. Let $epsilon >0$ be given and we choose $delta =epsilon $. If $0<|x-a|=|x|<delta$ then for irrational $x$ we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |=|x|<delta =epsilon $$ and for rational $x$ we have $|f(x) - f(a) |=0<epsilon $ therefore by definition $lim_{xto a} f(x) =f(a) $ and $f$ is continuous at $a=0$.
For $aneq 0$ we need to consider the cases when $a$ is rational and when $a$ is irrational. I show here the case when $a$ is rational and $aneq 0$. Here $f(a) =0$ and $|f(x) - f(a) |=|f(x) |$. Let $epsilon=|a|/2$ and choose any arbitrary $delta>0$. Then there is an irrational number $x$ which satisfies $$0<|x-a|<min(epsilon,delta)$$ and we have $$|f(x) - f(a) |=|x|=|a-(a-x) |geq |a|-|a-x|>|a|-epsilon=epsilon$$ Thus the limit of $f(x) $ as $xto a$ is not $f(a) $ and $f$ is discontinuous at $a$. You should prove in similar manner that $f$ is discontinuous at $a$ if $a$ is irrational.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 1:49
Paramanand SinghParamanand Singh
49.6k556163
49.6k556163
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3022044%2fproving-continuity-of-f-at-exactly-one-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
An $varepsilon-delta$ proof is the easiest way to do this, I think, and it is, in fact, very easy.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 2 '18 at 0:17