Example of GCD in UFD that can't be expressed as linear combination












6












$begingroup$


I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    6












    $begingroup$


    I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
    I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      6












      6








      6


      6



      $begingroup$


      I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
      I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I proved that any two elements in PID have GCD and it can be expressed as linear combination of those two elements.
      I know that even in case of UFD GCD exists but it may not be expressed as linear combination. Can anyone give me an example for which GCD is not expressed as linear combination?







      number-theory ring-theory greatest-common-divisor integral-domain unique-factorization-domains






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 15 '18 at 7:46









      qwr

      6,63342755




      6,63342755










      asked Apr 3 '16 at 6:03









      user298543user298543

      413




      413






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
            $endgroup$
            – qwr
            Dec 15 '18 at 7:49



















          6












          $begingroup$

          Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



            $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1725612%2fexample-of-gcd-in-ufd-that-cant-be-expressed-as-linear-combination%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              9












              $begingroup$

              It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                $endgroup$
                – qwr
                Dec 15 '18 at 7:49
















              9












              $begingroup$

              It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                $endgroup$
                – qwr
                Dec 15 '18 at 7:49














              9












              9








              9





              $begingroup$

              It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              It is true that in any UFD, any two elements have a GCD (this comes right away from the definition), but the Bezout property (i.e. such a GCD is a linear combination) does not hold in general. Counter-example: in the polynomial ring $mathbb{Z}[t]$, $2$ and $t$ are coprime, but the ideal $(2,t)$ is strictly contained in the whole ring, whereas it should be equal to it if Bezout were available.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Feb 28 '17 at 14:37









              Andreas Caranti

              56.5k34395




              56.5k34395










              answered Apr 4 '16 at 8:34









              nguyen quang donguyen quang do

              8,6441723




              8,6441723












              • $begingroup$
                To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                $endgroup$
                – qwr
                Dec 15 '18 at 7:49


















              • $begingroup$
                To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
                $endgroup$
                – qwr
                Dec 15 '18 at 7:49
















              $begingroup$
              To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
              $endgroup$
              – qwr
              Dec 15 '18 at 7:49




              $begingroup$
              To clarify: the GCD of $2$ and $t$ is $1$, and the ideal $(1)$ is the entire ring.
              $endgroup$
              – qwr
              Dec 15 '18 at 7:49











              6












              $begingroup$

              Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                6












                $begingroup$

                Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Let's consider $R[x,y]$. The GCD of $x^2y$ and $xy^2$ is $xy$ so we are looking for $a,bin R[x,y]$ such that $ax^2y+bxy^2=xyRightarrow ax+by=1$. But the constant term of both $ax$ and $by$ is $0$, so the constant term of their sum is also zero. Contradiction.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Feb 28 '17 at 14:31

























                  answered Apr 3 '16 at 6:19









                  Stella BidermanStella Biderman

                  26.6k63375




                  26.6k63375























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                      $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                        $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                          $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          First we have the result that $mathbb Z$ is a UFD implies $mathbb Z[x, y, z]$ is a UFD.



                          $operatorname{gcd}(xy, xz) = x$ but $x$ cannot be written as a linear combination of $xy$ and $xz$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 5 '18 at 17:48









                          qwrqwr

                          6,63342755




                          6,63342755






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1725612%2fexample-of-gcd-in-ufd-that-cant-be-expressed-as-linear-combination%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Plaza Victoria

                              Puebla de Zaragoza

                              Change location of user folders through cmd or PowerShell?