$( mathscr{X}, d_x)$ and $( mathscr{Y}, d_y)$ metric spaces ..Proof Verification
$begingroup$
Let
$( mathscr{X}, d_x)$ and $( mathscr{Y}, d_y)$ be two metric spaces and
$ D subset mathscr{X} $ a compact set.
To show is, that if
$f: D rightarrow mathscr{Y} $is continous and injective, then
$ f^{-1} :f(D) rightarrow D $
is also continous.
My Idea:
Since $D$ is compact, it is also closed.
$$ (f^{-1})^{-1} (D)= f(D) $$
And since $f$ is continous and $D$ compact, is also $f(D)$ compact.
As Subset of the metric space $mathscr{Y} $ is $f(D)$ also closed.
So the inverse image of a closed image is also closed, therefore is $f^{-1}$ is also continous.
Does that makes sense to you? :)
but where does the injectivity comes in?
Any help is appreciated !
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Let
$( mathscr{X}, d_x)$ and $( mathscr{Y}, d_y)$ be two metric spaces and
$ D subset mathscr{X} $ a compact set.
To show is, that if
$f: D rightarrow mathscr{Y} $is continous and injective, then
$ f^{-1} :f(D) rightarrow D $
is also continous.
My Idea:
Since $D$ is compact, it is also closed.
$$ (f^{-1})^{-1} (D)= f(D) $$
And since $f$ is continous and $D$ compact, is also $f(D)$ compact.
As Subset of the metric space $mathscr{Y} $ is $f(D)$ also closed.
So the inverse image of a closed image is also closed, therefore is $f^{-1}$ is also continous.
Does that makes sense to you? :)
but where does the injectivity comes in?
Any help is appreciated !
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by “completed”? Do you mean “closed”?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
yes, I edited it
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct. If $f$ was not injective, then $f^{-1}$ would not exist.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos The proof is not correct at all. He needs to verify the condition for any closed subset of $D$, not just $D$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 5 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
@Federico, how do I do that?
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:43
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Let
$( mathscr{X}, d_x)$ and $( mathscr{Y}, d_y)$ be two metric spaces and
$ D subset mathscr{X} $ a compact set.
To show is, that if
$f: D rightarrow mathscr{Y} $is continous and injective, then
$ f^{-1} :f(D) rightarrow D $
is also continous.
My Idea:
Since $D$ is compact, it is also closed.
$$ (f^{-1})^{-1} (D)= f(D) $$
And since $f$ is continous and $D$ compact, is also $f(D)$ compact.
As Subset of the metric space $mathscr{Y} $ is $f(D)$ also closed.
So the inverse image of a closed image is also closed, therefore is $f^{-1}$ is also continous.
Does that makes sense to you? :)
but where does the injectivity comes in?
Any help is appreciated !
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification
$endgroup$
Let
$( mathscr{X}, d_x)$ and $( mathscr{Y}, d_y)$ be two metric spaces and
$ D subset mathscr{X} $ a compact set.
To show is, that if
$f: D rightarrow mathscr{Y} $is continous and injective, then
$ f^{-1} :f(D) rightarrow D $
is also continous.
My Idea:
Since $D$ is compact, it is also closed.
$$ (f^{-1})^{-1} (D)= f(D) $$
And since $f$ is continous and $D$ compact, is also $f(D)$ compact.
As Subset of the metric space $mathscr{Y} $ is $f(D)$ also closed.
So the inverse image of a closed image is also closed, therefore is $f^{-1}$ is also continous.
Does that makes sense to you? :)
but where does the injectivity comes in?
Any help is appreciated !
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification
real-analysis general-topology proof-verification
edited Dec 5 '18 at 18:38
constant94
asked Dec 5 '18 at 18:15
constant94constant94
6310
6310
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by “completed”? Do you mean “closed”?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
yes, I edited it
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct. If $f$ was not injective, then $f^{-1}$ would not exist.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos The proof is not correct at all. He needs to verify the condition for any closed subset of $D$, not just $D$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 5 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
@Federico, how do I do that?
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:43
|
show 4 more comments
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by “completed”? Do you mean “closed”?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
yes, I edited it
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct. If $f$ was not injective, then $f^{-1}$ would not exist.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos The proof is not correct at all. He needs to verify the condition for any closed subset of $D$, not just $D$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 5 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
@Federico, how do I do that?
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:43
1
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by “completed”? Do you mean “closed”?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
What do you mean by “completed”? Do you mean “closed”?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
yes, I edited it
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
yes, I edited it
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct. If $f$ was not injective, then $f^{-1}$ would not exist.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct. If $f$ was not injective, then $f^{-1}$ would not exist.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos The proof is not correct at all. He needs to verify the condition for any closed subset of $D$, not just $D$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 5 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos The proof is not correct at all. He needs to verify the condition for any closed subset of $D$, not just $D$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 5 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
@Federico, how do I do that?
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:43
$begingroup$
@Federico, how do I do that?
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:43
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $g=f^{-1}:f(D)to D$. We show that $g$ is continuous if $g^{-1}(E)$ is closed for every $Esubset D$ closed.
Fix $Esubset D$ closed. Since $D$ is compact, $E$ is also compact. Therefore $g^{-1}(E)=f(E)$ is compact, hence closed.
Notice that the proof holds for every $f:Xto Y$ where $X$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff. No need for a metric structure.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027440%2fmathscrx-d-x-and-mathscry-d-y-metric-spaces-proof-verificati%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $g=f^{-1}:f(D)to D$. We show that $g$ is continuous if $g^{-1}(E)$ is closed for every $Esubset D$ closed.
Fix $Esubset D$ closed. Since $D$ is compact, $E$ is also compact. Therefore $g^{-1}(E)=f(E)$ is compact, hence closed.
Notice that the proof holds for every $f:Xto Y$ where $X$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff. No need for a metric structure.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $g=f^{-1}:f(D)to D$. We show that $g$ is continuous if $g^{-1}(E)$ is closed for every $Esubset D$ closed.
Fix $Esubset D$ closed. Since $D$ is compact, $E$ is also compact. Therefore $g^{-1}(E)=f(E)$ is compact, hence closed.
Notice that the proof holds for every $f:Xto Y$ where $X$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff. No need for a metric structure.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $g=f^{-1}:f(D)to D$. We show that $g$ is continuous if $g^{-1}(E)$ is closed for every $Esubset D$ closed.
Fix $Esubset D$ closed. Since $D$ is compact, $E$ is also compact. Therefore $g^{-1}(E)=f(E)$ is compact, hence closed.
Notice that the proof holds for every $f:Xto Y$ where $X$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff. No need for a metric structure.
$endgroup$
Let $g=f^{-1}:f(D)to D$. We show that $g$ is continuous if $g^{-1}(E)$ is closed for every $Esubset D$ closed.
Fix $Esubset D$ closed. Since $D$ is compact, $E$ is also compact. Therefore $g^{-1}(E)=f(E)$ is compact, hence closed.
Notice that the proof holds for every $f:Xto Y$ where $X$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff. No need for a metric structure.
answered Dec 5 '18 at 18:47
FedericoFederico
5,039514
5,039514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027440%2fmathscrx-d-x-and-mathscry-d-y-metric-spaces-proof-verificati%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by “completed”? Do you mean “closed”?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
yes, I edited it
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:39
$begingroup$
Your proof is correct. If $f$ was not injective, then $f^{-1}$ would not exist.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 5 '18 at 18:40
$begingroup$
@JoséCarlosSantos The proof is not correct at all. He needs to verify the condition for any closed subset of $D$, not just $D$ itself.
$endgroup$
– Federico
Dec 5 '18 at 18:41
$begingroup$
@Federico, how do I do that?
$endgroup$
– constant94
Dec 5 '18 at 18:43