Scaling - Rigid or Non-Rigid Transformation












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to look for a precise definition of what rigid and non-rigid transformation is, and to which categories does 'scaling' belong. This is connected to a Point-Set registration problem that I am trying to solve using Coherent Point Drift algorithm CPD.



Wikipedia and other sources claim that a rigid transformation preserves shape and size i.e distance between two points remains the same. This means that 'scaling' would not be considered to be in this category as the size increases.



This means that it has to be a non-rigid transformation. If this is true, than performing a non-rigid transformation should result in no translation, yet the translation in CPD is performed as seen in Figure 4 in the paper.



Moreover, there are affine transformations, and from my understanding they capture both forms of transformation. Well, if this is the case why do we bother with non-rigid transformations? Moreover, a result of applying non-rigid ( assuming that translation is performed as in paper) and affine transformation should result in the same thing ( but authors own implementation produces different results), which makes me think that they are two different things.



Am I missing something obvious or is that a mistake?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to look for a precise definition of what rigid and non-rigid transformation is, and to which categories does 'scaling' belong. This is connected to a Point-Set registration problem that I am trying to solve using Coherent Point Drift algorithm CPD.



    Wikipedia and other sources claim that a rigid transformation preserves shape and size i.e distance between two points remains the same. This means that 'scaling' would not be considered to be in this category as the size increases.



    This means that it has to be a non-rigid transformation. If this is true, than performing a non-rigid transformation should result in no translation, yet the translation in CPD is performed as seen in Figure 4 in the paper.



    Moreover, there are affine transformations, and from my understanding they capture both forms of transformation. Well, if this is the case why do we bother with non-rigid transformations? Moreover, a result of applying non-rigid ( assuming that translation is performed as in paper) and affine transformation should result in the same thing ( but authors own implementation produces different results), which makes me think that they are two different things.



    Am I missing something obvious or is that a mistake?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to look for a precise definition of what rigid and non-rigid transformation is, and to which categories does 'scaling' belong. This is connected to a Point-Set registration problem that I am trying to solve using Coherent Point Drift algorithm CPD.



      Wikipedia and other sources claim that a rigid transformation preserves shape and size i.e distance between two points remains the same. This means that 'scaling' would not be considered to be in this category as the size increases.



      This means that it has to be a non-rigid transformation. If this is true, than performing a non-rigid transformation should result in no translation, yet the translation in CPD is performed as seen in Figure 4 in the paper.



      Moreover, there are affine transformations, and from my understanding they capture both forms of transformation. Well, if this is the case why do we bother with non-rigid transformations? Moreover, a result of applying non-rigid ( assuming that translation is performed as in paper) and affine transformation should result in the same thing ( but authors own implementation produces different results), which makes me think that they are two different things.



      Am I missing something obvious or is that a mistake?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am trying to look for a precise definition of what rigid and non-rigid transformation is, and to which categories does 'scaling' belong. This is connected to a Point-Set registration problem that I am trying to solve using Coherent Point Drift algorithm CPD.



      Wikipedia and other sources claim that a rigid transformation preserves shape and size i.e distance between two points remains the same. This means that 'scaling' would not be considered to be in this category as the size increases.



      This means that it has to be a non-rigid transformation. If this is true, than performing a non-rigid transformation should result in no translation, yet the translation in CPD is performed as seen in Figure 4 in the paper.



      Moreover, there are affine transformations, and from my understanding they capture both forms of transformation. Well, if this is the case why do we bother with non-rigid transformations? Moreover, a result of applying non-rigid ( assuming that translation is performed as in paper) and affine transformation should result in the same thing ( but authors own implementation produces different results), which makes me think that they are two different things.



      Am I missing something obvious or is that a mistake?







      transformation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 1 '17 at 7:51









      Johhny BravoJohhny Bravo

      13




      13






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          A Rigid transformation is defined as rotation and translation. Think of rigid transformations as things you can do to 'solid' objects - like a glass cup. I can move the cup anywhere I wish, and spin it around, but I can't change it's scale.



          As for affine transformations these include translations, rotations, scaling, sheer.



          Both Affine and Rigid transformations are parametric, since we can create a single matrix which when applied on any point. See this page 2D Affine Transformations. As you can see, the product of all these matrices form the Affine transformation matrix.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2212743%2fscaling-rigid-or-non-rigid-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            A Rigid transformation is defined as rotation and translation. Think of rigid transformations as things you can do to 'solid' objects - like a glass cup. I can move the cup anywhere I wish, and spin it around, but I can't change it's scale.



            As for affine transformations these include translations, rotations, scaling, sheer.



            Both Affine and Rigid transformations are parametric, since we can create a single matrix which when applied on any point. See this page 2D Affine Transformations. As you can see, the product of all these matrices form the Affine transformation matrix.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              A Rigid transformation is defined as rotation and translation. Think of rigid transformations as things you can do to 'solid' objects - like a glass cup. I can move the cup anywhere I wish, and spin it around, but I can't change it's scale.



              As for affine transformations these include translations, rotations, scaling, sheer.



              Both Affine and Rigid transformations are parametric, since we can create a single matrix which when applied on any point. See this page 2D Affine Transformations. As you can see, the product of all these matrices form the Affine transformation matrix.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                A Rigid transformation is defined as rotation and translation. Think of rigid transformations as things you can do to 'solid' objects - like a glass cup. I can move the cup anywhere I wish, and spin it around, but I can't change it's scale.



                As for affine transformations these include translations, rotations, scaling, sheer.



                Both Affine and Rigid transformations are parametric, since we can create a single matrix which when applied on any point. See this page 2D Affine Transformations. As you can see, the product of all these matrices form the Affine transformation matrix.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                A Rigid transformation is defined as rotation and translation. Think of rigid transformations as things you can do to 'solid' objects - like a glass cup. I can move the cup anywhere I wish, and spin it around, but I can't change it's scale.



                As for affine transformations these include translations, rotations, scaling, sheer.



                Both Affine and Rigid transformations are parametric, since we can create a single matrix which when applied on any point. See this page 2D Affine Transformations. As you can see, the product of all these matrices form the Affine transformation matrix.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jul 28 '17 at 16:19









                ranhan429ranhan429

                1




                1






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2212743%2fscaling-rigid-or-non-rigid-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...