An integral estimate in conformal geometry












3












$begingroup$


Let $g_0$ be a Riemannian metric of positive scalar curvature $R_0$ on a closed 4-manifold, and for some fixed constant $C$, define the set
begin{equation}
mathcal{S} = {uin C^infty(M): ||u||_{W^{1,12}(M)}leq C}.
end{equation}

Then consider the set of conformal metrics
begin{equation}
mathcal{T} = {g=e^{2u}g_0:uinmathcal{S},~R_ggeq C(g_0)>0}.
end{equation}

The motivation behind this is I have a set of smooth solutions $u$ satisfying some PDE, for which I have uniform $W^{1,12}$ estimates and know that the corresponding scalar curvatures are uniformly bounded (i.e. a bound depending only on $g_0$) away from zero.



I am trying to obtain the following estimate:



begin{equation}tag{1}
int R^p|nabla^2 u|^4|nabla u|^4 ,dv_gleq Cint R^{p+6},dv_g + C
end{equation}

where $C$ again depends only on $g_0$. When $p>0$ I have no problem: the conformal transformation law for the scalar curvature implies



begin{equation}
|R|leq CBig(|R_0| + |nabla u|^2 + |Delta u|Big)\
implies|R|^p leq CBig(|R_0|^p + |nabla u|^{2p} + |Delta u|^pBig)
end{equation}



for some uniform $C$, and we can plug this into $(1)$ and apply Holder etc. But when $p<0$, I am really stuck - one attempt is to use $R^{-1}leq C$ (which follows from $Rgeq C>0$), but then I'm not sure how to reintroduce to scalar curvature to get something like $(1)$. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from math.stackexchange.com Dec 23 '18 at 0:32


This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a bit specialistic, if you do not obtain answers consider flagging for migration to MathOverflow.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 17 '18 at 10:34
















3












$begingroup$


Let $g_0$ be a Riemannian metric of positive scalar curvature $R_0$ on a closed 4-manifold, and for some fixed constant $C$, define the set
begin{equation}
mathcal{S} = {uin C^infty(M): ||u||_{W^{1,12}(M)}leq C}.
end{equation}

Then consider the set of conformal metrics
begin{equation}
mathcal{T} = {g=e^{2u}g_0:uinmathcal{S},~R_ggeq C(g_0)>0}.
end{equation}

The motivation behind this is I have a set of smooth solutions $u$ satisfying some PDE, for which I have uniform $W^{1,12}$ estimates and know that the corresponding scalar curvatures are uniformly bounded (i.e. a bound depending only on $g_0$) away from zero.



I am trying to obtain the following estimate:



begin{equation}tag{1}
int R^p|nabla^2 u|^4|nabla u|^4 ,dv_gleq Cint R^{p+6},dv_g + C
end{equation}

where $C$ again depends only on $g_0$. When $p>0$ I have no problem: the conformal transformation law for the scalar curvature implies



begin{equation}
|R|leq CBig(|R_0| + |nabla u|^2 + |Delta u|Big)\
implies|R|^p leq CBig(|R_0|^p + |nabla u|^{2p} + |Delta u|^pBig)
end{equation}



for some uniform $C$, and we can plug this into $(1)$ and apply Holder etc. But when $p<0$, I am really stuck - one attempt is to use $R^{-1}leq C$ (which follows from $Rgeq C>0$), but then I'm not sure how to reintroduce to scalar curvature to get something like $(1)$. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from math.stackexchange.com Dec 23 '18 at 0:32


This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a bit specialistic, if you do not obtain answers consider flagging for migration to MathOverflow.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 17 '18 at 10:34














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Let $g_0$ be a Riemannian metric of positive scalar curvature $R_0$ on a closed 4-manifold, and for some fixed constant $C$, define the set
begin{equation}
mathcal{S} = {uin C^infty(M): ||u||_{W^{1,12}(M)}leq C}.
end{equation}

Then consider the set of conformal metrics
begin{equation}
mathcal{T} = {g=e^{2u}g_0:uinmathcal{S},~R_ggeq C(g_0)>0}.
end{equation}

The motivation behind this is I have a set of smooth solutions $u$ satisfying some PDE, for which I have uniform $W^{1,12}$ estimates and know that the corresponding scalar curvatures are uniformly bounded (i.e. a bound depending only on $g_0$) away from zero.



I am trying to obtain the following estimate:



begin{equation}tag{1}
int R^p|nabla^2 u|^4|nabla u|^4 ,dv_gleq Cint R^{p+6},dv_g + C
end{equation}

where $C$ again depends only on $g_0$. When $p>0$ I have no problem: the conformal transformation law for the scalar curvature implies



begin{equation}
|R|leq CBig(|R_0| + |nabla u|^2 + |Delta u|Big)\
implies|R|^p leq CBig(|R_0|^p + |nabla u|^{2p} + |Delta u|^pBig)
end{equation}



for some uniform $C$, and we can plug this into $(1)$ and apply Holder etc. But when $p<0$, I am really stuck - one attempt is to use $R^{-1}leq C$ (which follows from $Rgeq C>0$), but then I'm not sure how to reintroduce to scalar curvature to get something like $(1)$. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $g_0$ be a Riemannian metric of positive scalar curvature $R_0$ on a closed 4-manifold, and for some fixed constant $C$, define the set
begin{equation}
mathcal{S} = {uin C^infty(M): ||u||_{W^{1,12}(M)}leq C}.
end{equation}

Then consider the set of conformal metrics
begin{equation}
mathcal{T} = {g=e^{2u}g_0:uinmathcal{S},~R_ggeq C(g_0)>0}.
end{equation}

The motivation behind this is I have a set of smooth solutions $u$ satisfying some PDE, for which I have uniform $W^{1,12}$ estimates and know that the corresponding scalar curvatures are uniformly bounded (i.e. a bound depending only on $g_0$) away from zero.



I am trying to obtain the following estimate:



begin{equation}tag{1}
int R^p|nabla^2 u|^4|nabla u|^4 ,dv_gleq Cint R^{p+6},dv_g + C
end{equation}

where $C$ again depends only on $g_0$. When $p>0$ I have no problem: the conformal transformation law for the scalar curvature implies



begin{equation}
|R|leq CBig(|R_0| + |nabla u|^2 + |Delta u|Big)\
implies|R|^p leq CBig(|R_0|^p + |nabla u|^{2p} + |Delta u|^pBig)
end{equation}



for some uniform $C$, and we can plug this into $(1)$ and apply Holder etc. But when $p<0$, I am really stuck - one attempt is to use $R^{-1}leq C$ (which follows from $Rgeq C>0$), but then I'm not sure how to reintroduce to scalar curvature to get something like $(1)$. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!







dg.differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curvature conformal-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 13 '18 at 23:26









jl2jl2

1632




1632




migrated from math.stackexchange.com Dec 23 '18 at 0:32


This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.









migrated from math.stackexchange.com Dec 23 '18 at 0:32


This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a bit specialistic, if you do not obtain answers consider flagging for migration to MathOverflow.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 17 '18 at 10:34














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a bit specialistic, if you do not obtain answers consider flagging for migration to MathOverflow.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Dec 17 '18 at 10:34








1




1




$begingroup$
This is a bit specialistic, if you do not obtain answers consider flagging for migration to MathOverflow.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 17 '18 at 10:34




$begingroup$
This is a bit specialistic, if you do not obtain answers consider flagging for migration to MathOverflow.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Dec 17 '18 at 10:34










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319322%2fan-integral-estimate-in-conformal-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319322%2fan-integral-estimate-in-conformal-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...