Why the alternate form of $frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$ is $sqrt[6]{-1}$?












0












$begingroup$


The alternate form of:
$$frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$$
is
$$sqrt[6]{-1}$$
(I know that thanks to WolframAlpha.)



What are the arithmetic actions that gets us from the former to the latter?






algebra-precalculus complex-numbers arithmetic







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well you can simply raise $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ to the sixth power and find out that you get $-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:35










  • $begingroup$
    The two forms are not equivalent. $sqrt[6]{-1}$ is an ambiguous presentation of 6 different complex numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












  • $begingroup$
    Related: "Principal $n$th root of a complex number".
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:46
















0












$begingroup$


The alternate form of:
$$frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$$
is
$$sqrt[6]{-1}$$
(I know that thanks to WolframAlpha.)



What are the arithmetic actions that gets us from the former to the latter?






algebra-precalculus complex-numbers arithmetic







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well you can simply raise $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ to the sixth power and find out that you get $-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:35










  • $begingroup$
    The two forms are not equivalent. $sqrt[6]{-1}$ is an ambiguous presentation of 6 different complex numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












  • $begingroup$
    Related: "Principal $n$th root of a complex number".
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:46














0












0








0





$begingroup$


The alternate form of:
$$frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$$
is
$$sqrt[6]{-1}$$
(I know that thanks to WolframAlpha.)



What are the arithmetic actions that gets us from the former to the latter?






algebra-precalculus complex-numbers arithmetic







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The alternate form of:
$$frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$$
is
$$sqrt[6]{-1}$$
(I know that thanks to WolframAlpha.)



What are the arithmetic actions that gets us from the former to the latter?






algebra-precalculus complex-numbers arithmetic




algebra-precalculus complex-numbers arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '18 at 22:51









gimusi

92.9k84494




92.9k84494










asked Dec 13 '18 at 22:33









HeyJudeHeyJude

1687




1687








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well you can simply raise $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ to the sixth power and find out that you get $-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:35










  • $begingroup$
    The two forms are not equivalent. $sqrt[6]{-1}$ is an ambiguous presentation of 6 different complex numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












  • $begingroup$
    Related: "Principal $n$th root of a complex number".
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:46














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well you can simply raise $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ to the sixth power and find out that you get $-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – SmileyCraft
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:35










  • $begingroup$
    The two forms are not equivalent. $sqrt[6]{-1}$ is an ambiguous presentation of 6 different complex numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












  • $begingroup$
    Related: "Principal $n$th root of a complex number".
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 13 '18 at 22:46








2




2




$begingroup$
Well you can simply raise $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ to the sixth power and find out that you get $-1$.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 13 '18 at 22:35




$begingroup$
Well you can simply raise $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ to the sixth power and find out that you get $-1$.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
Dec 13 '18 at 22:35












$begingroup$
The two forms are not equivalent. $sqrt[6]{-1}$ is an ambiguous presentation of 6 different complex numbers.
$endgroup$
– user
Dec 13 '18 at 22:44






$begingroup$
The two forms are not equivalent. $sqrt[6]{-1}$ is an ambiguous presentation of 6 different complex numbers.
$endgroup$
– user
Dec 13 '18 at 22:44














$begingroup$
Related: "Principal $n$th root of a complex number".
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 13 '18 at 22:46




$begingroup$
Related: "Principal $n$th root of a complex number".
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 13 '18 at 22:46










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

That's a terrible notation by Wolfram. There are six sixth roots of $-1$, so you cannot tell which one it is when you write $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



The notation makes sense when we write $sqrt{2}$, say, because we take the usual convention that it is the positive root. But such choice is meaningless for arbitrary roots.



The sixth roots of $-1$ are, from De Moivre's formula (and writing $-1=cospi+isin pi$),
$$
omega_k=cosleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right)+isinleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right), k=0,ldots,5.
$$
Your root is $omega_0$ above. It is what we call a primitive root, in the sense that 6 is the smallest positive integer $r$ such that $omega_0^r=-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    $$sqrt{3}/2+i/2=cos(pi/6)+isin(pi/6)=e^{ipi/6}"="(e^{ipi})^{1/6}=(-1)^{1/6}.$$



    The second equality is Euler's theorem. The third equals sign is in quotes is because technically there are $6$ values of $(e^{ipi})^{1/6}$, and $e^{ipi/6}$ happens to be one of them.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      We simply have that



      $$left(frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2right)^6=(e^{ipi/6})^6=e^{ipi}=-1$$



      and since $frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$ is the principal root of $z^6+1=0$ for that reason it is designed as $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



      Refer also to:




      • Principal $n$th root of a complex number






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        This demonstrates that $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ is a sixth-root of $-1$, but it doesn't explain why the value deserves the designation "$sqrt[6]{-1}$".
        $endgroup$
        – Blue
        Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












      • $begingroup$
        That's the principal root! Ok I add something more on that.
        $endgroup$
        – gimusi
        Dec 13 '18 at 22:46











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038663%2fwhy-the-alternate-form-of-frac-sqrt32-frac-i-2-is-sqrt6-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      That's a terrible notation by Wolfram. There are six sixth roots of $-1$, so you cannot tell which one it is when you write $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



      The notation makes sense when we write $sqrt{2}$, say, because we take the usual convention that it is the positive root. But such choice is meaningless for arbitrary roots.



      The sixth roots of $-1$ are, from De Moivre's formula (and writing $-1=cospi+isin pi$),
      $$
      omega_k=cosleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right)+isinleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right), k=0,ldots,5.
      $$
      Your root is $omega_0$ above. It is what we call a primitive root, in the sense that 6 is the smallest positive integer $r$ such that $omega_0^r=-1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        That's a terrible notation by Wolfram. There are six sixth roots of $-1$, so you cannot tell which one it is when you write $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



        The notation makes sense when we write $sqrt{2}$, say, because we take the usual convention that it is the positive root. But such choice is meaningless for arbitrary roots.



        The sixth roots of $-1$ are, from De Moivre's formula (and writing $-1=cospi+isin pi$),
        $$
        omega_k=cosleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right)+isinleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right), k=0,ldots,5.
        $$
        Your root is $omega_0$ above. It is what we call a primitive root, in the sense that 6 is the smallest positive integer $r$ such that $omega_0^r=-1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          That's a terrible notation by Wolfram. There are six sixth roots of $-1$, so you cannot tell which one it is when you write $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



          The notation makes sense when we write $sqrt{2}$, say, because we take the usual convention that it is the positive root. But such choice is meaningless for arbitrary roots.



          The sixth roots of $-1$ are, from De Moivre's formula (and writing $-1=cospi+isin pi$),
          $$
          omega_k=cosleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right)+isinleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right), k=0,ldots,5.
          $$
          Your root is $omega_0$ above. It is what we call a primitive root, in the sense that 6 is the smallest positive integer $r$ such that $omega_0^r=-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          That's a terrible notation by Wolfram. There are six sixth roots of $-1$, so you cannot tell which one it is when you write $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



          The notation makes sense when we write $sqrt{2}$, say, because we take the usual convention that it is the positive root. But such choice is meaningless for arbitrary roots.



          The sixth roots of $-1$ are, from De Moivre's formula (and writing $-1=cospi+isin pi$),
          $$
          omega_k=cosleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right)+isinleft(tfrac{pi+2kpi}{6}right), k=0,ldots,5.
          $$
          Your root is $omega_0$ above. It is what we call a primitive root, in the sense that 6 is the smallest positive integer $r$ such that $omega_0^r=-1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 14 '18 at 12:06









          Scientifica

          6,79641335




          6,79641335










          answered Dec 13 '18 at 22:41









          Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

          128k1182183




          128k1182183























              2












              $begingroup$

              $$sqrt{3}/2+i/2=cos(pi/6)+isin(pi/6)=e^{ipi/6}"="(e^{ipi})^{1/6}=(-1)^{1/6}.$$



              The second equality is Euler's theorem. The third equals sign is in quotes is because technically there are $6$ values of $(e^{ipi})^{1/6}$, and $e^{ipi/6}$ happens to be one of them.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                $$sqrt{3}/2+i/2=cos(pi/6)+isin(pi/6)=e^{ipi/6}"="(e^{ipi})^{1/6}=(-1)^{1/6}.$$



                The second equality is Euler's theorem. The third equals sign is in quotes is because technically there are $6$ values of $(e^{ipi})^{1/6}$, and $e^{ipi/6}$ happens to be one of them.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  $$sqrt{3}/2+i/2=cos(pi/6)+isin(pi/6)=e^{ipi/6}"="(e^{ipi})^{1/6}=(-1)^{1/6}.$$



                  The second equality is Euler's theorem. The third equals sign is in quotes is because technically there are $6$ values of $(e^{ipi})^{1/6}$, and $e^{ipi/6}$ happens to be one of them.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $$sqrt{3}/2+i/2=cos(pi/6)+isin(pi/6)=e^{ipi/6}"="(e^{ipi})^{1/6}=(-1)^{1/6}.$$



                  The second equality is Euler's theorem. The third equals sign is in quotes is because technically there are $6$ values of $(e^{ipi})^{1/6}$, and $e^{ipi/6}$ happens to be one of them.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 13 '18 at 22:39









                  Mike EarnestMike Earnest

                  23.9k12051




                  23.9k12051























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      We simply have that



                      $$left(frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2right)^6=(e^{ipi/6})^6=e^{ipi}=-1$$



                      and since $frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$ is the principal root of $z^6+1=0$ for that reason it is designed as $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



                      Refer also to:




                      • Principal $n$th root of a complex number






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This demonstrates that $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ is a sixth-root of $-1$, but it doesn't explain why the value deserves the designation "$sqrt[6]{-1}$".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Blue
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












                      • $begingroup$
                        That's the principal root! Ok I add something more on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – gimusi
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:46
















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      We simply have that



                      $$left(frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2right)^6=(e^{ipi/6})^6=e^{ipi}=-1$$



                      and since $frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$ is the principal root of $z^6+1=0$ for that reason it is designed as $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



                      Refer also to:




                      • Principal $n$th root of a complex number






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This demonstrates that $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ is a sixth-root of $-1$, but it doesn't explain why the value deserves the designation "$sqrt[6]{-1}$".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Blue
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












                      • $begingroup$
                        That's the principal root! Ok I add something more on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – gimusi
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:46














                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      We simply have that



                      $$left(frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2right)^6=(e^{ipi/6})^6=e^{ipi}=-1$$



                      and since $frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$ is the principal root of $z^6+1=0$ for that reason it is designed as $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



                      Refer also to:




                      • Principal $n$th root of a complex number






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      We simply have that



                      $$left(frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2right)^6=(e^{ipi/6})^6=e^{ipi}=-1$$



                      and since $frac{sqrt3}2+frac i 2$ is the principal root of $z^6+1=0$ for that reason it is designed as $sqrt[6]{-1}$.



                      Refer also to:




                      • Principal $n$th root of a complex number







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Dec 13 '18 at 22:49

























                      answered Dec 13 '18 at 22:37









                      gimusigimusi

                      92.9k84494




                      92.9k84494








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This demonstrates that $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ is a sixth-root of $-1$, but it doesn't explain why the value deserves the designation "$sqrt[6]{-1}$".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Blue
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












                      • $begingroup$
                        That's the principal root! Ok I add something more on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – gimusi
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:46














                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        This demonstrates that $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ is a sixth-root of $-1$, but it doesn't explain why the value deserves the designation "$sqrt[6]{-1}$".
                        $endgroup$
                        – Blue
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:44












                      • $begingroup$
                        That's the principal root! Ok I add something more on that.
                        $endgroup$
                        – gimusi
                        Dec 13 '18 at 22:46








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      This demonstrates that $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ is a sixth-root of $-1$, but it doesn't explain why the value deserves the designation "$sqrt[6]{-1}$".
                      $endgroup$
                      – Blue
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:44






                      $begingroup$
                      This demonstrates that $sqrt{3}/2+i/2$ is a sixth-root of $-1$, but it doesn't explain why the value deserves the designation "$sqrt[6]{-1}$".
                      $endgroup$
                      – Blue
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:44














                      $begingroup$
                      That's the principal root! Ok I add something more on that.
                      $endgroup$
                      – gimusi
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:46




                      $begingroup$
                      That's the principal root! Ok I add something more on that.
                      $endgroup$
                      – gimusi
                      Dec 13 '18 at 22:46


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038663%2fwhy-the-alternate-form-of-frac-sqrt32-frac-i-2-is-sqrt6-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Image
                      Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
                      Read more

                      In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
                      Read more

                      How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

                      Image
                      1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
                      Read more